Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Religion

CfD nomination of Category:Hispanic theologians

Category:Hispanic theologians has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. You are encouraged to join the discussion on the Categories for discussion page.

Tukdam

Eyes needed. Skyerise (talk) 00:58, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Common Era has an RfC

Common Era, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RfC for value. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Jeaucques Quœure (talk) 07:47, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scientology religion vs. Church of Scientology

I have a comment about a "religion/ideology/movement" vs. an "institution/organization/church":

From what I know, the "Scientology religion" refers to the religion itself, and the movement as a whole. The "Church of Scientology" is the name of the organization and/or organizations involved. There is a subtle distinction between the two. Thus, I think it's better to say that David Miscavige is "the leader of the Scientology religion" (in both the words of Scientologists and their critics), rather than simply a "leader of the Church of Scientology".

First of all, Scientology is a hierarchal religion comprised of distinct corporations that operate within the framework of the religion. These include the Church of Scientology Los Angeles, Church of Scientology International, Church of Scientology Western United States, and many others on five continents. Each entity is a 501(c)(3) corporation with its own board of directors responsible for overseeing its operations. Also, Miscavige serves as the Chairman of the Board for the Religious Technology Center (RTC).

There are many sources that cite him as the worldwide leader of the Scientology religion, which is a movement consisting of thousands of Churches, Missions, and affiliated groups across more than 100 countries.

There are also websites such as ScientologyReligion.org. I've listed some snippets below to give you an idea.

"As the founder of the Scientology religion and the sole author of its scripture, L. Ron Hubbard ..." [1]

In the official Scientology biography about Miscavige, he is described as:

"David Miscavige is the ecclesiastical leader of the Scientology religion." [2]

A Google search for "Scientology religion" Miscavige (including the quotation marks) turns up a lot of results where "Scientology religion" is mentioned.

DjembeDrums (talk) 18:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Stoicism

Stoicism has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:05, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Ancient Celtic religion#Requested move 24 October 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Ancient Celtic religion#Requested move 24 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 06:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Invented_tradition#Merge_from_pseudo-mythology

Please say a word at Talk:Invented_tradition#Merge_from_pseudo-mythology

Good article reassessment for Inanna

Inanna has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:09, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remove "____ equivalent" fields from Template:Infobox deity?

What do editors think of the idea of removing the "____ equivalent" fields (eg. "Greek_equivalent", "Norse_equivalent", "Hinduism_equivalent", etc.) from Template:Infobox deity? Input at Template talk:Infobox deity would be appreciated. – Michael Aurel (talk) 05:40, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Teleological argument

Teleological argument has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:17, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]