User talk:WikHead/Archive 1
CfD nomination of Category:Rush videosCategory:Rush videos, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Black Falcon (Talk) 17:56, 22 March 2008 (UTC) "Mysterious" redirect for Nancy ReganYou mentioned that the link to Nancy Regan, which you expected to identify one individual, ended up elsewhere. The problem was that someone made the Nancy Regan page a redirect (presumably assuming it was a typographical error). If you encounter this type of problem in the future you can "fix" it more appropriately by clicking on the "redirected from" link and editing that (making sure, of course, that pages which should link to the destination location link there directly). For now, since it appears nobody has felt it worth adding information about Nancy Regan to Wikipedia, I am sure your edit is fine. RichardJFoster (talk) 20:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Hit me backI replied on Talk:WTF#Newest_addition_as_of_now_.28.3F.29 Should I tell you this here? Still getting used to this wiki thing, even though I've contributed for what, 18 months?
engvarIn a recent edit to the page Phish, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles. For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to other English-speaking countries, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the appropriate variety of English used there. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used. In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, you can ask me on my talk page or you can visit the help desk. Thank you. — MusicMaker5376 20:22, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Re RutseyThanks for the heads up, I checked a few of the main Rush sites and couldn't confirm it myself, but your link is the first bit of evidence I've seen. Sigh, feel free to add it to the John Rutsey article. I'm not sure how to introduce into the main Rush article though. I suppose just parenthetical. Wisdom89 (T / C) 16:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC) Award - you are appreciated
Queens of the Stone Age TaskforceI'd like to invite you to join the newly-formed taskforce Queens of the Stone Age|Queens of the Stone Age. There's alot of Queens of the Stone Age-related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this taskforce can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help us get this taskforce off the ground and a few Queens of the Stone Age pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks! --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 10:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC) Hi, the sentence:
is grammatically correct, as the first see in the sentence is a noun describing an Episcopal see, or an ecclesiastical domain of a bishop. -- roleplayer 23:11, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
Rush portalUm... why does the Rush portal need a disambiguator? The only reason to use a disambiguator is to distinguish an article from a identically-named article, and there are no other portals named Rush. Portal:Slipknot isn't located at Portal:Slipknot (band). It's not like there's any technical restrictions; it's easy to link back between the articles. Xnux the Echidna 20:29, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
April Wine is a musical group. So it's under the scope of Wikiproject biography which deal with individuals and groups of them. Since at least one member of the group is alive the talk page has to be tagged with a banner warning editors to respect the policy on biographies of living persons. This is standard procedure of Wikipedia for living persons. -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:02, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
RollbackI have 1 granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –Juliancolton | Talk 04:28, 4 May 2009 (UTC) TalkbackHello, WikHead. You have new messages at ThoseStarsBurnLikeDiamonds's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. ThoseStarsBurnLikeDiamonds stargaze 07:51, 9 May 2009 (UTC) Hey, thanks for editing to Mashmakhan. I'm kinda new to the Music WikiProject, so thanks for giving me a little hint or two. :) So do you like Mashmakhan as well? They're a pretty good band. A shame they didn't stay together. :( – J U M P G U R U ■ask㋐㋜㋗■ 18:00, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
Altered Speedy Deletion rationale: In njillyHello WikHead, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I have deleted a page you tagged (In njilly) under a criterion different from the one your provided, which was inappropriate or incorrect. CSD criteria are narrow and specific to protect the encyclopedia, and the process is more effective if the correct deletion rationale is supplied. Consider reviewing the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Thanks again! SoWhy 18:48, 28 August 2009 (UTC) None taken. :)The current list looks fantastic. The one I deleted was totally empty save for the alphabetical headers. Not to worry; I ain't deleting the current version. :) Thanks very much for letting me know. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 20:43, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
It's rather lucky I had a quick look through the contributions of the recent contributors and found the above conversation with PMDrive! I was just seconds away from speedy deleting List of Christian rock bands under WP:CSD#G4; as the problems the article has are identical to those that got it deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Christian rock bands. It's worth noting that PMDrive1061 quite justifiably deleted a mangled and incomplete version that was created at List of Christian Rock Bands (note the caps), but that the destination page that it got moved had also been deleted twice before - see its deletion log. Do you think you can solve the concerns raised? Primarily, the article still seems to be completely redundant to Category:Christian rock groups. Let me know! Thanks :) ~ mazca talk 21:18, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks!Thanks for the reverts on vandalism. My internet is going really slow today. Not hot. --eric dilettante' (mailbox) 07:12, 7 September 2009 (UTC) thanks for the help on chineseyou're the best, oh yeah. nothing's gonna ever keep ya down! 谢谢您! 我喜欢吃你的裤子! 疏食飲水,曲肱而枕,樂在其中矣。不義而富貴,于我如浮雲。 —Preceding unsigned comment added by YOUR MOM (talk) 11:59, 14 September 2009 (UTC) Thanks for the help at OfcomI was getting a bit confused about what had been removed and that IP just kept on deleting. Thanks for reverting. --Alchemist Jack (talk) 11:08, 15 September 2009 (UTC) Edits at Lucknow by 67.148.61.99As I have just noticed that you have reverted edits of 67.148.61.99 at Lucknow, you may have also noticed this IP's vndalism efforts. This user is persistent in removing data/references and doing personal attack and vandalising the article Lucknow. On seeing track record of this IP it seems that this is the pattern which it follows across Wikipedia. Please help to contain this IP. Thanks. --Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haider Rizvitalk! 08:52, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your help on Korean Developemnt InstituteHi, thanks for stepping in reverting the spamming and promotion in this article. You and I are both up to our daily limit of edits, though, see WP:3RR. I've made a vandalism report. They should be shortly blocked. Regards, Piano non troppo (talk) 07:51, 21 September 2009 (UTC) BBC Midlands TodayHello I have noticed that you can edit this page. Can you please create wikipedia's for Patrick Burns and Giles Latcham call then Giles Latchma and Patrick Burns (BBC)]. Thank you, BBC Birmingham
Rian malanThanks for disambiguation on Rian Malan, I had been sloppy there...! --SkaraB 20:50, 28 September 2009 (UTC) Many thanks for removing the excessive templating. I've tried to improve the references position, but the source material for the school is limited so the references are rather repetitive. Are they sufficient to justify removing the tag (s)? KJP1 (talk) 08:21, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Little RichardThank for reversing the recent vandalism at the Little Richard article. I have been working tirelessly to make it more accurate recently. It is encouraging to see people jump in so quick. God bless you.--Smoovedogg (talk) 20:17, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
TalkbackHello, WikHead. You have new messages at BigDunc's talk page.
Message added 21:50, 8 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. BigDunc 21:50, 8 November 2009 (UTC) PMPTJonathanstray is incorrect when he states that the main difference between MPT and PMPT is the shape of the distribution. This is one of two equally important differences; the second being the way risk is measured (downside deviation vs. standard deviation). In addition, his claim that most of the criticisms that apply to MPT also apply to PMPT is unsupported. If there are specific problems that he is aware of in both domains then he should enumerate them rather than make general, unspecific statements. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianmarc (talk • contribs) 00:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Luther StrangeI noticed that you attempted to fix the info box on this page a while back. Apparently during the month of November someone completly rewrote the article without any discussion or notice. They delted entire sections and of course changed the info box information as you fixed back. I have restored the edits and placed the article back at the place it was before the November rewrites. I have also noticed the page to move any proposed changes to discussion and seek consensus. I have also placed a notification on the Alabama Project Page. Can you please put this on your watch list and also make a visit to see if there is anything that should be revised in formalities and formatting which might have been jumbled in the restore. If you think this should have been handled differently please feel free to chime in. I do not think the action was vandalism but I do think the editor was seeking to alter the POV.Alabamacross (talk) 22:36, 20 November 2009 (UTC) BrazilHello, Wikhead! Good morning! Or at least, I hope it's morning where you live! Anyway, the article Brazil is blocked due to a dispute over a content. I would like to know if you wold be interested in giving your opinion to end it once and for all. In case you do not know much about the subject, I could explain it better to you. This is the link. All help is needed. hank your very much and kind regards, --Lecen (talk) 11:40, 21 November 2009 (UTC) Hi WikHead, cheers for coming on board with SER. I'm trying to find some useful references other than what it available on the official SER website or blogs - The SER website is a useful resource, but it might be nice to have to references that come from somewhere other than the official website of the subject of the article. Do you think you might be able to come up with some useful sources? Cheers, Darigan (talk) 09:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
New unreviewed article/Darren FarrisThanks! for cleaning up my messes ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mackygirl (talk • contribs) 07:38, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Can you tell?Can you tell me why the V article should be reverted back to yesterday? (At my talk page) Feel free to tell me. I'll (fix) improve. Tuanese (talk) 17:28, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Reason: I saw many newly released albums had tracklist (you can always search), so I just want to upgrade to more modern, more beautiful look of track list.
Hi, I hope this is the right place to asnwer you. I don't think this page needs a further cleanup. I put a lot of extra links in it just now and a better picture. This article is rewritten a few times already in the past, many people made changes including me. It's objectivly written, with info about this rather well-known singer in Vietnam; not a promotional press letter, in my opinion. In the past 2 times some fools has screwed the whole page and it took me days to repair it. So I hope you can understand I'm getting a little tired of all those different opinions of all those different people. If somebody really has more info they are welcome to publish it. But in the meantime, please respect my work. I really don't know what to change more at this moment to make it more a wiki. Anyway, regards and thanx for your concern, Winfried Povel (I hope this works I never reflect on talkpages) Winfriedpovel (talk) 16:19, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Rescue Heroes: The Movie ReferencesJust wondering, what kind of references would the article need? What parts need to be referenced? I'm not sure what parts, so if you could tell me, I would appreciate it. Thanks. Abby 92 (talk) 00:04, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Saw your message. It's now on my watchlist so we'll see what happens. I just wish I spoke Finnish, it would be easier to improve the article then. NtheP (talk) 11:35, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Notability of individual band membersYou recently undid a number of redirects of individual members of the band The Tragically Hip that leave unsourced articles about individuals that contain no information as to how the person is individually notable outside of the context of participation in the band. The articles have been tagged for a long time. What kind of discussion do you believe is necessary to apply WP:N. Active Banana (talk) 16:31, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
AfD for Lesser of TwoHey, I noticed that you participated in editing the Lesser of Two article. It has recently been put into AfD at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lesser of Two. Perhaps you could add to the discussion. Thank you. noodle 06:57, 12 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Noodlesteve (talk • contribs) Page movesI did Death and All His Friends & Chinese Sleep Chant, but where do you want Yes(Song) to be? Keep in mind, there are other songs with the same name, so a more descriptive disambiguation might be necessary; possibly Yes (Coldplay song)? Thanks, MrKIA11 (talk) 14:33, 21 February 2010 (UTC) Yes, i would love for you to be more specific. from Dbunkley6...talk —Preceding undated comment added 19:18, 22 February 2010 (UTC).
On Conrad ModelsThanks for cleaning up Conrad Models on which I've done the majority of work (for now). The one thing I'm unsure about is citation method recommended. In scholarship and other writing, the general APA method where author is cited with year and page number to references at the end of a work is much easier to follow and interpret than numbered references with ibid, ibid, ibid and more ibid. This way, a work only has to be listed once at the end, it's easier to set up, easier to alter, and one doesn't have to deal with all the linking mechanics of the numbering - and, you HAVE no numbers! It's wonderful. So you commented that there are no citations in the text, but there are - in parentheses by the author's name, which lead one down to the bottom for the complete reference. Your comments on the bottom of my talk page would be welcome. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cstevencampbell (talk • contribs) 05:56, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Wikihead, Have corrected the URL issue as best I can. If it looks OK, can you please remove your message about it. An FYI - am kind of new to this - a month ago, ran across the Doss Tx page and found content to be lacking any facts but largely plagiarized - copied and pasted with no references - from other sites. Some local lore trying to pass as data, some vandalism, and otherwise some very bad prose. Have tried to spruce it up as best I can. Maile66 (talk) 15:55, 6 March 2010 (UTC) ThanksFor this. Doing too many things late at night, and starting to get sloppy. Think I should head to bed... Awickert (talk) 07:58, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
LoLThanks for helping out! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jozrael (talk • contribs) 20:40, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: The Final Riot! TourHello WikHead. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of The Final Riot! Tour, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I can't find the AfD. Please let me know where it is, then i can review. Thank you. GedUK 18:52, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
On the talk, I proposed stubifying the article and I just wanted to alert you to it to see what you think. Thanks! Mbinebri talk ← 00:59, 3 April 2010 (UTC) I have another COI article I could use a second opinion on, if you cared to take a look? There's a bit of discussion on the talk page too. Mbinebri talk ← 12:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC) hi Wikihead. if you are a live person you are really amazing. i can't believe how fast you are on things. thanks for your patience with my editting and creation, am really just trying out this feature to see how it works! happy day MelodyMedley (talk) 22:51, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi Wikhead. Thanks for all your pointers and help - you are amazing! read my mind with the merging of references - be well MelodyMedley (talk) 16:20, 14 May 2010 (UTC) Al Baker and the Dole QueueSo, I just now got the message you left on my talk page about Al Baker and the Dole Queue. I know this band is notable, and I really think there should be an article about them, but I really don't have the time to write them a full article. What would I need to do to make an article on them that isn't deleted immediately? 'Cause I thought that was what the stub tag was for. RaccoonTalk 03:14, 18 May 2010 (UTC) Orphaned articleHi. I've now added two articles which link to the Radio_23 wiki page- is this adequate to remove the "Orphan" tag? I am still in the process of adding more links and references. Please let me know what you think rather than me just removing it again. Regards. Fiedorczuk Fiedorczuk (talk) 17:35, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I'd like to ask you what references should I find and add (since you added the tag)? This article shares most of its information with the Polish Wikipedia, and almost everything is on the one link at the bottom - that is, specifications and order by Elbląg. If you could point out what exactly is unreferenced, I'll try to find that information. Soeb talk|contribs 12:41, 24 May 2010 (UTC) Thank you for your help WikHeadI noticed that some things were made more efficient on the page, it looks really good, I'm sure all the fans of these guys appreciate your help as well. Its exciting to be part of this whole wikipedia experience. Take care. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Briggsda (talk • contribs) 05:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Org structure of JWsI have partially undone your change at Organizational structure of Jehovah's Witnesses. Please note that the JW "Governing Body" is a proper noun and should be capitalized.--Jeffro77 (talk) 10:22, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
You cited bare url links for my references, but actually I put those links there to be helpful. My references at the bottom of the page encompass the information cited, and I also cited the urls correctly at the bottom of the page with the name of the interviewer, magazine name, and so forth. Is there anything else that needs to be done? Please respond on my talk page. Nightofstars (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:07, 11 June 2010 (UTC).
You are now a ReviewerHello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010. Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages. When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here. If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC) Closing TimeHey - the discussion is taking place on a user talk page User talk:Y2kcrazyjoker4 along with an admin. Allmusic.com is a reliable source, so you could have simply corrected my disambig mistake instead of reverting the entire thing. BTW, you're welcome to comment on the issue if you want. Thanks. --Yankees76 (talk) 18:57, 18 June 2010 (UTC) From the Inside Out (album) articleHey, I was wandering if you can help me change the articles name to just "From the Inside Out". It won't let me do this because it says an article with that title already exists but it doesn't, it just links to the main article, Stan Walker. Can you please help me. Thanks ozurbanmusic (talk)
Here Comes WinterHi MWikHead, I have added some references to the page "Here Comes Winter" (see the Wikipedia article/page: Here Comes Winter). Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to increase the article's references or sources. I hope you have a good day. Regards, Briggsda (talk) 23:51, 22 July 2010 (UTC) Edits - Environmental planningHi Wikhead Sorry, I haven't meant to annoy you editing this article. I'm new to Wikipedia editing, so I'm still getting used to the technology and the etiquette. I'm not sure what I did incorrectly that meant you needed to chnage some of my edits. I'd be grateful if you could enlighten me so I don't keep making the same mistakes and cause you and others unnecessary grief. Thanks, Declan Declan Palmer (talk) 13:11, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Ya I do plan on starting an article when i get more information (within the next couple of weeks). Password1125 (talk) 17:27, 1 November 2010 (UTC) URBI articleHey, I discovered the URBI page may not meet the general notability guidelines. I tried to find what was wrong and I really don't understand.
I'm new to Wikipedia editing so please tell me what's wrong with it and how I can improve the page so it gets rid of this label.
Thanks a lot!
Speedy deletion converted to PROD: GilivableHello WikHead. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Gilivable to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. WP:CSD#G1 is only meant for the likes of "%^K#**4cX#??%" or "Yaaaaayyyy LOL!!!!!". This is coherent; it fails WP:NAD and WP:V and WP:NFT, but it isn't speediable. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:32, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
|
The Invisible Barnstar | ||
I award you this barn-star. Thanks for fixing a link on Tops In Blue. Upon reading your contribs, it appears you are a hard working Wikipedian who does a lot of the tedious and subtle edits that many of us miss (especially me). Further, most of your edits are marked "M" for minor which takes much of the focus off the edit. While your edits may be marked with "M", you're contributions should be marked with "G" for greatly contributed. For the most part, you also don't use automated tools, except the occasional reflinks. Your actions reflect great character and your willingness to work with little or no gratitude, despite actually being given it, speaks volumes about you. v/r - TP 18:08, 10 February 2011 (UTC) |
Re: Grimpoteuthis
Hi WikHead. Thank you for the explanation. Cheers, mgiganteus1 (talk) 09:06, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Hello WikHead, thank you for welcoming me to Wikipedia. The assitance on the article and the information is greatly appreciated. Aonani 01:26, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you! I am looking forward to working on another one soon. I am still learning so most likely I will need assistance again. Thanks for adding the reference I think it's fine. Aonani 02:23, 20 February 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aonani (talk • contribs)
Thank you for adding the reflist - I added the ref and then missed that the reflist wasn't there! - Ahunt (talk) 00:33, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for your attention to Stephan's page. I appreciate the notice about possible linkrot, a great word for a problem I've encountered for some time. But I don't think there's much more we can do about this, except for the most recent two or three entries. For all the rest, I've already done extensive research and have cited every available original source in standard form rather than just URL. In cases where there's only a URL, it's either because there was no printed publication, just an online issue (e.g, #13, the NPR interview) or because further citation is impossible to find (e.g. #5, the Village Voice article by Sarah Ferguson. It took me days just to locate Sarah as the writer, and I've attempted to get the data of issue from the Voice archives with no success. The exact date is lost somewhere in history. Nevertheless, it's been quoted so often, for so long, by so many people, that there's no doubt about its authenticity. I'd like to remove the linkrot citation from top of the page. Please let me know if you have any other suggestions. Thanks again. Boztown (talk) 00:44, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks!
...for cleaning up. I really hope this is the only BLP that cites the Weekly World News. ;) Drmies (talk) 19:51, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:WikHead. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |