User talk:84.250.14.116

Committed identity: 4a0860fac6be168a66824cc00ad0e9d8221dd8c051d596dd4ea46b99dbf5b91f is a SHA-256 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

For the sake of transparency for Commons administrative purposes, I've edited previously with at least these IP-addresses:

84.250.14.116 (talk) 05:55, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

84.250.14.116 (talk) 21:01, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

84.250.14.116 (talk) 04:24, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

84.250.14.116 (talk) 04:35, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

5,925+ live edits from IP-addresses, 319 deleted edits, 6,245+ total edits and counting. 84.250.14.116 (talk) 05:48, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
At last, after 19 months and a few hours of Internet connectivity downtime during the night, 84.250.14.116 is no longer a dynamically allocated IP-address to the me (84.250.14.116) above. A new DHCP lease. In case there would be any doubts about socking. 84.250.8.226 (talk) 04:35, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Information icon Hello, I'm Yae4. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to GrapheneOS seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yae4 (talk) 21:35, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
I started Talk:GrapheneOS/Archive 1#"partly" open-source because you were involved in an edit war and I reverted your third addition of the same text. 84.250.14.116 (talk) 21:48, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Resonantia. Thank you. 84.250.14.116 (talk) 23:14, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Lamont's citation at MobileSyrup.The discussion is about the topic GrapheneOS. Thank you. 84.250.14.116 (talk) 17:03, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:HOUNDING, please stop

Obviously, I do not need to notify you of being added to this ANI[1]. After "apologizing" and saying you were "disengaging",[2] and after I said my "goodbye",[3] you continue to "engage" at my Talk page.[4] Please stop. In conjunction with recent tweets linking to my talk page, in my view, it has become WP:HOUNDING. Please stop. If you have anything constructive related to articles, please go to those Talk pages or elsewhere. -- Yae4 (talk) 17:21, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Particularly, I interpreted WP:DISENGAGE meant disengaging from the disputes in the article/talk namespace, which I did – and have found other editors to agree & disagree with me as well. But I'll consider your message at least acknowledged. Know that in certain cases notifying on your talk page may be necessary, particularly if it's mandated by policy or not appropriate somewhere else. 84.250.14.116 (talk) 17:28, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
...for ongoing manners, where we are or have been both subjects to the same dispute. 84.250.14.116 (talk) 17:31, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And sorry, I did not understand you to say "good bye". I still don't see it. 84.250.14.116 (talk) 17:40, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway, sorry if you feel so. 84.250.14.116 (talk) 17:43, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In conjunction with recent tweets linking to my talk page; I don't know what this refers to and it's unsourced, so I was unable to verify this claim independently. 84.250.14.116 (talk) 17:59, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have probably found the tweets: Special:Diff/1096478289 84.250.14.116 (talk) 18:53, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:84.250.14.116 reported by User:Yae4 (Result: ). Thank you. Yae4 (talk) 00:51, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Stop pinging me.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:39, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How have I pinged you? 84.250.14.116 (talk) 01:40, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In your edit summaries.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:44, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Today I learned that creates a ping. I'll use [[:User:Username]] in case I still need to revert you. Thanks for letting me know. 84.250.14.116 (talk) 01:47, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And not sorry. 84.250.14.116 (talk) 01:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) If you feel the need to mention me at all, it would be easier just to say Bbb23 without any wikilinking or quasi wikilinking. I don't expect someone like you to be sorry; nor was I asking for an apology. I'm done here.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The undo reason is what the wiki gives as pre-inputted text, with other relevant information (what I'm reverting). I usually do not modify it, only amending my reason for the undo at the end. If you rollback an editor which had some good-faith edits in here, expect to be undone. But as requested, I will try to avoid pinging you per your request. 84.250.14.116 (talk) 01:55, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning: Appearance of Edit Warring at GrapheneOS

IMO, You should reduce your rate of editing at GrapheneOS. I've "complained" once formally, but did not adequately "warn" you, or some such procedural BS. I have ignored it more times; however, you routinely appear to completely ignore WP:3RR when it comes to your own editing. You should hold yourself to the same or higher standard as you've held others. The following edits appear to "perform [far] more than three reverts, in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material, on a single page within a 24-hour period." Special:Diff/1102582741, Special:Diff/1102583961, Special:Diff/1102585125, Special:Diff/1102585309, Special:Diff/1102585596, Special:Diff/1102590230, Special:Diff/1102590504, Special:Diff/1102600355, Special:Diff/1102600512, Special:Diff/1102602243. I have not kept track of which of these may have been an undo of your own edit, and I do not want to. I agree with some of the changes. The point remains, you are too quickly and too frequently reverting others' edits. I have "slowed my roll". You should too. Consider yourself notified. -- Yae4 (talk) 03:11, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the compliment, but no 3RR violation has occurred. 84.250.14.116 (talk) 19:10, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk question

You did not get a response to this question. I'm not sure how to help you except, if you still want an answer, ask again.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the dispute in question was something to do with a contributor who was community banned in July 2023 for "Persistently casting aspersions". I don't care enough to get the question resolved anymore. 84.250.15.152 (talk) 11:36, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]