Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Main Hoon Saath Tere and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Yupsguts!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits!Talk!10:41, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grabup was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Sources are announcements only, no significant coverage of the subject found.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dil Ko Tumse Pyaar Hua and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mehndi Wala Ghar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Akshara Singh article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site this statement (or something similar): "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License".
Hello, You have recently clubbed the "In Shaktism" section into the "Worship and festivals" section on the page of Radha. Let me share the idea why I created the separate section for that one paragraph rather than clubbing it with any other section. If you have gone through the section, "In Shaktism", the section is not about the worship of the goddess but her identity in a completely different sect. I could have clubbed it with "As Supreme goddess" but still it won't have made any sense as both the perspectives are different. Also, while creating a section, size of the content doesn't matter as much as the relevance of the content. The section "In Shaktism" doesn't have anything common with the other existing sections. So, it's better to keep it separate and let it remain highlighted. Looking forward for your take. Thanks. Kridha (talk) 03:41, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If possible, can you please revert the edit. I am not using pc now, so if I separate the section, I have to do it manually. Regards. Kridha (talk) 05:15, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, you have recently provided the sources for the etymology section of Rukmini replacing the citation template. But there are few suggestions - 1) For name Krishnatmika - provide page number of the reference.
2) Dwarkeshwari - The source you provided nowhere had this name.
3) Dindirasura Sangharini - Provide the page number where this name is mentioned.
Also, there are few suggestions, while providing any book as the reference, it's always recommended to add page number from where the content is taken. It becomes easy to verify for the users.
Also, the source provided by you for the first paragraph in "Literature and symbolism" is taken from a fictional book. That cannot be taken as authentic reference. It needs to be replaced with better one. Thanks. Kridha (talk) 06:05, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The references you have provided for Rukmini Ashtami nowhere mentioned "Rukmini Ashtami". Also, the reference you provided for tradition, only mentions the worship of goddess in Warkari not in Haridasa and Sri traditions.
Kindly, read references before adding it in support of the content. Otherwise, it will later lead to deletion of content. Kridha (talk) 07:21, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The citations in Haridasa and Sri traditions and in Rukmini Ashtami were already added by someone else. It is not me who added it. But even then, I will make the changes. Also in case of god goddess, not everything written has a citation, you can check other pages. Also, I mentioned citations for Warkari, it doesn't mean anyone will remove the other do, because they are facts. They were written there without sources, much before I edited the page and no editor or administrator removed it. So hope you understand. Yupsguts (talk) 07:25, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that sources were there but I read them today and removed them because they were not relevant and supporting the content. But, when I removed them, you added them back without verifying whether the references provided are really supporting the statement or not. Also, the references provided for deities are limited to authenticate research and scriptures. Avoid adding blogs, incredible india websites and news articles. Kridha (talk) 07:31, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, if no other administrator or editor has removed the incorrect content doesn't mean they are agreeing with it. It might be possible that they have not cross checked the information with the reference provided as there are multiple pages to cross-check and verify but once, the incorrect information or mismatched content, comes in notice, they will be edited to provide readers the correct information. Ideally, every content any editor put on wikipedia should be backed by some reliable references otherwise there is no credibility left for the information provided on wikipage. Many pages lack these, but it directly affects their grading and relevance. Also, in case of deities' pages, avoid providing websites, news articles or blogs as references. Thanks. Kridha (talk) 07:58, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sir episode numbers are added or every television series page without a source, you can check from Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai to Kumkum Bhagya to Mangal Lakshmi, to Kundali Bhagya or any other show. If they are there on those pages without source, why is it removed from this page only. Episodes have been written without a source since forever. But even then I will add a source. Thank you and sorry if I went rude. Yupsguts (talk) 05:30, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted it again. You will need a RELIABLE source and one that has the actual episode count. The two sources you used in the body do NOT state an episode count yet you put it there anyway.--CNMall41 (talk) 06:23, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have just two questions to clarify sir:
1) Sony LIV is the only reliable source that has episode counts for any Sony TV show, so what else will I add other than that.
2) Sir, why are you removing episode numbers from the page of this series only, when every other series page has episode count written without a source.
You do sound rude but I do not take it personal as I am sure it is a language barrier between us so no hard feelings. Keep in mind that WP:CIR when editing English Wikipedia so please take talk page notices, edit summaries, and warnings to heart as they will help guide you through the process. To answer your question, this is not the only page I removed these from and I will be removing them from the pages you provided examples for above. The source you used is not reliable so you will need to find a reliable secondary source to include the information. If you feel the source IS notable, you will need the talk page per WP:ONUS to get consensus to include it. --CNMall41 (talk) 19:50, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Helly Shah, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I cannot explain this any clearer. This source falls under WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Look at the byline. Please read that guideline prior to adidng any more references in Wikipedia.CNMall41 (talk) 20:00, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jennifer Winget, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please familiarize yourself with WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Based on previous warnings about your editing, I fear there is more than just this edit that needs reviewed. Can you please go back and remove any references that fall under NEWSORGINDIA??CNMall41 (talk) 05:33, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your edit to Venkateswara has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Eucalyptusmint. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Padmavathi, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. For other info that you did provide a citation for please ensure that the info you are citing is in fact mentioned in the cited source, see WP:V. I would also encourage you to review the reliable sources policy, to provide an example, you used this source [1] in the article to cite info, however this site is not a reliable source as it is a general travel website trying to sell various travel services. Eucalyptusmint (talk) 01:16, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am so so sorry sir, I promise this would be the last time. I won't repeat this and won't add unreliable sources ever again. Will quickly learn this now. Please forgive me for now. Yupsguts (talk) 05:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I don't think profuse apologies are needed, just take some time to read the reliable sources policy/other policies and learn. As editors, it's important to ensure that the info we add is sourced from reliable sources. And if you're ever unsure there's many ways on Wikipedia to get help. Eucalyptusmint (talk) 01:18, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I learn from your edits, what you added on major deities such as Venkateswara, ranganatha, etc,.......these are just form of vishnu, not avatar, next time please dont add avatar birth and avatar end, this refers only to avatar of vishnu, not for forms of vishnu, i have already added content in god venkateswara wiki talk page, please read it before edits.
Thanking you. Ramapriya jeeyar (talk) 09:32, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions to Dil Ko Tumse Pyaar Hua. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:AayatS per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jha09. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators:Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
This is so bad. I had made so many useful edits on wikipedia, had improved so many pages and you guys blocked me just like that without any prove. Yupsguts (talk) 15:01, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yupsguts, do not create new sockpuppet accounts. Go back to your original account and make an unblock request. If you keep doing this, you'll find your page creations deleted and your edits reverted. It's better to wait six months and try to file a successful unblock request. LizRead!Talk!05:56, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions to Maati Se Bandhi Dor. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
