Equivalences between fiber bundle theory and gauge theory were hinted at the end of the 1960s. In 1967, mathematician Andrzej Trautman started a series of lectures aimed at physicists and mathematicians at King's College London regarding these connections.[4]
Yang also recounts a conversation that he had with one of the mathematicians that founded fiber bundle theory, Shiing-Shen Chern:[2]
In 1975, impressed with the fact that gauge fields are connections on fiber bundles, I drove to the house of Shiing-Shen Chern in El Cerrito, near Berkeley. (I had taken courses with him in the early 1940s when he was a young professor and I an undergraduate student at the National Southwest Associated University in Kunming, China. That was before fiber bundles had
become important in differential geometry and before Chern had made history with his contributions to the generalized Gauss–Bonnet theorem and the Chern classes.) We had much to talk about: friends, relatives, China. When our conversation turned to fiber bundles, I told him that I had finally learned from Jim Simons the beauty of fiber-bundle theory and the profound Chern-Weil theorem. I said I found it amazing that gauge fields are exactly connections on fiber bundles, which the mathematicians developed without reference to the physical world. I added ‘this is both thrilling and puzzling, since you mathematicians dreamed up these concepts out of nowhere.’ He immediately protested, ‘No, no. These concepts were not dreamed up. They were natural and real.'
In 1977, Trautman used these results to demonstrate an equivalence between a quantization condition for magnetic monopoles used by Paul Dirac back in 1931 and Hopf fibration, a fibration of a 3-sphere proposed io the same year by mathematician Heinz Hopf.[4]
Mathematician Jim Simons discussing this equivalence with Yang expressed that “Dirac had discovered trivial and nontrivial bundles before mathematicians.”[4]
In the original paper, Wu and Yang added sources (like the electric current) to the dictionary next to a blank spot, indicating a lack of any equivalent concept on the mathematical side. During interviews, Yang recalls that Singer and Atiyah found great interest in this concept of sources, which was unknown for mathematicians but that physicists knew since the 19th century. Mathematicians started working on that, which lead to the development of Donaldson theory by Simon Donaldson, a student of Atiyah.[7][8]
Description
Summarized version
The Wu-Yang dictionary relates terms in particle physics with terms in mathematics, specifically fiber bundle theory. Many versions and generalization of the dictionary exist. Here is an example of a dictionary, which puts each physics term next to its mathematical analogue:[9]
Wu and Yang considered the description of an electron traveling around a cylinder in the presence of a magnetic field inside the cylinder (outside the cylinder the field vanishes i.e. ). According to the Aharonov–Bohm effect, the interference patterns shift by a factor , where is the magnetic flux and is the magnetic flux quantum. For two different fluxes a and b, the results are identical if , where is an integer. We define the operator as the gauge transformation that brings the electron wave function from one configuration to the other . For an electron that takes a path from point P to point Q, we define the phase factor as
where are the generators of SU2, are the Pauli matrices. Under these concepts, Wu and Yang showed the relation between the language of gauge theory and fiber bundles, was codified in following dictionary:[2][10][11]
classification of U1(1) bundle according to first Chern class
electromagnetism without monopole
connection on a trivial U1(1) bundle
electromagnetism with monopole
connection on a nontrivial U1(1) bundle
^The original table also included the note: "i.e. electrical source. This is the generalization (See Ref.[12]) of the concept of electric charges and currents."