|
User talk:WikiOriginal-9/2023Nomination for deletion of Template:Chicago Enforcers roster
Nomination for deletion of Template:Las Vegas Outlaws roster (XFL)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Los Angeles Xtreme roster
Nomination for deletion of Template:Memphis Maniax roster
Nomination for deletion of Template:New York/New Jersey Hitmen roster
Nomination for deletion of Template:Orlando Rage roster
Nomination for deletion of Template:San Francisco Demons roster
Nomination of Cliff Baldwin for deletion The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cliff Baldwin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Therapyisgood (talk) 09:39, 27 February 2023 (UTC) Nomination of Alfred Eissler for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred Eissler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Therapyisgood (talk) 03:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of File:Paddy Driscoll.JPG A tag has been placed on File:Paddy Driscoll.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SecretName101 (talk) 07:45, 24 April 2023 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Paddy Driscoll.JPG Thanks for uploading File:Paddy Driscoll.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. 185.172.241.184 (talk) 14:12, 24 April 2023 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:DewellChC2.jpgThanks for uploading File:DewellChC2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:12, 18 May 2023 (UTC) Nomination of Baoshan (given name) for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baoshan (given name) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Iseult Δx parlez moi 21:20, 1 June 2023 (UTC) Nomination of Richard Medlin for deletionThe article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Medlin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. QuicoleJR (talk) 14:14, 10 August 2023 (UTC) Joseph Boyse
Thank you for the invitation :-) 37.26.194.132 (talk) 19:56, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Welcome back!I had to do a double-take on my watchlist when I saw your username show up! Welcome back to a great editor! Hope things have been well for you. Red Director (talk) 01:43, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Seconded. It's been a while, so I have no idea if you remember me lol but i'm glad to see you are back as well.-- Yankees10 19:08, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on Carl Kaplanoff
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:45, 14 October 2023 (UTC) GAThank you SO much for your current reviews of my good article nominations. I'll make sure to get to them soon. This is definitely giving me a good shot in the WikiCup :) (thanks to Gonzo as well) - If you're interested, I've got a few others: Lou Daukas, Christian Saulsberry, Hamp Cheevers, DuWayne Deitz, Brad White, Tony Okanlawon, Riley Morris, Bob Vaughn and John Kinch (I'm pulling out everything from my secret stash of potential GAs
Page mover granted Hello, WikiOriginal-9. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages. Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when Useful links:
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Courcelles (talk) 17:47, 23 October 2023 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:George Trafton.jpgThanks for uploading File:George Trafton.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC) New page reviewer granted Hi WikiOriginal-9. Your account has been added to the "
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:17, 24 October 2023 (UTC) Grover Underwooodhello, i am currently editing the page Grover Underwoood, please don't remove the contributions Manvik1515 (talk) 17:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Jim Gaffney.jpgThanks for uploading File:Jim Gaffney.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:15, 28 October 2023 (UTC) November Articles for creation backlog drive Hello WikiOriginal-9: WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive! You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful. Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
Draft ArticleIn a Message to me You have said that Your article have reviewed but the Article is not reviewed yet. Nnn edits (talk) 17:32, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Raskowski Leo CroppsedHeadshot.jpg listed for discussion A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Raskowski Leo CroppsedHeadshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. SecretName101 (talk) 19:01, 3 November 2023 (UTC) Draft Article: EBLIDAHello! I just saw that my draft article Draft:European Bureau of Library, Information and Documentation Associations was rejected by you. Thank you for your speedy review, and I am going to work on improving it. I do have a question, though. You said that it requires more unbiased, in-depth references. However, the German Wikipedia page for the same subject has the same references and it is available (I'm assuming it was approved). I am new to Wikipedia so I do not fully understand the details of how it works. Could you explain to me why the German one is fine, but this one is not? Thank you! Lieux de vivre (talk) 11:30, 5 November 2023 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: European Bureau of Library, Information and Documentation Associations has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! asilvering (talk) 21:11, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Request on 02:44:01, 6 November 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Roiyeho
Roiyeho (talk) 02:44, 6 November 2023 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for November 6Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sebastião Mota de Melo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazonas. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC) Request on 09:33:08, 6 November 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Sirius Stella
Sirius Stella (talk) 09:33, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Request on 15:35:50, 6 November 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Loosefacts
Good morning thank you for your review of Draft:Jules_Gimbrone. In order to better understand why the listed references don't qualify as independent, significant coverage, I looked at the page of a contemporary of this artist, Mariana Valencia. Could I ask what type of independent, significant coverage the Mariana Valencia contains that is missing from the draft I have written? Thank you so much in advance for your help & expertise! Loosefacts (talk) 15:35, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
You reviewed my draftYou declined my draft for the Five Iron Frenzy Album until this shakes apart. And in you reason, you said "Not enough independent, significant coverage listed.[1]", May I ask what you mean by that? To me, it seems vague. Do you mean you want more citations? If you can, please expand. Babysharkboss2 was here!! 16:42, 6 November 2023 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Jerry Shipkey.jpgThanks for uploading File:Jerry Shipkey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 6 November 2023 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Raskowski Leo CroppsedHeadshot.jpgThanks for uploading File:Raskowski Leo CroppsedHeadshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 6 November 2023 (UTC) Draft:Mika MuramatsuI've fixed the promotional language as you've requested. Can you do it now? And also Draft:Heikichi Yamamoto? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.207.134.32 (talk) 22:04, 6 November 2023 (UTC) Declined draft: Brian E. KinsellaDear WikiOriginal-9, I want to express my gratitude for taking the time to review my article, even though the outcome was less favorable than I had hoped. You deemed that my subject did not qualify for a Wikipedia article due to a lack of notability, specifically citing the absence of independent, significant coverage. I must admit that this decision has left me in a state of confusion and disappointment, hence taking extra time to write this somewhat long response. I have been making earnest efforts to improve and adhere to the required encyclopedic tone in my writing, carefully validating every move, both through reading up on guidelines, and using the IRC chat prolifically - promptly making the outlined changes suggested by reviewers. However, despite these efforts, I am somehow still falling short of the notability standard. After a month of editing rigorously almost daily, I now no longer believe I have a chance to ever get my article published, no matter what I do. I feel that my chance of ever publishing hangs in the balance between getting a fair reviewer and luck, instead of expecting an unbiased evaluation. While working on this, I have received feedback that my article was perfect and absolutely notable from some reviewers, with plenty of reliable great sources, to then suddenly as of late, not notable at all, short of reliable sources, accused of it being UPE and being paid for writing it. This is not true and this unpredictability in guidance and advice has left me deeply perplexed. I understand that reviewers have had experiences with fraudulent articles or individuals seeking fame, and I respect everybody’s vigilance in maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia. However, as a newcomer, the way of communication makes it hard to feel welcome in the Wikipedia community due to the inconsistencies in the review process and the abrupt shifts in the evaluation of my contributions, and suspicious assumptions about of my intentions. I would like to sincerely request that you kindly take another moment to review the links I have provided on the article talk page and see if they are not enough to justify adequate press coverage and reliable sources. I have aggregated over 90 link references. There are interviews, secondary sources, press releases, podcasts and other material. A lot from national publications. I genuinely believe that these sources and references should be considered in the evaluation process, and ask you to reconsider accepting my article based on this additional information. According to below definition, I believe it should: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people) Basic criteria See also: Wikipedia:Notability § General notability guideline · WP:BASIC People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. · If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not usually sufficient to establish notability. · Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject. People who meet the basic criteria may be considered notable without meeting the additional criteria below. Articles may still not be created for such people if they fall under exclusionary criteria, such as being notable only for a single event, or such as those listed in Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not I started this journey with optimism and motivation, and the article was initially classed as a: “predicted Class-B rating” article. However, this suddenly changed when a reviewer covered my article with aggressive and unfair language regarding my reasons for writing. Since then, the tone in the IRC chat, changed, and I am not sure how to correct this assumption about me, given the channels I have to communicate through. I implore you to reconsider the notability of my subject based on the additional links and sources I have provided. I believe that the work I have put into researching, gathering sources, and presenting the accomplishments of the individual in question is deserving of recognition. My subject is a recipient of the Meritorious Public Service Medal Award, at the age of 35. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meritorious_Public_Service_Medal He spent his entire adult life trying to improve mental health for thousands of people, through volunteer work, and founding a company aiming to ensure free mental healthcare for as many people as possible. When I look at other people covered on Wikipedia (assuming they are considered notable), I do think that my subject deserves to be represented as well. They have much less citations, and the articles are generally much more brief. Please see examples below: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Tighe_(CEO) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cindy_Marano https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Tighe_(CEO) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carol_Spahn https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milt_Kogan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margo_Jennings https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doughboy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angelo_J._Arculeo https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hobart_Baumann_Amstutz https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Bryant_Jr. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_A._Kidd
Thank you for your time and consideration and any help you might be able to provide. Best, Mwikiforce (talk) 23:01, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
Request on 23:25:35, 6 November 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Oucil
Why was this one declined, but the other approved? Thanks. Oucil (talk) 23:25, 6 November 2023 (UTC) I would argue that you accepted this draft too soon. It is confusingly and poorly written and poorly sourced. For example, the lede reads, in part, Hi there. Thanks for your review of Draft:Davey Wreden. As it stands at this point, the sources included in the article demonstrate subject meets WP:BASIC and WP:CREATIVE. Please note that I substantially reworked the article since a previous editor submitted it to AfC earlier in the year, please consider some of the sources added since then. Here are some good ones to start with:
—siroχo 18:07, 7 November 2023 (UTC) Clarification regarding Draft:Rachid IdrissiHello, are you currently reviewing the article through removing the banner and adding categories on Draft:Rachid Idrissi? B/r NAADAAN (talk) 23:57, 7 November 2023 (UTC) Declined speedy deletion for Draft:Josh Blanchard HistoryI have declined your A7 for Draft:Josh Blanchard History. A7 only applies to article space, and does not extend to draft space. -- Whpq (talk) 04:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC) Manoah SiblyReviewing AfC approvals and have a question about this one. It was already declined for referencing as it is cited to another Wiki. You then resubmitted and approved with no improvement. I am just wondering how she passes notability based on the ref in the draft. CNMall41 (talk) 05:54, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Clarification on the draft: Flux_Malaysiahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Flux_Malaysia Dear @WikiOriginal-9, I want to express my gratitude for taking the time to review my article, even though the outcome was less favorable than I had hoped. I would really like to get some insights if you do not mind sharing as I am new in publishing articles and after 3 months of efforts it is kind of disappointing that I could not get the article approved still. I did have learned and improved but now stuck at the reference where i am not sure what is wrong as i did check notable regulations and reference guide and i cannot locate why it has been declined still. One point about the reference is that as this is a new type of business in Malaysia so finding completely independent article on Flux is difficult but i did see some competitor's post has been approved even with not too much independent references which i am giving example below. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carsome This even got approved with their CEO interview while mine got rejected. It will be very helpful if you can help in guiding where exactly to change and get the article approve to publish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AfnanzafarBD (talk • contribs) 09:20, 8 November 2023 (UTC) Clarification on the draft: Flux_Malaysiahttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Flux_Malaysia Dear @WikiOriginal-9, I want to express my gratitude for taking the time to review my article, even though the outcome was less favorable than I had hoped. I would really like to get some insights if you do not mind sharing as I am new in publishing articles and after 3 months of efforts it is kind of disappointing that I could not get the article approved still. I did have learned and improved but now stuck at the reference where i am not sure what is wrong as i did check notable regulations and reference guide and i cannot locate why it has been declined still. One point about the reference is that as this is a new type of business in Malaysia so finding completely independent article on Flux is difficult but i did see some competitor's post has been approved even with not too much independent references which i am giving example below. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carsome This even got approved with their CEO interview while mine got rejected. It will be very helpful if you can help in guiding where exactly to change and get the article approve to publish. AfnanzafarBD (talk) 09:24, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
to dispute the rejection of draft about Temo SvirelyI would like to suggest some considerations about the rejection of my draft about Temo Svirely, hoping that you may change your opinion. The article is about a Ukrainian painter. It must be noted that Ukrainian artists usually do not receive much attention in Ukrainian press, compared to most other Western countries. This is partly due to many decades of oppression of the Ukrainian culture within the Soviet Union. The art environment simply has not yet developed to the necessary extent, not so many critics, art reviews etc. Therefore, I believe that the application of the criteria of notability should be adjusted in this case. Moreover, I looked up other modern painters in the Ukrainian Painters category on Wikipedia, and I must say that most of them have less source links, than my draft on Svirely. The same is true about Georgian artists. Each culture has its own peculiarity. In US lots of "spin-up", in post-soviet space a bit more quiet... Thus, it is unfair to compare a Ukrainian or Georgian painter to an American or European painter, in terms of media coverage or art reviews dedicated to them. I believe that an adjustment is needed, for fairness. A brilliant piece of music by world-famous Victoria Poleva, dedicated to Temo, already warrants notability. An English-speaking readers of Wikipedia deserve to be able to read about the artist, to whom the piece was dedicated. A big article about him in "Weekly Mirror" demonstrates notability. There is a discussion about "Weekly Mirror" as a reliable source, please comment: [[1]] He had many exhibitions in US and Europe, including Pollock foundation grant. Based on these considerations, would you reconsider your decision to decline the draft? --AndreiMikhailov (talk) 22:36, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Not enough significant, independent coverageHi WikiOriginal-9 I am a paid editor who has recently written four articles for Wiki. None have been accepted, for two main reasons - 'notability' and 'not enough significant, independent coverage'. While I (kind of) understand these reasons for three of the pages, I don't understand the second reason for the article on Draft:André Shearer. My message to you on my Talk page is:
How much 'significant, independent coverage' is deemed enough? Thank you. ÓCathail (talk) 12:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
1. Not independent. Written by his company. 2. Not independent. Written by his company. 3. This is sort of okay but not fully independent since it's partly an interview. 4. This is sort of okay but not fully independent since it's partly an interview. 5. This article is not about Shearer. He just has two passing quotes in it talking about something else. 6. Not significant coverage. Only one quote from Shearer. 7. Not significant coverage. Only one quote from Shearer. 8. This is sort of okay but not fully independent since it's partly an interview. 9. Youtube doesn't count and that video is partly an interview. 10. That's just the home page of a website. 11. This is sort of okay but not fully independent since it's partly an interview. 12. Only a passing mention of Shearer. 13. Interview. Not fully independent. 14. That's just the home page of a website. 15. Youtube doesn't count and the part of him in the video is an interview. Thus, I do not believe we have enough independent, significant coverage listed in the sources to support a Wikipedia article. Regardless, I can resubmit for a second opinion if you'd like. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 13:24, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Draft: Badr Al Samaa Group of HospitalsHey @WikiOriginal-9 I had drafted an article and submitted it which was on Badr Al Samaa Group of Hospitals. This was my 4th attempt. I had followed all that was told to me to edit before republishing, I added relevant, independant, secondary, reliable, multiple sources and significant coverage then what Am I lacking? Why is this article close but not comeplete and not enough to be published? It would be great if you could tell me exactly what's needed to be done and what is the cause for this to be declined. Thankyou. MartinaB21 (talk) 13:33, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Source 1. Not independent. Company website. Source 3. Not independent. Company website. Sources 2, 4 and 5. These three sources are not that bad honestly but they come off as sort of promotional and are partly interviews so I don't believe they are independent enough to support a Wikipedia article. Regardless, I can resubmit for a second opinion if you'd like. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 13:49, 9 November 2023 (UTC) Draft:James NaleskiHello @WikiOriginal-9, I had a draft I cited and submitted rejected. I feel that it was well-sited; he's mentioned on many award sites, credited in the Government libraries (for his photos), etc. I found a book he was mentioned in and added it. He's mentioned in various editions of Marquis Who's Who. For a stub, I don't feel this is bad. As more information becomes available, I will add it as it's a page I watch. I don't want to see all the contributor's work go to waste. JoeK2033 (talk) 18:12, 9 November 2023 (UTC) Draft:Sachidananda KangoviHi @WikiOriginal-9, You have many years of experience as a moderator in Wikipedia so I would like to state upfront that I am writing to seek your help. I am trying to understand what exactly you mean by “significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject.” when you declined this article. It has 13 citations from reputable sources that mention the subject while describing the major contributions of the subject. Secondly, the subject is an engineer and cannot get the sort of media coverage that politicians and other celebrities get. Please help with your valuable suggestions to overcome the objection. Thank you. TakeDealyo (talk) 19:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC) Your submission at Articles for creation: South Seattle Emerald has been acceptedCongratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation. If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider . Thanks again, and happy editing! Utopes (talk / cont) 03:45, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Draft:Luke CissellHi @WikiOriginal-9 thanks for taking a look at this draft. Clicking around on similar topics/articles in same genre, I'm stumped why this draft isn't passing muster. Out of curiosity I spent a few minutes looking at living composer wiki articles and have already turned up dozens that are more weakly sourced than this draft; only a handful had even a single source that satisfied the significant independent coverage (not merely passing mention) bar, and in many cases are entirely sourced from label promotional material, academic/institutional affiliates, artist websites, etc. I've been careful (at least I think I've been careful!) not to do that here so I'm left wondering, and beginning to feel that the significant coverage standards for this topic are either highly subjective or unevenly applied (or both). None of the sources in this draft can reasonably be considered "passing mention", all are independent and satisfy RS guidelines for music and BLP. The only thing I can figure is that sources are being interpreted as "promotional", but this would perplex me as well because they are independent RS (and a good vaulter's pole length over the bar of the type of sources mentioned above that are propping up entire articles on their own). AllMusic and PopMatters are greenlit listed RS, for that matter. Mind remains open and I appreciate you sharing your thinking on this! 24.44.45.156 (talk) 23:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC) Draft:Ruth HesseyDear @WikiOriginal-9 thank you very much for reading the draft article for Ruth Hessey. I do understand the points you made, however I would like to make a plea below if it is possible to reconsider her notability in a slightly different context and for this second rejection to be reconsidered. Firstly, I would argue that Hessey is notable for her extensive and (admittedly varied) work, not for her as a person. For example, Hessey was a national film critic on the Australian national radio and reviewer for several leading newspapers for almost two decades. If you search wikipedia for her name there are about 15 references sourcing Hessey's reviews of them in their articles. In other words, she spent many years as a critic interviewing others and writing about others' films, rather than being a celebrity or media personality herself. I would argue a similar perspective is possible with her second main career as an environmental educator and documentary filmmaker. This work tends to be, by definition, somewhat selfless, working to extend environmental education and raise awareness of the impact of environmental damage and protection rather than in seeking a notoriety/personality brand that say a drama film director requires. Although there isn't (I agree) extensive coverage of this by others, I would argue, that the fact that the film has been purchased by hundreds of schools, universities and local councils internationally and by companies such as Fujitsu and National Australia Bank as a staff engagement resource, confers a notability on her film as influential. Also the St Kilda Film Festival where she won an award for Best Documentary Film is a prestigious accolade as the St Kilda festival is an "Academy Award Qualifying Festival." https://filmfreeway.com/StKildaFilmFestival Furthermore, the film has been sold internationally and translated into Spanish, Turkish and Chinese which also attests to its international influence. The film led to a further web-based interactive educational resource and ongoing schools-based initiatives for which Hessey was Project Director. This was considered sufficiently significant to be funded by major donors - the Pratt Foundation and Myer Foundation and City of Sydney. Thanks again for your review of the draft. I have just now removed three paragraphs on some of Hessey's work which had less coverage. However, my main request is that the notability of Hessey's work might be viewed in a slightly different perspective due to the nature of the work itself. HapKee (talk) 01:46, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
A note about replies hereHey, I note in some of your replies here that you list sources and why they are unacceptable. That's great, but you may find {{Source_assess_table}} a lot easier :) - RichT|C|E-Mail 15:55, 12 November 2023 (UTC) AFDsHello, User:WikiOriginal-9, You have begun dozens of AFD discussions all at once. This is very inconsiderate for editors who participate in AFD discussions who do not have the time or energy to thoroughly investigate all of this articles. I would like to encourage you to withdraw half of them and post them at a later date. What you did is really discouraged and frequently results in discussions being relisted over and over because of no participation and then cloased as No consensus. If you want thoughtful participation, please nominate articles one at a time instead of by the dozens. Thank you for considering this request. Liz Read! Talk! 06:24, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
Maratha EmpireMaratha Empire Jarange Patil Saheb (talk) 02:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Tagging pagesPlease take more care when tagging pages. You tagged Flat Eye as an orphan, but it's obviously not. Also please read {{orphan}}, which says "
Greetings WikiOriginal-9, @[[NinjaRobotPirate and @El cid, el campeador, I concur with above discussion. The NPP flagging an article as "Orphan" is inaccurate. At each article, please check What links here (alt-shift-j) to verify. If the article has one or more incoming links (disambig. does not count), then the article is NOT an orphan. Regards, JoeNMLC (talk) 17:25, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Tagging Prototype Pollution with {{notability}}Hey, could you explain why you tagged Prototype pollution with the notability tag ? My understanding is that it satisfies WP:GNG based the on just the citations provided. Sohom (talk) 07:05, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
cancelling afc re-reviewsPutting this here to keep the re-review page cleaner: to un-re-review an article, you have to remove the bold text - that's what indicates to the bot that it's supposed to count a pass/fail/invalid. I don't think using strikethrough does anything. (Though I suppose you could leave them as they are and wait for the next bot run, for Science.) -- asilvering (talk) 20:15, 14 November 2023 (UTC) Orphans in articleDear User:WikiOriginal-9, you pointed out that article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Vengadesan is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Thank you. I have since introduced 7 links to this page from related articles. LunaLoveGoodSir (talk) 05:12, 15 November 2023 (UTC) Trevor Ombija draft articleHello WikiOriginal-9, I have received your feedback on the article on Mr. Trevor Ombija. I would like to inquire which sources were not credible in the sources used as they were sourced from the biggest news pages in Kenya as well as very notable blogs. I am relatively new to Wikipedia page creation and I am still learning so kindly forgive me. I look forward to hearing from you. Thank you very much Regards, Serrwinner Serrwinner (talk) 16:37, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Unaccepting draftsHi WikiOriginal-9, just a quick note - I seem to have run across a couple drafts at AfC recently where you accepted them and then reverted your accept. I'm not going to say that's wrong (although I suppose it's probably better to realize you don't want to accept it before accepting it), but just a quick note that in those cases you should tag the redirect from mainspace to draftspace for deletion (CSD R2 - I tagged what I saw), and also that you should also remove the acceptance notice from the submitting user's talk page. Cheers! LittlePuppers (talk) 21:58, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Where you removed the cited bit as "Wrong guy" I wasnt sure what you meant? It's late here but it looked to me from the source that the one was a son or grandson of the other? No? FloridaArmy (talk) 01:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Request on 18:03:39, 17 November 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Marco Ridenti
I need a better explanation on why this page was not accepted. I gave the most reliable source as possible for this satellite mission, giving the links for the official government sites (NASA, on the US side, and FAPESP, on the Brazilian side) that mention exclusively the SPORT mission. This are reliable, they are primary sources and most of them are indeed in-depth. I ask for another review from experienced editors. At least, please point me where exactly this article fails to give primary, in-depth and reliable sources. Does it need other references besides the oficial ones? If this is the case, there are plenty of conference papers about SPORT mission, that I would be pleased to include if this is the case.
I was told I needed to add 2-3 credible, reliable sources that proved notability independent of the subject for zhttps://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Matti_CharltonAnd I did that, so why is this being declined when I followed instructions? 216.209.142.143 (talk) 21:20, 17 November 2023 (UTC) NYTHey, I saw your comment of Draft:HEKTAD. You can read NYT articles if you disable Javascript for that site in your browser (easy to do in Chrome not sure about others). Since NYT is a solid source it really helps with reviewing if you don't have a subscription. Cheers KylieTastic (talk) 19:47, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Request on 01:33:39, 19 November 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by S. Fainéant
Very Best, S.F. S. Fainéant (talk) 01:33, 19 November 2023 (UTC) Articles for Creation: Jesse Mullen (Nov 7, 2023)Additional independent sources added, and now including new information about candidacy for Montana Secretary of State. The new sources and stories are from the Sidney Herald, Glendive Ranger-Review, Missoulian, Terry Tribune, and Montana Free Press. MontanaInfo (talk) 03:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC) Bub MeansCan you take another look at this? I don't believe he would meet WP:NCOLLATH so he would need to meet WP:GNG. The only thing I see is some local press which is likely all there is since he doesn't seem to have made any impact as a college player. CNMall41 (talk) 08:26, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
LibraryTo be clear - re your comment here - had you realized that your library account gives you NYT access? DS (talk) 21:35, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
CSD G6 taggingsHello, WikiOriginal-9, Looking at pages like 2023–24 Calcutta Women's Football League, you'll get a faster response from patrolling administrators if you make the CSD request a G6 Move request rather than asking them to delete a main space redirect page because of a draft article that you want to move. Speaking for myself, I'm not going to delete a main space redirect for a draft that isn't even approved yet. But, if I can see that the draft has received AFC approval, and by approved it means that all of the AFC tags and comments are removed and it is main space ready, then I'll do a page move that will move the draft article to that main space title. I can't speak for all admins who patrol CSD categories but I've noticed there are other admins who will pass on these deletions as well. Just thought I'd pass that observation along. Liz Read! Talk! 07:06, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Can you pls tell how to remove orphan tag from article - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mira-Bhayander,_Vasai-Virar_Police?markasread=297218004&markasreadwiki=enwiki ??Can you pls tell how to remove orphan tag from article - Mira-Bhayander Vasai-Virar Police?? Pratik.S2005 (talk) 09:41, 21 November 2023 (UTC) Draft of Prolonged Casualty CareHi there, thanks for reviewing this draft. You commented that there was not enough in depth references to support the article. What further do you feel needs adding? I note there are a few peer-reviewed academic articles cited, which cover the concept of Prolonged Casualty Care as well as links to the website prolongedfieldcar.org which covers the concept in detail. There are citations from multiple countries, demonstrating this is an internationally applied concept. I guess I'm unsure what citation could be more in-depth than these? Can you give me some pointers please? Thanks. TMallinson (talk) 12:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC) Hello dear Wikipedian, if The Daily Rudrabangla been accept on Wikipedia, why not Draft:Kavya Kishor. Which also a notable Magazine from Bangladesh. Mohammad Husen (talk) 15:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Stop declining the article without checking the references or I will report youDraft: Matti charlton 74.14.58.112 (talk) 17:29, 22 November 2023 (UTC) Hello. I just want to know why you rejected the draft. As far as I can see, only one source came from the subject, the one from his website. The rest are from his employers or are links to the books. I have added newspaper articles for the books and reviews but I can't understand what exactly is wrong here. Omnis Scientia (talk) 18:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
hiwhere do i get good film references Calmary Turkas(Forgotmypass) (talk) 01:38, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Draft:Koh Yock HengHi WikiOriginal-9. I've edited the issues highlighted and greatly appreciate your further insights and review. Thank you. Wendyapplenian (talk) 03:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Draft:Khumar (Television series)You said that this is copyvious but i have removed all the copied data and then resubmit it.So what is the reason for decline 223.123.5.154 (talk) 06:28, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Submission at Articles for creation: Max Nardari (November 17)Hi, can you give me some examples to better understand the problem? Please tell me what (in the wikitext) is mainly wrong and how I could fix it and if it is possible to fix it. Can you give me some examples of the draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Max_Nardari ? Thank you so much Igreo (talk) 14:17, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Submission for Shawn DuncanI'm not sure why my article was rejected. I looked at his brother's Wiki, and Shawn's has as much or more sourcing. Help! Thank you in advance! Willlev (talk) 23:03, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add About Draft:Arlyson Gomes SantosHi, WikiOriginal-9. I´m sysop in the Spanish Wikipedia. I came to comment on the Draft:Arlyson Gomes Santos. He has been deleted 9 times on eswiki, also on ptwiki. With this name] and with this other. It was also created and recreated by several of these shockpuppets and others blocked on eswiki. Greetings Geom (talk) 18:02, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Two Rejects (?)@WikiOriginal-9 I got an notice from you that my article was declined :( but then I also got a smaller, less-professional-looking one from this guy called @Aviram7 and I wasn't sure if that was just a mistake or what. Yours looked more legit, so I figured to ask you instead. AriLovesTacos (talk) 04:53, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
FeedbackDear WikiOriginal-9, Hello, Recently I accepted Elina Shammi,so, can you given me feedback for this acceptance of my work.Thnx :)~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:18, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Occupational Health Science (journal)Thank you for the advice you placed on my talk page on November 23 regarding creating an article using WP:Autoconfirm. In view of how the editors reacted to the article I created called Occupational Health Science (journal), I have rewritten it on my PC and plan to resubmit. I made sure to mainly cite secondary sources. I will perform some additional editing over the next month and will probably create the article again in January. I created more than 30 WP articles but I think the requirements have changed since 2018. Do you have any advice for me regarding my creating anew Occupational Health Science (journal)? What pitfalls to watch out for? Thanks. Iss246 (talk) 16:31, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Elizabeth L. BjorkThis doesn't look good enough for inclusion yet tbh. zoglophie•talk• 17:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Fresh NPP Reviewer of the month
P.S. If you are interested the annual awards that are given out for NPP, please take a look at WP:NPPA. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:51, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
Declined DraftHey! I think my draft has been rejected 3 times 😬 I don’t mind though Everyone just quotes the wikipedia criteria for an article, though I actually might need some help on what to edit. I’m still a newbie here so it my second try at creating a totally random article. It would help to get some more feedback on what to change, Thanks! Turtlepro22 (talk) 21:14, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
User:Bonnet Gang official/sandboxHi, I hope you are doing well and really appreciate your work at AfC. [[2]] - This could have been declined as a "joke" instead of "non-notable". Thank you QuantumRealm (meow • pawtrack) 07:12, 2 December 2023 (UTC) User:deleted page List of California political scandalsThank you for approving my draft submission to List of Alabama political scandals. I also submitted List of Arkansas political scandals which was approved and List of California political scandals which was not. I wrote the editor addressing his complaints, but he hasn’t answered. Is there any way you can bring it back? Also, I looked on create a page, but all I could find to start with was Article Wizard. Could you lead me through step by step how to publish it myself? Johnsagent (talk) 20:29, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
Dear WikiOriginal-9, Hello, can you accepted this submission at this time, I'm created this.if you feel comfortable? Thnx :) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 01:27, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Italy v MacedoniaGood morning, I would like to know what could be done to make my article publishable. Kind rrgards 14 novembre (talk) 07:57, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
EditsYes, that is a very humbling statistic. You realize how big the scope of the project is when you feel like you have done a lot of edits but barely have made a dent in what needs addressing. The tasks I fear will long outlast us unless AI and quantum computing takes over this site, which I fear it will one day. Adjusting references are a big mountain to climb and that is what I have had a big interest in the last few years because of the sheer scope of the number of opportunities there. The one millionth edit is something I hope to get one day because of how insane that number is. Those ahead of me on the list are so far ahead that I do not want to do cheesy edits to get up there (not implying what they have done is cheesy). I have slowed down so I think it will be a little while. Red Director (talk) 21:29, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Chalet Hotels changes queryHello WikiOriginal-9, thank you very much for making the Chalet Hotels live. However, I have a query, at the time of making it live there were no changes OLD Link & when I checked it today the article structure changed drastically NEW Link. I believe that the information I have added is all from reliable and notable sources. I am not sticking to it, just want to know your views as well so that I can take care of it next time when there is a new draft created. This is the second time which happened to me, so little curious if am I missing something. Your guidance is appreciated. VKG1985 (Talk | E-Mail | Contrib) 06:26, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Hello WikiOriginal-9, if you have timeI want to express my gratitude for your prompt review of new pages, despite the large backlog. please review Shailendra Pandya, Thank you. Sokoreq (talk) 07:37, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Hii WikiOriginal-9, if you have time again : )Good morning friend thanks a lot for taking the time to review many of my recent fish articles (graylings and now chars)! I have one doubt about another article I have created days ago, Food Security Doctrine (Russia), which seemed to be still unreviewed and hence cannot be found from the search engine. If I may check with you, what usually happens in such case? Thank you so much and please have a good day!!!!! HolyCrocsEmperor (talk) 03:17, 8 December 2023 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Review of Draft:Sail Rock (Grenadines)Thanks very much for the prompt review! I do have one question / comment that arose late during the writing process, and I think is worth bringing up now (and perhaps I should have mentioned, such as at the help desk, before submitting in the first place): it appears that the islet in question already has an article on no.wikipedia.org. Initially, I was wondering how the articles might get linked up as different-language versions of the same article, but now I'm also wondering what it means for the topic's notability. Thanks again, Agreeable-absurdist (talk) 05:41, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Reviewing pages with CSD tagsHello, I've noticed that you've been marking pages as reviewed when they have a CSD tag on them. We typically only mark pages sent to AfD or RfD as reviewed, not pages which are pending speedy deletion. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:01, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Paul Christman.jpgThanks for uploading File:Paul Christman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC) May I know why you think there is not enough references into this article? Pierre cb (talk) 06:26, 9 December 2023 (UTC) AFC workHello, WikiOriginal-9, It wasn't until I came to leave you a message and looked over your User talk page that I saw what kind of pressure is put on an AFC reviewer from other editors, both newbies and editors that have beeen around a while. Please do not feel like you have to approve a draft from anyone or that you don't have time to do a thorough review, looking over all necessary aspects of a draft to make sure it is main-space worthy. You are a volunteer after all, this is not your job, and while anyone can ask you for help, your only obligation is to be polite, you don't have to do what they are asking. Be a good and fair reviewer, not a rubber stamper. I should also say that I'm not posting this because I have concerns, I just thought I'd take a second and thank you for the job you are doing and also please resist any pressure that might be placed upon you to approve anyone's draft. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 03:25, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Seek your adviceDear @WikiOriginal-9 As you may recall I submitted the article about https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Bhargav_Sri_Prakash. I have been working on it on and off for several months. I am a first time author and am new to Wikipedia. Based on your review and comments for which I remain very grateful I added a number of citations to what I thought were reliable and independent sources that I found online. Your comment was that the sources that I had submitted were close but not enough to establish notability. So I spent a lot of time online and found several articles which I added to the article. I posted in the teahouse just a few days ago to request some feedback. I got feedback that there are too many citations. Also I think that I caused a major problem as the senior editors felt that because I am just a student and new to editing I should not be wasting my time contributing to wikipedia without my instructor going through the wikipedia education program and that I am wasting my time with an article about a bull shitter. I feel passionately about social impact and was drawn to Bhargav Sri Prakash's work after I saw his acceptance speech at the financial times IFC transformational award last year. I definitely do not want to mess up by creating a bad first article. May I hand over the draft to some one more experienced who can do a better job? If you will kindly guide me I am eager to learn how I can become a better wikipedia editor. I know it will take me time. Sorry if I caused any trouble. KrisJohanssen (talk) 17:27, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
K. Annamalai (politician)Hi, I see that you've patrolled K. Annamalai (politician), and just wanted to check with you that you actually meant to do that, not that it got inadvertently marked as patrolled like sometimes happens when you make some other edit or action. Given the extensive UPE, socking, etc. around this subject, I was going to look into this article, but obviously not if you've already done so. Cheers, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:54, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you reviewedHello, WikiOriginal-9. Thank you for your work on List of Connecticut political scandals. User:MicrobiologyMarcus, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with microbiologyMarcus (petri dish·growths) 18:37, 11 December 2023 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of List of Connecticut political scandalsHello WikiOriginal-9, I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of Connecticut political scandals for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles. If you don't want List of Connecticut political scandals to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks! Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 18:47, 11 December 2023 (UTC) Requesting BasiGo draft page reviewHello it's me once again. Sorry to bother you but I was requesting if you could kindly review another article I submitted to Articles for creation on 8/12/2023 Draft:BasiGo. It has almost been a week and I am not sure what to do anymore. Thankyou very much for your time. Serrwinner (talk) 14:58, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Jerry Brudos Arrested Salem Oregon June 1969.jpgYou beat me to my notification of this file discussion. I have found this image on the front page of the Saturday 28 June 1969 edition of the Statesman Journal. (Couldn't find it via newspapers.com yesterday.) Even though I believe the other image of Brudos would serve lesser in the infobox I was going to say it should be orphaned and removed because a free version exists. Thx. Kieronoldham (talk) 13:16, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Trouted!
You couldn’t resist the userbox Also - don’t worry, I don’t mind it at all (in fact, it’s brightened my day a bit Just kidding, see you at AIV /j Best, user:A smart kittenmeow 13:33, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Shuya ChangI don't understand why the article declined or I don't understand what you ask to do what is the problem to fix in The article to be accepted — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.113.28.88 (talk) 07:54, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Afc Submission review requestDear Wiki-Original-9, Hello, please look at Draft:Paltu Ram. 😊~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:46, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Dan Reeves (American football executive).jpgThanks for uploading File:Dan Reeves (American football executive).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media). Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC) OpinionHello. I have noticed your recent great edits in regard to copyedits and the Easter egg links. The year links on the separate season sections of NFL players was an editing style that I used to take part in a lot and not as much anymore so I apologize if I have created a lot of work for you. The was the style I perceived to be acceptable and ran with it years ago. I was a lot more active on those players back in the day. The style is on numerous articles among football players on here so it will be a large task to do but I know you can help lead the charge (unlike the real Chargers in the NFL). When I make similar edits in the future, I will not link the team's specific year article and if I see the team mentioned previously, I won't add the city. Best wishes in this editing cycle! Red Director (talk) 01:43, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 19An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jonathan Bane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Major League Football. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC) New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC) ThanksHello. Thanks for reviewing the page about Draft:Mark Taubert#cite note-43 Have added a number of references and sources that are independent, based on the advice, Best wishes and Merry Christmas JM JohnMoss67 (talk) 14:22, 20 December 2023 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lists of political scandals in the United States by state or territoryA tag has been placed on Category:Lists of political scandals in the United States by state or territory indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 21:41, 20 December 2023 (UTC) Request to review a draft articleHello, Draft:Mohamed Aarabcan you review the article and approve it, because all the things that were referred to by other officials were added and I added reliable sources. Thank you and sorry for the inconvenience. Chamosuhdod (talk) 01:26, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in AfC November 2023 Backlog Drive
Happy holidays!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message. – robertsky (talk) 06:41, 25 December 2023 (UTC) Season's Greetings.jpg) .jpg)   Hello WikiOriginal-9: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:48, 26 December 2023 (UTC) ,_cropped.jpg) Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message
Team season page linksHi there. I restored links to specific Chargers' seasons at Joshua Kelley. It seems his team's season pages are relevant to him. What was your rationale for deleting them? Thanks. —Bagumba (talk) 18:16, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
I can't forget the OriginalI only contact a few, and lucky you, YOU'RE ONE OF THEM!! Good health and happiness in 2024 and beyond. All the best, John Bringingthewood (talk) 22:40, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year 2024!🥳 Happy New Year! Hello WikiOriginal-9: Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a great New Year! Cheers, ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 17:08, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}