User talk:Zacatecnik

Welcome!

Hello, Zacatecnik, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Rigadoun (talk) 19:19, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Meeks

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Michael Meeks, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. mms 01:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Meeks? I dont´t really know that i was contribuete in this article, you may wrong? --Zacatecnik (talk) 09:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your are right, you didn't contribute to the article. I don't know any more how I stumbled upon you. I apologize for the inconvenience. --mms (talk) 12:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Arnold Schwarzenegger

Please do not needlessly add {{fact}} tags to information that easily verified. With regard to the sentence: Schwarzenegger is shown smoking a marijuana joint after winning Mr. Olympia in the 1975 documentary film Pumping Iron. It was widely reported prior to the release of this movie on DVD in 2002^[[1]] that Arnold smoked marijuana in a scene during this movie, and a casual viewing of the movie will confirm this. There's no need to ask for a citation as the movie itself is the source. Thanks. --Yankees76 (talk) 21:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, i will be buy this new version and watching on it. bye--Zacatecnik (talk) 21:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just watch this [2] - Arnold himself will tell you. Enjoy. --Yankees76 (talk) 21:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, pls receive my apology ;-) --Zacatecnik (talk) 09:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of BeSweet

The article BeSweet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable software. No claim to notability. No releases in 6 years. Three references, (1) the publishers' site (2) the Alexa page for the publishers' site (3) the netcraft page for the publisher's site.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:55, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, speedy deletion is possible. I agree... --Zacatecnik (talk) 21:56, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of BeSweet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BeSweet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BeSweet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 21:39, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of March for Life (Prague)

The article March for Life (Prague) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apparently non-notable event; checked sources on Czech version of article and they all seem to be unreliable and/or affiliated with the protest, meaning there's not enough reliable independent coverage for notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

thx, my reply is on talk's page. Cya --Zacatecnik (talk) 09:55, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Zacatecnik. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]