User talk:Althai

Welcome!

Hello, Althai, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Anupam^Talk 03:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carl Jockusch

Hello, Althai!

While reviewing new articles about mathematicians, I ran across this one that you wrote. I'm curious if you plan to add anything to it soon. As it stands the article doesn't say much, and it doesn't even assert that CJ is a notable person. I did dig around a little, and found that a couple of his papers have been cited more than 100 times. Anyway, I don't want to hit the article with a "PROD" if you're still planning to work on it. DavidCBryant 20:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I responded on your talk page so that you'd see the "new message" message; I'm not sure what the proper wiki etiquette is. Althai 23:54, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for writing back, Althai. I didn't know that he's associated with an important theorem. It's probably best to add a little more to the article to make that clear. I'll take care of it if you don't get to it first.

I don't think there's a hard and fast rule about Wiki etiquette when it comes to talk pages. I had added your talk page to my "watchlist", so I'd be sure to notice your response whichever way you decided to respond. I think a lot of experienced editors do that as a matter of course. Anyway, it worked out.

Your logic about not adding a page for CJ unless he is in fact a notable mathematician makes sense. Unfortunately, most editors probably don't know anything at all about the Low Basis Theorem. And unless they look at your edits pretty carefully, they probably won't realize that you're a conscientious guy who wouldn't put an article in Wikipedia for no good reason. So it's probably safest, when writing about a mathematician, to put in at least a couple of sentences describing his contributions. If you can link his bio to an article that cites his result, that's even better.

Oh – PROD is shorthand for this procedure. People sometimes nominate very short or uninformative articles for deletion from Wikipedia. Frankly, that was my immediate reaction when I saw Carl Jockusch. But then I looked at your contribution history, and realized you're pretty knowledgeable about some advanced math stuff. I also looked CJ up, and found that his papers are cited by quite a few other authors. So I just dropped a note on your talk page, figuring that you had a good reason for writing the article.

Thank you for all your good efforts! DavidCBryant 00:26, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 03:36, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. I always forget though. I'll try and be better about it. Althai 18:05, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a random note, there's a check box in the Preferences that you can click that will make the software prompt you for an edit summary if you forget. Very handy (I wish it was checked by default). EVula // talk // ☯ // 20:59, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thanks! I'll do that right now. Althai (talk) 22:12, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TeXnical issue

Hello. Please note this difference:

${\displaystyle \limsup _{n}a_{n}\,}$

${\displaystyle limsup_{n}a_{n}}$

You used the latter at effective dimension, but the former is standard. Michael Hardy 22:56, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Warmachine Terminus.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Warmachine Terminus.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]