User talk:Wonderwizard

Hello, Wonderwizard, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! 67.70.35.44 (talk) 05:13, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous
Teahouse logo
Hello! Wonderwizard, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

Welcome

If I have done something wrong like adding unconstructive edits, removing content without explanation or adding unsourced material, feel free to let me know but please go easy because I never add nonsense to Wikipedia. Also if any user is giving you personal attacks, let me know and I will sort them out.

A beer for you!

Just for your work with the darts! A-darts (talk) 11:13, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Jac16888 Talk 16:28, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Gladiators (1992 UK TV series) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Gladiators (original UK TV series). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. 67.70.35.44 (talk) 05:13, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Talk:Gladiators (2008 UK TV series) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Talk:Gladiators (revival UK TV series). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. 67.70.35.44 (talk) 05:13, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Gladiators (2008 UK TV series) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Gladiators (revival UK TV series). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. 67.70.35.44 (talk) 05:13, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Gladiators (2008 UK TV series) Series One a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Gladiators (revival UK TV series) Series One. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. 67.70.35.44 (talk) 05:32, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cricket scores

Hi. Please note that the articles have the correct formatting for the scores, depending on who won the toss and batted/fielded first. Any questions about the layout, please raise them at WT:CRIC. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 08:12, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Information icon Hello, I'm Struway2. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Villa Park, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Struway2 (talk) 10:12, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've just had a glance at your recent contributions, and it looks like you've spent the morning changing stadium capacities away from the figures in the cited sources. I'll undo your changes, and assume good faith on your motivation, but in future, please don't make any change to sourced content on here without providing a more reliable source to verify your change. Thank you for listening. Struway2 (talk) 10:18, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

<edit conflict>You're making masses of such changes, and the one you made to Carrow Road explicitly contradicts the stated source. Unless you have a better source, you just can't do that. As you don't tell us what source you're using, it's hard to tell whether your edits are good ones or should be mass reverted. --Dweller (talk) 10:20, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced changes to stadium capacities

I have drawn the attention of the stadiums project to your changes here. It might be an idea to stop altering capacity figures if they are not sourced as all the time you spend on them will be wasted. Britmax (talk) 10:22, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Information icon Hello, I'm Qed237. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2014–15 Premier League, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 10:52, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2009–10 Football League Championship, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. QED237 (talk) 14:49, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello. I don't know why you're choosing to ignore all these various editors trying to speak to you, but it's not a great idea to just ignore us all. --Dweller (talk) 15:26, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 4 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on Game of Thrones (season 5)

This content seems reasonably relevant, but you need to provide a source for it. [1] [2] [3] Otherwise, Drovethru and AlexTW will keep reverting you. If you like, I can show you how to format a reference tag. Darkfrog24 (talk) 16:57, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Can you help me to edit some seasons in Liga II of Romanian football. IF everyone will edit 1 season, all the seasons will be done by the end of the week.--Alexiulian25 (talk) 15:34, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (2006-07 WRU Division One East) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 2006-07 WRU Division One East, Wonderwizard!

Wikipedia editor Tom29739 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

References needed.

To reply, leave a comment on Tom29739's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Your edit to Harry Potter (film series) Comment

Greetings. I removed the section you added here because it is poorly worded, not referenced and did not substantially add to the topic of the article. Feel free to add it back if you can improve it. --Thomprod (talk) 16:16, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WWE Elimination Chamber

Template:WWE Elimination Chamber has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. JC · Talk · Contributions 07:29, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fifteen to One

Please refrain from adding WP:CRUFT to articles. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an indiscriminate collection of information. The information you added already exists at Celebrity Fifteen to One.--Launchballer 17:29, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Debatable, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Launchballer 21:38, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Make Me an Egghead

Please wait until the heats are over before putting what the leaderboard does. As far as I'm concerned, the terminology Vine used was "straight through" implying that those that didn't had another round to go.--Launchballer 20:05, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An article you contributed to has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Wonderwizard. An article you either created or to which you significantly contributedhas been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you knowDYK comment symbol. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:01, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Debatable, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Peter Jones and Llandrillo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mastermind International

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mastermind International requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Dane2007 talk 00:38, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mastermind (TV series 42) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mastermind (TV series 42) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mastermind (TV series 42) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 19:15, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Wonderwizard. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Make Me an Egghead has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Wonderwizard. Make Me an Egghead, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you knowDYK comment symbol. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:01, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Make Me an Egghead

On 12 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Make Me an Egghead, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Steve Cooke and Beth Webster are the newest Eggheads? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Make Me an Egghead. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Make Me an Egghead), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Debatable (TV show)

On 15 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Debatable (TV show), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Debatable panellists have included a former MP and a rapper? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Debatable (TV show)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mastermind Champion of Champions for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mastermind Champion of Champions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mastermind Champion of Champions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mortee (talk) 14:59, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Singapore Open (darts)

The article Singapore Open (darts) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks any references, notable participants, or any evidence of recognition by the World Darts Federation

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. : Noyster (talk), 10:29, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2014 Six Nations Under 20s Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcastle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2015 Six Nations Under 20s Championship, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Donnybrook and Saint-Gaudens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:36, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2009–10 Serie A (rugby union) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2009–10 Serie A (rugby union) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009–10 Serie A (rugby union) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 04:46, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2016 Six Nations Under 20s Championship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Donnybrook, Newcastle, Pau, Parc des Sports and Ashton Gate

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017 Six Nations Under 20s Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Donnybrook (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2010 UK Open Qualifier 1 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2010 UK Open Qualifier 1 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 UK Open Qualifier 1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MWright96 (talk) 21:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the following articles to which you have significantly contributed, are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted:

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 UK Open Qualifier 1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:06, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:16TeamX2RoundBracket

Template:16TeamX2RoundBracket has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Pbrks (t • c) 21:39, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2012 PDPA Players Championship 1

Notice

The article 2012 PDPA Players Championship 1 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article seems more like a chart then an actual article, the article is lacking reliable sources and it fails GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 20:56, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gladiators (1992 British TV series) series 4 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gladiators (1992 British TV series) series 4 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gladiators (1992 British TV series) series 4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

4meter4 (talk) 18:29, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Didam Open

Notice

The article Didam Open has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Failure to find any kind of in-depth WP:RS on this to meet WP:N (No news articles, either on web or in various archives; no coverage in books or reference work; definitely nothing academic). There's also nowhere else this could be redirected, as far as I can see.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 13:31, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]