User talk:192.234.214.110
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history. July 2013 Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Jean Fuller. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. March 2014Hello, I'm Bahooka. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of colleges and universities in California without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Bahooka (talk) 17:32, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Reference errors on 5 AugustHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 6 August 2015 (UTC) August 2015Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Political positions of Rand Paul. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you.Bettering the Wiki (talk) 22:56, 12 August 2015 (UTC) Reference errors on 4 SeptemberHello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 5 September 2015 (UTC) September 2016Hello, I'm James Allison. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2015 San Bernardino attack, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Regards, James (talk/contribs) 00:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
February 2017Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Talk:California State Capitol— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 19:59, 22 February 2017 (UTC) May 2017Hello, I'm PackMecEng. An edit that you recently made to Eloise Reyes seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! PackMecEng (talk) 19:29, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
January 2018Hello, I'm RA0808. I noticed that you recently removed content from Devon Mathis without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RA0808 talkcontribs 16:43, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
July 2018Hello, I'm Audacity. I noticed that you recently removed content from Chad Mayes without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Λυδαcιτγ 08:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Chad Mayes, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. MutchyMan112 (talk) 16:54, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!Hello, 192.234.214.110. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Interstellarity T 🌟 20:10, 19 June 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template. June 2019Hello 192.234.214.110. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO. Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:192.234.214.110. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:
Your thread has been archived
December 2020Hello, I'm 4thfile4thrank. I noticed that you recently removed content from Scott Wilk without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. 4thfile4thrank (talk) 19:46, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
March 2020 editHello! I'm curious about your edit on the Bound Together page, as Richard Tetenbaum was a close relative of mine. Why did you decide to include him? Let me know on my talk page. Jesgrew22 (talk) 05:15, 11 November 2022 (UTC) July 2023Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Phillip Chen, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 22:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC) |