My signature (for authenticity): 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon How I would pronounce (IPA-like): [Twɛntiˈsɪks-oʊ-wʌn-eɪ̯-si-fɔɹtiˈsɛvn̩]
For other people named 2601:, see [[:Special:ListUsers?username=2601:]].
#SaveBlinx (and wait for a 3rd game, hopefully by 2027 or sooner)
Also, as of Dec 31, 2024, I have exactly 434 pages on my watchlist; specifically, 5 categories, 12 WPs, 14 users (counting me) and 403 articles (counting 4 potential SB LIX teams, temporarily until Feb 10).
I have previously made contributions across Wikipedia (if only I know all those IPs, but I estimate over 2,000 total edits), most other WMF projects, and certain Fandom (formerly Wikia) and other notable wikis–almost all anonymously (a exception I willingly disclose is when I was on Fandom as Elder Pleasure; for some general advice I have regarding affairs from other wikis, see this example here (and scroll down to the last comment))–since around 2012, when I was in 3rd-4th grade; for that reason, please don't consider me a newcomer to editing. Chances are, I may have plenty more knowledge about something than you, especially if it pertains to films, games, TV series or other topics I've gained interest in, and I'd be willing to help you if available. Just please don't bring any WikiDrama or lure me to such contentious issues here (besides, I'm well aware of the heated debates, which I rarely consider needing to intervene, and I'm currently tired about some for the next few years). One thing to note: If I can't respond in due course to something on WP that's important for me in some way to deal with, than I apologize in advance; we all have real-world jobs to do too, ya'know. Thanks.
MAIL ME ONLY IF IT'S ABSOLUTELY URGENT AND YOU HAVE NO OTHER CHOICE... AND IF I'M WATCHING STRANGER THINGS, PLAYING FORTNITE OR I'M BUSY IN REAL-LIFE ELSEWHERE.
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
Could you explain what disruptive behaviour you believe both users to have engaged in?
In the case of the IP user, you cited their edit to the DRN - but that edit was to post what appears to be a perfectly legitimate request for dispute resolution. In the case of AceSevenFive, you didn't cite anything specific, and I can see nothing disruptive in their recent edit history, much less anything that would warrant telling them they "may be blocked from editing without further warning". AntiDionysius (talk) 19:20, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There's nothing wrong with going to DRN; it's an option presented to editors in the case of content disputes. I personally think it would be better if they went to BLPN because the case would likely get resolved quicker, sure, but picking DRN - especially if you're an IP user who might not understand the significance of BLP or know BLP exists - is okay and definitely not evidence of bad faith, let alone "only warning" territory.
As a help desk watcher, I didn't know until the IP came in. I checked both users and the article talk out. And in ASF's case, I got tipped early signs of sealioning. Again, I got sort of disillusioned. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon19:40, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(hmm...) Well, I would start by reading our policies and guidelines, and especially our Manual of Style. I'd also create an account and use a sandbox.
Moreover, I've put in the contentious topic alert because, while he doesn't seem to fall under it... Let's just say that what he did relates at least a little to it. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon14:07, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So why did you return the edits to the article? I honestly don't understand. Do you think they follow the policy? Or you just think you should always cancel edits without an account?.. 132.71.108.188 (talk) 15:34, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
🤭 "Edit summaries, always a good practice, are particularly important when reverting. Provide a valid and informative explanation including, if possible, a link to the Wikipedia principle you believe justifies the reversion"... 132.71.108.188 (talk) 15:50, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I edited Yossi Beilin's page and you deleted as there was no reference.
I have the photo of the honorary degree he received. How can I enter it? Thanks
84.229.179.242 (talk) 09:37, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since you’re a IP, obviously you can’t upload images like that on here (or Commons) unless you register. However, about that “honorary degree”: First, do you have a reliable source for the image of it, secondly, does it meet our guidelines on such images? And thirdly, and I say this gently (some others would not), be aware of the fact that he falls under one of our contentious topics. That’s also a good reason for me not to go farther unless absolutely needed.2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon23:25, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DYK for Dr Disrespect
On 13 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Dr Disrespect, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dr Disrespect's first videos featured a bombastic "champion" trash-talking game-play footage? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dr Disrespect. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Dr Disrespect), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Thank you. For the record, though, my work on it started well after it was established that he is notable (and initially while anon). 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon12:04, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
+rollback
Hi 2601AC47,
After reviewing your request, I have added your account to the rollback group. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:
Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Users should be informed (or warned) after their edits have been reverted. If warnings repeatedly don't help, WP:ANI is the default place to go. In cases of very clear ongoing intentional damage to the encyclopedia, WP:AIV can be used.
Reverting someone's edits may confuse or upset them. Whenever other users message you on your talk page, please take the time to respond to their concerns; accountability is important. For most users who message you, the tone and quality of your answer will permanently influence their opinion about Wikipedia in general.
Because the plain default rollback link does not provide any explanatory edit summary, it must not be used to revert good faith contributions, even if these contributions are disruptive. Take the time to write a proper summary whenever you're dealing with a lack of neutrality or verifiability; a short explanation like "[[WP:NPOV|not neutral]]" or "[[WP:INTREF|Please provide a citation]]" is helpful.
Rollback may never be used to edit war, which you'll notice to be surprisingly tempting in genuine content disputes. Please especially keep the three-revert rule in mind. If you see others edit warring, please file a report at WP:ANEW. The most helpful essay I've ever seen is WP:DISCFAIL; it is especially important for those who review content regularly.
If you encounter private information or threats of physical harm during your patrols, please quickly use Special:EmailUser/Oversight or Special:EmailUser/Emergency; ideally bookmark these pages now. See WP:OS and WP:EMERGENCY for details. If you're regularly patrolling recent changes, you will need both contacts sooner or later, and you'll be happy about the bookmarks.
To try rollback for the first time, you may like to make an edit to WP:Sandbox, and another one, and another one, and then revert the row with one click. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about rollback. Thank you for your time and work in cleaning up Wikipedia. Happy editing!
Let me just say that "excellence in the world of film industry" could not really make sense and that just "excellence in the film industry" is better in describing the purpose of the awards. Yes, the world, I assumed, refers to the industry worldwide and not just in the US; but historically and more broadly, it is usually just the industry in general. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon02:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.jpeg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=icon}
.jpg)
.jpg)
.svg){kind=small}
