User talk:Wingedserif/Archive 1

Archive 1Archive 2

Welcome!

Hello, Wingedserif, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Tao Lin. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 12:51, 19 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cultural Correspondence (June 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This really needs at least one good independent source showing its importance.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 19:26, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Wingedserif! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 19:26, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cultural Correspondence has been accepted

Cultural Correspondence, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 15:20, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slave Theater has been accepted

Slave Theater, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 22:08, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019 blitz bling

The Minor Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to Wingedserif for copy edits totaling between 1 and 1,999 words (including rollover words) during the GOCE August 2019 Copy Editing Blitz. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 16:26, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

FYI, the article you copy edited had been tagged in August 2019 rather than the target month of March 2019, but it was good work and your first blitz, so full marks this time! – Reidgreg (talk) 16:26, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Slave Theater

Hello! Your submission of Slave Theater at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 18:35, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mónica de la Torre (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CaptainEek was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Better and more sources are needed, some existing sources are self published (i.e. blogs), and are generally not sufficient to establish notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 08:08, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

September 2019 GOCE drive bling

The Modest Barnstar
This barnstar is awarded to Wingedserif for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE September 2019 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 17:27, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spectacle Theater has been accepted

Spectacle Theater, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 23:10, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Sack of Bath has been accepted

The Sack of Bath, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 21:03, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mónica de la Torre (December 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 06:20, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Wingedserif! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 06:20, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susan Bond has been accepted

Susan Bond, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MurielMary (talk) 11:44, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK for The Sack of Bath

On 13 January 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Sack of Bath, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Sack of Bath, a collection of newspaper articles by Adam Fergusson, sparked a resurgence in architectural conservation in Britain? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Sack of Bath. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Sack of Bath), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Mónica de la Torre concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mónica de la Torre, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Mónica de la Torre concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mónica de la Torre, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Salvadora Medina Onrubia concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Salvadora Medina Onrubia, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mónica de la Torre

Hello, Wingedserif. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mónica de la Torre".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 10:01, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Salvadora Medina Onrubia

Hello, Wingedserif. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Salvadora Medina Onrubia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:56, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raissa Calza has been accepted

Raissa Calza, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Raissa Calza

Hello! Your submission of Raissa Calza at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Corachow (talk) 18:25, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 20:51, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Raissa Calza

On 4 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Raissa Calza, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that actress and dancer Raissa Gourevitch performed in surrealist plays before becoming an archaeological authority on Roman statuary? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Raissa Calza. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Raissa Calza), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Napoleonic looting of art has been accepted

Napoleonic looting of art, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 10:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

GOCE review of Edward Mitchell Bannister

@Tdslk: Thank you so much! This will be my first attempt to put an article up for GAN, so I really appreciate the help. —WingedSerif (talk) 00:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Good luck! I enjoyed learning about Bannister. Tdslk (talk) 01:20, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Napoleonic looting of art

Hello! Your submission of Napoleonic looting of art at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! – Muboshgu (talk) 21:46, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

The Fourth Estate

@Dr. Breadward: Thank you so much for the thorough copyedit! You definitely caught both the howlers and more subtle errors. 🙏 All much appreciated, —Wingedserif (talk) 22:12, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Sure thing! Dr. Breadward (talk) 23:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

GOCE copy edit of Napoleonic looting of art