User talk:Alekksandr




I think the Sanford debate will never end, lol. I have 3 sources that are still discussing Mark Sanford in conjunction to 2012 that are less than 6 months old, but JerzeyKydd is still insisting that discussion for him has ceased for 6 months. The sources I added are less than 6 months. I agreed to take down Ensign because no one is talking him in conjunction 2012, but why are people still talking about Sanford in conjunction 2012? I was wondering if maybe you wanted to add your feedback to this discussion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Republican_Party_(United_States)_presidential_primaries,_2012. Thanks. --Diamond Dave (talk) 22:14, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Debate over whether or not Bobby Jindal and Mark Sanford should be removed the 2012 Rep Primary Page

There seems to be yet another debate over Mark Sanford and now whether not Bobby Jindal should remain on this page. Since you are an editor on this page, I was hoping you would be interested in joining the discussion at the link below.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Republican_Party_(United_States)_presidential_primaries,_2012#This_article_is_not_about_who_will_be_running.3F

Please provide your feedback! Thanks so much!

--Diamond Dave (talk) 20:04, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Autoblock?

{{unblock|I believe that I have been autoblocked because of someone else's activities}} Alekksandr (talk) 22:57, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot see a block, and the Autoblock check says no block. - In any case that was the wrong template - please see WP:ABK and use the template at Template:Autoblock - if you still have a problem.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In Lord Chief Justice of Ireland, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page John Denham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited James Ley, 1st Earl of Marlborough, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Gardiner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Original Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

East Down (UK Parliament constituency) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Ballynahinch and Dufferin
South Down (UK Parliament constituency) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Newcastle and Iveagh

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:19, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marian persecutions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Smithfield (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marian persecutions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Day (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:57, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marian persecutions may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:03, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marian persecutions may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:20, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marian persecutions may have broken the syntax by modifying 6 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:53, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Marian persecutions may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:42, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Protestant martyrs of the English Reformation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Protestant martyrs of the English Reformation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • <ref group="n" name="Beccles">(which refers to 'two men and a syster dere'))</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:59, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Protestant martyrs of the English Reformation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newbury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ghost ship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cape Lookout (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Election of 1788

Hello there. I was editing the Election of 1788-89 article recently, and I noticed that there are some pieces of information that I can literally not find. However, I was able to pinpoint which resource I needed. In The Documentary History of the First Federal Elections, 1788-1790, Volume 2 (pg. 306-308), it has some information I need for Virginia's popular vote that year. It would be wonderful if you had access to that text and were willing to pass the information on to me. I assume you have access because when I did a google search for this information, yur Wikipedia subpage popped up. It would be a great help and I could finally move on to some other project. Thank you. I would of just bought the book itself, but it seems to a reference book of some sort and therfore is out of my pricerange. Themane2 (talk) 20:25, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I was able to get the information I needed. My work on the election of 1788-89 is now complete. Thanks again. Themane2 (talk) 20:13, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Members of Irish parliament

Your category is still red inked - not yet created.-Shtove 20:54, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Irish MPs 1585-86 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • }} ||[[Waterford County (Parliament of Ireland constituency)|Waterford County]]||Catholic<ref>[http://www.waterfordcoco.ie/en/media/archives/Canon%20Power%20Churches-%20Article%20by%20Niall%20O'
  • 20Churches-%20Article%20by%20Niall%20O'Brien.pdf Canon Power churches</ref> ||Of Faithlegg<ref>[https://archive.org/stream/journalofwaterf1906wate_1#page/52/mode/2up/search/Aylward "Journal of

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:36, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leader of the Conservative Party (UK), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walter Long. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moving

Did you forget about moving? Easier than re-creating an article to get rid of quote marks. Peridon (talk) 14:43, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Protestant martyrs of the English Reformation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • those executed (284) and those who sickened or died in prison (34) - a grand total of 318.</ref> (Three of these people are commemorated with a gothic memorial in Oxford, England but there are many

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:12, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Protestant martyrs of the English Reformation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • and the Reformation [Oxford,1989], pp. 270-71 for the background to these executions. </ref><ref>[http://www.johnfoxe.org/index.php?realm=text&gototype=modern&edition=1583&pageid=1073&

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:22, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Protestant martyrs of the English Reformation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:21, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Protestant martyrs of the English Reformation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • exclassics209">[http://www.exclassics.com/foxe/foxe209.htm Foxe's Book of Martyrs: 209. Anne Askew]]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:47, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Catholic martyrs of the English Reformation may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * 13. [[[[Carthusian martyrs|Thomas Green]], Carthusian, 10 June 1537

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:18, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Protestant martyrs of the English Reformation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | align="center"|[[Stratford Martyrs|[William Hallywell/Holywell]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:51, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Protestant martyrs of the English Reformation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mary Tudor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Catholic martyrs of the English Reformation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Felton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Protestant martyrs of the English Reformation may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of Parliaments of England

You made a number of edits in March 2014 to the page List of Parliaments of England please add inline citations to the sources you used to support the names you added. -- PBS (talk) 15:05, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Reckless

Hi Alekksandr. I've used "Past" in front of Reckless' office, feel free to change it to "Ex" or similar if you prefer. You could comment out the whole line, but then the infobox looks a little silly (I tried in preview). One thing we can't do is leave the claim, he is not the MP for Rochester & Strood at the moment. Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 22:29, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. I have replied at Talk:Mark_Reckless#.27Member_of_Parliament_for_Rochester_and_Strood.27 'Member of Parliament for Rochester and Strood' - See the pages for Reckless' two predecessors as MPs for that constituency/its predecessors - Bob Marshall-Andrews and Peggy Fenner. They are both described as above, even though neither of them is still an MP. I therefore propose to show Reckless as above. Alekksandr (talk) 21:46, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nicky Morgan

Hadn't realized what a mess this was getting into. I've made some changes ..but you spotted the problem before I did & your input would be appreciated. Regards JRPG (talk) 21:51, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Papal deposing power may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • of France and released his Navarrese subjects from their oath of fidelity, September 9, 1585.)<ref>"[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07225a.htm Henry IV, King of France and Navarre]," ''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:07, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Papal deposing power, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chimera. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Waffen-SS foreign volunteers and conscripts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hiwi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Wilson (British Free Corps)

The article John Wilson (British Free Corps) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject fails WP:Soldier and WP:Basic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ad Orientem (talk) 21:53, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Wilson (British Free Corps) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Wilson (British Free Corps) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Wilson (British Free Corps) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem (talk) 22:43, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of members of the British Free Corps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central Criminal Court. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Alekksandr/Anne D'Evergroote

User:Alekksandr/Anne D'Evergroote, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Alekksandr/Anne D'Evergroote and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Alekksandr/Anne D'Evergroote during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. CommanderLinx (talk) 05:12, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Leister (British Free Corps) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Leister (British Free Corps) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Leister (British Free Corps) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edison (talk) 03:08, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Succession boxes

Thanks again for doing so much of the hard work!. Chrisdoyleorwell (talk) 20:24, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Lords Lieutenant of Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walter de Lacy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lulu imprint

Hi, I noticed that the source (Richard Landwehr, Britisches Freikorps) discussed in List of members of the British Free Corps is published by Lulu, which is a self-publishing imprint and the book therefore is considered "potentially unreliable." I came across this on Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources while looking up an unrelated matter. Not sure if you were aware of this. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:00, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

British Free Corps

I'm copyediting 11th SS Volunteer Panzergrenadier Division Nordland, and I came across the below statement sourced to the BBC article; upon quick scanning I don't see references to BFC participating in the fighting. Since you appear to have expert knowledge on the subject, could you review and let me know if the below should stay?

East Prussia and Pomerania

In early February 1945, the refitted Panzer Battalion returned to the division along with other reinforcements. Among these was the platoon-sized British Free Corps, a British Waffen-SS unit.[1] On 16 February, the division was participated in Operation Sonnenwende, the plan to destroy a Soviet salient and to relieve the troops encircled in the town of Arnswalde. Initially, Nordland's attack achieved a tactical surprise and the division soon advanced to the banks of Lake Ihna. However, the Soviet forces offered stiff resistance and the advance began to slow. On 17 February, the division reached Arnswalde and relieved the garrison.

References

  1. ^ "My father the war traitor". BBC News. 29 March 2002. Retrieved 15 October 2008.

Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:45, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Unionism in Ireland may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Lords|House of Lords]] owed their peerages to a direct connection with [[Northern Ireland]],<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20080515144900/http://www.stratagem-ni.com/nipeers.php Strategem -

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:00, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Courtesy Earldoms in the Peerage of England has been nominated for discussion

Category:Courtesy Earldoms in the Peerage of England, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Opera hat (talk) 23:34, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

supercats

Lotsa luck. Last time I tried to remove a supercategory from an Irish peerage entry, I ran into a brick wall of hostility to the idea. —Tamfang (talk) 01:03, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article for mainspace?

This page looks pretty good User:Alekksandr/Tory Government 1807–1809.

Also why does your userpage look like an article? Legacypac (talk) 16:59, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost ship

In the article Ghost ship you cited "cite web|title=Museum exhibits|publisher=Atlantic Heritage Center Museum and Library|accessdate=September 7, 2012", but didn't add a URL link, I've tried looking up "Atlantic Heritage Center Museum and Library" but can not find it. Can you please add a URL or send me more information so I can fix this. Thanks.Pennsy22 (talk) 05:59, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I had 'cut and pasted' this from Capt. John Jeffries Burial Marker, to which The Twenty One Friends redirects. This seems to be where the reference first appears. It reaches its current form here. Alekksandr (talk) 21:49, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 22 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Baron St John of Bletso into Earl of Bolingbroke. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:07, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Alekksandr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited President of Dáil Éireann, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Collins. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stubs and line breaks

Hi Alekksandr. Please do not remove the two breaks before a stub template; please view this discussion as to why the breaks are needed. Thanks.--Nevé–selbert 20:45, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question about peer or earl

You made a change to the page Mary Stanley, Countess of Derby where you made it a stub about an earl instead of a noble woman. She isn't an earl. The page is about her, not her husband. Is this the correct stub? I didn't want to revert without checking if there is a reason to support the change I'm not familiar with. ☕ Antiqueight haver 09:16, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Peerage of Ireland duke stubs has been nominated for discussion

Category:Peerage of Ireland duke stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dawynn (talk) 02:25, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

English monarchs

Hi. Your recent edits, treating the main English monarchs category as diffusing rather than non-diffusing, doesn't seem necessary, or at all helpful to the reader actually looking for somebody via the category tree, who now has to know what century they lived in. Were these changes discussed in advance? Johnbod (talk) 13:14, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Alekksandr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation

Regarding your revision on Rape (disambiguation), partial title matches should not be included on disambiguation pages (see WP:PARTIALMATCH). Also, each entry on the list should not have much information alongside the link (see WP:DABNOT). Also, per WP:DABREF, a disambiguation page should not have any citations (references). Interqwark talk contribs 01:36, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of baronies in the Peerage of England, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duchess of Cleveland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of peers 1290–1299, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baron St John (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Volunteer/member

Could you please revert all your edits where you changed "volunteer" to "member". This is incorrect, conform Volunteer (Irish republican). The Banner talk 17:26, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1. There are a large number of articles on wikipedia using the phrase "IRA member" - including high-profile figures such as Dolours Price and Carál Ní Chuilín, which describe them as such in the first sentence. Irish Republican Army uses the phrase "IRA member" in relation to Brendan Behan, and only uses the term 'Volunteer' in relation to the WW1-era Irish Volunteers. It appears from this that there is no consistent policy that the term 'volunteer' should be used as opposed to 'member'.
2. Volunteer (Irish republican) gives information about how members of republican organisations self-describe/how those organisations describe their members. I suggest that this should not determine how Wikipedia describes them.
3. For completeness, I should point out that I made similar edits in respect of members of loyalist paramilitary organsations who were described on wikipedia as 'Volunteer'. Alekksandr (talk) 19:22, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There is a consistent policy, which was determined 12 years ago at the Mediation Cabal. There would need to be a fresh discussion at a central location such as WikiProject Ireland to overturn it. Unilaterally changing the term is not helpful. Scolaire (talk) 17:02, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Done The Banner talk 18:25, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Louis Tronchin

Thanks for creating Louis Tronchin.

A New Page Patroller Boleyn just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

This has been tagged for 2 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 09:02, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Alekksandr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Alekksandr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Derry vs Londonderry

The subject of Derry vs Londonderry is a bit of a can of worms. However it was Derry city that is located county Derry. This is until the English came in to Ireland and conducted unspoken horrors on the Irish. . . You can say thay were only following orders. And the history of Derry city & Derry county is only a fraction of it.

1. Wikipedia's policy on dealing with the 'can of worms' is set out at Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Ireland-related_articles#Derry/Londonderry - "Use Derry for the city and County Londonderry for the county in articles."
2. What became County Londonderry was previously County Coleraine - see County_Londonderry#County_Coleraine_and_the_Plantation_of_Ulster and parts of Counties Antrim, Donegal and Tyrone. Alekksandr (talk) 13:16, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Earls of Rosse

You have maybe not unreasonably put two creations into one category

Attempting to making things clearer I may have messed up. Please tell me what you think should be done. Eddaido (talk) 12:45, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. There are different ways of sorting these categories. My own view is that it is simplest to sort them by the Christian names/forenames of the holders. Otherwise it can get confusing when (as here) there are multiple creations of one title, or when the numbering is unclear. See e.g. Category:Earls_or_mormaers_of_Mar. Alekksandr (talk) 13:04, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I don't agree that leaving them in alphabetical order functions well enough. I'll have another go later. In the meantime can you point to how the situation is handled aside from alpha in other cases? Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 13:07, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The sub-categories at Category:Earls in the Peerage of Ireland are examples of how sorting is handled in other cases. Alekksandr (talk) 13:23, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
I've sorted it out, I think better. I realise I may have used the English way of doing it and you are currently completing Ireland? with a different system. If you can't tolerate my latest edits just adjust them to suit yourself. Eddaido (talk) 14:04, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (List of Protestant martyrs of the Scottish Reformation) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating List of Protestant martyrs of the Scottish Reformation.

User:Masum Ibn Musa while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thanks for the creating article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Masum Ibn Musa}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 06:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Barons De la Warr

A tag has been placed on Category:Barons De la Warr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 01:32, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Irish (British Armed Forces) collaborators with Nazi Germany has been nominated for deletion

Category:Irish (British Armed Forces) collaborators with Nazi Germany has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 22:54, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of James Johnston Shaw

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on James Johnston Shaw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://archive.org/stream/dictionaryofnati23lees/dictionaryofnati23lees_djvu.txt and http://www.archive.org/stream/dictionaryofnati23lees/dictionaryofnati23lees_djvu.txt. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. comrade waddie96 (talk) 16:43, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, tagging with Twinkle automatically templated you, was going to write a custom message. Best, comrade waddie96 (talk) 16:47, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Londonderry

Hi, You've left edit comments on a few articles telling people to "see WP:Londonderry" a few times. It needs to be all caps. WP:Londonderry goes nowhere. WP:LONDONDERRY goes somewhere. Took me a while to figure out what you were referencing. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 20:19, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Feudal Barons of Bramber

A tag has been placed on Category:Feudal Barons of Bramber indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 19:31, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
You've defended the Republic well. Redditbutnotgay (talk) 05:08, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bishops from Northern Ireland has been nominated for renaming

Category:Bishops from Northern Ireland has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Laurel Lodged (talk) 15:47, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ards (Parliament of Ireland constituency) (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mori Calliope fan was:
This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mori Calliope fan talk 21:41, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Alekksandr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mori Calliope fan talk 21:41, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ards (Parliament of Ireland constituency)

Information icon Hello, Alekksandr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ards (Parliament of Ireland constituency), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1961 Londonderry Borough Council election moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1961 Londonderry Borough Council election, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 11:36, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:1961 Northern Ireland local elections

A tag has been placed on Category:1961 Northern Ireland local elections indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:04, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ards (Parliament of Ireland constituency)

Hello, Alekksandr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ards".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:57, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Aliens executed under the Treachery Act 1940

A tag has been placed on Category:Aliens executed under the Treachery Act 1940 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 03:30, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:1961 Londonderry Borough Council election

Information icon Hello, Alekksandr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1961 Londonderry Borough Council election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Dillon (died 1579)

Dear Allekksandr. Thank you for your attention to the article Robert Dillon (died 1579). You added:

"{{succession box | title = [[Attorney-General for Ireland]] ..."

However, Succession box is "Deprecated in favour of the s-start template series," So I replaced your Succession box with this sequence of three templates:

{{S-bef|before=[[Thomas St. Lawrence (judge)|Thomas St. Lawrence]]}}
{{S-ttl|title=[[Attorney-General for Ireland]] |years=1535–1554}}
{{S-aft|after=[[Barnaby Skurloke or Skurlog]]}}

Please do not take offence. There are many mistakes I make. Your edit count is more than 3 times mine. I remember well how You once corrected my English, where it was much needed. I did appreciated your correction very much. With thanks and best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 10:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - thank you. Alekksandr (talk) 18:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of eldest sons of earls in the peerages of Britain and Ireland for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of eldest sons of earls in the peerages of Britain and Ireland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of eldest sons of earls in the peerages of Britain and Ireland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 06:00, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional ghost ships has been nominated for merging

Category:Fictional ghost ships has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:59, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Earls of Cromartie (1703)

Category:Earls of Cromartie (1703) has been nominated for speedy renaming to Category:Earls of Cromartie (1703 creation), and two more like it. Please see WP:CFDS if you notice this within 48 hours. – Fayenatic London 12:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Curious about your edit [Continuity Irish Republican Army]

[1] [Continuity Irish Republican Army] how do you know it's referring to the county rather than the city? Can you make it unambiguous or revert, please. (t · c) buidhe 22:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See the 'citation needed' note which I have added to the article. I note that the edit was made at 17:09, 14 December 2012. Alekksandr (talk) 11:15, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Irish MPs 1569–1571 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of Irish MPs 1569–1571. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 22:46, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Irish MPs 1569–1571 has been accepted

List of Irish MPs 1569–1571, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CitrusHemlock 15:39, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]