User talk:50.200.118.243

Welcome! Last edited: Last edited by: 15:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC) Binksternet (talk · contribs) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your host, 50-200-118-243-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net (50.200.118.243), is registered to Comcast Business - Fort Union, Virginia, USA and is believed to be a static address used by only one connection. However, this IP address may represent more than one user, accessing the Internet via several personal computers or devices. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. If vandalism is noted from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block. Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

Welcome!

Hello 50.200.118.243! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address (50.200.118.243) is used to identify you instead. In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! - wolf 05:42, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

To edit, please log in.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

15:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
Binksternet (talk · contribs)

---

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.
September 2015 Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to William Smith (geologist)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^(talk) (contribs) 13:49, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at William Smith (geologist) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^(talk) (contribs) 13:49, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at William Smith (geologist), you may be blocked from editing. – Gilliam (talk) 13:51, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  – Gilliam (talk) 13:51, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in. This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to William Smith (geologist). (t) Josve05a (c) 20:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply] October 2015 Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Thomas Paine— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:28, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply] December 2015 Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Reliability of Wikipedia ‎ , even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:23, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply] Recent edit to Paul Laurence Dunbar Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! SMahenS (Talk) 18:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply] February 2016 Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Witch Doctor (song) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dcirovic (talk) 17:15, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. February 2016 Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Social Security Administration has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG. ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again. For help, take a look at the introduction. The following is the log entry regarding this message: Social Security Administration was changed by 50.200.118.243 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.971549 on 2016-02-25T02:00:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:00, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply] December 2016 Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of CHERUB characters has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG. ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again. For help, take a look at the introduction. The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of CHERUB characters was changed by 50.200.118.243 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.958104 on 2016-12-13T17:18:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:19, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply] January 2017 Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Naismith College Coach of the Year— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:43, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply] March 2017 Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bacteriophage has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG. ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again. For help, take a look at the introduction. The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bacteriophage was changed by 50.200.118.243 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.858348 on 2017-03-23T13:22:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply] December 2017 Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Warren G. Harding has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG. ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again. For help, take a look at the introduction. The following is the log entry regarding this message: Warren G. Harding was changed by 50.200.118.243 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954527 on 2017-12-05T02:02:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:02, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Semi-trailer truck. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Semi-trailer truck was changed by 50.200.118.243 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921739 on 2017-12-05T02:15:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at semi-trailer truck, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. additional text WikiRay360 (talk) 02:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply] January 2018 Hello, I'm Blue Edits. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Fork Union Military Academy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Blue Edits (talk) 14:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. April 2018 Hello, I'm PlyrStar93. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Trojan Horse— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 01:00, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply] September 2018 Hello. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Man-of-war— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 00:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply] August 2019 Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Avicenna— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:55, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply] November 2019 Hello, I'm ~riley. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Glass recycling—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ~riley (talk) 18:54, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply] February 2020 Hello, I'm Almy. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Oak Hill Academy (Mouth of Wilson, Virginia)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Almy (talk) 01:55, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply] January 2021 Hello, I'm Steve M. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Fork Union Military Academy—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Steve M (talk) 01:21, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply] Was probably one of the cadets that made that edit. Thanks Steve M for the revert for that one. 50.200.118.243 (talk) 19:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply] February 2021 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fork Union Military Academy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:53, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices. April 2021 Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Vernon Hills, Illinois, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:14, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply] July 2021 Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Azrakjo (talk) 18:52, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply] Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vine (service), you may be blocked from editing. jp×g 22:36, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply] If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2021

Hello, I'm Serols. I noticed that in this edit to Saint Petersburg, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Serols (talk) 15:17, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on 2024 Republican Party presidential debates and forums

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2024 Republican Party presidential debates and forums, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:14, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James C. Fox (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James C. Fox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 50.200.118.243! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Broken redirects

Hello, 50.200.118.243,

Do not put a broken redirect on a draft page or the entire page can be deleted. If you have questions about article creation and editing on Wikipedia, you should bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^Read! Talk! 06:29, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James C. Fox (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James C. Fox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:01, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:James Fox (filmmaker) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James Fox (filmmaker). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:58, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:James Fox (filmmaker) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James Fox (filmmaker). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:00, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Fox (filmmaker) (March 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Fox (filmmaker) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 21:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Fox (filmmaker) has been accepted

James Fox (filmmaker), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spinster300 (talk) 19:39, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at In Your Eyes (The Weeknd song), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 15:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]