This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Ultraviolet. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
RedWarn says reverting and rollback complete at the same time
RedWarn is saying "Reverting..." and "rollback complete" at the same time.
Enviroment:
@Thingofme: TypeScript code is not natively readable by the browser. TypeScript code is compiled (transpiled, actually) into JavaScript before execution on a browser. The final output is a JS file, readable by the browser. Chlod (RW • say hi!) 11:36, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Also why you do not use the ultraviolet name, and use the 10nm name? Again, because Ultraviolet is already taken so you may send a rename request which is complicated. Sometimes the username 10nm may be confusing because this is an userscript. Why RedWarn is not a gadget and will Ultraviolet be a gadget in the future? Thingofme (talk) 11:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
@Thingofme: The Ultraviolet account is not usurpable globally (since it has edits on other projects). As for gadgetizing: the current interface administrators are against registering gadgets which load JavaScript from non-Wikipedia sources, as seen in our previous gadget request. Chlod (RW • say hi!) 11:47, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
@Chlod 7 edits in dewiki is an issue, however sometimes global renamers may accept the request because 7 are not too many and the user is inactive for 13 years, but 7 edits are too many because Ultraviolet userscript is too new. However, in the past there is an account name "Ultraviolet" in enwiki but has renamed in 2015 due to global account reunification. Thingofme (talk) 12:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
The script is hosted on User:10nm, the "official" name of the team behind Ultraviolet and RedWarn. The following explaination of the name comes from the user page:
The username "10nm" comes from the lower limit of the range of ultraviolet light wavelengths on the electromagnetic spectrum — 10 nanometers.Remagoxer(talk)12:43, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
For those with rollback permission using RedWarn, the edit summary reads "Rollback edit (s)…", for those without rollback, what is written in the edit summary is "Reverting edit (s)", can't you change it to "Reverted edit (s)? For the better, because it’s past tense. And isn't it possible to remove (RW 16…) in the edit summary, and just make it a tag. Thanks. —Ctrlwiki (talk) 01:10, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
@Ctrlwiki—I'm not a RedWarn developer here, but it might be because "Reverted edit(s)" might just be too similar to other user scripts/diff browsers/standard rollback. Twinkle uses "Reverted (number of) edit(s)", Rollback uses "Reverted edits", to name a few. It could be that RedWarn developers are trying to make more "original", but if they think "Reverted edit(s)" are for the better, they should, by all means, switch it. — 3PPYB6 — TALK — CONTRIBS — 00:44, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
When I installed RedWarn on Speatle, my screen froze up. I can click on articles, but I can’t use the search bar to go to uninstall it.
Edit: Sometimes I can use the search bar now, but sometimes I can’t. Does it just lag it a bit?24.179.74.21 (talk) 12:39, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
It’s good now. Like I said, I think it was just some lag because it was gathering up information. Sorry for wasting your time. Speatle (talk) 10:52, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
@Speatle, it looks like your account hasn't been auto-confirmed which is why RedWarn didn't run. You need to have at least 10 edits for 7 days to be autoconfirmed, so you should be able to use RedWarn in a few days.@Sportzpikachu, probably check how the message is shown as iirc the code for warning people that are inelegible hasn't been changed for a while ✨ Edtalk! ✨ 20:31, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
