User talk:Werdna
Good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pulgawiki (talk • contribs) 08:48, 16 October 2023 (UTC) Next meetups in North EnglandHello. Would you be interested in attending one of the next wikimeets in the north of England? They will take place in:
If you can make them, please sign up on the relevant wikimeet page! If you want to receive future notifications about these wikimeets, then please add your name to the notification list (or remove it if you're already on the list and you don't want to receive future notifications!) Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:55, 28 March 2015 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
Help us improve wikimeets by filling in the UK Wikimeet survey!Hello! I'm running a survey to identify the best way to notify Wikimedians about upcoming UK wikimeets (informal, in-person social meetings of Wikimedians), and to see if we can improve UK wikimeets to make them accessible and attractive to more editors and readers. All questions are optional, and it will take about 10 minutes to complete. Please fill it in at: Thanks! Mike Peel (talk) 17:55, 20 September 2015 (UTC) Hi, Hi, Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivityFollowing a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC) Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivityFollowing a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 May 2016 (UTC) Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivityFollowing a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated , please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 13:11, 1 June 2016 (UTC) Sydney Meetup next Thursday eveningYou are invited to the Sydney Meetup!
Your inactive bot(s)Hello Werdna. We currently show that you are the operator on file for at least one Stig Harder, Fashion Net & LumiereHey Werdna, Could you help restore the articles for FASHION NET at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fashion_Net, Lumiere at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lumiere_(magazine) and my own at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stig_Harder? I read the reason was there weren't enough references online to establish notability. I got in touch with Justlettersandnumbers and she/he informed me I could request a WP:deletion review with the reason "significant new information has come to light since a deletion that would justify recreating the deleted page." At the Deletion Review article, I read I should talk to the closing administrator first. Here are several references from print publications back when the Internet was in its infancy: https://www.stigharder.com/media/harpers-bazaar-1995.jpg https://www.stigharder.com/media/henne-2002.jpg https://www.stigharder.com/media/british-vogue-1995.jpg https://www.stigharder.com/media/british-vogue-1996.jpg https://www.stigharder.com/media/cooper-hewitt-1997.jpg https://www.stigharder.com/media/elle-japan-1996.jpg https://www.stigharder.com/media/guardian-1995.jpg https://www.stigharder.com/media/le-monde-1997.jpg https://www.stigharder.com/media/net-magazine-1996.jpg https://www.stigharder.com/media/netuser-1996.jpg https://www.stigharder.com/media/new-york-times-1996.jpg https://www.stigharder.com/media/paper-magazine.jpg https://www.stigharder.com/media/planete-internet-1996.jpg https://www.stigharder.com/media/time-magazine-1996.jpg https://www.stigharder.com/media/usa-today-1997.jpg https://www.stigharder.com/media/vogue-1995.jpg https://www.stigharder.com/media/wired-1996.jpg My executive membership at the International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences (click on letter H): https://www.iadas.net/membership/ Also, an old video capture from BBC Television on Fashion Net: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9F5FgRZhSik The archived page for Cooper Hewitt's "Mixing Messages" exhibition in 1996-1997 where Lumiere was included is at: The article itself is missing from the archive, but my staff back then did a screenshot: https://www.stigharder.com/media/cooper-hewitt-1997.jpg Thank you so much. Kind regards, Stig Stigharder (talk) 03:43, 19 April 2017 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:AR reportTemplate:AR report has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 01:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC) MfD nomination of User:Abuse FilterUser:Abuse Filter, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Abuse Filter and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Abuse Filter during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 18:48, 21 October 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, Werdna. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) ArbCom 2018 election voter messageHello, Werdna. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) Bot Approvals Group inactivity noticeHi Werdna, Please see Wikipedia_talk:Bot_Approvals_Group#Bulk_inactivity_removals regarding our new activity requirements based on the recent RFC. This will impact your BAG membership, unless you meet the activity requirements in the next 7 days. SQLQuery me! 00:57, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
MfD nomination of MediaWiki:Abusefilter-degroupedMediaWiki:Abusefilter-degrouped, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/MediaWiki:Abusefilter-degrouped and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of MediaWiki:Abusefilter-degrouped during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 12:04, 3 May 2019 (UTC) MfD nomination of MediaWiki:Abusefilter-blockedMediaWiki:Abusefilter-blocked, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/MediaWiki:Abusefilter-blocked and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of MediaWiki:Abusefilter-blocked during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 12:04, 3 May 2019 (UTC) MfD nomination of Portal:Harry PotterPortal:Harry Potter, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Harry Potter (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Harry Potter during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:30, 1 August 2019 (UTC) Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:00, 29 August 2019 (UTC) desactivodesactive su filtro de ediciones. no puedo publicar la paginna angry birds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Estefano 442 (talk • contribs) 19:10, 18 October 2019 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:WerdnabotTemplate:Werdnabot has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 06:11, 14 November 2019 (UTC) Disable the edit filterEvery time I edit a page I get "A filter has been activated"--Jack Molito (talk) 16:43, 14 February 2020 (UTC) "Globe (Earth)" listed at Redirects for discussionA discussion is taking place to address the redirect Globe (Earth). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 7#Globe (Earth) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:47, 7 April 2021 (UTC) ภาษาไทยภาษาไทน 27.55.72.41 (talk) 10:50, 21 May 2021 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
|