en User talk:Alborzagros

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/2011 Winter in Alaska.jpg

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:2011 Winter in Alaska.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:18, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

English modals of habits and past facts

Your article is misleading, and I don't want to write it from scratch. It should be deleted. Think about your readers. Why do you teach them bad English? You claim that you English language level is en-5 (professional), therefore higher than en-4 (near-native). En-5 is certainly something you dream about, but for the time being your level is en-2 (intermediate) or between en-2 and en-3, at best. Perhaps, if you try very hard, in 10 years or so you will achieve en-4 (near-native) level. As to En-5, you may will never achieve it because not even every native English speaker ever will. Can you imagine a simple unskilled American laborer as a copy editor in our Wikipedia? He has learned English from birth but his real language level may be en-4 (near-native). You may say that his level is en-N (native) by definition. No, it applies only to well-read, educated people.

Copying and pasting from http://understandenglish.weebly.com/used-to-51.html is not very difficult, even at en-2 level. However wording changing needs much better skills. Look carefully at your "works":
...but it is not usually acted right now.
...but this is sometimes acted in...
There are obvious grammatical errors, ironically, in the article about grammar... 85.193.214.212 (talk) 08:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the phrase /it is not usually acted/ is usual and common in English language. take look at [1] Despite a general awareness that project communication is important, 95% of the time it is not usually acted upon, due to a lack of time, resources and energy. Unfortunately, this can result in a decrease in understanding project tasks, the occurrence of information noise, de-motivation, and in effect, the delay or even failure of a project.

and here: This key is the most commonly used key on the keyboard. When a command or anything else is typed in, it is not usually acted upon until the RETURN key is pressed. In other words, this key informs the computer that you have finished entering a line or a reply. Until you press RETURN, you can add to or delete what you have typed in.

so try to make your English better Mr. IP.Alborzagros (talk) 08:45, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that "act on something" | "act upon something" has nothing to do with your sentences:

It is better not to apply "used to" in questions or negative sentences; but this is sometimes acted in informal spoken English. INCORRECT
It is better not to apply "used to" in questions or negative sentences; but this is sometimes used in informal spoken English. Correct
It indicates that something was often repeated in the past, but it is not usually acted right now. INCORRECT
It indicates that something was often repeated in the past, but it does not usually happen right now. Correct

85.193.214.212 (talk) 15:48, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This picture

Hello,

I reverted your change to the infobox's picture on Soraya Bakhtiari (addition of Soraya Esfandiary-Bakhtiari-045.jpg), as I believe that picture is more well known, and imho, its better looking as well. Thought I'd just mention it here to you. I thought about placing it somewhere more down, but theres not really any room for it atm, as the article has not been expanded yet. - LouisAragon (talk) 00:55, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Al,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Bara Imambara Lucknow.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on January 12, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-01-12. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:39, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

À question

Hello Alborzagros,

Regarding this category. Shouldn't it also be added to articles such as Russo-Persian War (1804-1813), Persian Expedition of 1796, Battle of Ganja (1804), Russo-Persian War (1722-1723), etc? After all, they were all invasions of what was back then Irans territories. Let me know your opinion please, as you decided to mostly add the cats until now. :-) Could you ping me when replying? Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 06:40, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

plz help us

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List_of state visits to Iran#improve. Thanks. Shahin (talk) 09:11, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Alborzagros,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Darwinius masillae PMO 214.214.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on February 22, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-02-22. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 08:01, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sahabah favored in Sunnism has been nominated for discussion

Category:Sahabah favored in Sunnism, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Al-Andalusi (talk) 19:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bechari House

A tag has been placed on Bechari House requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Article about a house that does not assert notability. Part of the deletion of poor quality machine-translated articles per WP:CXT

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 19:01, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Alborzagros,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Царський курган 007.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on October 31, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-10-31. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:23, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Alborzagros. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Have to, gonna have to

Don't know what article your question is in relation to. Please advise. Racingmanager (talk) 11:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alborzagros

Hello Alborzagros (talk · contribs), You seems to confused with 'have to' and 'gonna have to'. You can find the best answer by following this link, thank you Jayabilla (talk) 11:19, 3 December 2016 (UTC)- http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/39802/i-am-gonna-have-to-vs-i-have-to[reply]

Please stop

You've been posting the same question to multiple user talk pages and have now progressed to user pages too. You've already been told what to do but are refusing to listen to said advice and are instead just spamming all around. This is getting to be highly disruptive. —SpacemanSpiff 12:54, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Persian Gulf Medal of Honor

	Persian Gulf Medal of Honor
	Hello, Dear User:Alborzagros. Hereby, with the greatest pleasure,The "Persian Gulf Medal of Honor of Iran", will be given you for your important services to the Wikipedia. Especially your edits on "Iran Wiki Project" and its "Persian Cinema Task Force" related articles. Thank you so much. The Stray Dog Talk Page 16:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2017 Utah Wildfire

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 2017 Utah Wildfire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/inpictures/2017/06/utah-brian-head-wildfire-forces-evacuations-170627084641252.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Alborzagros,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Jeju Island.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on August 6, 2017. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2017-08-06. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:52, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Alborzagros,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Barracudasauroides panxianensis MHNT Chine.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on August 11, 2017. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2017-08-11. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:00, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Alborzagros,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Cover, silk embroidery on cotton. Iran, Caucasus; 1st half of 18th century. Stored at The David Collection, inventarnummer 37-1969.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on August 15, 2017. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2017-08-15. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:14, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Alborzagros,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:Folio from a Koran (8th-9th century).jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on September 2, 2017. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2017-09-02. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:54, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Alborzagros,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture File:FIFA WC-qualification 2014 - Austria vs. Germany 2012-09-11 - Thomas Müller 01 edit.JPG is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on September 13, 2017. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2017-09-13. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 07:25, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Persian Toon

The article Persian Toon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable and (now) closed media channel. Only source is Facebook and self website

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Ammarpad (talk) 14:06, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Persian Toon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Persian Toon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persian Toon (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Ammarpad (talk) 15:07, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Alborzagros. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Caspian littoral states has been nominated for discussion

Category:Caspian littoral states, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 07:07, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Safe-to-eat listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Safe-to-eat. Since you had some involvement with the Safe-to-eat redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:29, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Taagepera Church

The article Taagepera Church has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article makes no claim of notability. The sources, which aren't reliable, do not provide backup that this church is unique, other than it is an old building. Simply being old does not make something notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:15, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Taagepera Church for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taagepera Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taagepera Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 17:33, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pull back (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pull back (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pull back (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nowak Kowalski (talk) 15:06, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timeline of the Achaemenid Empire for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of the Achaemenid Empire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of the Achaemenid Empire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chewings72 (talk) 12:13, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Alborzagros. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Alborzagros. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Blade and Termeh

Hello Alborzagros,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Blade and Termeh for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Isingness (talk) 10:46, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:20101229 Naqsh e Rostam Shiraz Iran more Panoramic.jpg

File:20101229 Naqsh e Rostam Shiraz Iran more Panoramic.jpg, a featured picture you nominated, has been nominated for delisting because it has been functionally superseded by a higher resolution image. Your comments are welcome. MER-C 18:22, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Houtan Shakiba

Hello, Alborzagros,

Thanks for creating Houtan Shakiba! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Biographies of living people need WP:INLINECITED references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 07:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

6.5 per Meter moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 6.5 per Meter, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:16, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 6.5 per Meter (April 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CAPTAIN MEDUSA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:6.5 per Meter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:6.5 per Meter, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 12:28, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alborzagros! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 12:28, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:7th-century judges

A tag has been placed on Category:7th-century judges requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:28, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 6.5 per Meter

Hello, Alborzagros,

Thanks for creating 6.5 per Meter! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

This has been tagged for one issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:47, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Nowruz 2017 in Bisaran, Kurdistan province.jpg

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Nowruz 2017 in Bisaran, Kurdistan province.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:45, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Salom Aleikum

Salom Aleikum Alborzagros! I liked your articles about pre-revolution Iranian movies and actors, can you make an article about Jahangir Ghaffari (fa:جهانگیر غفاری) who acted in Iranian and Turkish movies and find references, and where is he now? Thank you and I will grateful! --178.66.99.91 (talk) 10:44, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Donald Trump does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! - Mr X 🖋 14:05, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Mirabita Sisters

درود. خوراک ویکی پدیای فارسی است این . اگر دوست دارید نامزدش کنید. Gnosis (talk) 23:10, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

کدوم؟ Alborzagros (talk) 06:10, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Jasmin Moghbeli official portrait.jpg

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted

Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Jasmin Moghbeli official portrait.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:20, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:He Who Said No poster film.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:He Who Said No poster film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Battle of Scheveningen (Slag bij Ter Heijde)(Jan Abrahamsz. Beerstraten).jpg scheduled for POTD

Hi Alborzagros,

This is to let you know that the featured picture File:Battle of Scheveningen (Slag bij Ter Heijde)(Jan Abrahamsz. Beerstraten).jpg, which you uploaded or nominated, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for August 10, 2020. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2020-08-10. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:38, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Battle of Scheveningen was the final naval battle of the First Anglo-Dutch War, taking place on 31 July 1653 (10 August in the Gregorian calendar). This oil-on-canvas painting of the battle, by Dutch marine artist Jan Abrahamsz Beerstraaten, shows a Dutch ship sinking in the right foreground and an English vessel on the left. In the centre, the Dutch flagship Brederode is engaged in furious action with English ships on either side, including Resolution. By late afternoon, twelve of the Dutch ships had either been sunk or captured and the Dutch retired; however, the English fleet was also badly damaged, and returned to port to refit. Both sides claimed a victory; the English because of their tactical superiority, the Dutch because their strategic goal had been achieved by the lifting of the English blockade of their coast. This painting is in the collection of the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam.

Painting credit: Jan Abrahamsz Beerstraaten

Recently featured:

Category:Films and television series realated to Battle of Karbala has been nominated for merging

Category:Films and television series realated to Battle of Karbala has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:04, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Ahl al-Kisa has been nominated for deletion

Category:Ahl al-Kisa has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:43, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2021 establishments in Iran

A tag has been placed on Category:2021 establishments in Iran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:34, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ahmad Reza Darvish

Hello, Alborzagros. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ahmad Reza Darvish".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:00, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikimedia Toolserver" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikimedia Toolserver. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 20#Wikimedia Toolserver until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:29, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abū l-Hasan Banīsadr IMG 2044 edit.jpg scheduled for POTD

Hi Alborzagros,

This is to let you know that the featured picture File:Abū l-Hasan Banīsadr IMG 2044 edit.jpg, which you uploaded or nominated, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for March 22, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-03-22. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abolhassan Banisadr (born 22 March 1933) is an Iranian politician. He was the first president of Iran after the 1979 Iranian Revolution abolished the Pahlavi dynasty, serving from 4 February 1980 until his impeachment by the Islamic Consultative Assembly, the Iranian parliament, on 20 June 1981. Prior to his presidency, he was the Minister of Foreign Affairs in the interim government. Following Banisadr's exile in 1981, he has resided for many years in France, where he co-founded the National Council of Resistance of Iran.

Photograph credit: Christoph Braun

Recently featured:

Proposed deletion of Alexandra Chernitsyna

The article Alexandra Chernitsyna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FMSky (talk) 02:53, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Featured picture scheduled for POTD

Hi Alborzagros,

This is to let you know that the featured picture File:Mohsen Koochebaghi Tabrizi - 2010.JPG, which you uploaded or nominated, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for September 17, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-09-17. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Ayatollah Mirza Mohsen Koochebaghi Tabrizi (9 January 1924 – 3 August 2011) was an Iranian Marja' (religious authority) of the Twelver Shia branch of Islam. This photograph of Tabrizi was taken in 2010, the year before his death, at his home in Tabriz, Iran.

Photograph credit: Mehrdad

Recently featured:

Image on Template:English grammar

I noticed you've changed the image on Template:English grammar back from the grammar books to the dictionaries and thesauruses (predominantly from Longman and Oxford). Doesn't it make sense for a section about grammar to have an image of grammar books instead of word books?--Brett (talk) 16:56, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moths of the United States

Hi, you created Category:Moths of the United States, which was deleted per consensus at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_April_16#Moths_by_non-island_country. However, before its deletion I made Draft:List of moths of the United States. If you are still interested, please make this into a useful list, by adding citations or sub-divisions. Otherwise, it too will be deleted. – Fayenatic London 22:26, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For info, this draft has now been accepted as List of moths of the United States, but could yet be deleted. DGG advised on my talk page that to make the list useful, at least the family should be added. – Fayenatic London 07:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kabol (magazine)

Hello Alborzagros,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kabol (magazine) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Iflaq ^(talk) 11:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you move a page disruptively, as you did at Faravahar. JesseRafe (talk) 15:13, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamite (2021 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dynamite (2021 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BOVINEBOY2008 01:35, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Qaratape Qomrud

Hello, Alborzagros. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Qaratape Qomrud, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iran–United Kingdom relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afghan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dynamite (2021 film)

Hello, Alborzagros. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dynamite (2021 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Metropol Tower Collapse

This is an Engliah language Wikipedia. Please translate 1401.Xx236 (talk) 08:13, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to 1401, for something that happened in 2022, you have used totally inconsistent dates - according to Iran press the collapse was on 23 May 2022, but you claim it collapsed on 02 June (tomorrow) and have other events in the future. We only use the standard Western calendar on the English Wikipedia - please correct your dates, before someone deletes the article as a hoax, Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 15:24, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Xx236 and Arjayay: I went ahead and changed it to Gregorian dates based on recent coverage by English-language publications, e.g., DW and CNN (both originally published 23 May). I'm in the process of a rewrite of the article since, in its current state, since it's not easy to verify facts to their original sources. Bridget (talk) 18:32, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dynamite (2021 film)

Hello, Alborzagros. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dynamite".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:49, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Ideology of Safavids

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Ideology of Safavids. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Safavid conversion of Iran to Shia Islam. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Safavid conversion of Iran to Shia Islam. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. GenoV84 (talk) 09:07, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Alborzagros

Thank you for creating Abadan building collapse.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:26, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hi Alborzagros! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Template:English grammar several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Template talk:English grammar, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Lord Belbury (talk) 07:51, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Swimming and health

Hello, Alborzagros

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Arthistorian1977, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Swimming and health, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Arthistorian1977}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:12, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Swimming and health, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fitness.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Swimming and health moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Swimming and health, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 07:22, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Postmodern Ghazal moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Postmodern Ghazal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:41, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

This is your only warning; if you move a page disruptively again, as you did at Faravahar, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This is the 6th time you've disruptively moved the page without so much as a discussion. 11 months ago I put a final notice against this practice on your talk page. You've never responded despite the clear community consensus against you. If you do it again, I'm going to have to suggest you be blocked from this topic. JesseRafe (talk) 13:42, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Fredrik Robert Martin has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. DanCherek (talk) 16:32, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have previously received warnings about violations of the copyright policy here, here, here, here. In addition to the above text that I removed from Fredrik Robert Martin (copied from [2]), I took a look at your recent contributions and also removed copyright violations from North Korea–South Korea relations (copied from [3]) and Flag of Bulgaria (copied from [4]). I thought for a while about whether to block you, but have decided to issue a final warning: copying text from other websites is not allowed. You need to summarize information in your own words. Further violations of the copyright policy will result in an indefinite block and likely a contributor copyright investigation. DanCherek (talk) 16:49, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I mean the warning about the article that got me blocked. I was not warned on my talk page about the French grammar article and without warning I was blocked. Of course, there is a warning on my discussion page about drafts and other things. Now, if you can remove the blockage, I will be grateful to you. I was convinced enough. Alborzagros (talk) 19:36, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission, as you did at French grammar. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Diannaa (talk) 15:08, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alborzagros (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wrote the article by my words not the sourses text. thank you for unblocking me Alborzagros (talk) 07:50, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't think that's correct. 331dot (talk) 09:24, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alborzagros (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All text I added was kind of paraphrasing not just copping directly Alborzagros (talk) 15:12, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Plenty of direct copying. Plenty of close paraphrasing, but close paraphrasing is not sufficient. See WP:PARAPHRASE. Yamla (talk) 15:30, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alborzagros (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't deserve to be blocked. I was not given a warning. And I got blocked in the first step. My goal was to expand the encyclopedia and I tried to use different sources; Add useful content. I did my job by replacing the words. So how can I add content from a book here? My goal was to develop an encyclopedia, otherwise enlarging the article ((French Grammar)) doesn't any benefit for me. Can anyone who contributes more be at risk of being blocked? Please unblock my dear manager. Sincerely Alborzagros (talk) 18:08, 20 December 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Decline reason:

I'm not really sure, from these requests and the below, that you understand why you were blocked, much less how to tell us how you will avoid doing it again.

If you make another request like this, I must recommend to the reviewing admin that your acccess to this page be revoked, because we just can't get anywhere. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:16, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

At least you could have blocked me for a day or a week, not forever.Alborzagros (talk) 18:13, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are not blocked "forever", you are blocked until you make a successful unblock request. There is no requirement for warnings. We must take copyright seriously, because allowing copyright violations potentially puts Wikipedia in legal jeopardy. We must be certain you understand copyright in order to unblock you. 331dot (talk) 18:17, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I read all the rules after blocking. Of course, I had information about this. I just didn't know the details of the rules. The rules should definitely not be forgotten. I request you to unblock. I understand the rules. thanks a lot. Alborzagros (talk) 18:57, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like me to do something else, you tell me, I will surely do it.Alborzagros (talk) 18:59, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"I was not given a warning" Are you joking or are you attempting to mislead us? You've been warned over and over again about your copyright violations. Not given a warning indeed. That's insulting. --Yamla (talk) 19:02, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not joking. I never want to divert the discussion. Please give an example where I have violated copyright. thank you.Alborzagros (talk) 19:11, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please learn how to properly indent your replies. You stated you were not given a warning; I pointed out that you've been warned over and over again. I'm not sure why you are now attempting to change the discussion to something else. I'm only talking about the warnings given to you for copyright, warnings you claim you never received. --Yamla (talk) 19:24, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I mean the warning about the article that got me blocked. I was not warned on my talk page about the French grammar article and without warning I was blocked. Of course, there is a warning on my discussion page about drafts and other things. Now, if you can remove the blockage, I will be grateful to you. I was convinced enough.Alborzagros (talk) 19:37, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can any admin release me of 🚫 blocking? Thank Alborzagros (talk) 05:50, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alborzagros (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi. Unfortunately, I am still blocked. I have explained everything above. I fully understand the copyright laws. thank you Alborzagros (talk) 14:39, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You clearly don't fully understand copyright. You've ignored multiple warnings, then claimed that you never got any warnings. Look, I'm sorry, but we're not making any progress here. I've disabled your ability to edit this page. You still have the ability the file further appeals by following the instructions below. Anyone can restore your talk page access, but they should first be sure that you're going to make a thoughtful unblock request. Saying "trust me, I know this" doesn't work on college exams, in job interviews, or in Wikipedia unblock requests. You need to follow the guide to appealing blocks. If you're not going to do that, we have no way of knowing whether you'll follow any other Wikipedia guidelines. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:56, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Concern regarding Draft:Swimming and health

Hello, Alborzagros. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Swimming and health, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:00, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Swimming and health

Hello, Alborzagros. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Swimming and health".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Postmodern Ghazal

Hello, Alborzagros. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Postmodern Ghazal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Postmodern Ghazal

Hello, Alborzagros. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Postmodern Ghazal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:28, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:7th-century judges has been nominated for splitting

Category:7th-century judges has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:05, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]