This is an archive of past discussions with User:Yashthepunisher. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anurag Kashyap, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Huma Qureshi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
In Wikimedia commons, in the left-hand column, click on the "Upload file" tab under the "Participate" section.
Click "Select media files to share" and upload the image that you have downloaded from Bollywood Hungama.
"Continue" and click on "This file is not my own work".
In the "source" tab, copy-paste the Bollywood Hungama link. The "author" will be Bollywood Hungama.
Under "Now tell us why you are sure you have the right to publish this work:" click on "Another reason not mentioned above", and after selecting the button, you must provide the copyright license, which in this case will be "Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama". *Copy-paste this license in between open and close double parenthesis({{), and click on preview to check if it's okay.
Click "next", and then simply upload it.
The image and it's license will then be checked by a wikimedia administrator, and you will be able to use it here.
Do remember to only upload images from the website's "Parties and events" section, because they are the only ones that fulfill the licensing agreement.
Its not only about uploading the Image, the other problem is the watermark. The word "Bollywood Hungama.com" plastered on the pictures. How can I get rid of them? since I'm not an expert on adobe or picasa. Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Anushka Sharma you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FrB.TG -- FrB.TG (talk) 16:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Congratulations on bringing Ms. Sharma to GA status. I'd not come online for two days, and seeing that green symbol made my day. :) :)
It had been long overdue, to be honest. And I may be a bit late, but welcome back. Hoping to collaborate more with you. Semanti 04:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Semanti Paul (talk • contribs)
I know, the Bollywood Hungama thing, right? So far the pictures I've uploaded could be cropped as to remove the watermark. But I'm not a Photoshop expert, so. -- Semanti Paul (talk) 07:12, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Can you please crop and upload this Image for Anurag Kashyap's infobox image?? The current one is quite shoddy. Since Its one of the pictures you uploaded. -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Uh, that was before I knew pictures from Koimoi could not be used. But wait, I'll search for this particular event on BH and see if there's anything good. :) -- Semanti Paul (talk) 16:23, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
I believe the new picture will do. :)Semanti 17:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC)--Semanti 17:42, 12 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Semanti Paul (talk • contribs)
After failing two times, and being blamed for sockpuppetry in addition, you have managed to bring Anurag Kashyap filmography to featured list status. I gave this award to two great users who achieved some great, path-breaking goals with their unflinching efforts almost equal to the on-screen image of this cultural icon, and i find this effort of you similar! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:13, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
I find your effort sincere and as hardwork involving as the larger-than-life on-screen persona of Rajinikanth. That's why i gave this to you. Do try to watch his films some day, he is surely something more than a group of Chuck Norris facts. I quote Mullum Malarum and Thillu Mullu (remake of Gol Maal) as fine examples for this. But if you too like to celebrate his larger-than-life persona like me, you can find a plenty of films in his 158-film long career. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:24, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
The scene and the actor are the same. His aggression was very high in the Telugu version. His looks differ as per the nativity. I gave this scene to watch because you watched Bulandi and are familiar with the concept. Anyways, i like the way he reacts to his brother-in-law's warning and the way he proudly embraces the death. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
He does it, no doubt. But do not expect the regular frills attached with Rajini's name in the films i suggested. They purely belong to Rajinikanth, the actor. Anyways, i wish you the very best for your future endeavours and message me with your feedback once you watch both of em, of course in your free time. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi..! I have seen your current contributions to my most favorite singer, Shreya Ghoshal's article. I have developed Arijit Singh's article a few months back and I would like to kindly request you to review that article at your convenience and do a little copy editing in order to meet the article to a Good status which you are very very good at! Again it is just a request and only if you are willing. If you don't have time could you please see the article and check whether I am on the right track with the article please. Just a little feedback and a way to improve will do. Thank You very much. Shaphiu (talk) 17:18, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
@Shaphiu: I'm trying to take her article to GA status. One's i'm finished with that, I will look through Arijit Singh's article. It looks good already and after some c.e, it will be suitable for GA. Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
This list has been promoted to FL status yesterday and is my first FL success. Thanks for reviewing/commenting/supporting the list's promotion at its FLC. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 01:39, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shreya Ghoshal you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 09:40, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
You are more experienced than me here, and you know how a note section is required for a FL. We shouldn't be wasting our time arguing over this minor issue. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
As you can see, I have already started to add sources, so it won't be unsourced for long. The things you are calling "crap" are the same things that are mentioned on note section of many indian FL's. Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:44, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
For your significant contribution to Shreya Ghoshal article. I made some major changes in the infobox and expecting you to have a look. I am currently working on one of my subpages to make it a featured one. Whenever it's ready, I'll inform you. Please extend a supporting hand. Regards. Bubaikumar (talk) 18:07, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Sargun Mehta, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vishal Bhardwaj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
What do you actually mean by puff here? Although your changes were not nonconstructive, I suggest you please be more clear with your edit summaries. Also, per WP:TPG you're not supposed to change others' comments as you did here, especially in their talk pages. —Vensatry(Talk)06:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Words like "highly" and "unlike most filmmakers" are not neutral, and Puff means puffery; if you didn't get it. The latter was just in good-faith, and it has been reverted. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:10, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
You mean WP:WEASEL? While removal of "highly" makes sense, I don't think the "unlike ..." bit is puff. I haven't checked if it's fully covered in the source, but that is not exaggeration. Firstly, you need not WP:AGF on sock-puppets. Secondly, refactoring others comments is a violation of WP:TPG. There is hardly any good faith here. —Vensatry(Talk)06:24, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
The "unlike.." bit is a POV statement. There are many film-makers who have made films without assisting anyone before like Banerjee, Kashyap, Bhardwaj, Gowariker, Nolan, Tarantino and many more. That doesn't mean we need to include that. Its clearly non-encyclopedic. Also, I have understood to not to tamper with other's comment, so no need to constantly remind me that. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
From your argument, isn't it pretty obvious that the claim doesn't border WP:PUFF? Given we have sources which completely cover a particular claim, which is non-controversial and non-promotional, I don't see a reason why you term it "puff" and "unencylopedic". —Vensatry(Talk)09:08, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Oh the irony! You assume good-faith on blocked sock-puppets, but behave in the exact opposite way towards other editors. In my previous response, I was suggesting that you need not AGF on sock puppets; it wasn't a reminder. As far as I can see, that's the only time I used WP:AGF in your talk page. —Vensatry(Talk)09:12, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
I'm not interested in arguing with you, so let it be the way you want it to be. What other editors are you talking about? You? Also, my edit on that talk page was reverted, and here you were; telling me the same. That's why i said that. Yashthepunisher (talk) 09:30, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
I've nominated this article for FAC which also happens to be my first attempt. It is also the first Indian Telugu film article to be nominated for such status. If interested, please leave your comments here. All constructive comments are welcomed. Yours sincerely, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 09:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Vishal Bhardwaj you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 14:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manoj Bajpai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jail (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manoj Bajpai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fatehpur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Ah, now I got your intentions right. Just because I didn't return to your FLC, you're trying to pull my leg wherever possible. FYI, that's not a "review". —Vensatry(Talk)17:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
My sole intention was to express what I felt about the "female wikipedian" issue. I just though that if you can mock me by amening me why can't I. And what's with "pull my leg wherever possible"?? Where else have I done that before? You are the one who lectured me on AGF and then didn't gave a damn about my list. What's not a review? what are you talking about? Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:20, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Huh, then why did you brought up the FLC discussion at her talk page? 'Where else have I done that before?' So you're implying that you made an attempt there? 'You are the one who lectured me on AGF and then didn't gave a damn about my list.' Where on the earth are both interrelated? If someone gives you a 'lecture' on AGF, it doesn't mean they have to necessarily review your FLCs. —Vensatry(Talk)17:27, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
You are completely out of focus right now, copy-pasting my comments. If you had no intention to review the FLC, you should never have visited it or said: "I'll review this one in the next couple of days". Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:31, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Offcourse I pulled you leg with that last comment just like you did with the amen. But the whole "flc" thing is useless now, as you have opposed more list/articles than you have supported. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:53, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Seriously? If only you are good at reading comprehension, I was merely responding to your queries separately. As for the latter, is it an unwritten rule for FLCs? Please clarify! —Vensatry(Talk)17:36, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Fine if you won't visit that FLC. But please think about it that your cliffhanger comments might be an obstruction in getting it a clear consensus. Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:45, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Unless someone offers a review, I don't think it's mandatory that one should re-visit nominations. In my case, it was definitely not a review. Wikipedia is a voluntary project, so you can never force somebody to do something for you. And, I never asked clarification for the 'out of focus' thing. So that's redundant. —Vensatry(Talk)06:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
You mistook my request with forcing. I have never forced you for anything, it was you who visited the flc. I just thought that you will continue with some more comments that might me helpful. If its redundant, then what the edit confilct was about? Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:51, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Huh, but then requests should be done politely. I absolutely see no reason to raise the FLC issue at TrueHeartSusie3's talk page. If you think you never forced me at any point, then what's the intention behind this? Finally, what does 'edit conflict' has to do with this argument? I'm confused —Vensatry(Talk)07:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Also, I never 'mocked' you by saying 'Amen'. I was rather referring to the discussion. You might want to find out the meaning of the word (for the given context). This is bad faith at the extreme. —Vensatry(Talk)07:16, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
How many times will I have to request you politely. What are these then? [2][3]. It's been a month since you left that comment with no intention to return. What do expect me to do then? request you over and over again. Yashthepunisher (talk) 07:17, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
I even apologised to you when i realised my mistake there, and you said to review it. Now, you are accusing me of bad-faith, after all this..really? Yashthepunisher (talk) 07:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Didn't I respond to your comments after those "polite" requests at the nomination page? As I said earlier, you cannot expect editors to re-visit when they hardly conducted a review. In my case, it was just a single comment. Yes I said 'I'll review it in the next couple of days', but of late I'm not finding adequate time even for my tasks. So you cannot expect me to review your lists. That said, it's not an unwritten rule that one should re-visit the candidate after leaving a single comment. Additionally, I never opposed the candidate. So that shouldn't naturally affect the prospects of the candidate's promotion. If the delegates ask me, I'll respond. You should learn a lot about how stuff works here. —Vensatry(Talk)07:54, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
"I'm not getting time" is just a lame excuse. We give priorities to things the way we want to. Anyway, i don't want this conversation to end up badly; so we should end this now. You don't want to comment there, fine. But i feel that your comments at the FLC were quite helpful. As per learning the stuffs here: I agree I know nothing. Yashthepunisher (talk) 08:56, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
