User talk:Wiki you now, Wiki you later!

Note to other users: This page is only for simple messages and notifications. Any posts that could or are intended to open a discussion belong in my Help me zone as of 6/28/15. The link to my Sandbox page redirects to the Help me zone. Thank you.


The rarest vehicles

I respect your removal of the PROD I added to the page but I disagree with your reason; a month is more than enough time to provide even just citations for the clearly personal opinions given(leaving aside rewording it), and the page creator edited the page after I added the tag so they were well aware of it. That said, I will wait before deciding if pursuing other avenues is needed. 331dot (talk) 08:27, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

argh

See edit note with which PROD was placed. i have afded it now. big waste of time, but whatever. Jytdog (talk) 17:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding userboxes to other user's pages

Please do not add userboxes to other editor's user pages. In general, it is considered polite to avoid substantially editing others' userpages without their permission. Please refer to Wikipedia:User page for more information on User page etiquette. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:23, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:NashaathMohamed

Hi. Regarding this change, you should not change someone else's words to say something they didn't say based on your opinion of what they meant. If you think they misspoke, I think the best thing to do is simply to ask them to clarify what they meant. I've done that now. Mr Potto (talk) 12:04, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion work

I'm somewhat concerned by your work in tagging and un-tagging articles for deletion via various venues. In particular:

  • "we can't have 2 completely different deletion notices and reasons on the same article" - I don't see where the deletion policy says so, and removing a PROD for that reason may prove unhelpful. For example, Church Fall Festival is not a hoax, as a quick Google search will ahow (which you should have performed before taggig the article, by the way), and since a PROD, once removed, should not be replaced, we'll have to put it to AfD, arguably wasting the community's time.
  • The A3 speedy deletion criterion explicitly does not apply to articles that consist solely of an infobox.
  • You removed a PROD from The rarest vehicles because the original research "was less than a month old", requiring a deletion discussion where the page was found to have not a snowball's chance in hell of being a valid article - again wasting the community's time in the process.

In summary, when you change one deletion rationale for another, chances are the new rationale is less applicable than the old one. You may want to re-read the speedy deletion criteria or participate in deletion discussions at WP:AFD to gain more familiarity with Wikipedia's deletion processes. Huon (talk) 12:38, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Content of deleted article

I've deleted the article, so here's the content so you can work it in elsewhere. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:18, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Title

IQRL is less or equal is a common cause of a Blue screen of death in computer software. IQRL is the main control center of the computer or device, even more than the internal hard drive. However, in order for the computer to work, the amount of data stored on the IQRL must be greater than the amount of data storage on the internal hard drive. If the data storage of the IQRL is less than or equal to the data storage of the hard drive, it triggers a blue screen of death because one of the following things can happen or have already happened:


1. The hard drive can override the commands of the IQRL, which causes the computer to crash. This is the most common reaction.


2. The IQRL can run out of memory and start forcing everything onto the internal hard drive, which also causes a crash. The IQRL must have a high amount of data storage in order to keep its storage areas opening and closing. If the storage is weak, it shuts down. This is the second most common reaction.


3. The two drives can interact and create a serious glitch within the system. This is the least common reaction as it only happens to 1 person in America every 3 years. This error is not fixable and requires a brand-new computer.


If this blue screen occurrs, the most relevant and the first fix for it is to restart your computer completely. Upon reboot, the system will detect that there was a problem and attempt to clean out any damaged software and/or files. However, if this does not work, the blue screen itself displays a list of steps to try including chdcking for improper software/hardware installations. As a very last resort, you should go to a comuter repair shop.

Page move

On what basis did you move Memorial Bridge (Portsmouth, New Hampshire) to World War I Memorial Bridge. Neither title reflects the "official" name of bridge, but Wikipedia article title guidelines instruct us to use the name by which a thing is commonly known, in this case "Memorial Bridge" according to all of the sources in the article. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:28, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Homeodynamic principle

Hello Wiki you now, Wiki you later!. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Homeodynamic principle, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: not a hoax - see comments at AfD. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 08:50, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Block Notice

 CheckUser evidence has determined that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse.

Administrators: CheckUsers are privy to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy, and therefore must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement). -- Mike V • Talk 23:42, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean by "abuse"?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wiki you now, Wiki you later! (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have only one account (this one) and I have not been abusing it. If the checkuser evidence shows differently, the evidence is wrong. Wiki you now, Wiki you later! (talk) 21:13, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Strong technical and behavioural evidence of socking. Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:24, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

When checkuser evidence indicates sockpuppetry, as now, the user page is customarily replaced with a sockpuppet notice. Why are you surprised? This is not your first sockpuppet.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:51, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also, in case you did not know (??) checkuser evidence is never wrong. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:54, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Quit your questioning and accusing. It's bad enough having MikeV accusing me of using multiple accounts when I haven't been. I don't need another accuser as well. Wiki you now, Wiki you later! (talk) 21:57, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]