User talk:امین اکبر

User Page	User Talk Page	Pages/Notes	Statistics	Sub Pages	WikiLove	E-Mail	Bots

Archives

1, 2

Welcome to My Talk Page: User:Ameen Akbar.

Important Links

• Wikipedia:Obtaining geographic coordinates

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Constituency PP-278 (Muzaffargarh-XI)

Hello, امین اکبر. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Constituency PP-278 (Muzaffargarh-XI), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Constituency PP-279 (Muzaffargarh-XII)

Hello, امین اکبر. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Constituency PP-279 (Muzaffargarh-XII), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Constituency PP-274 (Muzaffargarh-VII)

Hello, امین اکبر. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Constituency PP-274 (Muzaffargarh-VII), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Constituency PP-275 (Muzaffargarh-VIII)

Hello, امین اکبر. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Constituency PP-275 (Muzaffargarh-VIII), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Constituency PP-276 (Muzaffargarh-IX)

Hello, امین اکبر. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Constituency PP-276 (Muzaffargarh-IX), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Constituency PP-277 (Muzaffargarh-X)

Hello, امین اکبر. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Constituency PP-277 (Muzaffargarh-X), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Constituency PP-272 (Muzaffargarh-V)

Hello, امین اکبر. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Constituency PP-272 (Muzaffargarh-V), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Constituency PP-271 (Muzaffargarh-IV)

Hello, امین اکبر. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Constituency PP-271 (Muzaffargarh-IV), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constituency PP-272 (Muzaffargarh-V) has been accepted

Constituency PP-272 (Muzaffargarh-V), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 17:22, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Constituency PP-273 (Muzaffargarh-VI)

Hello, امین اکبر. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Constituency PP-273 (Muzaffargarh-VI), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constituency PP-271 (Muzaffargarh-IV) has been accepted

Constituency PP-271 (Muzaffargarh-IV), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^Let's Talk ! 15:57, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pir Piai railway station

The article Pir Piai railway station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. Per "railwaystations.pk" (questionable), no trains actually stop here. Delete or merge into the larger line article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kazamzam (talk) 04:52, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constituency PP-273 (Muzaffargarh-VI) has been accepted

Constituency PP-273 (Muzaffargarh-VI), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Na-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^Let's Talk ! 16:11, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constituency PP-274 (Muzaffargarh-VII) has been accepted

Constituency PP-274 (Muzaffargarh-VII), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:57, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Naming conventions of constituencies: Arbitration request declined

Hello امین اکبر,

In response to your request for arbitration, the Arbitration Committee has agreed that arbitration is not required at this stage. Arbitration on Wikipedia is a lengthy, complicated process that involves the unilateral adjudication of a dispute by an elected committee. Although the Committee's decisions can be useful to certain disputes, in many cases the actual process of arbitration is unenjoyable and time-consuming. Moreover, for most disputes the community maintains an effective set of mechanisms for reaching a compromise or resolving a grievance.

Disputes among editors regarding the content of an article should use structured discussion on the talk page between the disputing editors. However, requests for comment, third opinions and other venues are available if discussion alone does not yield a consensus. The dispute resolution noticeboard also exists as a method of resolving content disputes that aren't easily resolved with talk page discussion.

In all cases, you should review Wikipedia:Dispute resolution to learn more about resolving disputes on Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia community has many venues for resolving disputes and grievances, and it is important to explore them instead of requesting arbitration in the first instance. For more information on the process of arbitration, please see the Arbitration Policy and the Guide to Arbitration. I hope this advice is useful, and please do not hesitate to contact me or a member of the community if you have more questions. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:19, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:19, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Captain Jack Sparrow (talk) 07:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constituency PP-275 (Muzaffargarh-VIII) (June 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Turnagra was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Constituency PP-275 (Muzaffargarh-VIII) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Turnagra (talk) 21:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, امین اکبر! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Turnagra (talk) 21:34, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lists of railway stations in Pakistan

A tag has been placed on Category:Lists of railway stations in Pakistan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^Read! Talk! 19:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Pakistan Railway-related lists

A tag has been placed on Category:Pakistan Railway-related lists indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^Read! Talk! 16:50, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constituency PP-276 (Muzaffargarh-IX) (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Losipov was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Constituency PP-276 (Muzaffargarh-IX) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Losipov (talk) 02:48, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Minister of state

Hi

According to Pakistan's constitution, Ministers of state are not members of the cabinet. We should add it Panam2014 (talk) 15:27, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jati Taluka moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jati Taluka. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Paul Vaurie (talk) 21:44, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jati Taluka has been accepted

Jati Taluka, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 10:35, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Constituency PP-278 (Muzaffargarh-XI)

Hello, امین اکبر. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Constituency PP-278".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 16:22, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Constituency PP-279 (Muzaffargarh-XII)

Hello, امین اکبر. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Constituency PP-279".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 16:22, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Constituency PP-277 (Muzaffargarh-X)

Hello, امین اکبر. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Constituency PP-277".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 18:26, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

امین اکبر (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 119.155.231.207. Yesterday it was different but that was also blocked. It looks that you blocked all IP addresses of PTCL. As per PTCL website, there are 1.3 million broadband users. Wikipedia's admins blocked all 1.3 million broadband users of PTCL. Please look into this matter. It would be best if you placed an automatic IP exemption for extended confirmed users. Ameen Akbar (talk) 14:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline as your account isn't blocked directly so there's no block to lift, and you can edit from another IP that isn't blocked. And lifting the proxy block is just not going to be very likely. I completely agree with your suggestion that we should at least give admins the power to exempt EC accounts from blocks; I brought it up at a session at Wikimania this year where we discussed the difficulties these rangeblocks create for legitimate editors in the developing world (and not just there either) and I will bring it up again at next year's Community Wishlist Survey on Meta (it would doubtless get a lot of support, but that alone doesn't guarantee the tech team will be able to do it). But we can't do it now, and in the alternative I will direct you to WP:IPECPROXY where there are instructions for requesting IP block exemption by email. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ameen Akbar (talk) 14:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Constituency PP-275 (Muzaffargarh-VIII)

Hello, امین اکبر. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Constituency PP-275".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 21:31, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Muzaffargarh by occupation has been nominated for merging

Category:People from Muzaffargarh by occupation has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harappa railway station

The article Harappa railway station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article does not have inherent notability, considering it has no sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 15:58, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Constituency PP-276 (Muzaffargarh-IX)

Hello, امین اکبر. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Constituency PP-276".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 02:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ghazal Siddique moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ghazal Siddique, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 18:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mohsinwal railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohsinwal railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohsinwal railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 09:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Constituency PP-278 (Muzaffargarh-XI)

Hello, امین اکبر. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Constituency PP-278".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 15:58, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Constituency PP-279 (Muzaffargarh-XII)

Hello, امین اکبر. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Constituency PP-279".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^Read! Talk! 15:58, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gullu Butt

The article Gullu Butt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is not a person of note. Wikipedia should not become a place where minor criminals get an own page with which, undeservedly, they achieve so-called immortality.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Happy birthday! Hi امین اکبر! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request to remove section

Hi. I wanted to make a request. If you have time,of course. I wanted to request you to remove a non neutral and political section from a non political article. I am not an editor so I don't know the process. But can you do it. Thanks. I'll explain the problem if you are interested in contributing. Donteatgarlic (talk) 15:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me your problem. If I think your proposed section should be removed, I will remove that. Ameen Akbar (talk) 17:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I Donteatgarlic (talk) 17:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for responding. I wanted to request to remove a section from an article. I am not an editor just someone who browses Wikipedia. I made the account to send request. So the article is tourism in Pakistan. There is a section in it called image and influencers. This section was too political and sensationalist. It contained incorrect information. I'll cite the link

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tourism_in_Pakistan&action=edit&section=2

So when I read this section, it seemed to be too political. Also a lot of info in it was wrong and sensationalist and like tourism in Pakistan is promoted to distract people from its problems. That's not true at all. People in Pak are very well aware of its problems and nothing distracts them from them and they criticise the problems . This line is straight up incorrect t and is the authors conspiracy. Also it contains opinionated and non neutral terms like gora complex. Why are Pakistanis being addressed by biased terms this way? Also why is a single article being given so much importance in the whole section. It's straight up dishonesty. The author isn't even prominent or anything. I read the original source and this author is kind of biased. She doesn't even live in Pakistan. Also she's anti pti so she had bias in mind while writing the article. Keeping in mind that Imran khan was promoting tourism. I don't even care for that guy but this bias was weird. Also about the women being allowed to drive bikes thing, it's common knowledge in many countries s that the places culture arent expected to be imposed on tourists. Like for eg in Saudi Arabia foreign women can roam around without burqa or hijab. It's common sense. No one is misrepresenting anything. Everyone knows what is happening everywhere. Why is such a political article being added to a page about tourism . The other countries articles don't have these type of sections so why this? I think it's irrelevant. Also promotion of tourism(along with mention of some influencers) is already covered in the Imran khan section. So I believe the whole section should be removed. It's entirely filled with references to an opinionated source written by a biased author. Opinionated articles shouldn't be allowed in pages like tourism in Pakistan. The section was too out of tone and off putting. Now about the history of the section. I looked at the history and discovered that the Wikipedia editor who added the section has been accused by other Wikipedia users (on unrelated matters) of having an agenda. In fact they have been banned by Wikipedia form writing about some topics relating to Pakistan. Because they had an agenda. In fact when they submitted the section it was in an even worst shape as it contained lines out of context front the original article. But then an editor corrected it. However I believe that the whole section should be removed. As it's biased violates neutrality rules and is opinionated and political. So if you have time will you kindly remove it? I don't know the process of removing sections but you are an experienced editor. Of course only if you have time. Sorry for the long read. I wanted to express my problems and make clear the whole things. I hope my request doesn't bother you. I shall be very thankful to you if you consider it. Donteatgarlic (talk) 17:32, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will see this later. Ameen Akbar (talk) 17:37, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. So what have you thought about the article? Donteatgarlic (talk) 09:23, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for responding to my request. You have helped a lot. Thank you for editing. There is something else I wanted to say. I want to point that the new section you made "Ranking in Tourism", the information in the section has already been mentioned in the Wikipedia article. So I think it should be removed as it has already been written in the article. I think this should be done to avoid repetition. Also because the new section contains link to the journalists article the biased one I was complaining to you about. Again thanks for agreeing to my request. Donteatgarlic (talk) 17:30, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sar-I-Bolan railway station

The article Sar-I-Bolan railway station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability or references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. XabqEfdg (talk) 01:33, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bandial railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bandial railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bandial railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kingsmasher678 (talk) 00:26, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Perak railway station for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Perak railway station is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perak railway station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

cyberdog958^Talk 06:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Salim Awan railway station

The article Salim Awan railway station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article lacks notability. No WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoeNMLC (talk) 18:35, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mirjat railway station

The article Mirjat railway station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article lacks notability. No WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoeNMLC (talk) 18:39, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Latif Abad railway station

The article Latif Abad railway station has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article lacks notability. No WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoeNMLC (talk) 18:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming expiry of your ipblock-exempt right

Hi, this is an automated reminder as part of Global reminder bot to let you know that your WP:IPBE right which gave you the ability to bypass IP address blocks will expire on 16:50, 15 October 2024 (UTC). If your IP is still blocked (which you can test by trying to edit when logged-out), please renew by following the instructions at the IPBE page; otherwise, you do not need to do anything. To opt out of user right expiry notifications, add yourself to m:Global reminder bot/Exclusion. Leaderbot (talk) 18:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Culture in Muzaffargarh

A tag has been placed on Category:Culture in Muzaffargarh indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^Read! Talk! 22:55, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Spezand–Zaheden Line

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Spezand–Zaheden Line, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:45, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]