Thanks for your help. This link is broken, so I'm going to remove it. Regarding your second point, you're wrong. Those books are not refering to a historical use, but a current use. Regards, Kordas (sínome!) 21:52 30 may 2019 (UTC)[responder]
- Thanks for returning to me. And many thanks in removing a broken link (possibly replacing it with one that really underlines the spelling in question). You seem to be right about the current (and not historical) use of the spelling in the sources. Sorry for not reading the whole book… :-)--Paracel63 (discusión) 22:09 30 may 2019 (UTC)[responder]