This is an archive of past discussions with User:Yashthepunisher. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hi Sid95Q I don't think they can be included in their respective actors filmographies, as they are just promotional appearances. Several actors briefly appear on tv shows/serials for their film's promotion, but we only inlclude those which are 'hosted' by them. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:41, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Yash. I have nominated my sixth FAC and my first one for a Hindi film. Do let me know if you wish to leave comments at the FAC by pinging me. Thanks. — Ssven2Looking at you, kid07:45, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Don 2
I had planned to work (and had worked on its lead, accolades, soundtrack etc) on it for GAC. You could have asked me about it? Agian (like NFA Supporting actress) I am not being mean but I did work on it and you came later. Can we do this by collaborating?Krish | Talk16:44, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
I don't mean to take over every other project you have planned to work on so I withdraw. You can resume your work on this. Collaboration doesn't seem necessary to me here as the article seems almost ready to me for a nom. Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:21, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Not really, the production section is a mess and does not include information about its inception and such stuff. Plus lots of fancrufty and unnotable statistics (some of which you, thankfully, edited out). Let's see. BTW, are you interested in Urmila Matondkar's biography?Krish | Talk17:31, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Yes some portions still need work. And yes, I am interested in Urmila Matondkar's biography. Not only her, I have a long 'to-do list' that includes the biography of Madhuri Dixit, Rekha, Manisha, Tabu, Konkana Sen etc. Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:39, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
I realised this after watching your "unconventional" choices on wikipedia. All these latter performers are highly underrated including Matondkar. I am glad someone is really interested in these stunning actresses. Although Tabu and Konkona (partly) have got their due Urmila and Manisha never did, which is such a shame considering both are gorgeous and super talented.Krish | Talk17:46, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
The likes of these could read me my homework and I'd still watch them do it, they're that good! I hope we see them on screen for another few years, especially Koirala after Dear Maya and Sen directing more! VedantTalk18:31, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Well, onto business Yash. I was wondering if you'd be willing to review Ismat Chughtai's article at GAN. I had asked Ssven2, but he'll be inactive for a while and I think I'll be done expanding the article soon. Let me know, thanks either way. VedantTalk21:58, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
So true. Manisha's acting in even an average (but entertaining) movie like Mann speaks volume. Damn those expressive eyes and voice. Urmila, despite being a very popular name (a superstar), has always been so natural in all her films even in craps like Karzzzzzzzzzzzzz. It's a shame she had to do an item number in 2018 and that too a shitty one. Urmila is responsible for Manish Malhotra's career too and she changed the wordrobe game in Bollywood. Remember those gaudy western clothes all the actresses used to wear in 80s and early 90s before Urmila showed them how it's done with Rangeela?Krish | Talk03:23, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Damn true. I'm waiting to see Manisha as Nargis in Sanju again. Urmila is undoubtedly blessed with both looks and talent. Pick any of her film (Bhoot for example, her acting is so real that its scary) and you won't be disappointed. Hope she'll get some meaningful roles someday. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
I have never seen a bad performance by Urmila that's why I wrote her filmography. She gave the best performance (by an actress) in Bhoot of the 2000 to 2010 decade along with Rani in Black and Tabu in Maqbool. I saw Rangeela in 2016 for the first time and was truely impressed both by her and the film. No doubt it made her an overnight sensation. Did I say she is also an underrated dancer? Madhuri's true successor, but unfortunately Indian media thinks shaking hands and legs is dancing (Pt. Birju Maharaj's comment on Katrina Kaif). I so wanna watch her in new films with all the big stars and in content driven stuffs. BTW, did you know she had to opt out of Dil Toh Pagal Hai? Karisma's National award would have been hers.Krish | Talk11:56, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Raman Raghav 2.0 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant (talk) 17:01, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Hey Yash! I am very sorry that I did not notice your post on my talk page. I don't usually check my talk page notifications and that is why I missed it. So tell me how can I help?Krish | Talk07:37, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for replying. Initially I thought that you might not respond so I reverted my message. Anyway, I have expanded the article Love Sex Aur Dhokha and I've nominated it for GAN. Can you please review it? Yashthepunisher (talk)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Love Sex Aur Dhokha you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Krish! -- Krish! (talk) 14:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Surreal Barnstar
Had to do this… couldn’t resist it.
You’ve done a magnificent job on the time you’ve spent editing and protecting Wikipedia. I hope and pray you succeed greatly in your life. Surge_Elec (talk) 21:52, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Shortly after Draft:High Jack was declined for lack of demonstrating notability, you created High Jack (film). This was all back in March, so by now (June), an April-released film is surely more notable than it was. Could you check if there is anything to salvage from the draft, or if it would be worthwhile to histmerge it into the article, or else just let the draft get deleted eventually? DMacks (talk) 04:11, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article NH10 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant (talk) 19:21, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Yes, I've been working on the development part separately, collecting sources and all that. But the page is kind of unstable now so I'll get to it when the intensity of edits reduce.:) Semanti Paul (talk) 09:37, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
It's probably because of the controversy the film created and it being a recent release. I think you should wait for a few week's and let the dust settle down. Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:37, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Can you please add this page to the watchlist as this new page needs modification and a lot of IPS and socks are editing this page. Thanks. Sid95Q (talk) 00:08, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
The reason I made the edit was that you are mentioning that Manjule completed the script in 2014 twice. Should be enough to do so just once. Which one is your call, Yash. — Ssven2Looking at you, kid14:28, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sairat you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Veera Narayana -- Veera Narayana (talk) 19:42, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
In this edit you restored a previously removed proposed deletion notice with the edit summary "You can't simply remove it. The filming hasn't started yet." Well, yes I can, please read the proposed deletion (prod) policy; prods can be removed for any reason by anybody. Even if no reason is given at all, or it is done in bad faith, the prod must not be restored. In any case, I removed it because the article had previously been the subject of an AfD discussion, which again makes it ineligible for prod. My removal amounted to a formal decline of the prod request in my role as an administrator. You are welcome to start a new AfD if you wist, but please do not attempt to restore the prod notice again. SpinningSpark10:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
As its mentioned in the article that 'sometimes there is a theme, such as a place, a person, or a thing, that is present in each story and serves to bind them together.' This is the case with LSD where one or two characters appear in more than one story. But, also Ebert's explanation of hyperlink which is 'films where the characters or action reside in separate stories, but a connection or influence between those disparate stories is slowly revealed to the audience.' That also applies to the film. So its your call. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:28, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
A better question: Is there continuity between the stories? If yes, it is hyperlink. If not, it is anthology. In fact, Pulp Fiction appears anthology-like, with each storyline carrying a title (like "The Gold Watch" and "The Bonnie Situation"), but they all share continuity, making it hyperlink. But this convinces me that LSD is indeed anthology. --Kailash29792(talk)13:37, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
No, they are on different timelines. I strongly believe that LSD is an anthology as, unlike Pulp Fiction, the stories aren't connected to one another directly. Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:37, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Bennv3771. Yashthepunisher, thanks for creating Soni (film)!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. 2 or 3 sentences are too closely paraphrased from The Hindu source.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
I saw your work on Sacred Games and many other articles. I just wanted to ask if you use any special tool to find references? I can just find 5-10 news articles with google on any television show. Any tips? Your work is great. ;) TryKid (talk) 13:48, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks bhai. No, I don't use any kind of special tool for collecting references, I simply pick them from google search results. In case of Sacred Games, I was intrigued by it ever since it was first announced and kept a track of what was available on the net. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:27, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
Hello Yash, been a while. How are things going on with your good self? BTW, Kailash29792 has listed this article about a 1965 cult classic film in Tamil cinema for peer reviewing with the intention of preparing it for FAC and subsequently taking it to FA. As always, your constructive comments would be deeply appreciated. Also do have a look at his other FAC. Thank you. — Ssven2Looking at you, kid08:12, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Yashthepunisher. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Varanasi, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Ikhtiar H (talk) 16:16, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
