User talk:Wakari07

Thank you

Hi Wakari07, I appreciate your help. But I don't have all the sources yet to include the info box. Still thank you very much. When I've included it, I'll let you know. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:01, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have included the info-box now. My trouble was her vice presidency of the HDP in 2016... I couldn't find any info about it. Now I looked and I noticed this is not true or at least not worth to mention. In 2016 Figen Yüksekdag was Co-Hair of the HDP. Anyway, thank you very much. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 15:45, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Paradise Chronicle: It seems she was co-vice president in 2016, 2017 and early 2018, I put a question on the talk page together with the sources. Regards. Wakari07 (talk) 19:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of content without adequate explanation

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. RobertPaulsonn (talk) 17:58, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And a fake warning also... @RobertPaulsonn: You try to add a non-notable source with slandering fake news here, here and here, using a misleading edit summary "I did not add that" on the second add too. Wakari07 (talk) 18:04, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Here are some reliable sources. [1][2] RobertPaulsonn (talk) 18:06, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, that was a quick block. Wakari07 (talk) 18:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Claudia do val page

Hello would you please stop removing the external links from my page? Brbjj (talk) 16:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You put way too many external links on the Claudia do Val page. That's what the sysop described as a "link farm". Please mind WP:NOTDIR. It's more useful for the reader to have links to reliable sources inside the article body. Wakari07 (talk) 16:44, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Claudia do val

I AM claudia do Val and Im editing MY page. Could you please just leave it alone and let me put my links? Brbjj (talk) 17:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brbjj, did you read WP:OWN and WP:COI? Wakari07 (talk) 17:25, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

democratic socialism

Thanks for your work! However, you're undoing everything I've done. I'm just gonna go back and put it all back the way I had it.... then if I accidentally left anything out, I will add it back. the goal is to standardize the refs to sfn and sfnm. The world will not crumble if a few refs are broken for a few hours... ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 01:12, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

oops, oh wait, you are changing them to sfn.... If you are then I was mistaken & I apologize. ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 01:14, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No problem Lingzhi2. I'm trying to get rid of the error messages. Thanks also for your resolute cleanup of the article. Wakari07 (talk) 01:29, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I think I may be arguing with several people in a few days or weeks. The task now is to clean up the refs and standardize the formatting. Everyone thinks that's OK. After that, though, the goal will be to IMPROVE the refs to academic quality, get rid of WP:TOOMANYREFS, and address POV issues. The latter will cause arguments, I am sure... but for now... if you wanna help:

Invitation to WikiProject Current Events.

Hello Wakario7. This is an invitation to Wikipedia:WikiProject Current events. The project became active again as of April 8th. Just wanted to send an invitation to another editor who edits Portal:Current events. Elijahandskip (talk) 14:02, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the invitation. This project is older than my username and I wasn't aware of it :-) Wakari07 (talk) 01:47, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Antaraṅga for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antaraṅga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antaraṅga until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:17, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bahiraṅga for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bahiraṅga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bahiraṅga until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:08, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sabīja for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sabīja is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabīja until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alert from WikiProject Current Events

Hello. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Current events format is currently being updated. However, one new change is a section for "Current discussions". The Portal:Current events has debates all the time to determine if things are notable for the portal (international news) or if they are better suited for a place like 2020 in the United States. In the past, small 'edit wars' have taken place between editors over topics. This new section on the WikiProject is a new place where editors can discuss between each other and have an easy access to 'outside opinion' from other participates. Members in the Current Event WikiProject are welcome to invite other editors that have disagreements to start the discussion on the WikiProject. (Unlike RFC's, discussions about topics would be about 1 week or whenever the topic is no longer relevant from the WikiProject).

Thank you for reading and thank you for participating in the Current Event WikiProject! (Current Event WikiProject Coordinator) Elijahandskip (talk) 19:13, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey thank you for your note, I fixed the references. Have a nice day. Eliko007 (talk) 15:01, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eliko007: No, thank you for having fixed it :) Wakari07 (talk) 03:44, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Reverted and had some major technical malfunction, thanks for sorting it out mate! RKT7789 (talk) 18:32, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RKT7789: The pleasure is mine :) Wakari07 (talk) 03:44, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

For adding bhima again rn Weeabo-kun2198 (talk) 11:03, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weeabo-kun2198, yes, whether as half-brothers, step-brothers or spiritual brothers... Wakari07 (talk) 11:20, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Empty reference names

Hello, when you added this to Bor Airport, you added three empty references <ref name="camping"/><ref name="bor030"/><ref name="panacomp"/>, which makes for big red error messages at the bottom of the page. Can you still provide these references? Wakari07 (talk) 10:08, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Also, the info on an unfinished hotel is not related to the airport by the source (the airport is not mentioned in the source) and I removed it, as well as the unsourced info on tourist attractions nearby. Wakari07 (talk) 10:25, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello Wakari07. The content was there till vandalism happened and some content is removed including my edits, so all is reverted together. If you look carefully my edits include only links to tourist attractions that are mentioned on Bor Airport page. References were already there, and they're not added by me. I will update that part by adding the new source. Info about unfinished hotel is also not mine work, I only updated name of the hotel, as it was wrong. Easternmagic (talk) 15:04, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Easternmagic, I see you provided sources for several statements. Thanks for your efforts to improve the article. Wakari07 (talk) 17:52, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Varṇamālā for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Varṇamālā is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Varṇamālā until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:38, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Children's rights in France

A tag has been placed on Category:Children's rights in France indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:47, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]