No, Capewearer didn't 'vandalise' the page. The number of links on there was not appropriate for an encyclopedic biography. The page was protected to prevent you from continuing to revert Capewearer's actions. It's time to move on while ensuring that you remain [{WP:CIVIL|civil]]. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:37, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I removed a lot of the external links already. After I removed the links, I asked Capewearer whether it was enough or not. It was a legit question. He did not answer me and just deleted everything. This shows that he just wanted to vandalise the entire page for no good reason. User ST47 put a lock on the page to prevent Capewearer's vandalism but he still managed to vandalise the entire page.112.199.181.130 (talk) 13:40, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No, it showed that the page needed to be improved further and perhaps (I don't know I'm not them) didn't believe that the incivil way that you approached them (such as accusing them of vandalism) was not worth responding to. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:42, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I politely asked Capewearer whether the page was okay or not after I removed the links. He did not reply and just deleted everything. He said that there were too many external links, it was a "linkfarm" etc. I made a ton of edits removing a lot of the external links. I was wondering it was enough. But capewearer never replied. He is abusing his position. 112.199.181.130 (talk) 13:45, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
They said that it was a "linkfarm". I replied that it was a proper and well sourced and well referenced bibliography with links to outside sources. They said "no". So I conceded and made edits removing a ton of external links from the page. I ask capewearer whether it was enough or not. He never gave me any sort of reply and deleted everything. Look, I already made concessions. But capewearer didn't even bother to reply to me.112.199.181.130 (talk) 13:50, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No, they explained their reasoning in their edit summaries and on the talk page. Anyway, this conversation has gone around in circles enough. Time to move on to something else. As I mentioned above leave Capewearer alone and find another article to work on. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:59, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
