|
User talk:Yankees10/Archive 11
Blue Moon OdomThe career stats box on Blue Moon Odom needed fixing. Why would you undo that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.3.45.113 (talk) 10:30, 3 July 2011 (UTC) Fair use images of movie/tv charactersHi Yankees10, I was just checking out one of the images you added at Geno Silva unfortunately we can't use these kinds of pictures to identify living people. Since he's alive it stands to reason that it would be easy to create a free image of him, and even such it is unlikely that he dresses up as "The Skull" on a daily basis as he's out and about so it's probably not an overly accurate representation of him anyway. The image is still available for viewing for those who continue through the part on the Skull anyway. If you have any questions or need any help with images feel free to get a hold of me on my talk page. Thanks!--Crossmr (talk) 10:08, 4 July 2011 (UTC) Nomination of Dorian Tyrell and Niko (The Mask) for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the articles Dorian Tyrell and Niko (The Mask) are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether they should be deleted. The articles will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorian Tyrell (3nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niko (The Mask) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussions focus on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the articles during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion templates from the articles. Cheers, theFace 17:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC) inre Tyler HerronI have removed the {{prod}} tag from Tyler Herron, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Again, and with respects, I have removed the deletion prod from the article, as it is ineligable for proposed deletion as it had previously been discussed at an AFD. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tyler Herron and then Wikipedia:Proposed deletion#Nominating. You are welcome to renominate for AFD. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 09:14, 10 July 2011 (UTC) Preston ParkerHey man GO BUCS!! Good job creating the Preston Parker article. I just finished adding info and more refs. Take a look! KING OF WIKIPEDIA - GRIM LITTLEZ (talk) 05:57, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Just cuz it was 10 years doenst make it notable enoughWhat a surprise, you again. Well let me take the time to once again address the situation. As you may remember a little over a year ago, we had this same problem, and both you and I made our presence known on WP: Baseball. And while there was an agreement to include the coaching history for both current coaches and coaches who had a long, or as you like to put it, notable career, there was never a consensus for past coaches, as the discussion quicky changed from coaching history to a World Series titles. Now let me put it in perspective, I simply cannot take your opinion that Rod Carew was not a notable coach, as you obviously have no knowledge about the subject which became all too clear when you wrote " Seriously I highly doubt anybody remembers (or cares) that Carew was a coach". Why? Because you don't remember him as a coach? Come on you never even saw him play. Eight years as a coach for one team is an impressive feat and he was huge part of Jim Edmonds, Garrett Anderson, Darin Erstad and Tim Salmon's careers. Now I understand that maybe guys like John Wetteland and Rickey Henderson may have not had long, notable coaching careers, but nevertheless their coaching history should be put in the infobox for information purposes, it's simply a part of their baseball career. Now please, let's end this bickering nonsense. Beast from da East (talk) 21:33, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
in re STEVE TOWLE May I ask why you deleted my addition of "the Towle Patrol"? and apologies if I didn't format this correctly, I'm new to this. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Canamets (talk • contribs) 00:08, 6 September 2011 (UTC) Second opinions solicitedI have done it already. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Second opinions solicited.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:04, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Michael BoleyMichael Boley did peg that dude in the face, objectively. I provided a source reference of indisputable evidence, and didn't imply that it was intentional or detrimental to his character in any way. In short, what's your beef, bro? http://gif.mocksession.com/2011/09/boleycameraman/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.42.76.153 (talk) 17:15, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
It's hilarious dog! ...and factual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.42.76.153 (talk) 17:25, 20 September 2011 (UTC) Nomination of Terrence Toliver for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Terrence Toliver is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terrence Toliver until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.William 18:06, 11 October 2011 (UTC) ApologiesI appologize for continuing to update those MLB player's pages. I will not do it again. I am new to using wikipedia like this and did not previously know about what you mentioned earlier. Again my sincerist apologies. SJCJR (talk) 21:26, 13 October 2011 (UTC) New Page Patrol survey
I just expanded Alex Green, and it is not up for WP:DYK, hopefully I expanded enough for it to pass. Regards,--SKATER Is Back 17:37, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
PropsHi thanks for fixing the infobox on Alex Avila. I tried 5 times and couldn't figure it out. TomCat4680 (talk) 00:26, 3 November 2011 (UTC)  TomCat4680 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}! "Featured" singlesNo they don't. Moreover, what does "featured single" even mean? Drmies (talk) 02:21, 9 November 2011 (UTC) DYK for Alex Green
Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 13 November 2011 (UTC) Rule 5 Protection DayI appreciate your creating stubs for players newly added to 40 man rosters, but a lot of them are too incomplete for stubs or include errors. For instance, you created David Adams (baseball) with no sources and only one category. Also, you used a source for the Reds adding Didi Gregorius that was actually just about who the Phillies added. There is no rush to create these stubs. It would be better for you to take more time and do a more complete job on some rather than creating incomplete stubs for all of them. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:04, 18 November 2011 (UTC) Starling Marté article nameThe article title is supposed to be Marté. See Damaso Marté and Andy Marté. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.14.134.127 (talk) 03:04, 19 November 2011 (UTC) Bolding in navboxesI'm not sure if there was ever a formal discussion about bolding in navboxes, but the dominant standard formatting for college football and college basketball navboxes is to bold the main subjects of the navbox where there are a parenthetical descriptors that are also wikilinked. There are many examples of this. See:
Whether the bolding here is the best option is certainly debatable, but it should be considered with this entire class of navboxes in mind. There are a few others of this sort, but I think the five categories above contain the bulk of them. You may want to bring the issue up at one or both of the project talk pages. Thanks. Jweiss11 (talk) 01:42, 21 November 2011 (UTC) Your nomination for deletion of – James F. RoeJust a note, you did not transclude this article in the Articles for deletion log page when you nominated it for deletion, as required in step 3 of the subsection "How to nominate a single page for deletion” on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion page. Another user has performed this step for you to complete the process. In the future, please follow all of the required steps when nominating an article for deletion. Thank you. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:43, 27 November 2011 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Johnny Dingle and Marc MagroI have removed the prod tags you placed on Johnny Dingle and Marc Magro, as both articles have been discussed at AfD and kept due to no consensus, and are therefore permanently ineligible for prod. Compliance with policy is the only reason I did this; I have no comment on the merits of deletion. If you still wish to pursue deletion, I recommend going over the arguments made in the previous deletion discussions as well as WP:BEFORE before re-nominating at AfD. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:22, 28 November 2011 (UTC) Frankie CrosettiI don't understand you. I truly don't. You've been told 1000 times NOT to change "All Star" to "All Star Selection," yet for some reason, you still insist upon doing it. What is the reasoning behind your completely unnecessary undoing of the changes I made to Frankie Crosetti? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.3.219.206 (talk) 20:48, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
Tyrann MathieuJust curious why you have deleted the table of stats that I added to the page for Tyrann Mathieu. It is common on many athletes pages to see a chart or table of their stats each year or over their career (see Patrick Peterson the previous LSU defensive player to wear #7) and that is what I added to this page. Are you saying add a legend to explain the categories? Or are you saying the table is excessive? I have attached it to show it is simple and only has a few categories, which adds to the overall information that is provided on this athlete.
Kingsnoopy (talk) 22:44, 6 December 2011 (UTC) Thank you for your quick reply, the Wikipedia:NOTSTATS article says that "excessive stats" should be avoided, not that stat tables are not allowed. Also on this page it makes it easier to read in a stat table rather than a paragraph full of numbers (i.e. Mathieu had 71 total tackles (54 solo and 17 assists), 1.5 sacks, 5 forced fumbles (2 returned for a touchdown), and 2 interceptions) in comparison to the much easier to read stat table. Kingsnoopy (talk) 23:00, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
ESPYPlease explain to me how ESPY's are not notable for an infobox, and how it is up to you whether it is notable enough? I feel that it should be discussed before deleted. ESPY's are notable enough to have an article devoted to each award, so that would indicate that they're more than notable enough.Racingstripes (talk) 04:41, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notificationHi. In Jarius Wright, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Warren High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 18 December 2011 (UTC)  The article Isaiah Crowell has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing Nomination of Ricky Elmore for deletionA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ricky Elmore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricky Elmore until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:27, 31 December 2011 (UTC) |
