1936 United States presidential election in Texas

Main article: 1936 United States presidential election
1936 United States presidential election in Texas
← 1932 November 3, 1936[1] 1940 →
All 23 Texas votes to the Electoral College
 
Nominee Franklin D. Roosevelt Alf Landon
Party Democratic Republican
Home state New York Kansas
Running mate John Nance Garner Frank Knox
Electoral vote 23 0
Popular vote 739,952 104,661
Percentage 87.08% 12.32%
County Results
President before election

Franklin D. Roosevelt
Democratic

Elected President

Franklin D. Roosevelt
Democratic

Elections in Texas
General elections
Federal government
Presidential elections
Presidential primaries
Democratic
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
Republican
1996
2000
2004
2008
2012
2016
2020
2024
U.S. Senate
U.S. House of Representatives
State government
Gubernatorial elections
Lieutenant gubernatorial elections
Attorney General elections
Comptroller elections
Senate elections
House of Representatives elections
Constitutional amendments
Austin
Mayoral elections
Austin municipal elections
Corpus Christi
Mayoral elections
Dallas–Fort Worth
Arlington mayoral elections
Dallas mayoral elections
Dallas municipal elections
Fort Worth mayoral elections
Denton mayoral elections
Plano municipal elections
El Paso
Mayoral elections
Municipal elections
Houston
Mayoral elections
Municipal elections
Laredo
Mayoral elections
Lubbock
Mayoral elections
San Antonio
Mayoral elections
Government

The 1936 United States presidential election in Texas took place on November 3, 1936, as part of the 1936 United States presidential election. Texas voters chose 23[2] representatives, or electors, to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.

Texas was won by incumbent President Franklin D. Roosevelt (D–New York), with 87.08% of the popular vote, over Governor Alf Landon (R–Kansas), with 12.32% of the popular vote, a landslide victory margin of 74.76%.[3][4] Despite the overwhelming Democratic victory here, however, Landon performed better than fellow Republican Herbert Hoover had in 1932, with the state swinging approximately two points towards the GOP, and he managed to flip both Gillespie County and Kendall County back into the Republican column, the latter remaining with the party ever since.

By percentage of the popular vote won, Texas was Roosevelt's fifth-best state, behind South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Georgia.

Results

1936 United States presidential election in Texas
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Franklin D. Roosevelt (inc.) 739,952[a] 87.08%
Republican Alf Landon 104,661 12.32%
Union William Lemke 3,281[a] 0.39%
Socialist Norman Thomas 1,075 0.13%
Prohibition D. Leigh Colvin 514[b] 0.06%
Communist Earl Browder 253 0.03%
Total votes 849,736 100%

Results by county

1936 United States presidential election in Texas by county[6]
County Franklin D. Roosevelt
Democratic 		Alf Landon
Republican 		William Lemke[7]
Union 		Various candidates
Other parties 		Margin Total votes cast
# % # % # % # % # %
Anderson 3,749 92.80% 289 7.15% 0 0.00% 2 0.05% 3,460 85.64% 4,040
Andrews 287 93.79% 18 5.88% 0 0.00% 1 0.33% 269 87.91% 306
Angelina 3,943 91.91% 342 7.97% 1 0.02% 4 0.09% 3,601 83.94% 4,290
Aransas 206 74.37% 60 21.66% 8 2.89% 3 1.08% 146 52.71% 277
Archer 1,672 91.77% 146 8.01% 4 0.22% 0 0.00% 1,526 83.75% 1,822
Armstrong 897 96.14% 33 3.54% 3 0.32% 0 0.00% 864 92.60% 933
Atascosa 2,041 86.85% 285 12.13% 17 0.72% 7 0.30% 1,756 74.72% 2,350
Austin 1,635 84.76% 290 15.03% 2 0.10% 2 0.10% 1,345 69.73% 1,929
Bailey 788 79.36% 191 19.23% 10 1.01% 4 0.40% 597 60.12% 993
Bandera 720 61.49% 431 36.81% 18 1.54% 2 0.17% 289 24.68% 1,171
Bastrop 2,395 92.04% 198 7.61% 7 0.27% 2 0.08% 2,197 84.44% 2,602
Baylor 1,541 93.85% 100 6.09% 0 0.00% 1 0.06% 1,441 87.76% 1,642
Bee 1,462 70.22% 603 28.96% 11 0.53% 6 0.29% 859 41.26% 2,082
Bell 6,119 92.42% 475 7.17% 21 0.32% 6 0.09% 5,644 85.24% 6,621
Bexar 35,781 72.74% 12,951 26.33% 205 0.42% 250 0.51% 22,830 46.41% 49,187
Blanco 1,056 76.97% 313 22.81% 0 0.00% 3 0.22% 743 54.15% 1,372
Borden 220 88.71% 26 10.48% 1 0.40% 1 0.40% 194 78.23% 248
Bosque 2,283 86.54% 350 13.27% 2 0.08% 3 0.11% 1,933 73.28% 2,638
Bowie 5,030 91.11% 472 8.55% 12 0.22% 7 0.13% 4,558 82.56% 5,521
Brazoria 2,284 82.01% 462 16.59% 29 1.04% 10 0.36% 1,822 65.42% 2,785
Brazos 2,610 98.16% 45 1.69% 0 0.00% 4 0.15% 2,565 96.46% 2,659
Brewster 828 84.40% 151 15.39% 2 0.20% 0 0.00% 677 69.01% 981
Briscoe 849 92.99% 64 7.01% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 785 85.98% 913
Brooks 365 75.57% 117 24.22% 0 0.00% 1 0.21% 248 51.35% 483
Brown 3,971 89.08% 448 10.05% 34 0.76% 5 0.11% 3,523 79.03% 4,458
Burleson 1,466 91.57% 135 8.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,331 83.14% 1,601
Burnet 1,581 93.33% 111 6.55% 1 0.06% 1 0.06% 1,470 86.78% 1,694
Caldwell 3,019 91.76% 247 7.51% 24 0.73% 0 0.00% 2,772 84.26% 3,290
Calhoun 685 87.71% 92 11.78% 1 0.13% 3 0.38% 593 75.93% 781
Callahan 1,739 87.34% 245 12.31% 2 0.10% 5 0.25% 1,494 75.04% 1,991
Cameron 5,887 71.74% 2,160 26.32% 150 1.83% 9 0.11% 3,727 45.42% 8,206
Camp 939 92.33% 78 7.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 861 84.66% 1,017
Carson 1,568 90.74% 147 8.51% 13 0.75% 0 0.00% 1,421 82.23% 1,728
Cass 2,461 93.57% 169 6.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,292 87.15% 2,630
Castro 950 92.68% 65 6.34% 10 0.98% 0 0.00% 885 86.34% 1,025
Chambers 984 87.78% 134 11.95% 2 0.18% 1 0.09% 850 75.83% 1,121
Cherokee 3,908 92.65% 302 7.16% 3 0.07% 5 0.12% 3,606 85.49% 4,218
Childress 2,076 89.99% 209 9.06% 13 0.56% 9 0.39% 1,867 80.93% 2,307
Clay 2,168 91.09% 196 8.24% 11 0.46% 5 0.21% 1,972 82.86% 2,380
Cochran 683 91.19% 58 7.74% 1 0.13% 7 0.93% 625 83.44% 749
Coke 888 91.93% 68 7.04% 3 0.31% 7 0.72% 820 84.89% 966
Coleman 2,900 91.28% 269 8.47% 4 0.13% 4 0.13% 2,631 82.81% 3,177
Collin 5,669 91.29% 531 8.55% 2 0.03% 8 0.13% 5,138 82.74% 6,210
Collingsworth 2,012 92.63% 158 7.27% 0 0.00% 2 0.09% 1,854 85.36% 2,172
Colorado 1,435 79.06% 372 20.50% 3 0.17% 5 0.28% 1,063 58.57% 1,815
Comal 1,611 74.21% 554 25.52% 4 0.18% 2 0.09% 1,057 48.69% 2,171
Comanche 2,587 86.09% 355 11.81% 60 2.00% 3 0.10% 2,232 74.28% 3,005
Concho 1,089 93.48% 76 6.52% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,013 86.95% 1,165
Cooke 3,686 83.93% 686 15.62% 12 0.27% 8 0.18% 3,000 68.31% 4,392
Coryell 2,064 92.85% 150 6.75% 5 0.22% 4 0.18% 1,914 86.10% 2,223
Cottle 1,265 93.08% 86 6.33% 5 0.37% 3 0.22% 1,179 86.75% 1,359
Crane 622 96.14% 25 3.86% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 597 92.27% 647
Crockett 231 75.00% 75 24.35% 2 0.65% 0 0.00% 156 50.65% 308
Crosby 1,711 91.64% 153 8.19% 3 0.16% 0 0.00% 1,558 83.45% 1,867
Culberson 239 91.22% 23 8.78% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 216 82.44% 262
Dallam 1,436 83.15% 220 12.74% 68 3.94% 3 0.17% 1,216 70.41% 1,727
Dallas 42,153 84.89% 7,204 14.51% 175 0.35% 125 0.25% 34,949 70.38% 49,657
Dawson 1,829 91.82% 156 7.83% 6 0.30% 1 0.05% 1,673 83.99% 1,992
Deaf Smith 1,236 89.11% 142 10.24% 9 0.65% 0 0.00% 1,094 78.88% 1,387
Delta 1,466 94.64% 82 5.29% 1 0.06% 0 0.00% 1,384 89.35% 1,549
Denton 5,021 90.91% 476 8.62% 15 0.27% 11 0.20% 4,545 82.29% 5,523
De Witt 1,977 75.98% 616 23.67% 1 0.04% 8 0.31% 1,361 52.31% 2,602
Dickens 1,445 92.57% 115 7.37% 0 0.00% 1 0.06% 1,330 85.20% 1,561
Dimmit 704 68.95% 296 28.99% 21 2.06% 0 0.00% 408 39.96% 1,021
Donley 1,513 90.93% 133 7.99% 17 1.02% 1 0.06% 1,380 82.93% 1,664
Duval 2,901 94.56% 163 5.31% 4 0.13% 0 0.00% 2,738 89.24% 3,068
Eastland 4,659 85.99% 724 13.36% 17 0.31% 18 0.33% 3,935 72.63% 5,418
Ector 816 89.87% 81 8.92% 10 1.10% 1 0.11% 735 80.95% 908
Edwards 354 68.87% 157 30.54% 3 0.58% 0 0.00% 197 38.33% 514
Ellis 5,644 94.46% 319 5.34% 4 0.07% 8 0.13% 5,325 89.12% 5,975
El Paso 11,920 86.32% 1,773 12.84% 96 0.70% 20 0.14% 10,147 73.48% 13,809
Erath 2,694 89.95% 290 9.68% 4 0.13% 7 0.23% 2,404 80.27% 2,995
Falls 3,411 95.92% 140 3.94% 0 0.00% 5 0.14% 3,271 91.99% 3,556
Fannin 5,242 93.32% 368 6.55% 1 0.02% 6 0.11% 4,874 86.77% 5,617
Fayette 2,820 82.46% 595 17.40% 4 0.12% 1 0.03% 2,225 65.06% 3,420
Fisher 2,068 92.78% 155 6.95% 2 0.09% 4 0.18% 1,913 85.82% 2,229
Floyd 1,863 88.93% 217 10.36% 14 0.67% 1 0.05% 1,646 78.57% 2,095
Foard 928 92.34% 74 7.36% 2 0.20% 1 0.10% 854 84.98% 1,005
Fort Bend 2,588 93.26% 176 6.34% 9 0.32% 2 0.07% 2,412 86.92% 2,775
Franklin 925 90.95% 90 8.85% 1 0.10% 1 0.10% 835 82.10% 1,017
Freestone 1,929 93.23% 134 6.48% 0 0.00% 6 0.29% 1,795 86.76% 2,069
Frio 1,019 83.59% 193 15.83% 7 0.57% 0 0.00% 826 67.76% 1,219
Gaines 680 93.66% 42 5.79% 0 0.00% 4 0.55% 638 87.88% 726
Galveston 9,370 84.37% 1,666 15.00% 44 0.40% 26 0.23% 7,704 69.37% 11,106
Garza 807 85.67% 132 14.01% 2 0.21% 1 0.11% 675 71.66% 942
Gillespie 1,016 40.41% 1,421 56.52% 69 2.74% 8 0.32% -405 -16.11% 2,514
Glasscock 252 89.05% 29 10.25% 0 0.00% 2 0.71% 223 78.80% 283
Goliad 1,184 78.36% 323 21.38% 2 0.13% 2 0.13% 861 56.98% 1,511
Gonzales 2,674 88.16% 352 11.61% 3 0.10% 4 0.13% 2,322 76.56% 3,033
Gray 4,347 89.83% 464 9.59% 21 0.43% 7 0.14% 3,883 80.24% 4,839
Grayson 10,627 91.64% 947 8.17% 12 0.10% 11 0.09% 9,680 83.47% 11,597
Gregg 6,489 91.12% 621 8.72% 6 0.08% 5 0.07% 5,868 82.40% 7,121
Grimes 1,851 93.06% 136 6.84% 0 0.00% 2 0.10% 1,715 86.22% 1,989
Guadalupe 2,962 69.91% 1,266 29.88% 3 0.07% 6 0.14% 1,696 40.03% 4,237
Hale 3,109 86.80% 451 12.59% 12 0.34% 10 0.28% 2,658 74.20% 3,582
Hall 2,195 93.56% 126 5.37% 20 0.85% 5 0.21% 2,069 88.19% 2,346
Hamilton 1,929 90.48% 202 9.47% 0 0.00% 1 0.05% 1,727 81.00% 2,132
Hansford 826 89.69% 74 8.03% 16 1.74% 5 0.54% 752 81.65% 921
Hardeman 1,991 90.17% 207 9.38% 7 0.32% 3 0.14% 1,784 80.80% 2,208
Hardin 2,351 95.18% 119 4.82% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,232 90.36% 2,470
Harris 59,205 87.67% 8,083 11.97% 109 0.16% 136 0.20% 51,122 75.70% 67,533
Harrison 3,400 91.69% 302 8.14% 0 0.00% 6 0.16% 3,098 83.55% 3,708
Hartley 560 93.33% 40 6.67% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 520 86.67% 600
Haskell 2,713 94.46% 156 5.43% 2 0.07% 1 0.03% 2,557 89.03% 2,872
Hays 1,964 86.94% 286 12.66% 9 0.40% 0 0.00% 1,678 74.28% 2,259
Hemphill 1,008 88.89% 121 10.67% 5 0.44% 0 0.00% 887 78.22% 1,134
Henderson 3,259 92.45% 260 7.38% 0 0.00% 6 0.17% 2,999 85.08% 3,525
Hidalgo 6,782 67.46% 2,962 29.46% 285 2.83% 24 0.24% 3,820 38.00% 10,053
Hill 4,710 94.58% 265 5.32% 4 0.08% 1 0.02% 4,445 89.26% 4,980
Hockley 1,731 94.44% 90 4.91% 2 0.11% 10 0.55% 1,641 89.53% 1,833
Hood 988 90.31% 102 9.32% 3 0.27% 1 0.09% 886 80.99% 1,094
Hopkins 2,753 91.22% 261 8.65% 0 0.00% 4 0.13% 2,492 82.57% 3,018
Houston 2,458 96.05% 99 3.87% 1 0.04% 1 0.04% 2,359 92.18% 2,559
Howard 3,094 92.75% 230 6.89% 4 0.12% 8 0.24% 2,864 85.85% 3,336
Hudspeth 363 93.56% 24 6.19% 0 0.00% 1 0.26% 339 87.37% 388
Hunt 5,801 94.37% 335 5.45% 7 0.11% 4 0.07% 5,466 88.92% 6,147
Hutchinson 2,478 86.25% 390 13.57% 1 0.03% 4 0.14% 2,088 72.68% 2,873
Irion 476 89.81% 49 9.25% 0 0.00% 5 0.94% 427 80.57% 530
Jack 1,113 85.22% 183 14.01% 7 0.54% 3 0.23% 930 71.21% 1,306
Jackson 952 84.40% 171 15.16% 4 0.35% 1 0.09% 781 69.24% 1,128
Jasper 1,500 93.05% 109 6.76% 3 0.19% 0 0.00% 1,391 86.29% 1,612
Jeff Davis 291 89.54% 33 10.15% 1 0.31% 0 0.00% 258 79.38% 325
Jefferson 18,187 87.40% 2,544 12.23% 32 0.15% 45 0.22% 15,643 75.18% 20,808
Jim Hogg 712 93.68% 48 6.32% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 664 87.37% 760
Jim Wells 1,691 82.97% 338 16.58% 7 0.34% 2 0.10% 1,353 66.39% 2,038
Johnson 4,281 92.12% 337 7.25% 24 0.52% 5 0.11% 3,944 84.87% 4,647
Jones 3,396 91.71% 305 8.24% 0 0.00% 2 0.05% 3,091 83.47% 3,703
Karnes 2,067 84.47% 371 15.16% 8 0.33% 1 0.04% 1,696 69.31% 2,447
Kaufman 3,943 94.44% 229 5.49% 1 0.02% 2 0.05% 3,714 88.96% 4,175
Kendall 405 36.68% 693 62.77% 4 0.36% 2 0.18% -288 -26.09% 1,104
Kenedy 96 76.19% 30 23.81% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 66 52.38% 126
Kent 533 94.50% 31 5.50% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 502 89.01% 564
Kerr 1,586 61.26% 994 38.39% 8 0.31% 1 0.04% 592 22.87% 2,589
Kimble 681 81.75% 151 18.13% 0 0.00% 1 0.12% 530 63.63% 833
King 211 94.20% 13 5.80% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 198 88.39% 224
Kinney 357 67.11% 175 32.89% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 182 34.21% 532
Kleberg 1,488 87.12% 156 9.13% 61 3.57% 3 0.18% 1,332 77.99% 1,708
Knox 1,823 91.15% 171 8.55% 1 0.05% 5 0.25% 1,652 82.60% 2,000
Lamar 5,621 94.65% 308 5.19% 10 0.17% 0 0.00% 5,313 89.46% 5,939
Lamb 2,320 88.21% 300 11.41% 4 0.15% 6 0.23% 2,020 76.81% 2,630
Lampasas 1,462 91.43% 134 8.38% 3 0.19% 0 0.00% 1,328 83.05% 1,599
La Salle 704 90.49% 74 9.51% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 630 80.98% 778
Lavaca 2,204 84.12% 403 15.38% 10 0.38% 3 0.11% 1,801 68.74% 2,620
Lee 1,155 80.94% 271 18.99% 0 0.00% 1 0.07% 884 61.95% 1,427
Leon 1,748 94.69% 97 5.25% 0 0.00% 1 0.05% 1,651 89.44% 1,846
Liberty 2,813 91.69% 244 7.95% 6 0.20% 5 0.16% 2,569 83.74% 3,068
Limestone 3,857 95.05% 196 4.83% 4 0.10% 1 0.02% 3,661 90.22% 4,058
Lipscomb 973 77.65% 273 21.79% 4 0.32% 3 0.24% 700 55.87% 1,253
Live Oak 874 76.33% 231 20.17% 32 2.79% 8 0.70% 643 56.16% 1,145
Llano 1,302 92.41% 107 7.59% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,195 84.81% 1,409
Loving 118 72.39% 21 12.88% 19 11.66% 5 3.07% 97 59.51% 163
Lubbock 6,425 90.97% 622 8.81% 11 0.16% 5 0.07% 5,803 82.16% 7,063
Lynn 1,983 91.89% 169 7.83% 0 0.00% 6 0.28% 1,814 84.06% 2,158
McCulloch 1,722 83.55% 323 15.67% 7 0.34% 9 0.44% 1,399 67.88% 2,061
McLennan 12,489 90.77% 1,116 8.11% 115 0.84% 39 0.28% 11,373 82.66% 13,759
McMullen 265 87.75% 37 12.25% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 228 75.50% 302
Madison 1,127 96.16% 45 3.84% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,082 92.32% 1,172
Marion 919 87.69% 129 12.31% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 790 75.38% 1,048
Martin 775 90.75% 70 8.20% 8 0.94% 1 0.12% 705 82.55% 854
Mason 787 68.61% 359 31.30% 1 0.09% 0 0.00% 428 37.31% 1,147
Matagorda 1,700 78.56% 459 21.21% 3 0.14% 2 0.09% 1,241 57.35% 2,164
Maverick 890 81.20% 166 15.15% 37 3.38% 3 0.27% 724 66.06% 1,096
Medina 2,050 67.63% 969 31.97% 10 0.33% 2 0.07% 1,081 35.66% 3,031
Menard 734 86.05% 115 13.48% 1 0.12% 3 0.35% 619 72.57% 853
Midland 1,229 86.06% 190 13.31% 8 0.56% 1 0.07% 1,039 72.76% 1,428
Milam 4,077 93.02% 288 6.57% 0[c] 0.00% 18 0.41% 3,789 86.45% 4,383
Mills 1,005 85.90% 165 14.10% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 840 71.79% 1,170
Mitchell 2,035 91.21% 192 8.61% 1 0.04% 3 0.13% 1,843 82.61% 2,231
Montague 2,789 89.16% 324 10.36% 0[c] 0.00% 15 0.48% 2,465 78.80% 3,128
Montgomery 2,443 92.61% 186 7.05% 2 0.08% 7 0.27% 2,257 85.56% 2,638
Moore 583 92.39% 47 7.45% 0 0.00% 1 0.16% 536 84.94% 631
Morris 1,220 95.91% 52 4.09% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,168 91.82% 1,272
Motley 867 92.93% 64 6.86% 1 0.11% 1 0.11% 803 86.07% 933
Nacogdoches 4,075 95.01% 209 4.87% 2 0.05% 3 0.07% 3,866 90.14% 4,289
Navarro 5,815 95.02% 293 4.79% 9 0.15% 3 0.05% 5,522 90.23% 6,120
Newton 1,111 92.12% 93 7.71% 1 0.08% 1 0.08% 1,018 84.41% 1,206
Nolan 2,913 91.15% 268 8.39% 11 0.34% 4 0.13% 2,645 82.76% 3,196
Nueces 6,597 83.09% 1,234 15.54% 104 1.31% 5 0.06% 5,363 67.54% 7,940
Ochiltree 1,111 88.03% 109 8.64% 41 3.25% 1 0.08% 1,002 79.40% 1,262
Oldham 437 94.59% 20 4.33% 5 1.08% 0 0.00% 417 90.26% 462
Orange 2,281 92.01% 190 7.66% 3 0.12% 5 0.20% 2,091 84.35% 2,479
Palo Pinto 2,738 87.67% 371 11.88% 9 0.29% 5 0.16% 2,367 75.79% 3,123
Panola 2,425 95.36% 95 3.74% 1 0.04% 22 0.87% 2,330 91.62% 2,543
Parker 2,493 86.08% 375 12.95% 13 0.45% 15 0.52% 2,118 73.14% 2,896
Parmer 936 86.83% 135 12.52% 4 0.37% 3 0.28% 801 74.30% 1,078
Pecos 1,330 88.79% 167 11.15% 0 0.00% 1 0.07% 1,163 77.64% 1,498
Polk 1,618 91.93% 141 8.01% 0 0.00% 1 0.06% 1,477 83.92% 1,760
Potter 6,496 84.99% 1,018 13.32% 117 1.53% 12 0.16% 5,478 71.67% 7,643
Presidio 938 89.42% 106 10.10% 2 0.19% 3 0.29% 832 79.31% 1,049
Rains 676 91.23% 63 8.50% 1 0.13% 1 0.13% 613 82.73% 741
Randall 1,656 91.80% 142 7.87% 3 0.17% 3 0.17% 1,514 83.92% 1,804
Reagan 477 87.85% 66 12.15% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 411 75.69% 543
Real 210 79.25% 55 20.75% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 155 58.49% 265
Red River 2,685 93.00% 199 6.89% 0 0.00% 3 0.10% 2,486 86.11% 2,887
Reeves 1,127 91.70% 100 8.14% 1 0.08% 1 0.08% 1,027 83.56% 1,229
Refugio 1,058 81.07% 242 18.54% 5 0.38% 0 0.00% 816 62.53% 1,305
Roberts 426 94.04% 27 5.96% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 399 88.08% 453
Robertson 2,633 96.77% 86 3.16% 2 0.07% 0 0.00% 2,547 93.61% 2,721
Rockwall 1,168 97.74% 26 2.18% 1 0.08% 0 0.00% 1,142 95.56% 1,195
Runnels 2,985 89.99% 313 9.44% 10 0.30% 9 0.27% 2,672 80.55% 3,317
Rusk 6,107 93.27% 433 6.61% 4 0.06% 4 0.06% 5,674 86.65% 6,548
Sabine 1,216 91.70% 108 8.14% 0 0.00% 2 0.15% 1,108 83.56% 1,326
San Augustine 1,054 94.28% 64 5.72% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 990 88.55% 1,118
San Jacinto 564 89.38% 67 10.62% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 497 78.76% 631
San Patricio 2,213 81.21% 482 17.69% 24 0.88% 6 0.22% 1,731 63.52% 2,725
San Saba 1,505 90.99% 147 8.89% 1 0.06% 1 0.06% 1,358 82.10% 1,654
Schleicher 469 85.58% 78 14.23% 0 0.00% 1 0.18% 391 71.35% 548
Scurry 1,746 91.32% 162 8.47% 3 0.16% 1 0.05% 1,584 82.85% 1,912
Shackelford 1,153 88.35% 152 11.65% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1,001 76.70% 1,305
Shelby 3,167 95.62% 136 4.11% 0 0.00% 9 0.27% 3,031 91.52% 3,312
Sherman 568 94.35% 34 5.65% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 534 88.70% 602
Smith 7,116 91.37% 660 8.47% 6 0.08% 6 0.08% 6,456 82.90% 7,788
Somervell 317 83.86% 57 15.08% 3 0.79% 1 0.26% 260 68.78% 378
Starr 2,289 87.43% 320 12.22% 3 0.11% 6 0.23% 1,969 75.21% 2,618
Stephens 2,380 77.27% 681 22.11% 13 0.42% 6 0.19% 1,699 55.16% 3,080
Sterling 384 96.48% 14 3.52% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 370 92.96% 398
Stonewall 1,001 94.34% 59 5.56% 0 0.00% 1 0.09% 942 88.78% 1,061
Sutton 398 86.15% 64 13.85% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 334 72.29% 462
Swisher 1,453 90.98% 140 8.77% 3 0.19% 1 0.06% 1,313 82.22% 1,597
Tarrant 29,791 88.24% 3,781 11.20% 139 0.41% 51 0.15% 26,010 77.04% 33,762
Taylor 6,169 89.43% 678 9.83% 6 0.09% 45 0.65% 5,491 79.60% 6,898
Terrell 324 79.41% 84 20.59% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 240 58.82% 408
Terry 1,619 94.18% 87 5.06% 11 0.64% 2 0.12% 1,532 89.12% 1,719
Throckmorton 949 87.63% 132 12.19% 1 0.09% 1 0.09% 817 75.44% 1,083
Titus 1,872 95.90% 77 3.94% 0 0.00% 3 0.15% 1,795 91.96% 1,952
Tom Green 4,803 87.34% 627 11.40% 50 0.91% 19 0.35% 4,176 75.94% 5,499
Travis 12,092 90.07% 1,154 8.60% 141 1.05% 38 0.28% 10,938 81.47% 13,425
Trinity 1,196 88.72% 151 11.20% 1 0.07% 0 0.00% 1,045 77.52% 1,348
Tyler 1,076 90.27% 116 9.73% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 960 80.54% 1,192
Upshur 2,243 87.38% 321 12.50% 0[c] 0.00% 3 0.12% 1,922 74.87% 2,567
Upton 728 89.54% 81 9.96% 2 0.25% 2 0.25% 647 79.58% 813
Uvalde 1,743 83.08% 354 16.87% 1 0.05% 0 0.00% 1,389 66.21% 2,098
Val Verde 1,262 71.26% 504 28.46% 3 0.17% 2 0.11% 758 42.80% 1,771
Van Zandt 3,257 92.24% 245 6.94% 11 0.31% 18 0.51% 3,012 85.30% 3,531
Victoria 2,081 85.46% 352 14.46% 2[d] 0.08% 0 0.00% 1,729 71.01% 2,435
Walker 1,715 96.02% 69 3.86% 0 0.00% 2 0.11% 1,646 92.16% 1,786
Waller 889 88.72% 111 11.08% 0 0.00% 2 0.20% 778 77.64% 1,002
Ward 1,113 91.76% 98 8.08% 2 0.16% 0 0.00% 1,015 83.68% 1,213
Washington 1,993 91.72% 176 8.10% 1 0.05% 3 0.14% 1,817 83.62% 2,173
Webb 3,594 83.78% 696 16.22% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2,898 67.55% 4,290
Wharton 3,034 90.43% 307 9.15% 7 0.21% 7 0.21% 2,727 81.28% 3,355
Wheeler 2,415 89.38% 277 10.25% 8 0.30% 2 0.07% 2,138 79.13% 2,702
Wichita 9,428 87.39% 1,327 12.30% 20 0.19% 13 0.12% 8,101 75.09% 10,788
Wilbarger 3,279 90.76% 316 8.75% 15 0.42% 3 0.08% 2,963 82.01% 3,613
Willacy 1,002 71.62% 376 26.88% 19 1.36% 2 0.14% 626 44.75% 1,399
Williamson 4,995 92.79% 375 6.97% 3 0.06% 10 0.19% 4,620 85.83% 5,383
Wilson 2,573 89.84% 286 9.99% 1 0.03% 4 0.14% 2,287 79.85% 2,864
Winkler 903 92.62% 63 6.46% 4 0.41% 5 0.51% 840 86.15% 975
Wise 2,737 88.58% 348 11.26% 2 0.06% 3 0.10% 2,389 77.31% 3,090
Wood 2,751 93.25% 192 6.51% 1 0.03% 6 0.20% 2,559 86.75% 2,950
Yoakum 227 92.65% 13 5.31% 3 1.22% 2 0.82% 214 87.35% 245
Young 3,065 90.65% 304 8.99% 7 0.21% 5 0.15% 2,761 81.66% 3,381
Zapata 282 89.24% 34 10.76% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 248 78.48% 316
Zavala 788 78.64% 209 20.86% 3 0.30% 2 0.20% 579 57.78% 1,002
Totals 739,900 87.06% 104,661 12.32% 3,187 0.38% 1,583[b] 0.19% 635,239 74.79% 849,845

Counties that flipped from Democratic to Republican

See also

Notes

  1. ^ a b This figure differs from either of those in America at the Polls and Géoelections.
  2. ^ a b This Prohibition Party vote was not included in the county tables for America at the Polls.[5]
  3. ^ a b c This zero vote total for Lemke is assumed given that no additional votes beyond the Géoelections total are required to give his figures as shown in America at the Polls.
  4. ^ The figures for this county are different from those in Géoelections because America at the Polls suggests there must have been five or six fewer Lemke votes than the Géoelections sum.

References

  1. ^ "United States Presidential election of 1936 — Encyclopædia Britannica". Retrieved December 23, 2018.
  2. ^ "1936 Election for the Thirty-eighth Term (1937-41)". Retrieved December 23, 2018.
  3. ^ "1936 Presidential General Election Results – Texas". Retrieved December 23, 2018.
  4. ^ "The American Presidency Project — Election of 1936". Retrieved December 23, 2018.
  5. ^ Scammon, Richard M. (compiler); America at the Polls: A Handbook of Presidential Election Statistics 1920-1964; p. 456 ISBN 0405077114
  6. ^ Scammon, Richard M. (compiler); America at the Polls; pp. 436–440
  7. ^ "1936 Presidential Election Popular Vote". Géoelections. (.xlsx file for €15 on request)