Hello, Wilfredor, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! ॐ Priyanathtalk19:02, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings - I reverted your change of the Aum symbol at Template:Hinduism_small. Hundreds of pages show that template, therefore your change shows up on hundreds of pages. That particular symbol has been discussed previously. It was decided to have a more traditional version of the symbol: colored red, using a classical version of the devanagiri script. Your stylized, calligraphic black version doesn't meet what others were asking for. If you would like to discuss changing it, I suggest you post a message at Wikipedia_talk:Hinduism-related_topics_notice_board. ॐ Priyanathtalk19:11, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Mistaken user page?
I noticed you posted a page at Usuario:Wilfredor that looked like it may have been intended for your user page. Since "Usuario:" is not a recognized namespace, the software considered it a mainspace article, so it had to be deleted. Please note that only the "User:" namespace is userspace. If you would like to place additional content on your userpage, please use the page located at User:Wilfredor. Thanks, and happy editing! SeraphimbladeTalk to me20:59, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I saw your comment on the main page discussion about issues with thumbnails. I'm not sure why other language projects would have the issue, but the blockiness/artifacting only exists with JPGs to my knowledge—PNGs scale much smoother (which is why I usually use them with small images.) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk)15:32, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Butan king picture on spanish wikipedia
I said i ment to put the editted one instead of the original. I dont know how to change the picture on the nomination. I was asking if you can help me with that. Also sorry about my spanish i dont know much and google translate is bad translating stuff to spanish. Spongie555 (talk) 17:36, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
one problem with my nomination is that my vote doesnt count beacuase i havnt done 100 edits on spanish wikipedia. thats one problem i have that i cant change my nomination 22:55, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
i changed the picture to the new one also so if my vote doesnt count then what happen if it gets no votes to oppose or support? I know that it probably wont happen but just wondering. Spongie555 (talk) 03:42, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just in case you withdrew because of me, it was not my intention to avoid the promotion of the picture. I was just expressing my opinions and maybe many users won't agree with me and the picture would have been promoted :) Anyways, I'd like to apologize to you and encourage you to keep nominating pictures to featured status. I remember the first pictures I ever nominated; they got a handful of opposes and none of them were promoted :/ Regards. — ΛΧΣ2105:54, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your message, I do not think nominate more images in a while, at least you understand what an image means encyclopedic here. Your argument was very good and convinced me to withdraw the nomination, thank you very much. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:17, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this is actually speediable - it would have to be rather more promotional to qualify for WP:CSD#G11 - so I have tagged it as a sandbox (which will NOINDEX it) for the moment, and will take it to MfD, once I have worked out how to explain to the user in Spanish why it is not appropriate. By the way, you should have left a notice on his talk page when you tagged it, though he has evidently noticed. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:08, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted your edit reverting my changes -- that content must be kept deleted as it is 99% sure to be a copyright violation. (It was added by a user who essentially only contributed copyright violations to Wikipedia.) Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:36, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
My initial reaction to Jimbo's comment was similar to yours. He repeatedly unfairly groups the decent users with the trolls, and this does very little to help or encourage the decent users. However, on reflection, if someone had arrange for someone to paint a penis-picture of me and post it on Commons, and if a group of similar users who hate me were in such powerful positions that the image could not be deleted, then I'd want nothing more to do with the site. The difference between me and Jimbo is that WMF, own the site. If I was Jimbo, I'd have those accounts closed along with anyone making a fuss about it. Nobody has a god-given right to be here. If Commons really has become so toxic that the Wiki figurehead wants nothing more to do with it, then it would be relatively easy for Wikipedia to sever any links with the site and for WMF to pull the plug on the servers. And why not? -- Colin°Talk14:23, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
They can not, generate a chain reaction, the community would reveal, would create a fork of the project and then would kill the goose of the golden eggs. The best, by far, is to empower the community, a small amount of money (chapters) to distract the community from conflicts while we take the biggest slice of the pie. They do not really care much community, Wikipedia was originated as a way to make money from the beginning, that has nothing wrong while also dealing with the community right now WMF has only helped to fan the flames of the problems of the chapters. Perhaps was it so difficult devote only servers? No! they wanted more money and help is a way to do it. Creating events in the most expensive cities in the world, staying in more expensive hotels in the city, while the crumbs fall under the table for community groups like chickens fighting over waste. --Wilfredor (talk) 17:14, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There are some problems with WMF spending, but don't believe everything the haters say. There are many losers on Commons who really need to get a life. I don't believe in "the wisdom of the crowd". Most internet forums like Commons and Wikipedia are populated by young men, and that demographic is pretty stupid and hot-headed. I think a better Terms of Use agreement would help eliminate the bad apples. -- Colin°Talk18:52, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Dakazo photos?
I know you have many photos from Venezuela and was wondering if you have any involving the Dakazo, a new article I created. I know you have provided some nice photos in the past, so you are the first person I thought of to ask.--ZiaLater (talk) 10:58, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @ZiaLater:, There will be no more photos of Venezuela, and was not a good place to live, I have left the country with millions of people this year, everyone is leaving. My family has stayed there because it is now very difficult to leave the country. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:55, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @ZiaLater: for this article. Look like a very nice article to translate, let me translate it this weekend. You could use for Venezuela Economy article this info. It is very difficult to explain what is happening in Venezuela for other people in other countries, much more difficult to explain to people who are fond of conspiracy ideologies (Comunism, Marxism, Socialism...) .--Wilfredor (talk) 00:45, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Help with article
I created the Units of Battle Hugo Chávez article with a limited amount of information. I was wondering if you could find more of a background on UBCh. I know they have done more than what is presented in the article, but that is the most I could find in recent times. Any help is appreciated!--ZiaLater (talk) 02:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help. Since I know you enjoy my edits, I found some information that surprised me and I added it to the Simon Bolivar article. I never knew that Karl Marx wrote about Simon Bolivar, so I found it quite interesting.--ZiaLater (talk) 05:53, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The government of Venezuela has done foolish things, to switch to Bolivar, both in history and in his physical image. Textbooks of children have been changed. The government has also brought thousands of children from Brazil, Argentina, Bolivia and Ecuador to indoctrinate.
Moving on, now there is a health crisis in Venezuela, 2 in 5 people has suffered from chicunguya, however, I myself have family members who have recently died from this. The state says it's a bacteriological bomb dropped from US, however, does not conduct informational campaigns or fumigation. It really is not the worst chicunguya disease, the health system is sick, the actual figures are manipulated and all chiefs of government health are Cuban doctors without professional training. It all began with the importation of Cuban doctors, many of whom are not prepared. Using plans to import Cuban doctors have brought Cuban paramilitary personnel to control Venezuela and other countries. There are similar plans in other latin american countries. --Wilfredor (talk) 11:15, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have finally created the Shortages in Venezuela article. It does not have a date in the title since recent shortages have been dated back all the way to 2007 and maybe even earlier. Go ahead and take a look and maybe even fix the sources for the items affected.--ZiaLater (talk) 18:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@ZiaLater:, I'm not sure about the name, perhaps something like "Shortages in Venezuela during the Bolivarian Revolution", or something similar, I've been thinking about changing the article name of Spanish version. I also noticed that you need to add internal links to other articles. I would like to congratulate you for this article, obviously you have a flair for writing, I believe your article in English is better than spanish version and you have made not only with good quality but in a short time. I would like you to take a break after this, you've done a good job. I'd like to help, however, I am translating your articles to Spanish. I will try to add some things in this article also to unify the version in Spanish. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 10:43, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have been looking for the history of shortages in Venezuela and have not found much information of shortages before Chavez's policies. I even read in an article that a 70+ year old woman said she never experienced shortages in Venezuela before recently. This makes me want to agree with you on a different title, but as of right now, I wanted to make a neutral title and have a discussion about a different title in the future. I will work on the links today too. Thanks for the compliments!--ZiaLater (talk) 22:11, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Isla Margarita, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Los Andes and San Juan Hill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I noticed that you have posted comments to the page User talk: Jimbo Wales in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:23, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I liked the Expanded Spanish version better myself. Please don't be rash, just take some time off to clear your mind and then come back strong when you're ready. best regards, —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 05:17, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
2014 Year In Review Awards
The WikiProject Barnstar
For your outstanding contributions for Featured Pictures in 2014 you are hereby award this WikiProject Barnstar. Congratulations! For the Military history Wikiproject Coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 08:40, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have a question about scanning bolívares for the Venezuelan bolívar article since I have a few different banknotes from my recent trip there. Is there anything I should or should not do? I wanted to remove You're better with files than I am so anything helps!--ZiaLater (talk) 00:29, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I believe there is copyright licensing for currency when you upload it to Wikipedia. Should I take a low resolution scan?--ZiaLater (talk) 01:51, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Nicolás Maduro. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Note:You haven't read our (most important) BLP policy or you don't understand it. Either way, BLP is not negotiable and your standard edit-summary doesn't explain why you think you can dismiss it. Please make yourself familiar with the above and if for some reason you really still think BLP doesn't apply, explain it to me our better the community via talkpage. Otherwise you might end up being blocked which I'm sure is not in your best interest and BTW, neither in mine.--TMCk (talk) 20:00, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Add: Also take a look at top info-boxes on the article's talk page. You'll read: This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous.--TMCk (talk) 20:13, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please discuss article related disputes at the relevant talk peages, which would be the most ideal place for an open discussion, and not a one way street of "templating". (t) Josve05a (c)20:42, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Josve05a: "Ouch!" indeed! With due respect. Please take a look at their contributions [a few hundred since 2006, mainly adding images] and especially the edits in question regarding their policy and editorial experience. Try to apply the latter to that "little advise" you linked and see what you get. And no, I don't use up more time than needed (that is when I don't have it) if some editor doesn't respond to given edit summaries but instead places their own time saving standard summary instead. Also, there is a thin red line in BLPs you can't cross I'm sure you're aware of. And just in case: No, no hard feeling from my side for waging your finger at me. You mean good but I have to disagree, in this case that is. Cheers,--TMCk (talk) 23:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Gustavo González López
Hello,
I was wondering if you could work on an article for the new Venezuelan Minister of Defense, Gustavo González López. If you can get started on that I can clean it up when you're done.--ZiaLater (talk) 04:45, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have been looking everywhere for free images but could not find any. Just as a warning, one that is popularly shared (File:Anti-chavez march.jpg) claiming to be part of the 2002 march is really from a 2004 march.--ZiaLater (talk) 10:12, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Can we use the image if we adapt it according to the image's license? If so, I can crop it quite well to fit the article.--ZiaLater (talk) 00:51, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Montanabw:, SVG should be a more easily readable format, you could send a print screen ?, please. I added more artistic version, if you have another model could be important in this process. Thanks --The_Photographer (talk) 14:54, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Look at the two images, the png has shading along the bones and a wider color palette; the fonts are different and the colors of the text labels are different. I don't know what you mean by a "print screen" - they look the way they look...File:Horseanatomy.png is a more professional design; File:Horse anatomy.svg is cartoonish and the use of shading fails to render the nuances of the skeleton properly. (Just to point out a couple examples, the cheekbone is entirely wrong on your image, it's just a line, it fails to illustrate the three-dimensionality of the skull; the tarsal bones in the hock are also wrong; and you added a funny bump on the distal end of femur that doesn't exist ). Also, the waving mane is simply a distraction, (the horse is standing still; how could its mane be flying in the "wind" anyway?) The italic text labels are also harder to read I don't know why the original version couldn't simply be copied and pasted, there was no need to recreate a whole new image. Montanabw(talk)16:57, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent comments, please open the full image and tell me if you can see the same problem. Maybe you need press Ctrl + F5 in your browser to clear the cache, and "print screen" is actually "screenshoot". Thanks @Montanabw:. I will try fix it, however, I will need your help again. --The_Photographer (talk) 17:03, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that the viewer sees it as a thumbnail or at 2x from prefs in articles, and then at Commons default if they click to view; at those resolutions, the shading is not enough and the black cartoon lines are too much. The other version (the .png) was better at the sizes actually used. The svg has both too little shading where 3-D effect is needed, but then the black lines outlining everything make it worse, not better - bones are not two-dimensional. Montanabw(talk)22:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"Spatula"? Can you link to the File: image, not the full sized one, please? I still don't understand why you couldn't just copy the png instead of redrawing the whole thing??? Montanabw(talk)01:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Help
I was wondering if you could help me with some polls, especially from September to November. You can take a look here and determine which month the polls took place. Some of the edits on the Spanish Wikipedia are not too reliable as I have found that the dates are incorrect or has data from previous polls. I wanted to have an extra person look this over before I make further edits if that is possible, I would be grateful with any help. I'm almost done with October polls for this, but I just want to make sure everything is correct. Thanks for all of your other help! --ZiaLater (talk) 07:04, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thank you. I think the November Datanalisis poll is from October though since it is an October-November poll. And thanks for your help.--ZiaLater (talk) 21:41, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Datanálisis 2014 is Nov-Dec and Datanalisis 2015 is Oct-Nov. Always takes the date of publication that is the last month. You are welcome, tell me whatever situation like that. --The_Photographer (talk) 02:19, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Crisco for nominate it, I'm trying improve the image description, however, it look too long. Take this picture were months of bureaucracy time lost with the Venezuela government only to get permission for use a tripod. --The_Photographer (talk) 01:23, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, The Photographer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
This is the very first newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.
(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, see below)
The future of the Genealogy project on the English Wikipedia, and a potential creation of a new Wikimedia Genealogy Project, is something where you can make a an input.
This is the second newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.
(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below)
Progress report:
In order to improve communication between genealogy interested wikipedians, as well talking in chat mode about the potential new wiki, a new irc channel has been setup, and you are welcome to visit and try it out at: #wikimedia-genealogyconnect
(In case you are not familiar with IRC, or would prefer some info and intro, please see Wikipedias IRC tutorial)
This is the third newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.
(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below)
Request:
In order to improve communication between genealogy interested wikipedians, as well as taking new, important steps towards a creation of a new project site, we need to make communication between the users easier and more effective.
At Mail list on meta is discussed the possibility of creating a genealogy-related Wikimedia email list. In order to request the creation of such a list, we need your voice and your vote.
In order to create a new list, we need to put a request it in Phabricator, and add a link to reasoning/explanation of purpose, and link to community consensus. Therefore we need your vote for this now, so we can request the creation of the mail list.
Read more about this email list at Meta; Wikimedia genealogy project mail list where you can support the creation of the mail list with your vote, in case you haven't done so already.
This is the fourth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.
(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below)
Mail list is created:
The project email list is now created and ready to use!
This is long overdue. You have contributed greatly to Venezuelan articles throughout Wikipedia and have admirably worked with others involved. At a time of unrest, you were present at situations unfolding despite the danger facing you, providing multiple files of what has been unfolding in the country for years now. With historical elements of Venezuela, you have documented them and their work is greatly seen through the many articles in which it is featured. Without you, we would be missing much of the picture of Venezuela in its current situation and I believe that your work will be used for better understanding for years to come. ZiaLater (talk) 19:08, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ZiaLater Yes I know and I added to spanish article version, however, my editions had been reverted and It's like a war more hard on wikipedia spanish because there are a hard presence of pro-vlz-gouvernement users. --The_Photographer (talk) 16:54, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ZiaLater The drama is generated to distract and while a user generates drama the others deviate the neutral point of view resulting in biased articles and discussion pages full of propaganda --The_Photographer (talk) 17:05, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, The Photographer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
This is the fifth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.
(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below)
A demo wiki is up and running!
Dear members of WikiProject Genealogy, this will be the last newsletter for 2017, but maybe the most important one!
You can already now try out the demo for a genealogy wiki at https://tools.wmflabs.org/genealogy/wiki/Main_Page and try out the functions. You will find parts of the 18th Pharao dynasty and other records submitted by the 7 first users, and it would be great if you would add some records.
And with those great news we want to wish you a creative New Year 2018!
Hello, The Photographer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
This is the sixth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.
(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below)
You can already now try out the demo for a genealogy wiki at https://tools.wmflabs.org/genealogy/wiki/Main_Page and try out the functions. You will find parts of the 18th Pharao dynasty and other records submitted by the 7 first users, and it would be great if you would add some records.
And with those great news we want to wish you a creative New Year 2019!
In recognition of the work done to get high-quality photographs of protests; not just going into the protests, but the choice to visually document political dissent in that climate. Kingsif (talk) 16:31, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Between November 16 and November 19 you will be able to join the Editathon to improve health knowledge, an editathon with the purpose of creating or improving articles related to human nutrition and health in general. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please write to us on the discussion page of the editathon.
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Hello Wilfredor, I noticed in your contribution to Universidad de Oriente sentences like "The university spirit, however, has tried to endure." and "However, for these solutions to be effective, it's vital that UDO's university autonomy is respected and guaranteed." It sounds very PR-like and not encyclopedic. Is this a result of translating word-for-word from the source, or something else? By the way, also watch out for time references that will be outdated when someone reads the article in the future (e.g. "recent", "in the past x years/decade", "current", etc). Cheers. –Vipz (talk) 02:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Laocoön and His Sons is an ancient sculpture which was excavated in Rome, Italy, in 1506. It depicts the Trojan priest Laocoön and his sons Antiphantes and Thymbraeus being attacked by sea serpents. The figures in the statue are nearly life-sized, with the entire group measuring just over 2 metres (6 ft 7 in) in height. The statue is likely to be the same one that received praise from the Roman writer Pliny the Elder, who attributed the work (then housed in the palace of the emperor Titus) to three Greek sculptors from the island of Rhodes: Agesander, Athenodoros and Polydorus, but he did not mention the work's date or patron. Modern scholars are not certain of the work's origins; it might be an original work or a copy of an earlier bronze sculpture. After its discovery, Laocoön and His Sons was put on public display in the Vatican Museums, where it remains.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Hello, I'm Magnolia677. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Quebec seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Magnolia677: I think it is a fairly discussed and relevant topic to be in the article, if you think it is not neutral you could edit it or add another point of view, but I consider eliminating it completely drastic. Especially because not leaving room for any discussion you simply eliminate it with a generic message that it is not neutral. Wilfredor (talk) 22:57, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I came here to warn you for the same thing after seeing your edit to François Legault and subsequently seeing that you've done it a lot, but see someone already has. It is not appropriate to use articles as a soapbox or for advocacy, nor to do any editorializing whatsoever. You have now done that at a substantial number of articles, and must cease doing this. While it is possible that some neutrally worded information sticking to facts could be inserted, that must be done without advocacy or editorializing. SeraphimbladeTalk to me23:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not an exhaustive list, as there are many. But as some examples from Quebec: ...government that has irresponsibly treated immigration... ("irresponsibly" is editorializing), This demonization persists... ("demonization" is a needlessly inflammatory term), Some have suggested... (weasel wording), Premier Legault continues to politicize on the backs... (more editorializing), and that's just in the first few paragraphs. That is not neutral and not acceptable. SeraphimbladeTalk to me23:16, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Quebec family reunification delays, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC.
Just now I noticed it was not a renaming, but a "global replace". I had never seen it before. Well, sorry, I'm not used to it. RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a very interesting article, and the subject matter is notable; however, it is very long and complex and will need other editors input on it for verification. thanks.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Thanks for tag the article, this article needs several improvements but I will be busy for at least these two weeks, but it is a pending task that I have. I think that not only what you mention but also needs more references, some sections seem too full of terminology, also other sections with a more neutral vision. The treatment part needs to be improved and other sections such as hypervigilance that do not have references related to prostitution. This is a job that will take me some time but I plan to start it in two weeks, which is when I will be freer because I took a lot of photos for Wikimedia Commons and I need time to process them. Thank you again for taking the time and kindness to write to me on my discussion page so kindly. Wilfredor (talk) 15:17, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
_male.JPG)
_-_48153967707.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
![[7]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ed/Ceiling_of_the_Hall_of_the_Consistory_in_Palazzo_Pubblico_%28Siena%29.jpg){kind=link}
![[8]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4f/Ceiling_of_the_%22Sala_da_ballo%22_in_Galleria_Doria_Pamphilj_%28Rome%29.jpg){kind=link}