WikiProject Musical Theatre is part of WikiProject Musical Theatre, organized to improve and complete musical theatre articles and coverage on Wikipedia. You can edit the page attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Musical TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject Musical TheatreTemplate:WikiProject Musical TheatreMusical Theatre
WikiProject Musical Theatre
Main Talk Page
If you have come from other parts of Wikipedia, please see our other subpages:
I've been looking into the notability for musicals produced by StarKid Productions and wish to double check one aspect of the article The Guy Who Didn't Like Musicals. I still need to search for reviews, but what is the standard for notability with musical theater productions? The musical received awards from a site, but I am unsure of the site's reliability and general importance within this WikiProject, and whether these awards mean anything at all toward the subject's notability. I wished to double check before moving ahead with doing a deep dive of reviews so I can have a better-informed assessment of this subject's notability. Any help with this is greatly appreciated. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 06:03, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A musical's notability should be judged based on a combination (balancing) of these factors:
1. Does it have notable writers, composer, director, cast?
2. Did it run a long time (more than a year?) at a major venue?
3. Did it get reviews and feature articles in national or international media, like The New York Times, The Guardian, Variety?
4. Awards: Did it win any Tony Awards? Olivier Awards?
5. Anything else that makes the musical particularly interesting? For example, was it premiered on a network TV program in prime time? Did it have numerous revivals around the world? Has it had a lengthy (more than a year) US, UK or world tour to notable regional venues?
I looked at these StarKid productions and did not think their short-running, never-revived musicals, with no notable creatives, cast or crew were very notable. They do not seem to have attracted reviews in major media. -- Ssilvers (talk) 06:33, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
GNG says: "significant coverage in reliable sources creates an assumption, not a guarantee, that a subject merits its own article." Let's unpack this. Does the coverage discuss the musical in depth? Does it discuss the writing, themes, societal, dramatic or comic impact or artistic merit of the musical? Can you tell from the sources that the musical has significant thematic, societal, dramatic or comic impact or artistic merit? Even if so, if the musical was only produced once for a short run, or in a small venue, with few or no notable people involved, as in this case, I don't think it really satisfies WP:MILL and WP:INDISCRIMINATE. -- Ssilvers (talk) 07:13, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This musical has been proposed for deletion at AfD. See WP:Articles for deletion/Holidays (musical). It got a New York Times review and quite a bit of other press, but it is hard to search for articles about it, because the name is a common word. I searched using the director's name and added a few more sources. Feel free to improve the article or comment at the AfD. -- Ssilvers (talk) 07:19, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]