User talk:Zebuready

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Zebuready, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like Wikipedia and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Ahunt (talk) 15:44, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zebuready, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Zebuready! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse
We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:11, 10 April 2020 (UTC)


Overlinking

Hi, thanks for your contributions. Please note that on en.WP we don't normally link common terms (actor, singer, etc). Tony (talk) 00:29, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Tony1: Thanks for the information. Zebuready (talk) 07:39, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm Paleontologist99. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Jae Crowder have been disallowed by an edit filter because they did not appear constructive. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page, which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Also feel free to ask for assistance at the Help Desk whenever you like to. Thank you. Paleontologist99 (talk) 16:48, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Paleontologist99: Hey, i have fixed the article by undone to last version, i didn't made any unconstructive changes to the article page Zebuready (talk) 16:52, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, but please see the edit filter log. Paleontologist99 (talk) 17:03, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Paleontologist99: Welcome :) Zebuready (talk) 17:06, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:53, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: A2Hosting (April 13)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.

Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.

This draft has been resubmitted without any visible improvement, or with very little improvement. If you do not know what is needed to improve this draft, please ask for advice at the Teahouse.

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it is likely to be Rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a topic-ban may be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission. If this draft is resubmitted, or an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection, a topic-ban or a partial block may be requested against the submitting editor, and the draft may be nominated for deletion.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:18, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A2Hosting Draft

I have noted that your draft, A2Hosting has been denied as A2Hosting does not meet Wikipedia's notablility guidelines. You might want to stop working on it and save yourself some time as it is not going to be published. JamesHSmith6789 (talk) 19:48, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@JamesHSmith6789: can you help me understand what is wrong with my article, i have submitted 2 verifiable reference source and writing in neutral point of view with proper grammar and still my article is getting rejected 3 times. any suggestion you can provide me to understand what mistake i am doing or where should i focus? Zebuready (talk) 18:17, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 13)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Sulfurboy (talk) 20:02, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:13, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert McClenon: Can you tell me about what? the recent article which i have submitted? I just want to clarify i am not a owner, staff, affiliate or any relation with the brand/company, i came here to wikipedia to learn, share, help. i am editing in my free time and also trying to understand how wikipedia works so trying to create a general good new article myself that why i have chosen random topic and a popular brand. Zebuready (talk) 18:11, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Move on to some other random brand that isn't paying you and get rejected for a different stub, then. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:43, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Robert McClenon: first of all, please stop blaming me without any proof. i have already said i am not getting any paid with A2hosting and other instead of telling me i should move to another topic, you should help me with suggestion and direction like what is my mistake in article, what i am missing or what should i do to improve it. Surely i will move to different brand but again i will do same mistake because i am unable to understand what is wrong with my article? Zebuready (talk) 18:52, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User:Zebuready - If you want advice, ask for advice rather than resubmitting without discussion. You already have a thread at the AFC Help Desk, so ask for advice there, if you are willing to listen rather than just trying to push on things. They may tell you about establishing corporate notability, and about secondary significant coverage by reliable sources, and that Wikipedia is not a directory. Ask for advice if you are willing to listen rather than just pushing things. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:03, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Robert McClenon: you can see i have already asked the advice and in mean while i was trying to improve myself and understanding the concept & working functions of wikipedia. Wikipedia allowed to be imperfect, i dont mean making it imperfect but practice makes the man perfect Zebuready (talk) 19:13, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Zebuready! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to upload files, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Please stop marking significant edits as "minor edits". ThatMontrealIP (talk) 19:18, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ThatMontrealIP: can you please tell me which article & edits you talking about? Recently i have edited many articles and i always include edit summaries. Zebuready (talk) 19:21, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
As it says above in bold text, you have marked dozens of edits as "minor" with an "m", when the edits were not minor. Just look at your contributions. There are way too many to list here. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 19:47, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@ThatMontrealIP: Ok, Sorry for that, i will take care from future & thanks for the guide Zebuready (talk) 19:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Zebuready! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to create sub userpage, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Truthfinder

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Truthfinder, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. | Naypta✉ opened his mouth at 13:06, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - since you didn't contest the deletion or make any further edits to the page, I've deleted it - we can't have blank articles. If you're going to put something together, but it's going to take a while, I'd suggest you create a draft, either in your sandbox or in userspace at User:Zebuready/Truthfinder - there you can work it up until it's ready to publish, rather than putting it straight into mainspace. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 14:05, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet