数据来源:Digby Smith. "Clash at Winterthur", Napoleonic Wars Databook: Actions and Losses in Personnel, Colours, Standards and Artillery, 1792–1815. Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole, 1998, ISBN1-85367-276-9, p. 157.
条约号召涉及各方进行会面探讨领土及款项细节问题。在莱茵兰中部地区小城拉施塔特举办的会议(英语:Second Congress of Rastatt)很快就在阴谋的泥淖和外交的惺惺作态中脱离了正轨。法国要求给予更多领土。而奥地利则不愿给出约定的领土。会议的种种问题加剧了法国与反法同盟盟国之间关系的恶化。那不勒斯的费迪南多一世拒绝向法国支付约定的赔款,于是他的反对者借此起义。法国随后入侵那不勒斯建立了帕特诺珀共和国。在法兰西共和国的鼓励下,瑞士各州的共和民主起义推翻了瑞士邦联,建立了赫尔维蒂共和国。[3]法国督政府认定奥地利准备再次发动战争。事实上,法国显得越羸弱,奥地利、那不勒斯、俄罗斯和英格兰就越发认真地将战争的计划提上日程。[4] 仲春时期,奥地利与沙皇保罗一世达成合约,传奇将军亚历山大·苏沃洛夫将复出,率领6万人的部队进驻意大利以帮助奥地利。
为避免这两支部队与卡尔大公的10万大军合流,5月22日,马塞纳率领多瑙河军团2.3万人从苏黎世出发前往温特图尔。[19] 在经过温特图尔之后,他们又向东北行进了14千米(8.7英里),5月25日,两路部队在弗劳恩费尔德遭遇。面对人数近乎是4倍的对手,霍茨的部队遭受法军重创;伤亡750人,1450人被俘;除此之外,霍茨还损失两门火炮,一杆军旗。他的副手克里斯托弗·卡尔·冯·皮切克(英语:Christoph Karl von Piacsek)少将身负重伤,不治身亡。[20] 虽然法军在人数上有绝对优势,但是霍茨成功地带领他的部队摆脱了遭遇战,绕开了法军据点,向温特图尔的方向逃离。[21]
^John Gallagher. Napoleon's enfant terrible: General Dominique Vandamme, Tulsa: University of Oklahoma Press, 2008, ISBN978-0-8061-3875-6, p. 70.
^A. B. Rodger. The War of the Second Coalition: A strategic commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964, p. 158.
^John Young, D.D. A History of the Commencement, Progress, and Termination of the Late War between Great Britain and France which continued from the first day of February 1793 to the first of October 1801. Two volumes. Edinburg: Turnbull, 1802, vol. 2, p. 220.
^Gunther E. Rothenberg. Napoleon's Great Adversary: Archduke Charles and the Austrian Army 1792–1914. Stroud (Gloccester): Spellmount, 2007, p. 74. For further information on the Army of the Danube's movements and orders, see Jean-Baptiste Jourdan. A Memoir of the operations of the army of the Danube under the command of General Jourdan, taken from the manuscripts of that officer. London: Debrett, 1799, pp. 140–144. For further information on its size and composition, see Army of the Danube Order of Battle, or Roland Kessinger, Order of Battle, Army of the Danube互联网档案馆的存檔,存档日期7 May 2010.. Retrieved 3 December 2009.
^Ramsey Weston Phipps. The Armies of the First French Republic. Volume 5: The armies of the Rhine in Switzerland, Holland, Italy, Egypt and the coup d'etat of Brumaire, 1797–1799. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1939, pp. 49–50; Digby Smith. The Napoleonic Wars Data Book. London: Greenhill, 1998, ISBN1-85367-276-9, p. 156;
^Armin Peter. River Fragmentation and Connectivity Problems in Swiss Rivers; The Effect on the Fish Communities. EAWAG, Limnological Research Center, Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology, Kastanienbaum, Switzerland, 1999–2000, p. 2.
^Lawrence Shadwell. Mountain warfare illustrated by the campaign of 1799 in Switzerland: being a translation of the Swiss narrative, compiled from the works of the Archduke Charles, Jomini, and other ... . London: Henry S. King, 1875. pp. 108–109.
^Smith, "Clash at Winterthur." Databook, p. 156–157.
^Archibald Alison. History of Europe from the fall of Napoleon in 1815 to the accession of Louis Napoleon in 1852. N.Y: Harper, 1855, Chapter 28, p. 20.
^Smith, p. 156; Leopold Kudrna and Digby Smith. A biographical dictionary of all Austrian Generals in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, 1792–1815. "Piacsek". Napoleon Series (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆), Robert Burnham, editor in chief. April 2008 version. Retrieved 14 December 2009.
^Atteridge, pp. 46–47. Atteridge maintains that Nauendorf's force fought this engagement with 15,000 men; Shadwell (p. 109) and Smith Databook, pp. 156–157) maintain it was Hotze's, and the force was only 8,000; Smith further says that Charles directed a portion of Nauendorf's column to secure Neftenbach, in the last hours of the battle.
^During the battle, Hotze commanded the entire left wing of Archduke Charles' army, which included 20 battalions of infantry, plus support artillery, and 27 squadrons of cavalry, in total, 19,000 men. (德文) Ebert, Freiherr von Hotze (页面存档备份,存于互联网档案馆); (德文) Hürlimann, Historisches Lexikon der Schweiz. Blanning, pp. 233–34.
^Smith places effective strength at 8,000. Bodart places the effective strength at 15,000; both assess losses at 1,000. Smith, Databook, pp. 156–157; Gaston Bodart. Losses of life in modern wars, Austria-Hungary: France. Oxford, Clarendon Press: London, New York [etc.] H. Milford, 1916. p. 42.
Jourdan, Jean-Baptiste.A Memoir of the operations of the army of the Danube under the command of General Jourdan, taken from the manuscripts of that officer. London: Debrett, 1799.
Kudrna, Leopold and Digby Smith. A biographical dictionary of all Austrian Generals in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars, 1792–1815. "Piacsek". Napoleon Series, Robert Burnham, editor in chief. April 2008 version. Retrieved 14 December 2009.
Peter, Armin. River Fragmentation and Connectivity Problems in Swiss Rivers; The Effect on the Fish Communities. EAWAG, Limnological Research Center, Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology, Kastanienbaum, Switzerland, 1999–2000.
Phipps, Ramsey Weston. The Armies of the First French Republic. Volume 5: "The armies of the Rhine in Switzerland, Holland, Italy, Egypt and the coup d'etat of Brumaire, 1797–1799," Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1939.
Rodger, A. B. The War of the Second Coalition: A strategic commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964.
Rothenberg, Gunther E.Napoleon's Great Adversary: Archduke Charles and the Austrian Army 1792–1914. Stroud (Glocester): Spellmount, 2007.
Seaton, Albert. The Austro-Hungarian army of the Napoleonic wars. London: Osprey, 1973, ISBN978-0-85045-147-4.
Senior, Terry J. The Top Twenty French Cavalry Commanders: No. 5 General Claude-Pierre Pajol. At Napoleon Series, Robert Burnham, editor in chief. April 2008 version. Retrieved 4 November 2009.
Shadwell, Lawrence. Mountain warfare illustrated by the campaign of 1799 in Switzerland: being a translation of the Swiss narrative, compiled from the works of the Archduke Charles, Jomini, and other ... . London: Henry S. King, 1875.
Young, John, D.D. A History of the Commencement, Progress, and Termination of the Late War between Great Britain and France which continued from the first day of February 1793 to the first of October 1801. Volume 2. Edinburg: Turnbull, 1802.