Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
Hello, 207.229.139.154!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! - RichT|C|E-Mail21:36, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Salimfadhley was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
This subject requires significant coverage in reliable secondary sources to show that it is notable by our standards. Since this is a fictional race, we cannot rely upon "in universe" sources to show the subject is notable - so for example, manuals and guides by the publisher of D&D are not sufficient. I can't help feeling that this article might be unsuitable for Wikipedia, since it is merely a point of trivia within the canon of D&D and not a subject that has had any significant coverage outside this fictional universe.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yuan-ti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yuan-ti, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Partha Basak20:09, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
Hello, I'm Lectrician2. I noticed that in this edit to Clea, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lectrician2 (talk) 04:00, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
It looks like the Playboy Press book is cited for the sentence "Jungle is a two-player strategy game and has been cited as resembling the Western game Stratego," and not the sentence that comes right before it where you added the wikilink to the book. Besides this, the source does not seem significant enough to spell out in the text of the lead. Fiwec81618 (talk) 03:36, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Assuming good faith however I think the edit may not have been disruptive. When I sent the warning I only checked the source for the sentence where you added it and saw that it did not agree with the added wikilink; I saw the Playboy Press source for the other unmodified sentence only after I saw your Talk page message. Fiwec81618 (talk) 03:40, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oops! My mistake. I apologize for that, I am still trying to find out how to get a specific thing working. Sorry for any inconvenience. I hope you are doing alright today. Garnarblarnar (talk) 16:06, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Serols, it looks like this edit before mine incorrectly identified Daredevil as a "mutant", so in my edit, I reverted it as being incorrect. Note that nowhere in the article is Daredevil identified as a mutant, as far as I am aware. If you think I made an error please let me know, and if you can explain how my edit was disruptive I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 04:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Hello, I'm Adakiko. An edit you recently made to Moon Knight seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 01:51, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Adakiko and what kind of a source is "Marvel Universe #42992"? Is that a comic book title, or another book of some kind, or a website? I'm pretty into comic books and I have to confess I actually have no idea what they are referring to and the person adding it did not specify where they got this information from. Now if you look at Infinity Wars and scroll maybe halfway down the page, you will see that there were indeed several titles published under the "Infinity Warps" warps name, although I will concede that there is no wikilink to that title, so changing it from "Infinity Warps" to "Infinity Wars" in this case actually makes the article less correct, but I can see changing it back without the redlink as being appropriate. In fact, if you look at the inline citations in that section, you will see that they still say "Infinity Warps" even after you reverted the section change. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 06:09, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Other than suggesting that you do understand edits before reverting them in future; because the citation template was warning of a generic author name when the author(s) named by the source are actually generic. By wrapping the author value in that way, the template ignores what would be a false-positive. I will revert your ill informed reversion of my edit now. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs21:57, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Ch'od, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 08:45, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Adakiko, because that text was newly added and unsourced, and is also greatly out of sequence with the rest of the text. But, if you believe it has value, then it's on you as the person who restored it so I'll defer to your judgement to its value being worth retaining. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 08:58, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure why you fact-tagged some other entries, even though you had just added uncited material in other entries, but a given work can function as its own primary source for its existence, credits, and content, even though secondary sources are preferred. However, entires on a comics character's appearances in other media should be succinctly summarized, without excessive detail about those works' plots.
If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 15:15, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Gen Con
Oops! Good catch on the year for Gen Con. As a side-note, you might have an easier time around here if you registered an account. Of course it isn't required, but it does seem to help. The WordsmithTalk to me17:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I moved some of them into the reception section, which is not easy as I'm using Google Translate to give me an idea of what the foreign review says. Do you think it would be acceptable to include these under a "Further reading" section until someone is able to add them actually into the articles? 207.229.139.154 (talk) 14:31, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Stop mangling articles by adding fake sections and broken date formats, which violate MOS:LAYOUT, MOS:DATES, and WP:PROSELINE at the very least. You actively destroyed valid section layouts, prose, and date formatting[3] and you never format citations, such as bare URLs. You and BOZ and possibly others have spammed this identical pattern of robotic, profoundly disruptive, and WP:TENDENTIOUS editing for years, leaving a huge mess for everyone else to clean up. You stop right now and go back and clean every single one of these edits. Users can be blocked for disruptive editing, and I'm reporting it. — Smuckola(talk)06:48, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
April 2023
Hello. Thank you for your efforts. However, if you're going to be adding sources without actually writing any content, please be aware of WP:LINKFARM. Lists of random links at the bottom of articles are not desirable. Feel free to keep finding sources, but put them on talk pages for other editors to implement if you're not willing to implement them yourself. Thanks. Sergecross73msg me13:12, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Warren Spector, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
It looks like you keep adding Backstab. They're not considered a reliable source. Not yet anyway. I highly suggest you check out this page for a list of sources. And if you feel strongly, then make a new post on the talk page there. Xanarki (talk) 04:31, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What you're doing is vandalism whether you realize it or not. You keep removing titles from citations and messing with links. If this continues you will be reported. Silbad (talk) 22:09, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As you can see from the last comments in here, I'm not the only one complaining about your edits. You do not remove the title from the citation. If you don't think it's good enough, you either improve it by adding something more to it, or you just let it be. You do not remove anything from it. That's not improvement, that's making it worse. Silbad (talk) 01:26, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
{{cite web}} isn't that hard to use or figure out. If you see I or someone else has stripped the "title" from your bare citation, you can also activate User:Citation bot on that article to get it to generate a citation template. Threatening me over it is kind of silly when you're the one not doing the work in the first place. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 02:29, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You removed my citation-needed mark for the pronunciation of Clea’s name, stating that there was there’s a citation for this in the infobox. Which citation, specifically, tells us how to pronounce Clea’s name?
Neutron Jack (talk) 19:18, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies @Neutron Jack, I misinterpreted. I thought your cn tag was for her name being "Clea Strange" (for which there is a citation in the infobox), not for the pronunciation itself. Add it back, I will not revert. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 19:52, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
Just apologising for reverting your recent edit on the page (and correcting it in the 1st place, if it was yours originally).Your version was grammatically correct and clear! I realised it too late. I've restored it, of course. Yours, — MY, OH, MY! (mushy yank) — 20:50, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke (The Walking Dead) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelly (The Walking Dead) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leah (The Walking Dead) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
