User talk:Yojimbo501

This user may have left Wikipedia. Yojimbo501 has not edited Wikipedia since 15 August 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

The Status Bot has been blocked.
See my last edit here.

WP:FILMS Welcome

Welcome!

Hey, welcome to WikiProject Films! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of films, awards, festivals, filmmaking, and film characters. If you haven't already, please add {{User WikiProject Films}} to your user page.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Most of our important discussions about the project itself and its related articles take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.

• The project has a monthly newsletter. The newsletter for December has been published. January's issue is currently in production; it will be delivered as a link, but several other formats are available.

There is a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• Want to jump right into editing? The style guidelines show things you should include.
• Want to assist in some current backlogs within the project? Visit the Announcements template to see how you can help.
• Want to know how good our articles are? Our assessment department has rated the quality of every film article in Wikipedia. Check it out!

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
• Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, article improvement contests, and other tasks.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a style guide that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention.
• The project has a stress hotline available for your use.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill 01:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films January 2008 Newsletter

The January 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have any suggestions for improvement or desire other topics to be covered, please leave a message on the talk page of one of the editors.Thank you. Nehrams2020 (talk) 02:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIII (January 2008)

The January 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history coordinator selection

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Woody (talk) 11:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films February 2008 Newsletter

The February 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIV (February 2008)

The February 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 08:29, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films coordinator elections

The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 09:27, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films March 2008 Newsletter

The March 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:51, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXV (March 2008)

The March 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:12, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attack pages

Hi. When you find an attack page like Mike Crapulli it's a good thing to blank it, as you did, but it's also worth putting {{db-attack}} on it (which gets it deleted, along with the attack material which is still there in the history), and copying to the originator's talk page the warning which that template generates. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:34, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I am not that experienced an editor. I just did what I thought was right. Thanks again for telling me how to handle an attack page. Yojimbo501 (talk) 15:40, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 16:14, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Template:Uw-toilet1 worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the toilet. Thank you. The way, the truth, and the light (talk) 15:12, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Soldier X

Hello, I've declined the speedy deletion on this as it does not meet CSD G 10. Cheers, and happy editing. Dlohcierekim 16:31, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I'm not aware of a speedy criterion for books yet. Probably the PROD is the best way to go. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 16:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks. Yojimbo501 (talk) 16:35, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category talk:Scenic highways in Oregon

This isn't an article; it's a talk page for helping to populate the category. I removed the improper "notability" tag. --NE2 17:54, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your CSD tagging of Joke it

I have deleted the article you tagged, but I need to let you know about a couple of problems. First, please don’t blank the page you are tagging. Second, that page was not a bio or anything else that would be covered under WP:CSD#A7, it was pure vandalism, so I deleted it under WP:CSD#G3. Please be certain of the criteria you are using before tagging. Thanks. —Travis^talk 18:14, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• As it turned out, this wasn’t much of a problem, but in my opinion, accuracy is more important than speed. Cheers —Travis^talk 19:02, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but it's just I have gotten use to tagging thing pretty quickly (however this sadly does result in accidents sometimes). Yojimbo501 (talk) 21:33, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Amy lynne holbrook

I noticed you tagged Amy lynne holbrook with a CSD that claimed it was an article about a person that did not assert the notability of the subject. However, the keyword in that statement is "assert." The subject doesn't have to be notable, the article just has to say that the person is. Claiming that the person is a former Miss USA, etc, is certainly in my eyes an assertion of notability. Just letting you know that I removed the tag. —  scetoaux (T|C) 21:02, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologize. I make mistakes too. Just letting you know. :) —  scetoaux (T|C) 21:07, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tytherington railway station

You're very fast on the draw. Ref and cats now in place on this. Johnlp (talk) 21:06, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I will. :-) Johnlp (talk) 21:11, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Remember

Hey, thanks for the message. The guy was bugging me for a while, and you may have noticed I left a rather rude message after he accused me of vandalism. I'm actually quite suprised at how mean I was ;) The best way we can shut up this AdamDeanHall is to find an official source which says it is only one episode; and this official source can be found here! I will know post this on the List of Desperate Housewives episodes talk page. Corn.u.co.pia Discussion 02:20, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The cite is here: Talk:List of Desperate Housewives episodes, under the Remember heading. Thanks for the support! Corn.u.co.pia Discussion 06:13, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, well Adam seems to agree with me now, but it seems another IP address is arguing with him now! He says there's 23 episodes like us, but this random person say's there's 24. I think the problem has been resolved but I'll have to see. Cheers! Corn.u.co.pia Discussion 08:15, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I hope the issue is over. Who knew a two hour episode could cause so many problems! lol - Corn.u.co.pia Discussion 04:14, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Primates sign up

Hi Yojimbo501, I've made it easier to sign up now. My reply is here. Cheers, Jack (talk) 13:07, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

assessment request

You should post your request here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Primates/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment. - UtherSRG (talk) 22:47, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films April 2008 Newsletter

The April 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:40, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kon Ichikawa

No problem-- your original removal of the film made me search around quite a bit too, to confirm it... I knew it was a Tezuka manga, but apparently Ichikawa made a film of it too.. And that film is probably worth an article... Cheers! Dekkappai (talk) 23:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help

{{help me}} I want to know if there is any chance for articles that don't have enough Info out there to get past being a stub or start. I ask this because an article I've worked on heavily (Fires on the Plain (film)) can't go past start simply because there isn't enough info. Yojimbo501 (talk) 23:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I would say merging it to Ooka Shohei might be a good idea if it seems to be a permanent stub. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 23:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• My bad. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:02, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'll just butt in, Yojimbo-- I'm sure there has to be lots of information out there on a novel as famous as Fires on the Plain. Maybe check some of the larger works on contemporary Japanese fiction... If you don't find anything, I might look around next week. Anyway, I don't think it needs merging, it's a very notable novel. Dekkappai (talk) 23:52, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh-- you mean the film? Well, the above applies to that too... Don't give up-- I'll chip in next week. Cheers! Dekkappai (talk) 23:55, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm gonna continue to search for help (no offense) because merging it seems to be unnescesary. Yojimbo501 (talk) 00:01, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged it for expert attention, and will drop a line at WT:FILM. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 00:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just quick-- Here are a few places to start for info on Fires on the Plain, the film:

• CHARITY, Tom: Reviews: Ichikawa Kon Sight and Sound (0037-4806) v.17 n.6 , June 2007, p.88-89, English, illus (DVD reviews for Ichikawa Kon's BIRUMA NO TATEGOTO and NOBI.)
• Edinburgh Film Festival Catalogue v.56th , 14 August 2002, p.117, English, illus (Includes director's note.)
• MASTERS, Patricia Lee: "Warring bodies: most nationalistic selves." East-West Film Journal v.7 n.1 , January 1993, p.137-148, English. (Focuses on the Japanese at war, especially the Pacific War, exploring how nationalism was advanced and made sacred and how, after the war, such nationalism was openly criticised and questioned. NOBI and YUKI YUKITE SHINGUN are discussed.)
• "Nobi" Atlas Filmheft n.6 , June 1971, p.[whole issue], German, illus (Review of NOBI and article about director Ichikawa)
• Image et Son n.214 , March 1968, p.121-132, French (Analysis.)
• Cineforum n.58/59 , October 1966, p.751-756, Italian
• Cinema Nuovo (0009-711X) v.19 n.179 , January 1966, p.56, Italian
• Hollywood Reporter (0018-3660) v.171 n.2 , 06 July 1962, p.3, English
• Sight and Sound (0037-4806) v.31 n.2 , April 1962, p.91, English
• Films and Filming v.8 n.6 , March 1962, p.32, English
• Monthly Film Bulletin v.29 n.338 , March 1962, p.33, English
• Daily Cinema n.8574 , 16 February 1962, p.6, English
• Kine Weekly n.2836 , 08 February 1962, p.9, English
• Filmkritik (0015-1572) n.10 , October 1961, p.488, German
• Image et Son n.140/141 , May 1961, p.34, French
• Cahiers du Cinéma (0008-011X) v.20 n.119 , May 1961, p.59, French
• Variety (0042-2738) , 19 April 1961, English
• Cinéma n.55 , April 1961, p.108, French
• Cinématographie Française n.1909 , 18 March 1961, p.19, French

And there are bound to be many book sources... Will check next week. Great film, as I recall (haven't seen it in about 25 years) Dekkappai (talk) 00:05, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

...and here we can see the James Quandt-edited book on Ichikawa has a chapter, "Fires on the Plain: The human cost of the Pacific War" by William B. Hauser, pp. 205-216... Dekkappai (talk) 00:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. You've all been a real help. But Dekkappai... is there a website showing all this info or will I have to buy it? Yojimbo501 (talk) 00:24, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, thanks for the chapter ;) Yojimbo501 (talk) 00:26, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First, look around the Internet for online copies of the journal articles. Variety, for one, should be out there. Then, try the local library. If you need the Quandt chapter, I've got the book handy, and would be happy to give you quotes from it later, if you don't have it. Dekkappai (talk) 00:29, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'm gonna go offline for the moment but will be back. Yojimbo501 (talk) 00:31, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK-- I'll be offline for the weekend, but will take notes from the Quandt & see what I can add to the article next week. Happy editing! Dekkappai (talk) 00:34, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:48, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ichikawa / Fires

Hi, Yojimbo. I skimmed through the Quandt book this weekend and took some notes which I've put into the article. I lumped them mostly under "Reception" though it's really more like interpretation/criticism, etc. Feel free to move them around as you see fit. I also added an interesting quote from Ichikawa on his influences-- Disney & Chaplin. I notice the article implies that Ichikawa's style is overwhelmingly bleak, as the three war films imply. In the book, it's pointed out several times that this is a misleading impression of Ichikawa's career because of these three films being his most-circulated work. Actually he was quite eclectic, and made some very light films. If you're working on that article, it would be worth it to add this probably. I'll look around for more reviews of Fires-- If we can't locate the Variety review online, I can find a hard copy. I got all those sources through an online database-- Film Index International. You might want to see if your local library has it, and you can access it through your library card. I'll look around for other contemporary reviews too-- New York Times, etc. I'm sure there's a lot out there on a major film like this. Dekkappai (talk) 17:30, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, Yojimbo. I'll look around for more print-reviews this week. Keep plugging away on it, it'll be a good article! Dekkappai (talk) 23:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Yojimbo-- Yes, I'll work on reformatting the citations. For finding DVD-release info, I think Amazon is considered a reliable source (not sure if some of the more extremist editors consider it so though). Anyway Amazon's Fires on the Plain listing says it was released March 13, 2007. Dekkappai (talk) 21:07, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yojimbo-- I've found hard-copies of the contemporary Variety review and a contemporary New York Times review-- both are harsh, but positive in a way. Interesting. I'll add quotes/paraphrasings of them tonight. By the way, if you like this kind of film, do you know Kinji Fukasaku's Under the Flag of the Rising Sun? One of the best anti-war films, I think. I started a stub on it a while ago, and it hasn't grown much. Dekkappai (talk) 18:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Harsh in that they go on & on about how awful it is to watch, implying that it's needlessly extreme-- even warning viewers away from it... but they they kind of grudgingly admit that it's well-made, and makes its point. I suspect that the different war-experiences between Japan & America probably had something to do with it-- especially in the pre-Vietnam days... Dekkappai (talk) 20:21, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you can cite DVD commentaries, extras, interviews, etc. It's a good idea to put down the exact point at which such & such a statement is made. If you're not averse to taking a glance at an article on a softcore S/M film, check Wife to be Sacrificed-- in the Notes section, at #13, I quoted the director in a documentary that comes with the DVD. The citation template fills it out as "Event occurs at Chapter 4, 45:50." IMDb isn't considered a reliable source for much more than film personnel, and it's probably better to rely on a better source even for that. Include the IMDb link at the article, of course, but cite to the best sources you can, and IMDb is something like Wikipedia, in that anyone can edit it. Dekkappai (talk) 01:31, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I'm not saying it's untrue. It very well could be. It's just that IMDb is not considered a good source for this kind of information... It's always best if whoever wrote that told where he got the story, then we could cite that. Yes-- look through the DVD booklet, commentary, whatever-- that would be considered reliable. Dekkappai (talk) 18:51, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, Yojimbo, my pleasure. If you need any help on a Japanese or Korean film, just drop me a line-- I'm a big fan of a lot of their films and always happy to contribute to Korea/Japan film articles. I still haven't worked through the main chapter on Fires on the Plain, and plan to do that later. Dekkappai (talk) 23:00, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

vampire

I have incorporated the japanese material into vampire and reworded so it all makes sense. Sounds like an interesting book :) Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:02, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:59, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I love you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.237.17.15 (talk) 22:00, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fires on the Plain

Good job on the article so far, and here are a few recommendations I have on further improving the article:

1. Continue to expand the lead so that it better summarizes the rest of the article, briefly touching on each section. For guidelines see WP:LEAD.
2. For the main image Image:Fires on the Plain DVD.jpg, on the image's page, you need to specify the rationale stating that it is being used for this article. Just reword the heading to: "Fair Use Rationale for Fires on the Plain (film)". Make sure you add a link for the film, or eventually some bot could come by and put it up for deletion because it doesn't specifically name the film in the heading.
3. The lead is at an acceptable length, and appears to cover the plot well. Good job there.
4. If you can, continue to expand the production section further. Mention more about the script, filming locations/techniques, casting, etc. The more comprehensive this is, the better the article looks.
5. The reception section looks good but may be a bit long in comparison to the other sections in the article. I would recommend seeing if you can cut maybe a few reviews, keeping the most notable/important reviews in.
6. For availability, you can mention if there are any particular special features if on DVD and perhaps mention DVD sales/rentals in its first weeks of release.
7. If possible, add more sections related to the music of the film, marketing, etc. The more details of the topic the article covers, the better it will appear.

Good job so far, it looks like you have done a lot of work with the article. It is great that there are a lot of sources in the article, and keep looking for more to find more information for the article. If you would like further clarification or have any more questions, let me know and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 07:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As to getting an image to illustrate the article. My usual resort is to create a screencapture of a frame of the film and to use the following template to identify the source:

Non-free media information and use rationale true for Fires on the Plain

Description	Screenshot
Source	DVD copy of the film screenshot
Article	Fires on the Plain
Portion used	one frame
Low resolution?	low
Purpose of use	illustration
Replaceable?	This image is a screenshot from a copyrighted film, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by the studio which produced the film, and possibly also by any actors appearing in the screenshot. It is believed that the use of a limited number of low-resolution screenshots for critical commentary and discussion of the film and its contents on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under the Copyright law of the United States. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information. To the uploader: Please add a detailed non-free use rationale for each article the image is used in, which must also declare compliance with the other parts of the non-free content criteria, as well as the source of the work and copyright information. For example non-free use rationales, see Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. This is only for images which are screenshots from films. To patrollers and administrators: If this image has an appropriate rationale please append |image has rationale=yes as a parameter to the license template. Fair use rationale 1. This image is being used to illustrate the article on the movie in question and is used for informational or educational purposes only. 2. This image is of low resolution. 3. It is believed that this image will not devalue the ability of the copyright holder to profit from the original work. 4. No alternate, free image exists that can be used to illustrate the subject matter.
Fair useFair use of copyrighted material in the context of Fires on the Plain//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Yojimbo501true

Be sure to fill in the all the pertinent information. As to the other question you posed: "Do you think the "Awards" section should be a subsection of the "Reception" section?" Both sections can remain as separate areas. FWiW, copy/paste the template to use as an edit guide for the illustration you are using. Bzuk (talk) 20:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC).[reply]

• Thanks for the note, Yojimbo. I wouldn't think about removing much content at this point. If one section is much larger than another, it's because the others are too small. Keep building them up. You might put parts of the larger section into the smaller ones, but this is still a work in progress. This is a major film and it deserves a major article. Keep up the good work! Dekkappai (talk) 20:57, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image already has a fair use rationale it is the rationale provided by Doctor Sunshine on the image's page. I never really understood fair use rationales when I first started, and it took a while to get a hold of. The rationale is just a list of reasons why an editor believes that the non-free image should be allowed to be used in the article. If there isn't a sufficient rationale, it could be deleted. Generally, non-free images are allowed to be used for media and educational purposes, so long as there is a justifiable reason to use it. I'll modify it for you and you can go ahead and take a look at it for future images that you work with. The template above listed by Bzuk is a great way to ensure that the image isn't deleted as it covers all of the basics. If you want to learn more information about film images, take a look at the project's style guidelines. It details how an image should be set up and includes several example images. The awards section could be a subsection since it is only a few sentences. If you ever expand that further, you can choose to split it off into its own section again or continue to list it under reception. I would definitely leave the RottenTomatoes review in, as it takes the reviews of multiple sources and is a great resource (it is listed in most reception sections I've seen). For the reception section, I'd recommend cutting some of the reviewers' mentioned reviews. For example, consider using only one or two sentences of Jamie S. Rich's review if you think some of it isn't really necessary. I hope that cleared some things up for you. If not, fire away on my page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 21:28, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The cast section should come directly after plot ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 21:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually after production but I often like it as the next section myself. Maybe this is an area that can be explored in the WP:Film Article guideline. I could live with it being either way. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 04:42, 15 May 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Well actually I have always added cast afte rplot and I was under the impression this wa sin the guidelines too. FA articles I have worked on like Casino Royale (2006 film) all have cast after plot. Also that rationale is not adequate and it doesn't even link to the film article so it will soon enough be found by a bot anyway. I'll add a proper rationale for you and try to find a screenshot also ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 08:54, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I'm loving your user name. Something tells me it isn't a tribute to Jumbo Wales himself but rather the subject of Sergio Leone's plot copying! ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 09:15, 15 May 2008 (UTC) I have kindly added a rationale for you:[reply]

By the way, Yojimbo, I've got a film-poster template set up HERE. Just copy the code into notepad and do the replaces (replace ***FILM NAME*** with the film's name, etc.), then cut out the top five lines and paste it into the image description. I find it quick and useful-- Cheers! Dekkappai (talk) 16:04, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale for use on wikipedia in the article Fires on the Plain (film)

Ichikawa/Fires

Hi, Yojimbo. I see you've done a lot more work on it. It's still not a big article though, by any means, so I wouldn't think about cutting out material just to make it shorter, at least at this stage. Sure, re-arrange things... Some of the "Reception" could actually go into an "Interpretations" or "Criticisms" section... move things around, keep tinkering with it. If the article as a whole seems too large, then I'd think about what could be left out. Dekkappai (talk) 16:04, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greek

I looked at the revision with the section in it as well and don't believe it to be necessary. It almost appears to be trivia. If anything, one small sentence in the intro or other relevant section could mention it, but other than that, a whole section isn't needed unless it has been commented on by numerous sources or has other importance (which I doubt). However, if the section continues to be added, don't continually revert it as you may break the WP:3RR rule. I'd recommend discussing it on the talk page of the article, and if nothing gets accomplished there, try the WikiProject:TV talk page. Usually, if all of the members remain civil, an adequate solution can be found. Don't worry about contacting me for help, everybody needs help at times and I'm always happy to help if possible. If you need further clarification or assistance, let me know. --Nehrams2020 (talk) 04:29, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films May 2008 Newsletter

The May 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:33, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help?

{{help me}}

I don't know how to post pictures, and for some of the articles I'm working on, I'd like to know how to. As you can see above, various editors have tried to help me, but it just hasn't been working. Yojimbo501 (talk) 21:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• What part specifically do you need help with? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:47, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• If you want to add an existing image to an article, type [[Image:File name.jpg|right|Optional caption.]] to the article – replacing File name.jpg with the actual file name of the image, right with the alignment of the image on the page and Optional caption with the caption, which of course, is optional. See our picture tutorial for more information.
• If you want to upload an image from your computer, to put in an article, you must find out what license the image is licensed under. If you know your image is licensed under a free-license, upload it to the Wikimedia Commons, where all projects have access to the image. If you are unsure what license your image is licensed under, see the file upload wizard for more information. Also, please read Wikipedia's image use policy, because if you upload the image under a false license, you may be blocked.

Hope this has helped. Your question was quite vague, so if you ask again please be more specific. -Optigan13 (talk) 21:51, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVII (May 2008)

The May 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:35, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yojimbo, is this the proper way to use the "User Talk" feature? Also, I don't know how to use the "Discussion" feature within a particular article. I'm at a loss, and no one has answered me on this.Magnet For Knowledge (talk) 01:19, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: stub sorting

No problem. I'm not a stub sorter either. I just saw that you hadn't sorted it, so I found this list and chose what seemed to be the most appropriate. Cheers! J.delanoy^gabs_adds 19:38, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Onibaba picture help

Hi! I noticed you are struggling quite valiantly to get an image on the Onibaba article. I'd like to help! Your code for uploading an image is correct but it only looks like you didn't upload the image to wikipedia. Was this picture online or one you took yourself? If it's somewhere else online, I can help you get it there if you'd like! Get back to me on my talk page if you need more help. Andrzejbanas (talk) 02:48, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added the picture! With relevence and more. Wow! That hungarian article of Onibaba is huge! I think this is the one you wanted. If the article gets larger maybe we could add one other image, but for now I think this is good. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:24, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, godo job on that article too! I almost picked up that movie on dvd a few days ago. The citations are probably fine with that, I'm not an expert in that area but I think it's more of a reference point of when something was cited for more articles that would be changing more, like on topics of politics and such. Not so much on more historical things, like production information of movie isn't likely to get outdated as easily. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:13, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My pet hater

Oh lord, what's he up to now (other than this)? --Orange Mike | Talk 20:26, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Turns out he dropped extra copies of Haters' Magazine off at my place of employ's main branch, so everybody could learn how evil I am! --Orange Mike | Talk 12:59, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Saving Private Ryan

My explanation of it (which was also mentioned in the discussion you commented on) is that the German was already in shock with such close combat with Mellish and that he couldn't kill Upham in close combat either. That and Upham's cowering away. bibliomaniac15 00:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films June 2008 Newsletter

The June 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 00:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Healthcare-NOW!

I have asked User:Tanthalas39 who deleted it yesterday to take a look at it and protect the page name. – ukexpat (talk) 20:14, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVIII (June 2008)

The June 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films July 2008 Newsletter

The July 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:52, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXIX (July 2008)

The July 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:27, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 07:00, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:21, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter

The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:48, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXX (August 2008)

The August 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:48, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The September 2008 Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of fourteen candidates. Please vote here by September 30!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:57, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films coordinator elections - voting now open!

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 01:29, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)

The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:20, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXII (October 2008)

The October 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:24, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIII (November 2008)

The November 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:52, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Horror needs your help

Yojimbo501 : You've received this message as you are listed as a WikiProject Horror Participant. As you may have noticed, WikiProject Horror has suffered from a lack of direction and coordination of late. A suggestion on how to improve the Project and maintain it as a viable resource has been placed up for discussion here. As a member of the Project, your voice is valued and your input is requested. Thank you, hornoir (talk) 00:09, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008)

The December 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXV (January 2009)

The January 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:50, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)

The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:17, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:18, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:38, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 22:06, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 17:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:08, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 05:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 00:05, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:50, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 00:27, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:28, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Military Historian of the Year

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 00:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

Military history coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 10:10, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 22:16, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^[talk] [majestic titan] 05:22, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:09, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:25, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]