Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Slipknot/AoF

	This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Slipknot (inactive) This page is within the scope of WikiProject Slipknot, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

WikiProject Slipknot
This box: view talk edit
Information Main Project page Main Discussion page Article of Focus Current History To do Scope Assessment Outreach Guidelines

Before nominating and voting, please read and understand the How To page.

Nominations

Please put the name of the article on this list and your username and timestamp beside it. An example can be found on the How To page.

Nominations will be open after the next AoF has been decided.

Votes

Please put your username and timestamp beside the article you are voting for. Example: ##~~~~, more information can be found on the How To page.

Voting is now open for the next AoF, please post your votes below.

1. .5: The Gray Chapter Kevon100 ^Talk! _Mail 19:54, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
2. The Negative One Kevon100 ^Talk! _Mail 19:54, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
3. The Devil In I Kevon100 ^Talk! _Mail 19:54, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
4. Duality (song) REZTER ^TALK ø 20:15, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
   1. Self-vote. REZTER ^TALK ø 15:22, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
   2. KezianAvenger™ 20:21, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
5. Music made in tribute of Slipknot CrowzRSA ^02:54, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
   1. 1. Slipknot (band) ##FUN WITH AHMED (talk) 18:25, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

Hey, I made templates. Check them out: {{CurrentWPSlipAoF}} and {{PastWPSlipAoF}} —Burningclean _{[Speak the truth!]} 03:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I like them. Sweet man! Blackngold29 (talk) 04:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't design them myself, I just transformed the Wikiproject Alternative Music templates. But thank you! —Burningclean _{[Speak the truth!]} 04:20, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting

I just have a quick question, before we start a new AoF, shouldn't we try promoting the past articles to a better status? Slipknot needs a copyedit, bigtime. Slipknot needs a copyedit, and Slipknot discography should go to FLC. —Burningclean _{[Speak the truth!]} 22:32, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, promotion should be dealt with before we start working on another AoF. Thanks for reading, ThunderMaster ^UTC 08:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So do you guys think that after the discography is removed from focus we should have a "Promotion Period" in which the project focuses it's attention on attaining higher status for articles within the project's scope? For example, in this one we could focus on Slipknot (album) and Slipknot discography and maybe Slipknot (band). Rezter ^TALK 10:45, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I think that would be a good idea. If we keep going on with new AoF projects, we will have a backlog of terrific articles that are not at a better status. I think we should definatly start off with getting Slipknot (band) to FA. —Burningclean _{[Speak the truth!]} 21:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We should try to spend longer on articles to get them to their best before we let them leave AoF (or get them some sort of promotion). Thanks for reading, ThunderMaster ^UTC 09:50, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]