User talk:Wieno/Archive 1

Archive 1

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Wieno, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! J Milburn (talk) 02:33, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Ontl2007.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ontl2007.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 21:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Ways to improve Contraventions Act

Hi, I'm Carriearchdale. Wieno, thanks for creating Contraventions Act!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add some categories to the article. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Carriearchdale (talk) 20:56, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

I added two more categories and removed the tag. Four categories isn't a lot but I honestly can't think of any other ones, so it seems complete. Hope that works for you. Wieno (talk) 06:33, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for removing the PROD at Women's Rights are Human Rights. I've asked for someone at the feminism WP to take a look at it and improve it overall, as I only know a little bit about it and this area of Wikipedia isn't really my forte. I was going to remove the PROD myself since I'm finding quite a bit to show notability, but I appreciate you removing it. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:03, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Frank Ongley Darvall

You recently initiated an article for deletion discussion on the above article that I created. You will note that in my initial response to that discussion I highlighted WP:BEFORE and WP:ATD. As users, we are different as anyone taking a casual glance at us would easily tell; I spend much of my time creating articles and very little on deletion discussions; with you it seems to be the exact opposite. I would not assume that we are likely to change our emphasis, however, I would urge you to read the two policies I refer to above and consider a different approach. If you did, I think you would find those creative users like myself happy to collaborate with you to improve wikipedia. Graemp (talk) 18:17, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

There are currently 6387 unreviewed Wikipedia pages awaiting curation, dating back to October 21st, 2013. I'm currently trying to lower that backlog, and that includes nominating for deletion articles that I do not believe meet the notability guideline. Page creation and page curation are both important aspects of making Wikipedia such a great site, and I don't believe one is inherently more valuable than another. One of the nice things about Wikipedia is that there is a great deal of important work to be done, and different editors with different skillsets and interests can focus on the tasks they wish to focus on. It's true that in this particular instance I did not check Google Books when I should have, and I appreciate you pointing that out. If, upon going through Google Books I had found enough coverage for the subject to meet GNG, I would have withdrawn my nomination, but that didn't happen. So the flaw in the process here does not invalidate the result, which I still believe to be sound. In any event, I do not believe it warrants continued digs at my character, skills or nationality. If your comments were not meant to cause offence, then I understand and ask that you maybe be a bit more cautious about how comments like those may come off to recipients. If you did mean to cause offence, then I do not believe you are acting within the spirit of Wikipedia's civility pillar. An AfD nomination, even one you may believe to be premature or shoddily done, is not an attack on you as a creator. It should not be met by hostility. Wieno (talk) 18:39, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Notability

Hi, we haven't met, and sorry for this to be first comment but this tag was not appropriate. In such cases an editor should check the original (in this case German) wikipedia for GNG before using a CSD of this kind. Best regards. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:45, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

You're right; I was being too hasty. I'll try to be more careful in the future. Thanks for the pointer. Wieno (talk) 20:34, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
No problem. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:15, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you

Hi, I just noticed that you left a message on my talk page concerning my User Page move. Thank you for notifying me. I will try to fix this (if not already fixed). Thanks again. Lovecherry (talk) 18:40, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

M. S. Howell

Hello Wieno,

I have thoroughly read two Wikipedia articles that relate to notability and academic significance, and after reading them both, I must say that M. S. Howell in no way falls short of either.

Perhaps you can elucidate further your specific concerns.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uq (talk • contribs) 23:28, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

The problem is that all of the biographical information comes from a self-published source. I suppose if the book is notable he may be as well per WP:AUTHOR, but really any biographical information apart from the fact that he wrote the book should ideally come from an independent, secondary source. Perhaps you can point me to some other secondary sources that cover him (or better yet include those in the article)? As was pointed out in the removal of the PROD, his CIE makes him notable per WP:ANYBIO (I didn't notice it, which is my bad), but I'm still wary about all his biographical details coming from his own book. Wieno (talk) 23:45, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
I understand your concerns. M. S. Howell's biographical information was actually sourced predominantly from the British Archive. I will do my best to retrieve the sources I used and to reference the information on the article. Thank you for pointing this out. Uq (talk) 23:53, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Superpowers

There is no problem with the categories you suggested, once the page protection is expires (17 February) we will add them. But as you can see from the IP who commented at the articles talk page, who thinks China and Russia are superpowers, there is a lot of nationalistic POV surrounding the article. I have been trying to remove nationalistic POV from the article and get it back on track to dealing with the history, characteristics and definitions of a Superpower. Antiochus the Great (talk) 23:13, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

My acedemic source for Russia as a superpower in catagory in Superpower is using this acedemic source: http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam051/2004045110.pdf

I am not Russian but I feel this is country to have its own catagory under superpower since it is a superpower. --64.129.10.92 (talk) 00:29, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

deletion

Hi Wieno,

Why you are going on and deleting my contents? Zaha Talhouni and MuslimAwards?

You should have notified me if there is anything missing in the article. I am new to this, and I think what you have done is improper. I can't now retrieve my contents. so I kindly ask you to at least get me back my contents so I can work on improving them. In Regards to Zaha talhouni, all the reference as National News papers that are in Arabic. She is well know in the Middle east and a really hero to all female athletes in the middle east. She was honored the King Hussein Honor Medal the highest rank in the Hashemite kingdom of Jordan.

Awaiting your response

Regards HakamS — Preceding unsigned comment added by HakamS (talk • contribs) 13:59, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi HakamS, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! In regards to Zaha Talhouni, this is the first I've heard of the article. It looks like someone else has nominated the article for deletion, but it has not yet been deleted, and the discussion is actually tilting towards keeping the article. You are more than welcome to weigh in on why you think that article should be kept at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaha Talhouni.
For the Muslim Awards, I tagged the article for speedy deletion because it did not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the awards. I did not actually delete the article; that decision was made by RHaworth, an administrator on Wikipedia. If you believe that the speedy deletion criteria were wrongly applied or want a copy of the article moved into your user space so you can work on it, he's the person you should ask. You can do that by posting a message on his talk page. Hope this helps, and let me know if you have any other questions. Wieno (talk) 18:53, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

A S M Bazlul Karim entry: WP:PROF

His notable publications and conference papers are..

1) Karim ASMB, Smith AL, Hardicar W. Hepatitis C Infection in Children-A Melbourne Perspective (Abstract). J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1997;12:A66. 2) Karim ASMB, Alex G, Smith AL, Hardicar W. Hepatitis C Infection in Children-A Melbourne Perspective. J Paed Child Health 2000;36:385-388. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10940177

3) Karim ASMB, Nazir MFH. Risk factors of persistent diarrhoea in children below 5 years of age (Abstract). J Ped Gastroenterol Nutr 2000;31:S22. 4 Karim ASMB, Akhter S, Rahman A, Nazir MFH. Risk factors of persistent diarrhoea in children below 5 years of age. Ind J Gastroenterol 2001;20:59-61. ** http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11305492

5) Karim ASMB. Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Children- An Experience at a Paediatric Gastroenterology Unit. Mymensingh Med J 2003;12:124-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12894047 

6) Bhuiyan MR, Rahman MT, Karim ASMB, Islam MN, Hasan M, Khan AKA. Hepatitis A virus infection in Bangladesh (Abstract). J Gastrenterol Hepatol 2003;18:A99.
7) Karim ASMB, Hoque S, Kamal M. Anti-tuberculosis Drugs Induced Focal Nodular Hyperplasia of the Liver. Ind J Pediatrs 2004;71:1025-27. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15572825?report=abstract

8) Karim ASMB. Caroli’s disease. Ind Pediatr 2004;41:848-850. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15347876

9) Karim ASMB, Rahman M, Kamal M. Perforation of jejunal duplication lined with ectopic gastric mucosa- a case report. J Paediatr Child Health 2004;40:649. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15469539?report=abstract


10) Karim ASMB, Rahman M. Safety of Blind Liver Biopsy. Ind J Pediatr 2004;71:899-901. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15531831?report=abstract

11) Rahman MM, Akhter S, Karim ASMB. Epilepsy in children with Cerebral Palsy. Mymensingh Med J 2004;13:67-70. 

               http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14747790

12) Karim ASMB. Cystic fibrosis in a Bangladeshi child: a case report. Mymensingh Med J 2004;13:206-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15284707

13) Karim ASMB. Safety of Blind Liver Biopsy in Children: Experience of a Paediatric Gastroenterology unit (Abstract). J Ped Gastroenterol Nutr 2004;39(S1):S196-97. 14) Karim ASMB, Kamal M. Cholestatic jaundice during infancy: experience at a tertiary care center in Bangladesh. Ind J Gastroenterol 2005;24:52-54. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15879649

15) Karim ASM, Rahman M, Islam S. Wilson’s disease with hepatic presentation in childhood. Mymensingh Med J 2007;16:29-32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17344776

16) Rukunuzzaman M, Karim ASM. Ulcerative colitis in infancy. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2011;17:414-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22064342

17) Rukunuzzaman M, Karim MB, Rahman MM, Isalam MS, Mazumder MW. Wilson disease in children with blindness: an atypical presentation. Mymensingh Med J 2013;22:176-79. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23416828


Can this entry not be put in WP:PROF category? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amran.haroon (talk • contribs) 19:57, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Every academic is going to have a number of published papers. That's what academics do. In order to be notable, his papers would have to be far more cited than they currently are. In any case, the best place to have the discussion is at the AFD page, not on my user page. Wieno (talk) 20:34, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Genocide definitions, Definitions of pogrom and Definitions of fascism for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Genocide definitions, Definitions of pogrom and Definitions of fascism are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genocide definitions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Oncenawhile (talk) 09:48, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vyamoham (2nd nomination)

As the film's existence is not in question nor is their doubt that it is one by a notable director, How about a redirect to filmmaker K. G. George, specially in considering the difficulties inherent in finding coverage for pre-1990 Indian films? Schmidt, Michael Q. 18:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

I don't think a redirect would be helpful. None of the content is being merged into George's page, so there's no copyright need to keep this one's edit history. Further, there's no subtopic on George's page saying anything about the film, so it's not as if content that would otherwise be on the Vyamoham page can be found on George's page. And without any content there, there's no reason why Vyamoham page should redirect to his page, rather than one of the actors or composers or whatever. It doesn't seem to me to be a natural redirect. Wieno (talk) 19:04, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
A reasonable redirect of a searchable title.... though I may just have to go improve the article per available sources and change my vote to keep. . Be well.

Happy New Year

Happy New Year !!!
Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and aHappy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS

Speedy deletion declined

I declined your speedy deletion nomination of Don Lewis with no prejudice against its deletion through WP:AfD because A7 does not applies to articles with claim of significance. Thanks! Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 22:13, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Fair enough. There was also a G12 tag that the article creator removed before you reviewed the article, so I suspect you didn't get the chance to see it. I've restored the tag since creators can't remove speedy deletion tags. While the creator deleted some of the copyrighted materials and made minor modifications to other parts of the article, it's still almost entirely copied from the website. Anyhow, you may want to give it a look if you weren't previously aware of the copyright issue (if you were aware of that tag and thought the article didn't meet G12, then I apologize for restoring it). Wieno (talk) 04:02, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Sorry that I responded late. However, the G12 was appropriate. What I normally do is that if the copyvio is within a section, I usually blank the entire such, just like I did to this one. I decided to saved the article from speedy deletion just to give the new editor a sense of belonging but I never remove the notability tag I previously placed on the article but if you feel it should go, feel free to take it to AfD. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 07:14, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ontario PC Logo 2010.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ontario PC Logo 2010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Season's greetings

Wikiclaus greetings
Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you the happiest of Wikipedia cheer from Wikiclaus himself. This
message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiCheer, and hopefully makes your day just a little bit better. Choose to spread smiles, fellowship, and seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person.
Share the good feelings and the happiest of holiday spirit from Wikiclaus.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Wieno. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wieno. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Archive 1