^Ertür, Başak (2019). "Law of Denial"(PDF). Law and Critique. 30 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1007/s10978-019-09237-8. The fact that Perinçek's case went all the way to the ECtHR Grand Chamber was a significant political victory for the so-called Talât Pasha Committee: this successful legal provocation entailed the ECtHR's spectacular instrumentalisation in denialism in the centenary of the Armenian genocide. The high profile of the case allowed Perinçek and his allies to claim in their media campaign that this would be the case that decides whether or not there was a genocide. The campaign was effective: the ECtHR Grand Chamber hearing was widely covered in the Turkish media as the trial that would put an end to the so-called 'hundred year-old genocide lie'... Perinçek and his party celebrated the judgment claiming in bold PR campaigns, 'We put an end to the genocide lie'.Parameter |s2cid= yang tidak diketahui akan diabaikan (bantuan)
.jpg)
