This is an archive of past discussions with User:Yashthepunisher. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anurag Kashyap may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
case|Sanjeev Nanda BMW hit-and-run case]] and [[DPS MMS Scandal|MMS scandal]] in [[Dev.D]]'' (2009)) and portrayal of real life gang wars that took place in the region of [[Dhanbad]]'',[[Jharkhand]]''
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anurag kashyap filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kaun. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anurag Kashyap, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Anurag Kashyap you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kailash29792 -- Kailash29792 (talk) 15:01, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the offer, but I will only get back to major editing by June 2015 as per my talk page. So, I have to decline this one. Sorry. — Ssven2Speak 2 me05:57, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Based on the oppose votes at the FLC nomination, I'm suggesting that you should withdraw the nom and work on it. I myself had to do this with Akshay Kumar filmography. This is not what you wanted to hear but based on present circumstances there is no chance that this will be passed in the first attempt. Regards, --Skr15081997 (talk) 16:13, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Yes, congratulations Yash on your first GA. You can create your userpage and use it as a gallery of your achievements and awards received. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:14, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you both of you. Sure I will. Yashthepunisher (talk) 5:39, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
I was talking about the peer review, and not withdrawing. Whenever you list an article for peer review, do this in the talk page. Anyways you do not need to do anything else for withdrawing. Just wait and the featured list director or a delegate will close it. Now you have to do is wait for the reviewers' comments at peer, and later renominate it for the FLC. Hopefully it will be soon an FL. I have posted comments at the peer review. -- FrankBoyCHITCHAT20:15, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for clarifying, but i'm not against your edits, I am just clarifying that the removal contents are really unnecessary, so i just asked to someone. Hetika (talk) 16:48, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
I am unable to swipe the places of year and title, If you could show me by doing it to any one film of the feature film and short film section, I'll do the rest.
Can you also do the scope row thing to the short film section? Again I'm unable to do that as well.
I have done everything (the whole). Now you have to do is check if all comments in the pr are resolved. Check for the errors personally and fix them. See ya at the FLC. -- FrankBoyCHITCHAT15:48, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Anushka Sharma you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 06:40, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for being late. Well, the best way to fix those references, is to archive them. Because, though you can simply click on the url and copy-paste the new one in the place of the existing one to solve this problem, there is a risk of link-rotting. So now you can archive them using this for archiving those links and in those references add |archiveurl=the url you are shown as a result of "saving"|archivedate=the date on which you archived the link}}</ref> If the link i gave does not work for few of them, you can use this one. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:46, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
I've been a major contributor to the Sharma article for the past year or so. It's a shame that you nominated it for GA after making some changes without even consulting me. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 07:50, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
It's not about retaliation, and I am not here to be a hysterical diva. I'm just making an observation on how I am not involved in the GA process of an article that I helped expand for several months. I only wish he was kind enough to notify me. That's all. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 07:59, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
@Krimuk90: I have tried asking you for help in the past, but you don't respond. I am not ashamed of taking it to GA, and I'm not doing this for taking credits. You make please check the article history and see my contribution. Its not personal and Kailash is right, you can take it to FA status. I just thought when most of her contemporaries are either GA or FA, why leave her..! --Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:48, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Please think before you say something as ridiculous as "its a shame you nominated it without asking me"...well you are not the owner of the article and neither am I, so I don't need your approval for doing anything. "some changes", What does that means??? Check If the "Personal life and off-screen work" and "In the media" section existed before my edit. If you care so much, Why its not a GA already? You can edit and do whatever you want to do with now and take the credit coz I'm done with it. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:41, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
It's that sucky know-it-all attitude of yours that's disgusting. You are new here; learn from the more experienced editors and don't throw your weight around. It's people like you who make editing on Wikipedia a tiresome experience. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 02:26, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Spending more time here than me doesn't gives you a right to say anything. Its all about credits, well I helped taking Vivah to GA as a unregistered user; but I don't take credit for that. Its very sweet of you to interrupt in between a on-going review. You started It all, I didn't. --Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:41, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
That's too rude guys. Both of you. Instead of collaborating for something productive, you both have picked up a row. Hope you leave this here itself. Wikipedia cannot afford another cockfight! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:58, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
GA article
Fine. I'll do that.
I am a girl, by the way.Semanti 07:21, 2 July 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Semanti Paul (talk • contribs)
I didn't knew that. You can continue it after it becomes a Good Article, which it will become soon.-Yashthepunisher (talk) 7:28, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
The article Anushka Sharma you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Anushka Sharma for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssven2 -- Ssven2 (talk) 09:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yashthepunisher, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. I have never vandalized any article or abused anyone, and I want to continue my contributions to wikipedia. Please unblock me.
Decline reason:
There is nothing we can do about a block on an IP address unless you tell us what IP address it is that is blocked. Please make another unblock request, but this time tell us what IP address it is. The notice telling you that you can't edit will include that information. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:27, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
