Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Microsoft/Archive 1

Archive 1

Microsoft articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Microsoft articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:20, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

MfD listing and results

WikiProject cleanup listing

I have created together with Smallman12q a toolserver tool that shows a weekly-updated list of cleanup categories for WikiProjects, that can be used as a replacement for WolterBot and this WikiProject is among those that are already included (because it is a member of Category:WolterBot cleanup listing subscriptions). See the tool's wiki page, this project's listing in one big table or by categories and the index of WikiProjects. Svick (talk) 20:37, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Windows Phone

I have an interest in the Windows Phone and its ecosystem, and in improving related articles. Is this the right project or should i go to the Microsoft Windows -project?--Caygill (talk) 09:35, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

no your in the right place.Greg Heffley 21:26, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Do all articles that fall under WikiProject Xbox also apply to this WikiProject?

Just curious, do ALL articles that fall under WikiProject Xbox also apply to this WikiProject? Steel1943 (talk) 04:09, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

WPXBOX uses the WPMS banner for assessment, so it does fall under WPMS. {{WikiProject Microsoft}} has the xbox switch. -- 70.24.247.66 (talk) 04:33, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Review of FA status for Microsoft Security Essentials

I have challenged the decision to award this article FA status over what I allege is a lack of balance and neutrality in the article. Fresh opinions and input are encouraged here. Quantumsilverfish (talk) 01:38, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Request for comments: Establish standards for version history tables in software articles

I'd like to introduce the Template:Version template to Wikipedia with the goal to establish one standard for version history tables (or lists). It simplifies creation of release histories, standardizes release stages and makes the content more accessible. Please comment on the template talk page (there already is some discussion). Thanks for your contribution. Jesus Presley (talk) 07:05, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Request for comment on Talk:Microsoft Office 2013#Retail editions locked to the first PC they are installed on

Hi.

There is a discussion about Talk:Microsoft Office 2013 licensing terms in progress and we need someone with access to source to confirm or deny the problem.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 10:26, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:ADO.NET Entity Framework

Greetings! I have recently relisted a requested move discussion at Talk:ADO.NET_Entity_Framework#Requested_move, regarding a page relating to this WikiProject. Discussion and opinions are invited. Thanks, Tyrol5 [Talk] 01:19, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Apps Proposal

A proposal for a WikiProject Apps has been made at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Apps. As WikiProject Microsoft is a related WikiProject, members of this WikiProject are invited to join the discussion. Thank you. XapApp (talk) 02:32, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

consciously approach may be ideal

This option is satisfactory when visually comparing samples superb to well a uniform specified reference — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.240.163.34 (talk) 20:16, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Unassessed Articles

I am thinking of creating a "drive" to assess all the unassessed articles, of which the total is building up. Anyone interested? Rewards shall be barnstars- like AfC. If I get no response in three/two days, I'll assume it's fine to go ahead. jcc (tea and biscuits) 15:52, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Terry Myerson

Any ideas for finding WP-compatible images of Terry Myerson? Flickr is dry and his public appearances aren't well-photographed. Closest I've found was a cc-by-nd in Wired. Potential strategies appreciated, if not actual images. czar · · 05:23, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

I've put in this issue of the newsletter if that helps. jcc (tea and biscuits) 09:46, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Worth a shot! Thanks czar · · 10:34, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Xbox files for deletion

image:XboxMusicLogo.png and image:XboxVideoLogo.png has been nominated for deletion -- 65.92.181.39 (talk) 03:52, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

RFC: Restoration of article "Windows 9"

There is currently a clear consensus against reinstating "Windows 9" as an article. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:55, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

It seems that the codename along with most of the features has already been confirmed for the next major OS of Microsoft. Most of the sources say that the public beta may be released in February 2014.

I'm confused weather the restoration of Windows 9 article is necessary or not. As today I saw some of the news regarding this matter bellow

And others reports are also found in Google News, Yahoo News, Bing etc

What could be done ?

Himanis Das  talk 05:46, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

  • Oppose. Hi. When you read keywords like "Microsoft Suggests" and "Users Claim", it means we are still at rumor level. (WP:CRYSTALL) We should wait until we have much more than just a product announcement (we don't even have that; Windows 9 is probably just an unconfirmed name;) or just a rehash of Paul Thurrot's personal opinion. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 09:32, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Yep! You are correct, these are all rumors, these may be only reported to attract other people. Most of the news in Softpedia are fake and are based in public thinking.Himanis Das  talk 09:42, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
"Most of the news in Softpedia are fake".
I have never seen any fake news there. Softpedia News is a journal, which means its usefulness is as limited as any other journal, but evidently no less. When I took an article to WP:FA, everyone agreed that third-party publisher descriptions are the only unreliable items on Softpedia. Indeed, most items that you listed are related to Microsoft strategic planning for the next OS instead of Windows 9 itself. For example, "New Windows 9 Details Revealed" refers to the merger of Windows Store and Windows Phone Store, which certainly impact Windows 9 but does not warrant an article.
I can't understand why you propose something based on sources from a publisher whom you condemn entirely in your next post. This gives the wrong impression of having been here for this purpose in the first place. However, you might want to check Google News Search to see what other sources have to say, though at this time there are no encyclopedic items on it.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 07:24, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
100% correct, I've gone through the link you mentioned, there is no encyclopedic reports regarding this. They are only rumors. Ok! I'll not propose from now.Himanis Das  talk 13:52, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Unfortunately per WP:NOTACRYSTALBALL we cannot host articles like this unless they have been formally announced or publicly recognized by its creators. For example, we have Category:Upcoming software which lists software that has been formally announced by companies but are still in development and have not been released yet. Same thing with Category:Upcoming video games scheduled for 2015. To be honest, we really don't have any idea if the next iteration will be called '9' or if it will even be a Windows platform at all. So, in the meantime, just stay put and wait until Microsoft formally publishes its codename. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 02:44, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
  • Oppose. My rationale is the same as what Ahnoneemoos said. The uncertainty about version number, 9 or 9.1 or maybe even straight to 11, who knows, is a very good point. The news articles, all 5, were sourced from Softpedia. For future reference, it is better to use more than one source if you are going to mention 5 posts. As for Softpedia, I don't believe that their news stories are ever fake. Sometimes they are conjectural, but that is why they use words like "claim", "could" and "suggest". Sometimes those posts will be proven incorrect, but that doesn't diminish Softpedia's credibility, as they make it adequately clear when content is tentative versus certain. Some Softpedia news is excellent e.g. keeping track of Syrian Electronic Army hack incidents, by date, wave and occurrence number. EDIT: That's just one example. I am not implying that Softpedia specializes in tracking hackers! --FeralOink (talk) 11:03, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Does this WikProject have an article alerts section?

I cannot find wp:article alerts here. just wonderig if anyone has set it up? XOttawahitech (talk) 20:33, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Why isn't Dwayne active?

Because he's the founder, why isn't he the leader of the project any more? Typo385.5 (talk) 19:24, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Sonic

Even though I've just joined, I'll make a WikiProject Sonic today. However development of it will be slow and it will take 2-3 months to become viewbale (I can't program HTML/JavA/ whatever PL you use very well) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Typo385.5 (talk • contribs) 19:40, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Talk:United States v. Microsoft Corp.#Requested move 2

The move request was re-proposed. In case you missed, the prior proposal resulted in "no consensus". Please join in by clicking above and inserting comments to improve consensus. --George Ho (talk) 01:02, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Age of Mythology's FAR

I have nominated Age of Mythology for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. GamerPro64 17:29, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Windows 5.0 (disambiguation) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Windows 5.0 (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windows 5.0 (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Codename Lisa (talk) 19:49, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Microsoft FAR

I have nominated Microsoft for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Indrian (talk) 04:57, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Cortana Easter Eggs

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Cortana Easter Eggs. Codename Lisa (talk) 23:51, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Possible Additions For Microsoft's Cortana Page

Hello,

I am new to Wikipedia, so excuse me if I do anything that may be incorrect.

I am not sure how to go about submitting information to the Microsoft's Cortana Page. I did not edit it, because I do not want to break guidelines. I am submitting this information for someone to review and guide me.

I had an interview about Cortana on the day they announced it at Build 2014. It was with Savas Parastatidis, Principal Architect in Bing, Application Services Group. The interview was approved by Stefan Weitz, Head of Search at Bing.

I believe my interview includes valuable information for this page. Here are a few points:

1) How did Cortana get it's name? Robert Howard, a Principal Program Manager in the Windows Phone team, made the recommendation to Marcus Ash (his manager) to use “Cortana” as an internal codename. That happened at the beginning of the project. Everyone loved the name.

2) Security: Will Cortana save these queries in audio format? What security measures are in place? "We take our users’ privacy extremely seriously. We store our users’ information in a highly secure store. Not even our own developers have open access to the data. The speech queries are completely anonymized. That’s the way the service can improve. However, there is no way to track a particular voice query to a user."

3) Ethics Of Virtual Personal Assistant: Cortana was developed to make life easier. For that concept to really work, you would need to trust the assistant 100%. One could argue that the definitive search results could be paid for. And unlike Bing.com, there would only be room for one answer. What are your thoughts on the ethical challenges at hand and how does Bing plan to handle them? Excellent observation! For a personal assistant to become my gate to the information/knowledge/services world, he/she will have to gain my trust. I truly believe that any service that doesn’t try to truly help the user, that doesn’t have the user’s interests as a priority, will eventually become irrelevant. Personal assistants will further emphasize this point. It’s exactly as in real life. If your personal assistant starts giving you information that isn’t relevant to YOU or that doesn’t really help YOU in completing a task, they will be fired, no? I don’t think there is a difference here.

Cortana doesn’t display any ads. We are trying to do our best for the user. When the user asks a question, we truly try our best to give the best response.

It’s actually an observation we made internally. Since we can only give one answer, we really need to get it right. Instead of showing 10-20 blue links and let the user pick, a personal assistant really needs to show just one answer to a direct question. It’s a very difficult problem to get right.

4) Steps Cortana Takes After a Verbal Query:

a) The voice is streamed to the cloud. b) Our speech recognition servers host speech models which have been trained using Deep Neural Networks. c) The output of the speech reco phase goes through our natural language understanding phase so that we can figure out the user’s intent (e.g. when the user asks if they need an umbrella, then we determine with some degree of confidence that they are interested in the weather). d) In the next step, we go through the conversational management engine that maintains context about the user’s conversations. This allows us to support turns in a conversation and carry the context and the user’s intent forward as we help them accomplish a task. e) We use the information from the user’s notebook to resolve gaps in our understanding (e.g. “home” becomes a geolocation). f) If the user’s intent is to find information, then we query our Bing knowledge sources. g) Finally, we generate language (a response) and then the rendering of the response (HTML) to send to the device.

There are other important facts in my interview with Savas. You can read that here: http://thebc.co/interviews/intro-microsofts-cortana-interview-savas-parastatidis/

In my humble opinion, there are details in this interview that have not been written about. Thank you for your time, I truly appreciate the guidance.

Matt --Matt Sells (talk) 05:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Helping

I may help this project for some things that I suggest are missing. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 23:15, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

By all means! We welcome and appreciate any and all help! Just list below whatever you have in mind and you will receive feedback and support. Thank you for your contributions and willingness help,
STJMLCC (talk) 23:28, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject's revival

This WikiProject is in the process of being Revived. We welcome any user who is willing to help and invite them to join the current WikiProject member group. Thank you in advance,

STJMLCC (talk) 17:04, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi. For the start, try not to insert ''' into the title; it only makes linking to the section harder. And "WikiProject Revival" was another WikiProject. You might confuse people if you keep writing that. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 12:04, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

How Do I Join

I am in the list of participants but does a coordinator have to put the green tick at the side of my name? (Which signifies that I'm active in the project).

Thanks, UltraGold
UltraGold (talk) 23:19, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Absoluptly Not! You Are Free To Do As You Please, This Is YOUR WikiProject (Signifying That Nobody Owns It [But There Are Still People Whom Are In Charge]). This project is a community for everyone to join in and participate. But, I will do it for you by all means! Thank you for your interest in joining OUR WikiProject,
STJMLCC (talk) 23:32, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Major Goal Accomplished Today!

Good Work WikiProject Microsoft! We have finally broken the shackles and we are starting to gain steam! We now have an equal number of active and retired WikiProject members! 1 More and we will have more active users than not! Now, Let's Get This Thing Off The Ground! Thank you all for your contribution and support of this WikiProject and hoping for many more prosperous years,

STJMLCC (talk) 00:01, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Interview for The Signpost

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Microsoft for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Thanks, Rcsprinter123 (tell) @ 17:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

My concern about this article is directly related to why I came to the article: I have IIS on my Windows 7 machine. I do not know if I need it running. I do not know if it provides functions that I need, or that it is primarily for people who want to develop websites, or even run websites from their machine. I do not intend to run or develop websites. But I cannot tell from this article if I can therefore safely turn it off. Nowhere does the article say simply what its purpose is. I see that it is a webserver but what does that mean for someone who does not run a web page or is not developing a web page? Is IIS needed by the average user of Window 7? I cannot tell from this article. I keep searching through the internet and every article reproduces this same perspective. Nowhere can I find whether I need it if I am not running or developing a website. A simple question. The article assumes too much. It should simply start with what IIS does, who it is used by, when it needs to be turned on as a Windows Feature control console, etc. Simple questions that I cannot get answers from, but would have expected to find here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Personalnjc (talk • contribs) 01:37, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Can I please join?

I would like to join Wikiproject Microsoft. DeskOS (talk) 23:51, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

@DeskOS: Knock yourself out. Just add your own name to the roster. You know how Wikipedia works: everyone can edit... the roster. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 09:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Windows thumbnail cache

Hi. There is a small dispute in Talk:Windows thumbnail cache § EXIF thumbnails that I was hoping someone could help with. Hopefully, it is not serious. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 16:21, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Surface (first generation) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Surface (first generation) to be moved to Surface RT. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 23:21, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

RFC regarding title dispute for Xbox Video

Please could participants help revolve a title dispute for the now renamed Xbox Video at its talk page? Thanks, Rob984 (talk) 22:56, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Microsoft Silverlight listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Microsoft Silverlight to be moved to Silverlight. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 18:15, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Cortana (software) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Cortana (software) to be moved to Cortana. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 19:16, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Incomplete and incorrect history on Groove Music page

The Groove page has a History section that talks briefly and incompletely about Zune's place in the history of Groove music. As I see it, there are only two possible solutions. The less-preferable solution is to not include a history section at all but that would just be to cover up the important history of Microsoft music applications. The right way to fix the problem is to include the MSN Music history as well and the fact that there is a trend in Microsoft Music to start a new app, convince unwitting customers to spend their money, and then, when the tools aren't profitable, shut them down causing purchasers to lose all that they purchased. I won't even mention that Microsoft Books did the same thing with eBooks as MSN Music and Zune did to music buyers. Since Groove is music we can focus in Microsoft's music app shutdown history and not that it's a repeat pattern across virtually any Microsoft DRM-based technology.

Not including the complete history makes the page simply a brochure authored and controlled by Microsoft. If it is truly an open-source, community-authored, encyclopedia then these inaccuracies and omissions should not stand. They can be written in encyclopedic style and include references but to delete them is to turn Wikipedia into a advertising brochure or magazine. 96.19.193.177 (talk) 17:25, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Template:Currentmicrosoftcotw and Template:Formermicrosoftcotw listed for deletion

See Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 August 7#Template:Currentmicrosoftcotw and the discussion that immediately follows. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:01, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Outlook.com listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Outlook.com to be moved to Outlook Mail. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 21:01, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Greetings, everyone. Our fellow Wikipedian User:Ians18 has engaged in a number of edits that I find highly controversial; they are being discussed in Outlook.com § Requested move 17 August 2015. I believe we need additional input. A summary of the dispute is as follows:

Traditionally, both Microsoft Outlook and Outlook Web App / Outlook on the web had four modules: Mail, Calendar, Contacts (or People) and Tasks. But Ians18 changed the names of Outlook.com, Calendar (Microsoft service) and People (Microsoft service) into Outlook Mail, Outlook Calendar and Outlook People and merged Outlook Web App into Outlook.com. He initially said that they are actually renamed, but now has retreated to the position of "their rename is announced and will definitely happen". I, however, cannot see any of these and believe he has taken too much for granted, is sailing too close to WP:CRYSTAL, and his point of view is badly influenced by being an Office 365 user.

Additional input is welcome. Fleet Command (talk) 12:10, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Please see the discussion here: Talk:Outlook.com § Discussion the information above is wrong. "but now has have retreated..." no I haven't. It already has happened. You are violating WP:5P4. Ians18 (talk) 04:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Surface (first generation) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Surface (first generation) to be moved to Surface RT. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 08:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Movies & TV listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Movies & TV to be moved to Microsoft Movies & TV. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 08:15, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Microsoft Certified Professional

Sorry, I should have posted this sooner. Microsoft Certified Professional is listed at WP:copyright problems because of innumerable copyright violations from Microsoft sources, going back to the day it was created, 17 July 2004. It needs to completely re-written from scratch; it will otherwise probably be reduced to a few sentences. If anyone is interested, a re-write can be started here; obviously, no running text should be copied from the current version unless it is definitely established to be free of copyright infringement. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:25, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

I have created a new portal at Portal:Halo and nominated it for featured portal status at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Halo. Comments will be much appreciated. Thank you. sst✈discuss 07:04, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Windows Automated Installation Kit listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Windows Automated Installation Kit to be moved to Windows Assessment and Deployment Kit. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 03:30, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Age of Empires II: The Age of Kings listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Age of Empires II: The Age of Kings to be moved to Age of Empires II. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 07:14, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Microsoft Accessories listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Microsoft Accessories to be moved to Microsoft Hardware. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 18:30, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Rare listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Rare to be moved. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 17:00, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Sway (Office app) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Sway (Office app) to be moved to Office Sway. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 04:01, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

We should take a note out of the Apple articles' book

For years I've seen a weird double standard between Microsoft articles and Apple articles here on Wikipedia, Apple articles seem to be expanded upon, well-sourced and detailed while Microsoft articles seem to be minimalistic often first party or no sources present and while the editors of Apple's pages love historic products the moment a product is discontinued on a Microsoft page hoards of editors will try to delete everything about it, and those are quite general things I've noticed I'd like to point out a very recent example of how neglected Microsoft articles are, recently a user created the Surface Pen article as a small stub with no sources or references, so I added references and tried to expand the content a bit but if you'd compare it to the Apple Pencil article about a product that's not only more recent (by several years) has been written less about and is available for less devices and in less variants, the page is way better organised and shows more details.

Another example would be the iPad article Vs. the Microsoft Surface article, the editors of the Microsoft Surface article try to stay as minimalistic as possible, they've even removed all references to software and services that were there before and one can argue that those are mentioned in Windows 8 and Windows 8.1 their specific relation to the Surface is not there, while the iPad article goes in full detail about every historical and current device the Microsoft Surface article seems to try to remove any information the moment 2 devices aren't alike anymore, instead of being extremely nihilistic minimalists the editors of this WikiProject should try to emulate Apple articles more.

Sincerely, --86.81.201.94 (talk) 10:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Template:Windows Phone listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Template:Windows Phone to be moved to Template:Microsoft Mobile. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 06:15, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Template:Windows Phone listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Template:Windows Phone to be moved to Template:Microsoft Mobile. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:45, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Xbox (console) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Xbox (console) to be moved to Xbox (first console). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 08:59, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Date format

Good day to everybody,

I would like to bring up the issue of MOS:DATEFORMAT when it comes to Microsoft-related articles. We all know that Microsoft is an American company. Hence all of its products are Made in USA, and to that extent, all MSFT product-related articles, as per MOS:DATETIES, should adopt MDY dating conventions. This is true for pages like Microsoft Windows, Xbox and even Microsoft Surface.

However, I have noticed this is not the case for Microsoft Office. When I discussed this with an editor, he or she claims that as opposed to Apple Inc., there is no strong US connection as per WP:DATERET, justifying this with the fact that MSFT has more users in China than the rest of the world combined (over 250 countries). The user even stated that such discussions existed in the past, which I cannot seem to locate.

That being said, I would like to ask the community whether agreeing on adopting spelling and dating conventions with regards to MOS:TIES would be possible.

Thanks in advance for your feedback! <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 14:31, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add me...

I have tried and I cant figure it out. Dre Waters thank you —Preceding undated comment added 21:28, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

 Done Welcome! <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 03:39, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Windows Maps look over

Hi, I was putting the Microsoft Wikiproject on a few Articles that did not have the Wikiproject Microsoft on the talk page. While looking I found this page that was a very small "stub" and had nothing on there. But thinking about it, "well... it is it's own app... Maybe I should add more." Please review my changes here Windows Maps I have suggestions on the talk page there. Please give an explanation if you undo all my changes, it would be grateful. Hope that helps :) (P.S. there is one screen shot I added from Wikicomons) Dre~ (talk) 04:14, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! Dre~ (talk) 16:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC) (was resolved)

project status

Hi could these pages be looked over on what project rating these should get? Windows Maps, Kodu Game Lab, and Microsoft Small Basic Dre~ (talk) 03:36, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Office mobile apps listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Office mobile apps to be moved to Microsoft Office Mobile. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 02:46, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Bing listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Bing to be moved to Bing (search engine). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 07:31, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Windows ME listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Windows ME to be moved to Windows Me. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 18:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

dispute over Windows Me capitalisation (ME vs Me)

please help solve the dispute over Windows Me capitalisation (ME vs Me) Maria Kappatou (talk) 05:41, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Windows Me is more common than Windows ME, Microsoft and PCWorld use Me instead of ME

Microsoft uses the Windows Me spelling. This is the most common spelling and PC World also uses it. Google "windows me" on any search engine and you will see for yourself that Windows Me is more common than Windows ME. Should we use the "Me" capitalisation on our Windows Me article? Should we move the article to Windows Millennium Edition? Maria Kappatou (talk) 05:35, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Windows ME listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Windows ME to be moved to Windows Millennium Edition. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 05:46, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Unused Pages - Microsoft Dynamics

Do you need to keep https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Microsoft_Dynamics — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.174.167.146 (talk) 09:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

@86.174.167.146: If you want to contribute to the article, do so directly. The talk page should be kept, as they are only deleted in rare circumstances (e.g. when the article is deleted). jcc (tea and biscuits) 12:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
sorry, I meant the actual page. 86.174.167.146 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:57, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Microsoft Dynamics

The article Microsoft Dynamics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article is outdated and has articles for the products of this software now on the wiki.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 86.174.167.146 (talk) 08:56, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Shutdown.exe

I added a table that defines the parameters for the command.Beastly334 (talk) 15:30, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft/Archive 1/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft.

We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:

  • The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
  • The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
  • The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Microsoft, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Cortana (software) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Cortana (software) to be moved to Cortana (virtual assistant). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 01:18, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Embrace, extend and extinguish listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Embrace, extend and extinguish to be moved to Embrace, extend, and extinguish. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 14:59, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Windows Store listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Windows Store to be moved to Microsoft Store. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 12:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Microsoft Edge listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Microsoft Edge to be moved. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 21:31, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Microsoft Edge listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Microsoft Edge to be moved. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 21:46, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Microsoft Edge listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Microsoft Edge to be moved. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:01, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Expert attention

This is a notice about Category:Microsoft articles needing expert attention, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated. There might be as few as one page in the category, or zero if someone has removed the expert request tag from the page.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  01:07, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Halo (megastructure) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Halo (megastructure) to be moved to Halo (fictional megastructure). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 21:29, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

United States v. Microsoft Corp. (2001) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for United States v. Microsoft Corp. (2001) to be moved to United States v. Microsoft Corp.. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 16:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

Paul Allen

Paul Allen, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. AIRcorn (talk) 04:14, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Microsoft OneNote listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Microsoft OneNote to be moved to OneNote. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 19:00, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

List of Microsoft Windows versions listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for List of Microsoft Windows versions to be moved to Microsoft Windows version history. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 12:15, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

History of Microsoft Windows listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for History of Microsoft Windows to be moved to Microsoft Windows version history. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 00:29, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject

The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background

On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   07:48, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Halo (series) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Halo (series) to be moved to Halo (franchise). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:59, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

C Sharp (programming language) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for C Sharp (programming language) to be moved to C♯ (programming language). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 21:36, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

To opt out of RM notifications on this page, transclude {{bots|deny=RMCD bot}}, or set up Article alerts for this WikiProject.

New logos

Can someone update the office logos across articles? https://news.microsoft.com/europe/2018/11/29/say-hello-to-microsofts-new-office-icons/ RhinosF1 (talk) 07:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

A new newsletter directory is out!

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Age of Empires II

I have nominated Age of Empires II for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SchroCat (talk) 16:32, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Portal:Microsoft for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Microsoft is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Microsoft (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 07:14, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Features new to Windows XP#Requested move 11 August 2021

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Features new to Windows XP#Requested move 11 August 2021 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.  — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 01:56, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Bill Gates

Bill Gates, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Lizzy (talk 23:41, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Discussion on the new "Xbox" platform

A discussion on how to write about the new Xbox platform, including the Xbox Series X console, has been opeend up at Talk:Xbox Series X. Feel free to share your thoughts on the matter over there! Thanks! – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 19:08, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Cortana reassessment

Cortana, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. TheAwesomeHwyh 16:39, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

User script to detect unreliable sources

Main page: User:Headbomb/unreliable

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

  • John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Microsoft Viva

Hi all, starting a page on MS Viva would love if you guys could contribute! GR86 (📱) 17:33, 26 February 2023 (UTC)