Height discrimination

Part of a series on
Discrimination
Forms
Attributes
Social
Religious
Ethnic/national
Manifestations
Policies
Countermeasures
Related topics

Height discrimination (also known as heightism) is prejudice or discrimination against individuals based on height. In principle, it refers to the discriminatory treatment against individuals whose height is not within the normal acceptable range of height in a population. Various studies have shown it to be a cause of bullying, commonly manifested as unconscious microaggressions.[1][2]

Research indicates that people often use height as one factor to measure social status and fitness. Both the cognitive and the culturally-ingrained unconscious heuristic association between height and the mentioned traits has also been found to be stronger when assessing men than women.[3][4][5]

Lexicology

The term heightism was coined by sociologist Saul Feldman in a paper titled "The presentation of shortness in everyday life—height and heightism in American society: Toward a sociology of stature", presented at the meeting of the American Sociological Association in 1971.[6][7] Heightism was included in the Second Barnhart Dictionary of New English (1971)[8] and had a further degree of popularization by Time magazine in a 1971 article on Feldman's paper.[9]

The term heightism can also be seen as an example of the increase in popular usage of phrases, particularly those relating to prejudice and discrimination, patterned after that of the word sexism.[8] Height discrimination can also come in the form of pejorative slang terms.[10]

Height and social discrimination

Employment wage and social experience discrimination

A 2004 study published in the Journal of Applied Psychology showed that height is strongly related to success for men. It showed that increase in height for men corresponds to increase in income after controlling for other social psychological variables like age and weight.[1] That same year, a study published in the Journal of Political Economy conjectured a "height premium" and found that "a 1.8-percent increase in wages accompanies every additional inch of height". They also found that men's wages as adults could be linked to their height at age 16. The researchers found that on an average an increase in height by one inch at age 16 increased male adult wages by 2.6 percent. This is equal to an increase of approximately $850 in 1996 annual earnings (or $1,650 today).[11] In other words, the height and corresponding social experiences of a taller male adolescent at age 16 would likely translate to higher wages in later adulthood as compared to a shorter male adolescent.[2]

Recent findings suggest that height discrimination occurs most often against racial minorities. A 2007 study published in the Journal of Vocational Behavior found that African-Americans reported higher weight and height related discrimination. This discrimination was even higher in female employees.[12]

In 2017, attorney and author Tanya Osensky published Shortchanged: Height Discrimination and Strategies for Social Change.[13] The book examines the cultural, medical, and occupational issues that short people face, which are often deemed unimportant and disregarded. Osensky challenges heightism by disclosing some beneficial aspects of shortness and suggesting avenues of activism and change.

In business

Some jobs require a minimum height. For example, US Military pilots have to be 160 to 200 centimetres (63 to 79 in) tall with a sitting height of 86 to 102 centimetres (34 to 40 in).[14] Other jobs require a maximum height or to be between a certain height range, such as flight attendant.[15] These exceptions noted, in the great majority of cases a person's height would not seem to have an effect on how well they are able to perform their job. Nevertheless, studies have shown that short people are paid less than taller people, with disparities similar in magnitude to the race and gender gaps.[16]

Surveys have uncovered that less than 3% of CEOs were below 1.70 m (5 ft 7 in) in height, and 90% of CEOs are of above average height.[17]

Perceived attractiveness

Initial studies indicated that taller men are more likely to be married and to have more children, except in societies with severe sex imbalances caused by war.[18] However, more recent research has drawn this theory into question, finding no correlation between height and offspring count, although the sample was 200 and consisted only of delinquent youth.[19] Moreover, research on leg length and leg-to-body ratio conflicts with the notion that there is a distinct preference for taller mates. A 2008 study found that both extremes, tall and short, reduced attractiveness, and a 2006 study found that a higher leg-to-body ratio in both genders increased aesthetic appeal.[20][21] Conversely, research by Dan Ariely found that American women exhibit a marked preference for dating taller men, and that for shorter men to be judged attractive by women, they must earn substantially more money than taller men.[22] Also, the perceived attractiveness of taller men may also apply to men of average height. A study showed that there isn't a notable difference between the perceived attractiveness of taller men and average height men when compared to each other. Rather, it's that shorter men are more unfavorably viewed and the increased preference for the other two groups are a possible side effect.[23]

A 2012 study found that both men and women are willing to excuse height differences by using a trade-off approach. Men may compensate 1.3 BMI units with a 1 percent higher wage than their wife. Women may compensate 2 BMI units with an additional year of higher education.[24] Furthermore, a 2015 study found that both men and women receive economic benefits from having a tall spouse.[24]

Nonetheless, on a cultural level in post-industrial society, a sociological relationship between height and perceived attractiveness exists. For instance, in a 2019 survey performed by Ipsos in Hungary with over 500 respondents, the perfect height for men for 53% of participants was between 1.78 m (5 ft 10 in) to 1.85 m (6 ft 1 in), while regarding female ideal height, 60% of respondents stated that it should be between 1.65 m (5 ft 5 in) and 1.75 m (5 ft 9 in), indicating a predominant preference for average to moderately tall height in both sexes.[25] A study produced by the Universities of Groningen and Valencia, found that the taller a man was, the less anxious he felt about attractive, physically dominant, and socially powerful rivals.[26] This cultural characteristic of conferring relevance to height as an indicator of attractiveness, while applicable to the modernized world, is not a transcendental human quality.[27]

In the media

In 1987 the BBC comedy series A Small Problem imagined a totalitarian society in which people under the height of 5 feet (1.5 m) were systematically discriminated against. The program attracted considerable criticism and complaints which accused the writers of reinforcing prejudice and of using offensive terms; the writers responded that their intention had been to show all prejudice was stupid and that height was chosen randomly.[28]

S&M Short and Male, a documentary aired in 2008, demonstrated the obstacles and bigotry that short statured men face every day in life, love and work.[29][30][31]

In 2019, the teen romantic comedy Tall Girl was released. It told the story of a 16 year-old girl who struggled in high school due to her height.

Law

Currently, there is one state in the United States of America, Michigan, that prohibits height discrimination.[32] Three American cities currently prohibit height discrimination: Santa Cruz, California,[33] San Francisco, California,[34] and New York City; New York City prohibits it in employment, housing, and public accommodations.[35] The District of Columbia prohibits discrimination based on personal appearance.[36] Ontario, Canada, prohibits height discrimination under the human rights code.[37] Victoria, Australia, prohibits discrimination based on physical features, including height, under the Equal Opportunity Act of 2010.[38]

Examples of successful legal battles pursued against height discrimination in the workplace include a 2002 case involving highly qualified applicants being turned down for jobs at a bank because they were considered too short;[39] a 2005 Swedish case involving an unfair height requirement for employment implemented by Volvo;[40] and a 1999 case involving a Kohler Company informal practice not to consider women who applied for jobs unless they were at least 5 ft 4 in (1.63 m) tall.[41] Height requirements for employment which are not a bona fide occupational requirement are becoming less common.[citation needed] In 2022, the Supreme Court of Spain ruled that height requirements for joining the National Police Corps must take into account the average height for each sex in the Spanish population, disallowing a previous height rule for women.[42]

Height and mental health in men

Height is related to body image and does have an effect on the cognitive process. A study done involving spatial attention showed that people who were unhappy with their height were prone to looking quicker to short-associated words and tried to avoid attention to tall connected words because they could illicit negative feelings. Which could be caused when the participants with a dismal body image are exposed to their desired height, it creates an internal conflict, that they would like to lessen by facing away. This would potentially confirm agitation in individuals who are not satisfied with their height.[43]

A research report published in the American Journal of Psychiatry found a strong inverse association between height and suicide in Swedish men. In other words, the suicide rate was higher for shorter men. This may signify the importance of childhood exposure in the etiology of adult mental disorder or reflect stigmatization or discrimination encountered by short men in their adult lives. A record linkage study of the birth, conscription, mortality, family, and census register data of 1,299,177 Swedish men followed from age 18 to a maximum of age 49 was performed and it was found that a 5 cm (2 in) increase in height was associated with a 9% decrease in suicide risk.[44]

Another study involving was conducted involving suicide and height for men, specifically relating to suicide attempts. It looked into hospital admissions of Swedish men and found that the risk of suicide declined when height increased. There were strong correlations between social class and height in the participants, particularly shorter men of lower status had a higher suicide probability. Also those of low socioeconomic standing could be more susceptible to health problems that cause shortness, and were more vulnerable to psychiatric illnesses.[45]

For other forms of discrimination there is without a doubt some form of psychological harm on the individual. However, for height discrimination, it can be disputable. Research has shown that heightism has arguably little effect on any aspects of someone's quality of life, including mental state. Only individuals on the high end range of short and tall have experienced some moderate impact on physical performance.[46] Furthermore, majority of the potential negative mental health effects individuals could have came from internally, height discontentment, and it was relatively small compared to overall livelihood. While there is an increase in negative treatment towards individuals in the height area of less then 175 cm, it was mild in totality and only a small percentage of the overall study group reported it. The correlation between heightism and the well being of someone was found to be small.[47]

References

  1. ^ a b Judge, Timothy A.; Cable, Daniel M. (2004). "The Effect of Physical Height on Workplace Success and Income: Preliminary Test of a Theoretical Model". Journal of Applied Psychology. 89 (3): 428–441. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.428. PMID 15161403.
  2. ^ a b Persico, Nicola; Postlewaite, Andrew; Silverman, Dan (October 2004). "The Effect of Adolescent Experience on Labor Market Outcomes: The Case of Height" (PDF). Journal of Political Economy. 112 (5): 1019–1053. doi:10.1086/422566.
  3. ^ Blaker, Nancy M.; Rompa, Irene; Dessing, Inge H.; Vriend, Anne F.; Herschberg, Channah; van Vugt, Mark (January 2013). "The height leadership advantage in men and women: Testing evolutionary psychology predictions about the perceptions of tall leaders". Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 16 (1): 17–27. doi:10.1177/1368430212437211.
  4. ^ Stulp, Gert; Buunk, Abraham P.; Verhulst, Simon; Pollet, Thomas V. (26 February 2015). "Human Height Is Positively Related to Interpersonal Dominance in Dyadic Interactions". PLOS ONE. 10 (2): e0117860. Bibcode:2015PLoSO..1017860S. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117860. PMC 4342156. PMID 25719490.
  5. ^ Blaker, Nancy M.; Van Vugt, Mark (2014). "The Status-Size Hypothesis: How Cues of Physical Size and Social Status Influence Each Other". The Psychology of Social Status. pp. 119–137. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0867-7_6. ISBN 978-1-4939-0866-0.
  6. ^ Feldman, Saul. "The presentation of shortness in everyday life—height and heightism in American society: Toward a sociology of stature Paper". Presented at the meeting of the American Sociological Association. Chicago, Il. 1971.
  7. ^ heightism, n." OED Online. June 2003. Oxford University Press. September 2006.
  8. ^ a b Shapiro, Fred R. (Spring 1985). "Historical Notes on the Vocabulary of the Women's Movement". American Speech. 60 (1): 3–16. doi:10.2307/454643. JSTOR 454643.
  9. ^ "Heightism.(Behavior)". Time. Vol. 98, no. 14. 4 October 1971. p. 82.
  10. ^ Cohen, Arianne (2009). The Tall Book: A Celebration of Life from on High. Bloomsbury Publishing USA. ISBN 978-1-60819-110-9.[page needed]
  11. ^ 1634–1699: McCusker, J. J. (1997). How Much Is That in Real Money? A Historical Price Index for Use as a Deflator of Money Values in the Economy of the United States: Addenda et Corrigenda (PDF). American Antiquarian Society. 1700–1799: McCusker, J. J. (1992). How Much Is That in Real Money? A Historical Price Index for Use as a Deflator of Money Values in the Economy of the United States (PDF). American Antiquarian Society. 1800–present: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. "Consumer Price Index (estimate) 1800–". Retrieved February 29, 2024.
  12. ^ Roehling, Mark V.; Roehling, Patricia V.; Pichler, Shaun (1 October 2007). "The relationship between body weight and perceived weight-related employment discrimination: The role of sex and race". Journal of Vocational Behavior. 71 (2): 300–318. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.008.
  13. ^ Osensky, Tanya S. (2017). Shortchanged: Height Discrimination and Strategies for Social Change. Brandeis University Press. ISBN 978-1-5126-0143-5.[page needed]
  14. ^ "U.S. Air Force ROTC despite statistical and physical evidence to support the proposition that short people consistently have reduced reaction times.: Admissions requirements". afrotc.com. Archived from the original on 8 October 2006. Retrieved 22 October 2017.
  15. ^ "Weight & Height Restrictions for Flight Attendants". Work - Chron.com. 2 December 2013. Retrieved 2022-02-15.
  16. ^ Donohue, Meg. "Why tall people make more money". CNN. Retrieved 22 October 2017.
  17. ^ "Short guys finish last". The Economist. Vol. 337, no. 7946. 23 December 1995. pp. 19–22. ProQuest 224124138.
  18. ^ Miami University of Ohio: "Don't Want No Short, Short Man: The Study Of Height, Power, and Mate Selection" Archived 2015-01-26 at the Wayback Machine.[self-published source?][full citation needed]
  19. ^ Genovese, Jeremy E. C. (July 2008). "Physique Correlates with Reproductive Success in an Archival Sample of Delinquent Youth". Evolutionary Psychology. 6 (3). doi:10.1177/147470490800600301.
  20. ^ Sorokowski, Piotr; Pawlowski, Boguslaw (March 2008). "Adaptive preferences for leg length in a potential partner". Evolution and Human Behavior. 29 (2): 86–91. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.09.002.
  21. ^ Swami, Viren; Einon, Dorothy; Furnham, Adrian (December 2006). "The leg-to-body ratio as a human aesthetic criterion". Body Image. 3 (4): 317–323. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2006.08.003. PMID 18089235.
  22. ^ "Ariely found that a 5'4" man would need to make $229,000 more than a 6' man to have equal appeal; a 5'6" man would need $183,000 more; a 5'10" man would need $32,000 more." Lori Gottlieb (2010). Marry Him: The Case for Settling for Mr. Good Enough. Penguin, ISBN 9781101185209 p. 239
  23. ^ Jackson, Linda; Ervin, Kelly (August 1992). "Height Stereotypes of Women and Men: The Liabilities of Shortness for Both Sexes". The Journal of Social Psychology. 132 (4): 433–445. doi:10.1080/00224545.1992.9924723.
  24. ^ a b Sohn, Kitae (1 July 2015). "The value of male height in the marriage market". Economics and Human Biology. 18: 110–124. doi:10.1016/j.ehb.2015.05.004. PMID 26051039.
  25. ^ Clark, Daniel (2019). "Height considered ideal for men/women in Hungary 2019". statista.com.
  26. ^ Cressey, Daniel (13 March 2008). "Short men are the jealous type". Nature News Blog.
  27. ^ Sear, Rebecca; Marlowe, Frank W. (23 October 2009). "How universal are human mate choices? Size does not matter when Hadza foragers are choosing a mate". Biology Letters. 5 (5): 606–609. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0342. PMC 2781963. PMID 19570778.
  28. ^ A Small Problem in BBC Comedy Guide.
  29. ^ "CANOE - JAM! S&M: Short And Male: Short guys film rises to challenge". Jam.canoe.ca. 16 May 2008. Archived from the original on June 24, 2013. Retrieved 20 August 2013.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  30. ^ "Short People Face Discrimination, Teasing and Lower Salaries". ABC News. 18 August 2009. Retrieved 20 August 2013.
  31. ^ "In short, stature's no joke, filmmaker argues". Canada.com. 11 May 2008. Retrieved 20 August 2013.
  32. ^ Text of the Elliot Larsen Civil Rights Act of 1976.
  33. ^ Chapter 9.83 Archived 5 November 2006 at the Wayback Machine of the City of Santa Cruz code – "Prohibition against Discrimination", 1992.
  34. ^ Text Archived 14 November 2006 at the Wayback Machine of Compliance Guidelines To Prohibit Weight and Height Discrimination; San Francisco Administrative Code Chapters 12A, 12B and 12C and San Francisco Municipal/Police Code Article 33, 26 July 2001.
  35. ^ "Mayor Adams Signs Legislation To Prohibit Height Or Weight Discrimination In Employment, Housing, An". The official website of the City of New York. May 26, 2023.
  36. ^ Text Archived 6 December 2006 at the Wayback Machine District of Columbia Human Rights Act.
  37. ^ Policy on height and weight requirements Ontario, Canada Human Rights Code.
  38. ^ "Equal Opportunity Act 2010 Quick Guide" (PDF). Victoria Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission. June 2022. p. 6. Retrieved 2024-11-24.
  39. ^ "Chinese height discrimination case". CNN. 2004-06-09. Archived from the original on 2004-06-08.
  40. ^ Berg, Annika (2005-09-21). "Volvo's demand for a specific height for female work applicant is discrimination, the Swedish Labour Court rules". European Industrial Relations Observatory on-line. Archived from the original on 2012-09-18. Retrieved 2006-12-06.
  41. ^ Kohler Corp. Gender Discrimination Case Archived 29 August 2017 at the Wayback Machine.
  42. ^ "Top Spanish court nixes height rule for women joining police". CityNews Toronto. 18 July 2022. Retrieved 2023-12-18.
  43. ^ Chen, Tingji; Li, Yishuang; Feng, Chengzhi; Feng, Wenfeng (February 2023). "Spatial attentional biases toward height-related words in young males with physical stature dissatisfaction". Psychophysiology. 60 (2): e14163. doi:10.1111/psyp.14163. PMID 35965305.
  44. ^ Magnusson, Patrik K.E.; Gunnell, David; Tynelius, Per; Davey Smith, George; Rasmussen, Finn (2005). "Strong Inverse Association Between Height and Suicide in a Large Cohort of Swedish Men: Evidence of Early Life Origins of Suicidal Behavior?". American Journal of Psychiatry. 162 (7): 1373–1375. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.7.1373. PMID 15994722.
  45. ^ Whitley, Elise; Rasmussen, Finn; Tynelius, Per; Batty, G. David (August 2010). "Physical stature and method-specific attempted suicide: Cohort study of one million men". Psychiatry Research. 179 (1): 116–118. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.06.011. PMC 4170761. PMID 20627206.
  46. ^ Coste, Joël; Pouchot, Jacques; Carel, Jean-Claude (September 2012). "Height and Health-Related Quality of Life: A Nationwide Population Study". The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 97 (9): 3231–3239. doi:10.1210/jc.2012-1543. PMID 22745240.
  47. ^ Griffiths, Scott; Murray, Stuart B.; Medeiros, Aimee; Blashill, Aaron J. (December 2017). "The tall and the short of it: An investigation of height ideals, height preferences, height dissatisfaction, heightism, and height-related quality of life impairment among sexual minority men". Body Image. 23: 146–154. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2017.10.001. PMID 29031097.