|
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music/Archive 33
Add musical notation directly in wikisyntaxYou can add musical notation through the use Like this
gives  See more details : Thanks to all project contributors:Thanks to all project contributors for your recent helpful new references and edits. Keep up the good work everybody! Zachtron (talk) 07:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC) Music terminology expertise neededHello, I need help understanding a music terminology used in this article in the second paragraph. It's currently at FAC and its being asked to be removed since I nor the reviewer seems to understand the term used by the composer. Best, Jonatalk to me 22:28, 28 April 2013 (UTC) WikiProject Record Labels members needed:Hi everyone. We really need some contributors for WikiProject Record Labels, which is a part of this project. I am currently one of the leaders of the project which right now does not have many active participants at all, so it would be great to get some more editors contributing to the project. Please check out the project's page and participate if you have interest in it. Thanks! Zachtron (talk) 05:09, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
Discussion about "Mary Was the Marrying Kind" by singer Kip MooreDear All: There is a discussion about whether or not to split "Mary Was the Marrying Kind" from Up All Night by Kip Moore into a brand new article. Please visit Talk:Up_All_Night_(Kip_Moore_album)#Split to contribute. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:55, 1 May 2013 (UTC) Getchyer larfin gear rand this lotTHE WP:RED LIST OF ENDANGERED MUSICIANS -- Hillbillyholidaytalk 13:12, 12 May 2013 (UTC) WP:NFCC#7 problemDue to a change to the {{audio}} template, lots of files suddenly show up as unused. This means that lots of audio files may be deleted as "orphaned fair use". See Wikipedia talk:Non-free content#How to interpret WP:NFCC#7 for audio files for a discussion related to this. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:54, 24 May 2013 (UTC) New TFA nominationI've nominated the article 1987 (What the Fuck Is Going On?) for consideration as a candidate for WP:Today's Featured Article, please see Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests, — Cirt (talk) 20:51, 6 June 2013 (UTC) Notability question - Main AttrakionzPlease join the discussion regarding the notability of Main Attrakionz at Talk:Main Attrakionz#Notability is iffy and help render the discussion moot by finding suitable references so there is no longer any question about the band's notability. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)23:45, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Article alerts section added to wikiproject PercussionJust to let you know that wikiproject Percussion now has an: Article alerts section. XOttawahitech (talk) 01:26, 13 June 2013 (UTC) Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tonality shiftCan anybody here shed any light on the veracity of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tonality shift and how/if it differs from Tonality flux or Progressive tonality. Thanks. Pol430 talk to me 22:23, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
talk page templateDoes this project have a talk page template? Kinda WikiProject Music. Anyway, please categorize International Space Orchestra/Talk:International Space Orchestra. - Altenmann >t 04:06, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
Redirect for Reiteration to Tremolo changed to a DAB pageThe term "reiteration" has a meaning in mathematics also, which means the page cannot just redirect to the musical concept. Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics#"Reiteration" rule of inference. Thanks.M∧Ŝc2ħεИτlk 14:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC) Metallica band member timelineCan anyone weigh in on this discussion?Jauersockdude?/dude.16:10, 17 July 2013 (UTC) Brief members of a band/group still considered as full members?Hi, guys. I just want to ask about Wikipedia's standards when it comes to articles about bands/members. So let's say two original members left and then the talent agency announces that two new members are added. Later on when the group gears up for a comeback single, those 'two' replacements are no longer there and have been replaced by three newer ones. So are the two previous replacements still worth being considered as 'former members?. They never really released any music with the group hence they didn't debut with them. I've opened a discussion on this talk page as well.Masterpeace3(talk) 04:06, 31 July 2013 (UTC) Peer review wantedCould I please get a peer review for Travis Tritt? I'd really like to get this to GA, as I feel it's pretty close already. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:01, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Article split discussions for Amon Amarth, Guttermouth, Pop Evil, SeS, TNAF & UproarFestI am writing to encourage users to comment on the discussions at Talk:Amon Amarth, Talk:Guttermouth, Talk:Pop Evil, Talk:Smile Empty Soul, Talk:The Naked and Famous & Talk:Uproar Festival about whether or not parts of the pages should be split from the remainder of the article. If someone can indicate the best place to post this, it would be greatly appreciated. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:12, 5 August 2013 (UTC) Mixed to positive / Mixed to negativeHey all, is there an official stance on the use of "Mixed to positive" and "Mixed to negative" to describe critical reaction to music? Either of these phrases sound absurdly redundant, as "mixed" implies both positive and negative reactions. I see these phrases all over Wikipedia. I appreciate your thoughts. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 23:43, 13 August 2013 (UTC) Help with an article in AfC?Hi! I need help with an article that someone has submitted to AfC. The article in question (Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Klaus Zehelein) looks to be about a notable enough person to merit an article, however the article's grammar and punctuation isn't the greatest. At times it's hard to understand and the article would need an almost complete re-write. In good news, there looks to be enough sourcing about Klaus Zehelein to show easy notability, so this would be just a re-write. I thought I'd ask here, since it'd probably be better for someone for the music WP to be involved than anyone else. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:09, 16 August 2013 (UTC) What's the deal with "All-Steinway Schools"?Is this a real thing? I removed a sentence from the lede (!) at Oral Roberts University (!) stating that it was "All-Steinway School", on the grounds that this sounds like ridiculous promotional hokum and who cares what brand their equipment is. But then a search showed that this phrase is shot through our articles on colleges. Absent some explanation of why this is not hogwash I propose to redact them all. Steinway's take on the matter is here although they don't say much. Granted Steinways are great, but it's not like the other pianos are chopped liver, and really beyond snob appeal why shouldn't a general-education university let the freshmen use Baldwins or whatever and save a few bucks? Or use electronics, which IMO are superior for most needs unless your needs are to cater to habit and nostalgia? Why is it such a great accomplishment to refuse to do this? Herostratus (talk) 05:59, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Missing topics pageI have updated Missing topics about Music - Skysmith (talk) 08:41, 29 August 2013 (UTC) Question regarding merging album pages to those on their respective artistSo, at Laguna (album), my PROD was removed by Lx 121 after being up for ten days, with the remover proposing a merge to D*Note, the artist's article. As a part of this informal merger proposal, Lx 121 proposed merging the album track listing onto the artist's page. I, however, disagree and still think the page should just be deleted outright. (The thread is here.) My issue with adding the track listing to the artist's article is that I thought discography was supposed to consist of released albums and singles, which the artist's discography section already has. None of the songs on the album were released as singles, so I don't think the track listing belongs in the discography section. Thoughts? TCN7JM 22:42, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Charts in France forumI found topics on Charts in France forum about sales in some countries and full sales Top 200 in France... (now I can't found link...). Where this peoples get it? Or other forum [www.ukmix.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=96139&start=100 UKMix]. Eurohunter (talk) 20:53, 6 September 2013 (UTC) Category:James singlesCategory:James singles, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. .... notable? --S.G.(GH) ping! 12:06, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
Notable? Not notable? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:44, 10 October 2013 (UTC) Notable? Not notable? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:45, 10 October 2013 (UTC) Help with an article?I need some help here. Long story short, I'm involved in a really very messy small "war" with a somewhat new editor, User:Ben0kto. He's made some big controversial edits to the article Acid Rap, which is currently about the 2013 mixtape. The editor has said that the article was "hijacked" by people trying to create the album's page and that the page itself should be about a subgenre by Esham, acid rap. The problem is that originally this was a redirect because a discussion was made over whether or not the subgenre is independently notable outside of Esham. It's performed and I'm not denying its existence, but almost everything I've found has mentioned the subgenre as an aside in favor of Esham as a whole. Even the people that have had some sort of influence from the subgenre mention it in relation to how Esham has influenced them. ([7], [8]) An AfD closed as a keep years ago, but by today's standards the notability is relatively low when you figure that you have to establish notability outside of Esham himself. If someone were to find a way to finagle an article outside of Esham#Style, then I have no overwhelmingly huge problem with that. I do have to say that I'm not really confident that the subgenre would really pass notability guidelines if an article was created and put up for AfD. Almost all of the sources mention the subgenre in passing in relation to Esham himself, and that's just the ones that might be able to be used as a reliable source. Many of the sources given have been relatively unusable as RS. Now the other problem is that the editor in question is demanding that "Acid Rap" either be an article for the subgenre or redirect to Esham's subsection. My issue is that although the subgenre predates the album by a long stretch, the subgenre isn't as likely a search term as the mixtape is. Put bluntly, between the two the mixtape is the more notable of the two and as such, more likely to be a search term. I've tried explaining this in terms of how Michael Jackson goes to the article for the performer as opposed to say, the priest born in the 20s or the footballer active in the 50s. I've also tried to explain that even if we reverted to a redirect, the most likely thing would be that the mixtape would be moved to the main term of "Acid Rap" since it'd make more sense to have that and get a hatnote. Can anyone wade into this? There's been a huge discussion on the editor's talk page and he's been blocked twice now for disruptive editing. Now he's accusing me of having a bias against underground music, so I doubt he'll listen to anything I have to say. I really need some people to come in and help with this, since it's getting pretty nasty. It doesn't fit into any one specific category, so reporting it has mostly ended with people saying "not the right forum". The way it's going, I feel that this will probably end with the user in question either ragequitting or getting permabanned, neither of which I particularly want but am beginning to think is inevitable at this point. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:22, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Talk page boxIs there a reason why there is no talk page box for this project? Philafrenzy (talk) 11:57, 16 October 2013 (UTC) |
