Wood v. Allen

Not to be confused with Woody Allen.

Wood v. Allen
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 20, 2010
Full case name	Wood v. Allen
Citations	558 U.S. 290 (more)
Holding
The state court’s conclusion that the petitioner's counsel made a strategic decision not to pursue or present evidence of his mental deficiencies was not an unreasonable determination of the facts. Habeas petition denied.
Court membership
Chief Justice John Roberts Associate Justices John P. Stevens · Antonin Scalia Anthony Kennedy · Clarence Thomas Ruth Bader Ginsburg · Stephen Breyer Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Case opinions
Majority	Sotomayor
Dissent	Stevens, joined by Kennedy

Wood v. Allen, 558 U.S. 290 (2010), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the state court's conclusion that the petitioner's counsel made a strategic decision not to pursue or present evidence of his mental deficiencies was not an unreasonable determination of the facts. The Court therefore denied the habeas corpus petition.[1] Having thus disposed of the claim, the Court declined to decide the issues the petition raised about interpreting the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act.[2]

References

1. Wood v. Allen, 558 U.S. 290 (2010).
2. "Court denies habeas relief without ruling on AEDPA interpretation". SCOTUSblog. 2010-01-22. Retrieved 2024-10-30.

External links

• Text of Wood v. Allen, 558 U.S. 290 (2010) is available from: Cornell Findlaw Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain. "[T]he Court is unanimously of opinion that no reporter has or can have any copyright in the written opinions delivered by this Court." Wheaton v. Peters, 33 U.S. (8 Pet.) 591, 668 (1834)