War on women

For the band, see War on Women (band).

"War on women" is a slogan in United States politics used to describe certain Republican Party policies and legislation as a wide-scale effort to restrict women's rights, especially reproductive rights, including abortion.[1][2][3][4] Prominent Democrats such as Nancy Pelosi[5] and Barbara Boxer,[6] as well as feminists, have used the phrase to criticize proponents of these laws as trying to force their social views on women through legislation.[7][8][9][10] The slogan has been used to describe Republican policies in areas such as access to reproductive health services, particularly birth control and abortion services; the definition of rape for the purpose of the public funding of abortion;[11][12] the prosecution of criminal violence against women; and workplace discrimination against women.[13][14][15][16]

While used in other contexts, and prior to 2010,[17][18] it became a common slogan in American political discourse after the 2010 congressional elections.[19][20] The term is often used to describe opposition to the contraceptive mandate in Obamacare and policies to defund women's health organizations that perform abortions, such as Planned Parenthood. The concept again gained attention in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, when Republican nominee Donald Trump drew notice for a history of inflammatory statements and actions toward women.[21][22][23][24][25]

The phrase and the concept have been criticized by Republicans and some anti-abortion Democrats.[26] Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus described it as an over-simplified fiction advanced by Democrats and the media[27][28] while other Republicans contended that such rhetoric was used as a distraction from President Barack Obama and the Democrats' handling of the economy.[29][30] In August 2012, Todd Akin's controversial comments regarding pregnancy and rape sparked renewed media focus on the concept.[31][32][33] Republicans have tried to turn the phrase against Democrats by using it to argue hypocrisy for not critiquing sex scandals of members within their party who have cheated, sexted, and harassed women, and for not supporting bills to combat sex-selective abortion.[34][35][36][37]

Development of the term

In 1989, radical feminist Andrea Dworkin[38] wrote in a book introduction about "war on women"[39] and, in 1997, she collected that and other writings in Life and Death, for which the subtitle was Unapologetic Writings on the Continuing War Against Women.[40] Feminist Susan Faludi's 1991 book Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women, argued that throughout the 1980s the media created a "backlash" against the feminist advances of the 1970s.[17] Former Republican political consultant Tanya Melich's 1996 memoir, The Republican War Against Women: An Insider's Report from Behind the Lines, describes the incorporation of the anti-abortion movement and opposition to the Equal Rights Amendment by Republicans as a divergence from feminist causes.[18]

George W. Bush's administration met with resistance from feminists and women's rights activists throughout his Presidency.[41][42] In 2004 The Feminist Press published Laura Flanders' collection of essays The W Effect: Bush's War On Women.[43] The same year, Sylvia Federici's Caliban and the Witch used "war on women" as a framework for analysis of the restructuring of gender relations in early modern Europe.[44] In 2006 economist Barbara Finlay's critique of the Bush administration's treatment of women was published by Zed Books under the title George W. Bush and the War on Women: Turning Back the Clock on Progress.[45][46]

In the 2010 midterm elections, the Republican Party (GOP) won the majority in the House of Representatives. On January 4, 2011, the day after Congress convened, Kaili Joy Gray of the liberal Daily Kos wrote an opinion piece titled "The Coming War on Women".[47] In the article, she outlined many of the measures that Republicans intended to push through the House of Representatives, including personhood laws, fetal pain laws, and the effort to defund Planned Parenthood.[47] In February 2011, an AlterNet article by Sarah Seltzer and Lauren Kelley entitled "9 New laws in the GOP's War on Women" began to document state-level legislation restricting abortion access and rights. That same month, New York Representative Jerrold Nadler referred to the proposed No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, one of the Congress's first actions and one that would have changed policy to allow only victims of "forcible rape" or child sex abuse to qualify for Medicaid funding for abortion, as "an entirely new front in the war on women and their families".[11] Florida Representative and Chair of the Democratic National Committee Debbie Wasserman Schultz began using the term "war on women" in March 2011.[11]

Reproductive rights

Zerlina Maxwell, in an editorial for U.S. News & World Report, cited these figures from the Guttmacher Institute as evidence of a "war on American women".[10] The findings, according to the Guttmacher Institute, show that state restrictions on abortion greatly increased in 2011.[48][49][50]

Main article: Reproductive rights

The "war on women" slogan was used often when describing the unprecedented rise in the passage of provisions related to women's health and reproductive rights in 2011 and 2012.[48][49] In 2011, state legislatures across the United States introduced over 1100 provisions related to women's health and reproductive rights,[48][51] and in the first quarter of 2012 an additional 944 provisions were introduced in state legislatures, half of which would restrict access to abortion. Legislation has focused on mandatory ultrasounds, narrowing the time when abortions may be performed and limiting insurance coverage of abortion.[49][52]

Abortion restrictions

See also: Types of abortion restrictions in the United States

Democratic strategist Zerlina Maxwell wrote an editorial for U.S. News & World Report in which she cited a Guttmacher Institute analysis showing state legislatures enacted 135 pieces of legislation affecting women's reproductive rights as evidence that the "Republican 'War on Women' is no fiction."[10] The analysis found that between 2000 and 2011, the number of states hostile to abortion rights have increased markedly, and that in 2011 there was an unprecedented rise in the number of provisions passed by state legislatures restricting abortion.[50]

Many states have adopted model legislation written by Americans United for Life, an anti-abortion advocacy group.[53][54] In June 2011, Charmaine Yoest and Denise M. Burke of Americans United, acknowledged the expression in an op-ed for The Wall Street Journal, writing that "Indiana is being threatened with the loss of federal funding for health care and being held up to scorn as having 'declared war on women.'"[55]

Mandatory ultrasounds

Ultrasound of fetus at 14 weeks (profile)

In 2011 and 2012, "war on women" was used to describe the legislation passed by many states requiring that women seeking abortions first undergo government-mandated ultrasounds.[56] Some states require that women view the image of the fetus and others require that women be offered the opportunity to listen to the fetal heartbeat. Since many women's pregnancies are not far enough along to get an image via a traditional ultrasound, transvaginal ultrasounds, which involve the physician inserting a probe into the woman's vagina, may be required, but these requirements vary state to state.[57][58] Critics have questioned the value of having a medically unnecessary procedure, and characterized it as similar to some states' legal definition of rape.[59] Writer Megan Carpentier underwent the procedure and indicated that although it was not comparable to being raped, the process was "uncomfortable to the point of being painful, emotionally triggering... and something that no government should force its citizens to undergo to make a political point."[60][61] However, in an article critical of the assumptions of those on both sides of the issue, sociologist Tracy Weitz, who opposes mandatory ultrasound, notes that "the use of trans-vaginal ultrasounds is routine among abortion providers."[62]

Virginia State legislators passed a bill in 2012 requiring women to have an ultrasound before having an abortion.[63] The legislation, signed by Governor Bob McDonnell, would require that the provider of an abortion make a copy of the fetal image and include it in the file of the patient.[64] In Louisiana, where pregnant women are already required to view ultrasounds of their fetuses before receiving an abortion, lawmakers proposed a bill that would require them to listen to the embryonic/fetal heartbeat as well.[65] Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett drew criticism when he said of his state's new mandatory transvaginal ultrasound law that "You can't make anybody watch, okay? Because you just have to close your eyes. As long as it's on the exterior and not the interior."[66]

Gestational limits on abortion

See also: Late termination of pregnancy § United States 2

In June 2013, Representative Trent Franks of Arizona, passed a national bill in the House Judiciary Committee that would ban abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy. The bill did not include exceptions for rape, incest or health of the mother.[67][68][69] In responding to the bill's lack of exception for rape victims, Franks stated that "the incidence of rape resulting in pregnancy are very low," which was compared to the controversial statements made by Todd Akin; studies show that the incidence of pregnancy from rape is approximately equal to or higher than the rate from consensual sex.[68][70] Afterwards, the House Rules Committee added exceptions for rape and incest.[71] Georgia legislators passed HB 954, a "fetal pain bill" criminalizing abortions performed after the 20th week of pregnancy. The bill, which does not contain exemptions for rape or incest, has been referred to as the "women as livestock bill" by opponents[72] after Representative Terry England made a comparison between women seeking abortions for stillborn fetuses to delivering calves and pigs on a farm.[73]

In April 2012, Arizona passed legislation banning abortions occurring 20 weeks after a woman's last menstrual period. A judge from the District Court initially upheld this ban, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in August 2012 that the ban could not be enforced until an appeal on the law had been decided.[74] The Ninth Circuit then struck down the law as unconstitutional in May 2013.[75] Eight other states, including Nebraska,[76] Alabama,[77] Georgia,[78] Indiana,[79] Idaho[80] and Oklahoma,[81] have passed such bills; unlike Arizona, the gestational age in these states is calculated from fertilization (20 weeks post-fertilization-which means 22 weeks LMP).[82] In 2013, Idaho's ban was struck down as unconstitutional by a federal judge.[83] States such as Ohio have proposed six-week abortion bans, the earliest time embryonic or fetal cardiac activity can usually be detected.[84]

Defining the beginning of human personhood

Main article: Beginning of human personhood

In 2011, voters in Mississippi rejected Initiative 26, a measure that would have declared that human life begins at fertilization, which had drawn support from conservative Republicans and Democrats. Critics of the initiative indicated that the law would have made abortion illegal even in cases where the mother's life is in danger.[85]

Targeted regulation of abortion providers

Since the mid-1990s, the regulatory burden on abortion providers has increased.[86] TRAP laws (Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers) have been passed in numerous states.[87] In 2015, the United States Supreme Court agreed to an emergency appeal regarding a Texas law that would have shut down 10 of the remaining 19 abortion clinics within the state. Sometime in the fall of 2015, the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to hear the clinics' full appeal of the ruling, which, if held, would be the largest abortion case before the Supreme Court in nearly 25 years.[88]

Other

In February 2011, South Dakota state legislators considered a bill that would expand that state's definition of justifiable homicide to include killings committed by a party other than a pregnant woman for the purpose of preventing harm to a fetus, a measure interpreted by critics as allowing the killing of abortion providers.[89] Similar legislation was considered in Iowa.[90]

Several state legislatures have passed or are considering legislation to prevent parents from suing doctors who fail to warn them of fetal problems, which are sometimes known as wrongful birth lawsuits. Some of the laws, such as one proposed in Arizona, make exceptions for "intentional or grossly negligent acts", while others do not.[91][92][93]

A Kansas bill passed March 2012 requires doctors to warn women seeking abortions that they are linked to breast cancer,[94] a claim that has been refuted by the medical community.[95]

In April 2012, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker signed into law a bill requiring doctors who prescribe the medical abortion pill to have three meetings with patients or be subject to felony charges. Planned Parenthood suspended non-surgical abortions in the state.[96]

Birth control

Representative Jackie Speier criticizes Rush Limbaugh for his comments about Sandra Fluke

On January 20, 2012, Health and Human Services' Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced a mandate requiring that all health plans provide coverage for all contraceptives approved by the FDA as part of preventive health services for women.[97] Following complaints from Catholic bishops, an exception was created for religious institutions whereby an employee of a religious institution that does not wish to provide reproductive health care can seek it directly from the insurance company at no additional cost.[98] Missouri Senator Roy Blunt proposed an amendment (the Blunt Amendment) that would have "allowed employers to refuse to include contraception in health care coverage if it violated their religious or moral beliefs",[99] but it was voted down 51-48 by the U.S. Senate on March 1, 2012.[100] A bill passed by the Arizona House would allow employers to exclude medication used for contraceptive purposes from their health insurance plans.[15][16]

Sandra Fluke reading a prepared statement for U.S. Congressional testimony, 16 February 2012.

In February 2012, Republican Congressman Darrell Issa convened an all-male panel addressing religious freedom and contraceptive mandates for health insurers. He did not allow Sandra Fluke, a Georgetown University Law Center student who was proposed as a witness by the Democrats, to participate in the hearing, arguing that Fluke was not a member of the clergy.[101] Democratic Representatives then staged a separate panel where Fluke was allowed to speak. Later that month, American conservative talk-show host Rush Limbaugh controversially called Sandra Fluke a "slut" and "prostitute" and continued in similar fashion for the next two days.[102] Foster Friess, the billionaire supporting the candidacy of Rick Santorum, suggested in February 2012 that women put aspirin between their knees as a form of contraception.[103] Limbaugh echoed the sentiment, saying he would "buy all of the women at Georgetown University as much aspirin to put between their knees as they want."[104] Nancy Pelosi circulated a petition and asked that Republicans in the House of Representatives disavow the comments by Friess and Limbaugh, which she called "vicious and inappropriate".[105]

Defunding Planned Parenthood

Several Democrats used the phrase War on Women to criticize the Republican Party after House Republicans passed legislation to cut off funding for Planned Parenthood in February 2011.[106] Texas, Indiana and Kansas have passed legislation in an effort to defund the organization. Arizona, Ohio and New Hampshire are considering similar legislation. In Texas, lawmakers reduced funds for family planning from $111M to $37M.[107] The future of the Women's Health Program in Texas, which receives 90% of its funding from the federal government, is unclear.[108] The Indiana legislature passed a bill restricting Medicaid funds for Planned Parenthood.[109] Indiana Representative Bob Morris later referred to the Girl Scouts of the USA as a tactical arm of Planned Parenthood.[110] A 2011 Kansas statute cut funding to Planned Parenthood.[111]

On January 31, 2012, breast cancer organization Susan G. Komen for the Cure stopped funding Planned Parenthood, citing a congressional investigation by Rep. Cliff Stearns and a newly created internal rule about not funding organizations under any federal, state or local investigation.[112] Four days later, Komen's Board of Directors reversed the decision and announced that it would amend the policy to "make clear that disqualifying investigations must be criminal and conclusive in nature and not political".[113] Several top-level staff members resigned from Komen during the controversy.[114]

Defunding international family planning

The National Organization for Women (NOW), in the U.S., in 2011, stated its opinion that "the 'war on women' isn't restricted to U.S. women",[9] saying that the House of Representatives planned to "cut ... international family planning assistance.... [to] include the elimination of all U.S. funds designated for UNFPA"[9] (now known as the United Nations Population Fund).

Violence against women

Rape

Main article: Rape and pregnancy statement controversies in the 2012 United States elections

See also: Pregnancy from rape

In January 2011, the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act moved to change how rape is treated when used to determine whether abortions qualify for Medicaid funding. Under the language of the bill, only cases of "forcible rape" or child sexual abuse would have qualified.[115] Political activist groups Moveon.org and Emily's List charged that this constituted a Republican attempt to "redefine rape".[115][116][117]

In 2014, Michigan law prohibited all public and most private insurers from covering abortions including in cases of rape and incest.[118] It requires women to buy separate insurance and has been called "rape insurance" by opponents because of the possibility that women will need to have separate insurance for an abortion resulting from rape.[118][119]

Unsuccessful Missouri Republican candidate to the U.S. Senate Todd Akin made controversial comments in August 2012 asserting (falsely[120][121][122][123]) that women who are victims of "legitimate rape" rarely experience pregnancy from rape.[31] While he issued an apology for his comments, they were widely criticized, and they sparked a renewed focus on Republican attitudes towards women[8][32][33][124] and "shift[ed] the national discussion to divisive social issues that could repel swing voters rather than economic issues that could attract them".[125]

There were multiple calls from Republicans for Akin to step down as nominee. The Washington Post reported a "stampede" of Republicans dissociating from Akin. NRSC chairman John Cornyn said the Republican Party would no longer provide him Senate election funding.[126] A campaign spokesman for Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan said both disagreed with Akin's position and would not oppose abortion in instances of rape. Ryan reportedly called Akin to advise him to step aside.[127] RNC Chairman Reince Priebus warned Akin not to attend the upcoming 2012 Republican convention and said he should resign the nomination. He described Akin's comments as "biologically stupid" and "bizarre" and said that "This is not mainstream talk that he's referring to and his descriptions of whatever an illegitimate rape is."[128][129]

Other Republican candidates in the 2012 election also created controversy with their comments on rape.[130] Indiana Senate candidate Richard Mourdock, when discussing his opposition to exceptions on abortion bans in cases of rape, said, "I think even if life begins in that horrible situation of rape, that it is something that God intended to happen."[131][132] Tom Smith, the Senate candidate in Pennsylvania, compared pregnancy from rape to pregnancy out of wedlock.[133] Akin, Mourdock, and Smith all lost their races due to backlash from women voters.[134]

Military sexual assault

See also: Sexual assault in the United States military

Columnist Margery Eagan has said that opposition to reforming the military in order to better prosecute sexual assaults constitutes a war on women.[135] Senator Saxby Chambliss of Georgia was criticized for saying that part of the cause of the sexual assault was young officers' "hormone level created by nature".[136]

Domestic violence

The renewal of the Violence Against Women Act, which provides for community violence prevention programs and battered women's shelters, was fiercely opposed by conservative Republicans in 2012.[14] The Act was originally passed in 1994 and has been reauthorized by Congress twice.[137][138] Senate Minority leader Mitch McConnell, who has previously voted against renewal of the Act, said the bill was a distraction from a small business bill.[139] However, in 2013 a strengthened version of the act was passed by Congress with bipartisan support.[140]

Financial assistance

In February 2011, Ms. magazine charged House Republicans with launching a new "war on women" for their proposal to cut the WIC budget by 10%.[141][142] The WIC program, which President Barack Obama has called a spending priority, is a federal assistance program for low-income pregnant women, breastfeeding women, and infants and children under the age of five. The program had been running a surplus, primarily due to decreases in the cost of milk, which make up 20% of WIC expenditures, and lower participation than expected.[142] WIC's budget was later cut by 5.2% as part of the bipartisan budget sequestration in 2013.[142][143]

Workplace and pay discrimination

In April 2012, Governor Scott Walker's repeal of Wisconsin's Equal Pay Enforcement Act was described by opponents as furthering the "war on women", which became a big issue in his recall election.[144] The Equal Pay Enforcement Act was passed in 2009 in response to the large gap between the wages of men and women in Wisconsin. Among other provisions, it allowed workplace discrimination victims redress in the less costly and more accessible state court system, rather than in federal court.[145][146] Defending the repeal, Walker stated that the Act had essentially been nothing but a boon for trial lawyers, incentivizing them to sue job creators, including female business owners, and that the law was being used to clog up the legal system in his state.[147] While it is still illegal in Wisconsin to pay women less on the basis of their sex,[147] the repeal was criticized for reinforcing the gender pay gap, a recurrent theme in the struggle for women's rights. Republican State Senator Glenn Grothman said of the repeal, "You could argue that money is more important for men. I think a guy in their first job, maybe because they expect to be a breadwinner someday, may be a little more money-conscious."[148] Law student Sandra Fluke, criticized Grothman's comment, highlighting legislation that supports equal pay for equal work, such as the federal Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009.[149]

Public opinion

A May 2012 Kaiser Family Foundation poll found that 31 percent of women and 28 percent of men believed there was an ongoing and wide-scale effort to "limit women's reproductive health choices and services".[2][150] 45 percent of women and 44 percent of men responded that some groups would like to limit these choices and services, but it's not wide‐scale.[150] Democrats were more likely than Republicans to say there is a movement, but the largest gap was between liberal and conservative ideologies.[150] Among those women believing these efforts to be wide-scale, 75 percent saw this as "a bad thing" against 16 percent who saw this as "a good thing".[150] In the same poll, 42 percent of women and men have said they have taken some action in response to what they heard regarding reproductive health issues.[2][150]

Potential negative consequences of the term

While the "war on women" rhetoric has been used to target Republican party attacks on women's rights, particularly on issues of reproductive health, research has shown some potential negative impacts of the Democratic party using this terminology. A Cambridge Core study published in 2017 by scholars Simas and Bumgardner found that the use of this rhetoric may steer male voters, particularly liberals who would usually vote for the Democratic party, away from the Democratic party.[151] A study in 2015 by scholars Deckman and McTague found a growth in the gender gap from 7 percentage points in 2008 to 10 between Obama and Romney in 2012.[152] Though it could be theorized that this growing gender gap can be attributed to an increasing female support due to the inclusion of women's issues in Obama's campaign, this is in fact incorrect. In actuality, Obama's male vote decreased from 49% in 2008 to 45% in 2012.[151] The Cambridge Core study attributed this decrease to sexist men who embody a concept called "modern sexism," a version of sexism similar to neosexism that focuses on a belief that sex discrimination no longer exists and, as a result, women should receive no special favors or advantages.[151] As the Encyclopedia of Group Processes and Intergroup Relations puts it," Modern sexism manifests itself in terms of downplaying the existence of discrimination against women and resentment of complaints about sexism and efforts to assist women."[153] This compares to a more traditional form of sexism which is focused on gender roles and the exclusion of women from the public sphere.[151] Simas and Bumgardner theorize that Obama's focus on women's issues drove away male voters who were modern sexists and thus found this focus on women's issues to be futile and unfair. In their study, they find that modern sexism significantly increases the likelihood that men vote for Romney. On the other hand, these results do not hold for female voters.[151] These results imply that the use of rhetoric such as the "war on women" narrative which emphasizes women's rights as a salient political category may harm the Democratic party by pushing away Democratically aligned voters who do not prioritize or believe in women's rights as requiring special attention.

Potential positive consequences of the term

Though some research has shown a negative impact of the adoption of the term "war on women," some research has shown potential positive consequences of the political and public attention that terms like "war on women" bring to issues. One study by Katherine McCabe found that when abortion becomes a salient political topic, voters revert back to their pre-existing beliefs on abortion more so than when it is less salient.[154] This contradicts former scholarship showing that voters tend to side with the issue preferences of their party, especially in recent years. This finding may serve as emphasis for the importance of terms like the "war on women" which bring more public attention and salience to issues like abortion, potentially causing more people to vote in line with their beliefs rather than their party's beliefs.

Political campaigns

Mark Udall

In the Colorado race of the 2014 midterm elections, the Republican candidate Cory Gardner unseated the incumbent Democratic Senator Mark Udall. NARAL Pro-Choice America gives Udall a 100% rating for abortion rights,[155] and Gardner earned a 0% rating.[156] Udall ran a number of TV ads highlighting his abortion stance,[157] which critics said was a negative campaign that overplayed the "war on women" issue.[158][159][160][161][162][163]

Sandra Fluke stood as a candidate in California, losing by 61 to 39.[163]

2012 presidential candidates

President Barack Obama and Mitt Romney shake hands in the Oval Office

The "war on women" narrative was particularly salient in the 2012 presidential election because Obama's campaign largely targeted female voters and attempted to spread the narrative that the Republican party and Mitt Romney were out of touch with women's issues. A 2015 Fordham University study by Deckman and McTague studied the effects of the "war on women" narrative and vote choice in the 2012 election with respect to two issues: birth control insurance coverage and abortion attitudes.[152] They found that voters, but particularly women, who supported the Obama administration's birth control mandate were far more likely to vote for Obama than those who didn't.[152] However, abortion attitudes were found not to be a strong predictor of vote choice in this election.[152] This disparity was characterized largely due to a difference in conceptualization of the issues. While abortion was seen more as a moral/cultural issue, the birth control mandate was viewed more as an economic and social welfare issue.[152] Due to these differences, it is difficult to tell whether the "war on women" narrative played a positive or negative role in women's vote choice in the 2012 presidential election.

2014 Democratic candidates

Birth Control Pills

Despite the power of the "war on women" rhetoric in 2012 presidential and congressional elections, the 2014 election cycle saw far less deployment of the term by Democratic candidates.[164] After the 2012 presidential elections experienced the largest gender gap in partisanship based on voting since Gallup began tracking presidential voting behavior in 1952, the Republican party felt the pressure to regain its female voting contingent for the 2014 elections.[164] Many efforts were taken to bring women back to the Republican party and reduce the public perception at that time that the Republican party didn't address women's issues. For one, the Republican party took considerable efforts to dismantle the use of "the war on women" narrative by attempting to show female voters that they did care about women's issues and to highlight instances when the Democratic party demonstrated "anti-woman" behavior.[164] Furthermore, the Republican party attempted to re-attract female voters by taking a pro birth control pill stance, telling voters that they supported birth control pill access over the counter, 24-7.[164] This move was found to be particularly wise by sociology scholar Deana Rohlinger because it "balances religious freedom and women's rights," protecting Republicans' relationship to their religious and socially conservative constituents by continuing to support workplaces in their right to deny birth control access on the basis of religious freedom, but still allowing birth control to be accessible to those who need it.[164] Though these efforts did not close the gender partisan gap in the 2014 elections, they did diminish Democratic candidates use of the "war on women" rhetoric by highlighting Democratic hypocrisy at times and showcasing Republican efforts to support women's issues.

2016 presidential candidates

Political analysts have interpreted the 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign as appealing to a female constituency, and have used the phrase "war on women" to describe Republican opposition.[158][165][166][167] Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina said "If Hillary Clinton were to face a female nominee, there are a whole set of things that she won't be able to talk about. She won't be able to talk about being the first woman president. She won't be able to talk about a war on women without being challenged. She won't be able to play the gender card."[168]

Donald Trump, a Republican candidate for the 2016 Presidency attended a Fox News debate in August 2015, where Megyn Kelly asked him about how he would respond to a Hillary Clinton campaign saying that he was waging a "war on women".[169][170] In a later interview with Don Lemon on CNN Tonight, Trump said that Kelly is a "lightweight" and had "blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever".[171][172] Trump tweeted that his remark referred to Kelly's "nose" but was interpreted by critics as a reference to menstruation. RedState editor Erick Erickson cancelled Trump's invitation to a RedState meeting, saying "there are just real lines of decency a person running for President should not cross".[173][174]

Reaction

Response from Republicans

Critics of the term have denied that a war on women exists and some have suggested that it is a ploy to influence women voters. Reince Priebus, the Chairman of the RNC, referred to the War as a "fiction", saying: "If the Democrats said we had a war on caterpillars and every mainstream media outlet talked about the fact that Republicans have a war on caterpillars, then we'd have problems with caterpillars."[175][176][177] Republican Representative Cathy McMorris Rodgers called the war a myth, saying "It's an effort to drive a political wedge in an election year." Referring to the 2010 elections and Nancy Pelosi, she said that "It could be argued that the women actually unelected the first woman Speaker of the House."[178][179] South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley said in 2012 "There is no war on women. Women are doing well."[180] Republican Representative Paul Ryan mocked the idea of a Republican War on Women, saying "Now it's a war on women; tomorrow it's going to be a war on left-handed Irishmen or something like that."[181]

Republican Senator Lisa Murkowski countered the criticism from her fellow party members, challenging them to "go home and talk to your wife and your daughters" if they did not think there was a war on women, saying "It makes no sense to make this attack on women."[3]

After the 2012 rape and pregnancy controversies, Republican strategists met with aides of Republican figures to advise them on how to run against female candidates.[182][183]

Democratic sexual harassment scandals

Members of the Democratic Party, both prominent and local, have been accused of participating in the war on women. In a column for USA Today, Glenn Reynolds wrote in July 2013 that "most of the action in the war on women seems to be coming from the Democratic front," referring to the allegations of sexual harassment against San Diego mayor Bob Filner, the Anthony Weiner sexting scandal, and the Eliot Spitzer prostitution scandal.[184] The Republican National Senatorial Committee has also used these scandals in press releases, tying Democratic Senators in Iowa and New Hampshire to the allegations.[185][186]

The messaging from Republicans was described as unlikely to be effective by Garance Franke-Ruta in The Atlantic because "[the War on Women] was an argument about Republican policies on women ... rather than about reprehensible individual behavior." Noting that many of the targets are not on upcoming ballots, Franke-Ruta continued by saying the Republican Party "is going to need its own pro-active framework for thinking about what is happening in America and why women have been drawn to Democrats in numbers that matter in key elections."[19]

Other reactions

Jonathan Alter characterized the phrase as an "alliteratve but unfair notion".[187]

David Weigel called for "a moment of silence" in his article entitled "The 'War on Women' Is Over: The life cycle of a political talking point, from birth to adolescence to death." In it he explained his understanding of the stages in the "life cycle" of the Democratic "talking point".[11]

Molly Redden wrote an article for Mother Jones entitled "The War on Women is Over -- and Women Lost". She described the difficulties faced by abortion providers: "Activists have been calling it the 'war on women.' But the onslaught of new abortion restrictions has been so successful, so strategically designed, and so well coordinated that the war in many places has essentially been lost."[188]

Feminist Camille Paglia has called the term "war on women" a "tired cliché that is as substance-less as a druggy mirage but that the inept GOP has never been able to counter."[189]

See also

• Antifeminism
• Culture war
• Birth control movement in the United States
• War as metaphor
• Forced pregnancy

References

1. "War On Women". American Civil Liberties Union. Archived from the original on May 6, 2012. Retrieved November 16, 2022.
2. Rosalsky, Greg (2012-05-31). "'War On Women' Only Seen By Third Of Female Poll Respondents". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 2013-08-28.
3. Johnson, Luke (April 5, 2012). "Lisa Murkowski: 'It Makes No Sense To Make This Attack On Women'". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 17 July 2012.
4. Talbot, Margaret (19 March 2012). "Taking Control". The New Yorker. Retrieved 28 August 2013.
5. Bendery, Jennifer (March 1, 2012). "House Democrats Raise $1.1 Million In 'War On Women' Campaign". The Huffington Post. Retrieved December 14, 2013.
6. Boxer, Barbara (April 15, 2012). "Foul play: War on women is real". Politico. Retrieved December 14, 2013.
7. Houston
8. Zengerle, Patricia (September 2012). "Democrats charge Republicans with "war on women" at convention". Employee Benefits News.
9. On International Women's Day NOW Calls for End to the "War on Women": Statement of NOW President Terry O'Neill (National Organization for Women), March 8, 2011, as accessed December 12, 2013 (probably press release).
10. Maxwell, Zerlina (April 10, 2012). "Reproductive Health Laws Prove GOP 'War on Women' Is No Fiction". U.S. News & World Report.
11. Weigel, David (April 12, 2012). "The "War on Women" Is Over". Slate.
12. Crary, David (November 8, 2012). "Election won't end abortion /contraception debate". Associated Press. Retrieved November 21, 2012.
13. Feldmann, Linda (February 3, 2011). "Did bill try to redefine rape? GOP backs down after public outcry". The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved August 1, 2012.
14. Weisman, Jonathan (March 14, 2012). "Women Figure Anew in Senate's Latest Battle". The New York Times.
15. "Arizona Might Curb Birth Control Coverage". The New York Times. March 17, 2012.
16. Marlowe, Lara (March 16, 2012). "Romney enters fray in Republican 'war on women'". The Irish Times. Archived from the original on 2012-03-17. Retrieved 2023-04-16.
17. "Why Women Are Angry". Newsweek. October 20, 1991.
18. "The Republican War Against Women by Tanya Melich". Kirkus Book Reviews. Retrieved April 22, 2012.
19. The Atlantic: The GOP's Totally Reactive Reaction to the War on Women. Garance Franke-Ruta, August 2013.
20. Epstein, Jennifer (April 8, 2011). "Nancy Pelosi calls GOP budget 'a war on women'". Politico. Retrieved 2012-08-29.
21. Barbaro, Michael; Twohey, Megan (May 14, 2016). "Crossing the Line: How Donald Trump Behaved With Women in Private". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2016-11-01.
22. Parker, Kathleen (March 25, 2016). "Donald Trump's war on women is officially in full swing". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2016-11-01.
23. "Dozens of Women Are Protesting Donald Trump Outside Trump Tower". The Cut. Retrieved 2016-11-01.
24. Twohey, Megan; Barbaro, Michael (2016-10-12). "Two Women Say Donald Trump Touched Them Inappropriately". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2016-11-01.
25. Graham, David A. "Trump Brags About Groping Women". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2016-11-01.
26. Sarah Boesveld (September 4, 2012). "Pro-life Democrats 'don't buy the line into the war on women'". National Post. Canada. Retrieved February 13, 2014.
27. K Jensen, Priebus Says Gender Battle Fictional as Caterpillar War [1] in Bloomberg
28. "Democrats double down in ' War on Women :' Goal here is to rescue Inslee". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. May 5, 2012. Retrieved January 2, 2013.
29. Haberman, Maggie (2013-03-11). "Next 'war on women' front: Pennsylvania governor race?". Politico. Retrieved 2013-08-20.
30. "Op-ed: Ann Wagner: 'War on women' rhetoric a distraction from economy". Archived from the original on September 9, 2012. Retrieved March 25, 2013.
31. Maxwell, Zerlina (August 20, 2012). "Todd Akin, Paul Ryan and the very real war on women". Daily News. New York. Archived from the original on August 22, 2012.
32. "Akin's comments reignite war on women". NBC News. August 20, 2012. Archived from the original on August 24, 2012.
33. "Despite Denials Akin's Comments Are Part GOP War On Women". CBS. August 20, 2012.
34. Metzler, Rebekah (August 2, 2013). "GOP Turns 'War on Women' Back on Democrats". U.S. News. Retrieved September 1, 2013.
35. Rachel Weiner and Sean Sullivan (July 31, 2013). "GOP finds its own 'War on Women'". The Washington Post. Retrieved September 1, 2013.
36. Joseph, Cameron (August 2, 2013). "GOP committees unite to push 'Democrats' war on women' attack". The Hill. Retrieved September 1, 2013.
37. "Anti-abortion groups turn 'war on women' charge against Democrats". TheHill. 30 May 2012.
38. The Nation: Seeing Eye to Eye; A Radical Feminist Who Could Dine With (Not On) Conservatives, in The New York Times, § Week In Review, April 17, 2005, as accessed May 9, 2010.
39. Dworkin, Andrea (1989). Beaver Talks. In Dworkin, Andrea (1997 (ISBN 0-7432-3626-2)). Life and Death: Unapologetic Writings on the Continuing War Against Women (New York: Free Press), p. 89.
40. Dworkin, Andrea. Life and Death: Unapologetic Writings on the Continuing War Against Women, op. cit., cover I.
41. Williamson, Elizabeth (April 25, 2004). "Abortion Rights Advocates Flood D.C." The Washington Post. Archived from the original on May 14, 2011.
42. "Abortion activists on the march". BBC News. April 26, 2004.
43. Flanders, Laura, ed. (2004). The W Effect: Bush's War On Women. New York: The Feminist Press. ISBN 978-1-55861-471-0.
44. Federici, Silvia (29 July 2021). Caliban and the witch : women, the body and primitive accumulation. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-241-53253-9. OCLC 1294640032.
45. Esterchild, Elizabeth (2008). "Book Review: George W. Bush and the War on Women. By Barbara Finlay". Gender & Society. 22 (6): 824–826. doi:10.1177/0891243207312133. S2CID 144060973.
46. Finlay, Barbara (2006). George W. Bush and the War on Women: Turning Back the Clock on Progress. London: Zed Books. ISBN 978-1-84277-784-8.
47. Gray, Kaili Joy (January 4, 2011). "The Coming War on Women". Daily Kos.
48. "States Enact Record Number of Abortion Restrictions in 2011". Guttmacher Institute. January 5, 2012.
49. "State Policy Trends: Abortion and Contraception in the Crosshairs". Guttmacher Institute. April 13, 2012.
50. Gold, Rachel Benson; Nash, Elizabeth (Winter 2012). "Troubling Trend: More States Hostile to Abortion Rights as Middle Ground Shrinks". Guttmacher Policy Review. 15 (1).
51. Lithwick, Dahlia (April 20, 2012). "The Faux Mommy Wars". Slate.
52. Eckholm, Erik (March 1, 2012). "Poll Finds Wide Support for Birth Control Coverage". The New York Times.
53. Bazelon, Emily (May 27, 2011). "The Reincarnation of Pro-life". The New York Times.
54. Karen McVeigh (25 May 2012). "Anti-abortion group drafting legislation to limit women's right to choose". The Guardian.
55. Yoest, Charmaine; Burke, Denise M. (June 27, 2011). "Planned Parenthood Takes on the States". The Wall Street Journal.
56. O'Neill, Terry (Feb 2, 2012). "Mandatory Ultrasound Laws Violate Women's Rights and Bodies". The Huffington Post. Retrieved Dec 12, 2013.
57. "State Policies in Brief: Requirement for Ultrasound" (PDF). Guttmacher Institute. 1 January 2014. Retrieved 27 January 2014.
58. "Laws Affecting Reproductive Health and Rights: Trends in the First Quarter of 2012". Guttmacher Institute. April 2012. Retrieved 27 January 2014.
59. Kristof, Nicholas D. (March 3, 2012). "When States Abuse Women". The New York Times.
60. Carpentier, Megan (April 17, 2012). "I had a transvaginal ultrasound: My perspective on the mandate that touched off 2012′s War On Women". The Raw Story.
61. Lowder, J. Bryan (April 18, 2012). "What's It Like To Undergo a Transvaginal Ultrasound?". Slate.
62. "What We Are Missing in the Trans-vaginal Ultrasound Debate". RH Reality Check. March 2013.
63. Madison, Lucy (March 7, 2012). "Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell signs Virginia ultrasound bill". CBS News.
64. Kumar, Anita (February 1, 2012). "Virginia Senate passes bill requiring women to undergo ultrasound before abortion". The Washington Post.
65. "Bill would require woman hear heartbeat before abortion". WWL (AM). April 18, 2012.
66. Bassett, Laura (2012-03-15). "Tom Corbett, Pennsylvania Governor, On Ultrasound Mandate: Just 'Close Your Eyes'". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 2013-08-20.
67. Milbank, Dana (June 12, 2012). "Trent Franks's abortion claim and the manly Republican Party". Washington Post. Archived from the original on June 16, 2013.
68. Terbush, Jon (June 12, 2012). "The War on Women is back". The Week.
69. Cottle, Michelle (June 14, 2013). "Rep. Trent Franks: Just Another Idiot When It Comes to Abortion". The Daily Beast.
70. The claim that the incidence of rape resulting in pregnancy is 'very low' : Washington Post Fact Checker
71. Bassett, Laura (June 14, 2013). "Rape, Incest Exceptions Quietly Added To Trent Franks' Abortion Bill". The Huffington Post.
72. "Lindsay Beyerstein - Profile". In These Times. Retrieved 2013-08-20.
73. Peck, Adam (March 12, 2012). "Georgia Republican Compares Women to Cows, Pigs, And Chickens". Think Progress.
74. "Ninth Circuit Blocks Arizona's 20-Week Abortion Ban". Christian Post. 2012-08-03. Retrieved 2013-08-20.
75. Santos, Fernanda (May 21, 2013). "Arizona Law on Abortions Struck Down as Restrictive". The New York Times.
76. "LB1103 - Adopt the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act". Nebraska Legislature. Retrieved April 20, 2012.
77. "Legislative Detail: AL House Bill 18 - Regular Session 2011". LegiScan. Retrieved April 20, 2012.
78. "House Bill 954". Georgia General Assembly. Archived from the original on November 9, 2012. Retrieved April 20, 2012.
79. "HOUSE BILL No. 1127". in.gov. Retrieved April 20, 2012.
80. "Senate Bill 1148". Idaho Legislature. Archived from the original on July 31, 2016. Retrieved April 20, 2012.
81. "Bill Information for SB 1274". Oklahoma State Legislature. Retrieved April 20, 2012.
82. Eckholm, Erik (July 12, 2012). "Lawsuit Tries to Block New Arizona Abortion Law". The New York Times.
83. Zuckerman, Laura (2013-03-07). "Federal judge strikes down Idaho ban on late-term abortions". Reuters. Archived from the original on February 3, 2016. Retrieved 2013-08-20.
84. McCartney, Hannah (April 19, 2012). "Ohio's Heartbeat Bill Drawing National Attention". CityBeat.
85. Seelye, Katharine Q. (November 8, 2011). "Mississippi Voters Reject Anti-Abortion Measure". The New York Times.
86. Yeoman, Barry (September–October 2001). "The Quiet War on Abortion". Mother Jones.
87. Carmon, Irin (April 12, 2012). "Abortion options fade in South". Salon.
88. "Supreme Court blocks Texas abortion-clinic rules". FOX News via Associated Press. June 29, 2015. Archived from the original on June 29, 2015. Retrieved June 29, 2015.
89. Sheppard, Kate (February 15, 2011). "South Dakota Moves To Legalize Killing Abortion Providers". Mother Jones.
90. Sheppard, Kate (February 24, 2011). "Iowa Bills Could Also Allow for "Justifiable Homicide" Defense Against Abortion Docs". Mother Jones.
91. "Senate approves bill on 'wrongful births'". Arizona Capitol Times. The Associated Press. 2012-03-06. Retrieved 2013-08-20.
92. "Should Parents Be Able To Sue For 'Wrongful Birth'?". NPR. 2012-05-15. Retrieved 2013-08-20.
93. Durden, Chris (March 16, 2012). "House panel approves changes to abortion regulations". KWCH 12.
94. Celock, John (February 6, 2012). "Kansas Abortion Bill Would Impose Sweeping Restrictions". The Huffington Post.
95. Celock, John (March 17, 2012). "Kansas Abortion Bill To Ban Procedure By State Workers Passes House". The Huffington Post.
96. Bauer, Scott (April 20, 2012). "Planned Parenthood suspends pill abortions in Wis". The Kansas City Star.
97. Hicks, Josh (March 8, 2012). "A whopper ad for John Boehner's GOP opponent". The Washington Post.
98. "FACT SHEET: Women's Preventive Services and Religious Institutions". White House Office of the Press Secretary. 10 February 2012. Retrieved 27 January 2014.
99. Parkinson, John (March 1, 2012). "Women's Health vs. Religious Freedom: House Leaders Debate Birth Control Mandate". ABC News.
100. Negrin, Matt; Miller, Sunlen (March 1, 2012). "Senate Blocks Blunt's Repeal of Contraception Mandate". ABC News.
101. "Rep. Darrell Issa Bars Minority Witness, a Woman, on Contraception". ABC News. February 16, 2012.
102. Portero, Ashley (March 22, 2012). "MoveOn Ad Uses Conservatives' Own Words In 'War On Women'". International Business Times.
103. James, Frank (February 16, 2012). "Santorum Ally Friess Praises Old-School 'Contraceptive': Aspirin Between Knees". NPR.
104. Bassett, Laura; Bendery, Jennifer (March 1, 2012). "Rush Limbaugh: I'll Buy Georgetown Women 'As Much Aspirin To Put Between Their Knees As They Want'". The Huffington Post.
105. Geiger, Kim (March 2, 2012). "Rush Limbaugh's 'slut' comment draws rebukes from all sides". Los Angeles Times.
106. Nather, David; Nocera, Kate (February 18, 2011). "House votes to defund Planned Parenthood". Politico.
107. Falkenberg, Lisa (February 14, 2012). "Dumping Planned Parenthood may be expensive". Houston Chronicle.
108. Tomlinson, Chris (April 15, 2012). "Women's health fight over politics, not health". Star-Telegram.
109. Guarino, Mark (April 29, 2011). "Indiana governor vows to block federal funds for Planned Parenthood". Christian Science Monitor.
110. Guarino, Mark (February 22, 2012). "Indiana lawmaker slams 'radicalized' pro-abortion group. Yes, Girl Scouts". Christian Science Monitor.
111. "Judge blocks Kansas law aimed at Planned Parenthood". Reuters. August 1, 2011.
112. Goldberg, Jeffrey (February 2, 2012). "Top Susan G. Komen Official Resigned Over Planned Parenthood Cave-In". The Atlantic. Retrieved February 3, 2012.
113. "Statement from Susan G. Komen Board of Directors and Founder and CEO Nancy G. Brinker". Susan G. Komen for the Cure. February 3, 2012. Archived from the original on 2012-02-04. Retrieved 2023-04-15.
114. "Komen Foundation VP resigns, blasts Planned Parenthood". CNN. February 7, 2012.
115. Baumann, Nick (January 28, 2011). "The House GOP's Plan to Redefine Rape". Mother Jones.
116. "Sign the Petition: "Bruises and broken bones do not define rape - a lack of consent does. Stand up and oppose the dangerous GOP legislation to redefine rape."". Moveon.org. Archived from the original on November 7, 2013. Retrieved August 1, 2012.
117. "EMILY's List Takes Action Against Boehner's Radical Anti-Woman Agenda". Emily's List. February 2, 2011. Retrieved August 1, 2012.
118. Abcarian, Robin (December 12, 2013). "'Rape insurance,' a new front in the GOP's clueless 'war on women'". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on January 13, 2014. Retrieved 21 August 2012.
119. Woods, Ashley (13 March 2014). "Michigan's 'Rape Insurance' Abortion Rider Law Goes Into Effect Today". Huffington Post. Retrieved 15 March 2014.
120. Carroll, Linda (21 August 2012). "Doctors appalled over Rep. Akin's comments that 'legitimate rape' prevents pregnancy". NBC News. Retrieved 21 August 2012.
121. Belluck, Pam (2012-08-21). "Health Experts Dismiss Assertions on Rape". The New York Times. Retrieved 2012-08-21.
122. Danielle Dellorto, Experts: Rape does not lower odds of pregnancy, CNN Health (22 August 2012)
123. Sharon Begley and Susan Heavey, Rape trauma as barrier to pregnancy has no scientific basis, Reuters (20 August 2012).
124. Robinson, Eugene (August 20, 2012). "Todd Akin's comment brings 'war on women' back to prominence". The Washington Post.
125. Akin imbroglio is bad news for Republicans Tom Cohen, CNN updated 3:23 PM EDT, Wed August 22, 2012
126. Henderson, Nia-Malika; Kane, Paul (2012-08-20). "National GOP pulls funding from Todd Akin's Missouri race". The Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 20 August 2012.
127. "Reports: Paul Ryan called Todd Akin — Tim Mak". Politico.Com. 2012-08-08. Retrieved 2012-08-21.
128. Killough, Ashley (August 20, 2012). "GOP chair: Akin should drop out, skip convention". CNN. Archived from the original on December 8, 2012. Retrieved 21 August 2012.
129. "PICKET: RNC Chair wants Akin to 'step aside' and not come to convention". The Washington Times. Retrieved 2012-08-21.
130. Green, Joshua (November 6, 2012). "Obama Wins, Big Time". Business Week. Archived from the original on November 7, 2012.
131. Raju, Manu. "Richard Mourdock under fire for rape remarks". Retrieved 24 October 2012.
132. "Richard Mourdock's response to abortion question provokes controversy in Indiana Senate debate". Indianapolis Star.
133. Couloumbis, Angela (2012-08-29). "Pennsylvania Senate candidate Tom Smith tangled up over rape and abortion". Philadelphia Inquirer. Archived from the original on October 27, 2013. Retrieved 2013-08-20.
134. Haberkorn, Jennifer (November 6, 2012). "Abortion, rape controversy shaped key races". Politico.
135. Eagan, Margery (June 16, 2013). "Eagan: Lawmakers in real war on women". Boston Herald.
136. Bassett, Laura (June 6, 2013). "DSCC Compares Saxby Chambliss, Erick Erickson To Todd Akin". The Huffington Post.
137. Miller, Sunlen (March 16, 2012). "Politics vs. Policy: Violence Against Women Act Dustup in Senate". ABC News.
138. Hunter, Kathleen (March 16, 2012). "Senate Democrats Aim to Extend Violence Against Women Act". Businessweek. Archived from the original on March 17, 2012.
139. Kellman, Laurie (March 16, 2012). "Democrats raise violence against women act". Seattle Post-Intelligencer.
140. Henderson, Nia-Malika (7 March 2013). "Obama signs a strengthened Violence Against Women Act". The Washington Post. Retrieved 23 January 2014.
141. "Republican House Leaders Launch New War on Women". Ms. Magazine. February 14, 2011.
142. "House Republicans want to cut WIC by 10%". CNN. February 25, 2011.
143. "The Sequester: Absolutely everything you could possibly need to know, in one FAQ". The Washington Post. March 1, 2013.
144. Terkel, Amanda (April 17, 2012). "Scott Walker Recall: 'War On Women' Fight Becomes Big Issue In Election". The Huffington Post.
145. Goldberg, Michelle (April 7, 2012). "Wisconsin's Repeal of Equal Pay Rights Adds to Battles for Women". The Daily Beast.
146. Wyler, Grace (April 9, 2012). "Wisconsin Republican: Women Are Paid Less Because 'Money Is More Important For Men'". Business Insider. Archived from the original on April 27, 2012.
147. Terkel, Amanda (April 23, 2012). "Scott Walker Pressed For Answers On Wisconsin Equal Pay Law Repeal". The Huffington Post.
148. Shahid, Aliyah (April 11, 2012). "Wisconsin GOPer: Women make less because 'Money is more important for men'". New York Daily News. Archived from the original on May 4, 2012.
149. Fluke, Sandra (April 17, 2012). "Who says women don't care about wages?". CNN.
150. "Kaiser Health Tracking Poll" (PDF). Kaiser Family Foundation. May 2012. Retrieved 27 December 2013.
151. Simas, Elizabeth; Bumgardner, Marcia (May 2017). "Modern Sexism and the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election: Reassessing the Casualties of the "War on Women"". Politics & Gender. 13 (September): 359–378. doi:10.1017/S1743923X17000083. S2CID 148886113.
152. Deckman, Melissa; McTague, John (January 2015). "Did the "War on Women" Work? Women, Men, and the Birth Control Mandate in the 2012 Presidential Election". American Politics Research. 43 (1): 3–26. doi:10.1177/1532673X14535240. hdl:11603/33668. ISSN 1532-673X. S2CID 154621964.
153. Levine, John; Hogg, Michael (2010). Encyclopedia of Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi:10.4135/9781412972017. ISBN 978-1-4129-4208-9.
154. McCabe, Katherine T. (2022-10-01). "Can we learn from 2012? Priming and abortion's influence on voting decisions". Electoral Studies. 79: 102518. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2022.102518. ISSN 0261-3794. S2CID 251887626.
155. NARAL Pro-Choice America. "2014 Congressional Record on Choice". prochoiceamerica.org.
156. "The Senate Races With the Biggest Ideological Stakes". FiveThirtyEight. 8 July 2014.
157. Joshua Green (8 Oct 2015). "The Battle for Colorado Is the Battle for America". Bloomberg. Torbit blurted out what anyone in Colorado with a TV can see: "His ads are all about abortion!"...But the main line of attack is Gardner's record on birth control and abortion, which he opposes even in cases of rape and incest.
158. Kay Steiger (6 Jun 2015). "Will We Be Talking About The 'War On Women' In 2016?". ThinkProgress.
159. Jack Healey (5 Nov 2014). "Mark Udall of Colorado Loses Senate Seat to Cory Gardner, a Republican". The New York Times. Mr. Udall's campaign echoed what Republicans called a "war on women" strategy, casting Mr. Gardner as a rigid opponent of abortion who supported legal rights for embryos and whose positions could outlaw some forms of birth control.
160. "The Surprising Struggles of Mark Udall to Win Colorado Women". 27 October 2014. The "War on Women" is a playbook Democrats ran successfully in 2012, with significant assists from GOP senatorial candidates Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock whose inopportune remarks on women and rape helped paint the party as out-of-touch on female issues. Unfortunately for Democrats, there have been no Akin and Murdoch repeats and candidates like Gardner have been much savvier in their messaging on women's issues. "A myopic focus on reproductive freedom and the 'War on the Women' does not seem to be an effective way to mobilize and motivate women in a year when the economy and jobs are at the forefront of voters' minds, and GOP candidates have not made the same kinds of mistakes that Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock did in 2012," says Jennifer Lawless, director of American University's Women & Politics Institute.
161. Henderson, Nia-Malika (5 Nov 2014). "How 'Mark Uterus' lost in Colorado". Washington Post. For the "war on women" message to actually be effective for Democratic candidates, one key thing has to happen: Women have to show up and vote for Democrats in larger numbers than men. In Colorado, that didn't happen for Sen. Mark Udall.
162. Alexandra Jaffe (26 Sep 2014). "Democrats' 'war on women' falling flat in Colorado Senate". The Hill.
163. Nina Easton (7 Nov 2014). "What Republicans learned from 2012's "War on Women" rhetoric". Fortune Magazine.
164. Rohlinger, Deana A. (February 2015). "What happened to the "War on Women?"". Contexts. 14 (1): 70–71. doi:10.1177/1536504214567863. ISSN 1536-5042. S2CID 61885286.
165. "Hillary Clinton relishes role as champion of women - CNNPolitics". 29 August 2015.
166. Freedlander, David (20 March 2015). "Hillary's Ready for the 'War on Women'". The Daily Beast.
167. Elijah Cummings (30 Sep 2015). "The House GOP's War on Women". Politico.
168. "Republican Fiorina says she would neutralize Clinton's 'gender card'". Reuters. 16 Apr 2015.
169. Is Donald Trump part of the 'war on women'? - Fox News Republican Debate. YouTube. August 6, 2015.
170. "Trump draws boos as he bristles at 'war on women' question". Reuters. 6 August 2015.
171. Holly Yan (August 8, 2015). "Trump draws outrage after Megyn Kelly remarks". CNN.
172. "Donald Trump axed from event over Megyn Kelly blood comment". BBC News. 8 August 2015.
173. "Erick Erickson: 'The Republican Party Created Donald Trump'". The Atlantic. 8 August 2015.
174. "Trump camp in crisis". Politico. 8 August 2015.
175. Edwards, David (April 5, 2012). "RNC chair: GOP 'war on women' fictional like 'war on caterpillars'". The Raw Story.
176. Benen, Steve (April 5, 2012). "RNC chairman reflects on women, caterpillars". The Maddow Blog. Archived from the original on April 5, 2012.
177. Jensen, Kristin (April 5, 2012). "Priebus Says Gender Battle Fictional as Caterpillar War". Businessweek. Archived from the original on April 5, 2012.
178. Dennis, Steven T. (April 20, 2012). "Hill Women Play Starring Role in 'Mommy Wars'". Roll Call.
179. Ferraro, Thomas (18 May 2012). "Top Republican woman in Congress becomes a force". Reuters.
180. Emily Schultheis (4 Oct 2012). "Nikki Haley: 'There is no war on women'". Politico.
181. "At Fla. fundraiser, Paul Ryan mocks 'war on women'". The Washington Post.
182. Anna Palmer; John Bresnahan (12 May 2013). "GOP men told how to talk to women". Politico.
183. Anna Palmer (4 Aug 2014). "GOP solution to 'war on women'". Politico.
184. USA Today: The latest in the war on women. July 29, 2013.
185. NRSC Press Release: Republican Party of Iowa.
186. NH Journal: NRSC dings Shaheen over 'war on women'. July 23, 2013.
187. Alter, Jonathan, The Center Holds: Obama and His Enemies (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1st Simon & Schuster hardcover ed. 2013 (ISBN 978-1-4516-4607-8)), p. 281 (author columnist, Bloomberg Voice, analyst & contributing ed., NBC News & MSNBC, & former sr. ed. & columnist, Newsweek).
188. Redden, Molly (September 1, 2015), The War on Women is Over -- and Women Lost. While you weren't watching, conservatives fundamentally rewrote abortion laws, Mother Jones, retrieved September 28, 2015
189. Paglia, Camille (April 7, 2016). "Camille Paglia: Feminists have abortion wrong, Trump and Hillary miscues highlight a frozen national debate". Salon. Retrieved August 1, 2016.

Further reading

• Rich, Frank (March 25, 2012). "Stag Party: The GOP's woman problem is that it has a serious problem with women". New York Magazine.

External links

• Media related to War on Women at Wikimedia Commons