Hybrid Scorecard
Promoted by Sharktopus
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Sharktopus talk
Created/expanded by Mariordo (talk) at 02:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook
Article
- Length: Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Vintage: Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sourcing (V, RS, BLP): Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutrality: Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Plagiarism/close paraphrasing: Problems. This and especially this show major cut and paste action. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Copyvio: Images are fine. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Obvious faults in prose, structure, formatting:
Comments/discussion:
No. Needs a total rewrite to eliminate cut and paste, as well as close paraphrasing. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator has expressed interest in rewriting the offending bits. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:37, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Paraphrasing seems to have been improved. Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:49, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
