User talk:Yserbius

Ark

Wikipedia is not a place where anything that exists is automatically entitled to an article. The onus is not on me to prove that it's insignificant; it's your job to provide reliable media sources (newspaper or magazine articles, books, etc., which are published by independent sources) about the series, which demonstrate that it is sufficiently notable for inclusion. Bearcat (talk) 05:03, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

/* Megaphone desktop tool */

Hi,
Again in Israel lobby in the United States I reverted your edit. If you edit in good faith, please keep talks and edits in line. With yourself, and with other editors contributions. If you are "still new to Wikipedia", as you state yourself, please read WP:RS, WP:OR and such. This is an invitation to join the community.
On the other hand, if you can pull of an WP:AFD after 40 edits, I think you are not that new as you suggest. In that case, please read this as a warning that delusive behavior is not accepted.
Anyway, we have policies, and I ask you to read and apply them. -DePiep (talk) 21:36, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very well, I guess it stays then. This account is old, but rarely used, that's probably why I was able to pull off an AFD, which I discovered last week when an article I wrote got very quickly deleted because it was an Internet thingy with the only references to it were from the Internet, something that seems to describe Megaphone, especially since the Jpost link was broken.
For future reference, how exactly would you go about finding source material that something is "not notable"? The OR that you refer to seems to be my comments that searches on Google turn up nothing relevant. I'm not sure how else you would go about showing that. Also, what exactly do you mean "I turned 180 on the topic"?
Yserbius (talk) 06:01, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Programming AfDs

Since you placed the AfD notices on the pages for Chef (programming language) and Piet (programming language) but did not complete the AfD process, I have removed the notices for now. If you complete the nominations, feel free to undo my removals. Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:05, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sikrikim

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sikrikim requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Oddbodz (talk) 20:27, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

)

FriendlyRobotOverlord (talk) 02:52, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposals

Just to let you know (in case you aren't watching the talk pages) that I have opposed your proposal to merge various articles into Esoteric programming language - see Talk:LOLCODE#Merge proposal. BTW, when you kick off a merge proposal you are supposed to create a section on the relevant talk page explaining your rationale for the proposal. Otherwise the discuss link points nowhere. Gandalf61 (talk) 14:31, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal of Piet (programming language)

Hi Yserbius, I noticed you tagged Piet (programming language) for merging a little while back, but you didn't include an argument for the merge on the talk page (Talk:Piet (programming language)#Merge proposal is the default target). If you're still interested in seeing that happen, I'd suggest you do that, or remove the tag if you no longer feel the merge would be an appropriate step. Otherwise, we at WikiProject Merge just wait until it's a year old and perform it or remove it as we see fit, which really isn't the best outcome for anyone. Thanks, BDD (talk) 23:23, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kaaterskill Falls (novel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington Heights (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Information icon Hello, I'm Elizium23. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Hanging Tree (The Hunger Games song), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 02:00, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Yserbius. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Yserbius. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]