User talk:Welsh/Archives/2015/November

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Welsh. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Stubs

Trying to understand your decision to remove the stub notice from Lostock Lane railway station. The article has only 91 words spread over just six sentences—the rest is boilerplate. I guess maybe I don't see what you see? Just trying to understand your reasoning, as I think an article about this place could be expanded, probably considerably, from what it is now; and I often place stub tags when copy editing very short articles such as this one. Regards, GenQuest ^"Talk to Me" 14:21, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

My thinking was that the article is well formed - has infobox, references, external links, categories, coords, adjacent stations. To my way of thinking it doesn't fit into the stub description "Provides very little meaningful content". Of course it is not perfect, but for an average disused station the amount of information in a good article would be relatively small, so I think start is fair. welsh (talk) 21:49, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

OK. Thanks for the insight. GenQuest ^"Talk to Me" 02:09, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXVI, November 2015

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-Class content Book review: Hawkeye7 on the Battle of the Bulge Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the collapse of the Serbian Army in World War I Timeline: This month in World War I

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 03:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)