User talk:Zad68/Archive 2015 Jan


Happy New Year Zad68!

Happy New Year!

Zad68,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:32, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:31, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Doc! And to you and yours! Zad68 19:49, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Cucurbita at FAC

It is finally there! Your input and review would be greatly appreciated. I can never thank you enough for helping me all you have. The main reason I got serious about editing was to improve this article. HalfGig talk 00:19, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations HalfGig and fine work! I'll peek in. Zad68 19:50, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 December 2014

Your interest in medical articles: Dyslexia upgrade section

Hello Zad68: Recently i saw that you might have an interest in refining and improving medical articles. My own interest was in pulling the article on Dyslexia up to peer review quality consistent with the integration of the categories in ICD-10 to expand the material to include the Alexia material from the old ICD-9 classification. Is this something that might be of possible interest for you? Cheers. FelixRosch (TALK) 21:49, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Hey thanks for the note FelixRosch. That would indeed be a worthwhile task, especially if the goal were to bring the article to GA status. I believe also that Dbrodbeck has some interest and expertise in the area so he might be able to help. My Wiki-time has been limited in recent weeks so I can't promise anything but will try to help. Bringing it to GA status would be great. Zad68 02:56, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello Zad68: That sounds good to make a try at the GA status level. The time frame on this can be medium-length or long-term in terms of the enhancement approach. My preference is for team work and if there is a preliminary list of things to start looking at then I can try to get a start at them when you have a chance to begin listing them. Cheers. FelixRosch (TALK) 15:05, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi to both of you. Yeah, that article needs some work. I have not looked at it in a while, other than reverting vandalism, but, I think getting the sourcing up to snuff is a good place to start. Dbrodbeck (talk) 15:32, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Actually, the sourcing is looking pretty decent now. I have not looked closely at the article in quite a while. Dbrodbeck (talk) 15:38, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
@Zad68 and @Dbrodbeck:; Agreement with your comments, though I'm not fully sure the article is ready as is without at least some enhancement and improvement. Possibly one of you could suggest the best step to take. Cheers. FelixRosch (TALK) 21:37, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
why was there edit warring with Dolfrog and why isn't this "talk" going on the article talk page?--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 00:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
@Ozzie10aaaa; Previous user apparently was unfamiliar with ICD10 reclassification. The other edits of the previous user on Dyslexia were all retained. FelixRosch (TALK) 17:18, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Separate discussion for history of ICD10

For those not familiar with the history of ICD10 on Dyslexia see the link. FelixRosch (TALK) 17:18, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Pls see Talk:Dyslexia#Merger with Alexia -- Moxy (talk) 01:16, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 January 2015

Please see comments 1, 3, 7, 13 on Talk Page.

Hi. 3 of these comments have been up for a while but you haven't got back to them. Can you get back to these? Also, I think that some of the unfinished talk page comments have been archived by the archive bot. Do you know how to get them back out again if they weren't finished?


JohnP (talk) 23:11, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Please see comment "Circumcision is associated with reduced rates of cancer causing forms of HPV[15][16] : Poor representation of the literature and a poorly cited statement."

Hi,

this comment has been up for awhile and you haven't responded. Don't forget about it.

JohnP (talk) 02:00, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi JohnPRsrcher, I've been traveling and also have been involved in other articles a bit. Hope to get around to it. Zad68 04:43, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

No you won't — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.168.151.106 (talk) 16:16, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 January 2015

The Signpost: 21 January 2015

Huggle message

Hey Zad68! You are receiving this message because you are subscribed at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers

I have recently launched a new downloads for beta testers that contains nightly builds of huggle, eg. versions that are built every day from our master branch and contains latest huggle. These builds are currently provided only for Windows and Ubuntu. You can find them here: http://huggle.wmflabs.org/builds/

Please keep in mind that these don't have any automatic updates and if you download and start using nightly build, you will need to update it yourself! So don't get yourself to running old version, it's possible to install both stable and nightly huggle, which is what I suggest.

Keep the bug reports coming to phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniphest/task/create/?projects=Huggle Many thanks! Petrb (talk) 10:05, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2015