User talk:WBRSin

Welcome!

Hello, WBRSin, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 08:55, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Canal Solar Power Project

Hey WBRSin, Just wanted to let you know that I saw that you created the new article Canal Solar Power Project-- The information is presented clearly and is easy to understand. However, I noticed there are some holes that may need filling: the article currently does not have appropriate sections and headings. It would be great if you could also improve the related article Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Limited.

It's always nice to see users contributing to make Wikipedia better! Amy Z (talk) 05:02, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 Mangalore Homestay attack

Please see my comments here.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:35, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The kitten

Thanks for the kitten man:)--PremKudvaTalk 04:30, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank u for kitten :) - KuwarOnline Talk 19:34, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, WBRSin. You have new messages at Shujenchang's talk page.
Message added 03:22, 19 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Shujen Chang (talk) 03:22, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

DRDO NETRA (software) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Ministry of Home Affairs and Intelligence Bureau
Drona (Simulator) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to SLR and LMG
2012 Assam violence (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Ramzan
Kadi, India (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to GIDC
Lohia Machinery Limited (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Director

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:57, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That was a nice Noon Chai

Thanks Sin for the Noon chai, I love tea. btw, do visit my user page and subsequently the list of articles that I have created and recently improved. I am planning to upgrade a few to GA status. -Ambar (talk) 06:15, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:30, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for an Interview

Hi WBRSin,

I recently sent you a message about Canal Solar Power Project.

I am a researcher at Carnegie Mellon University examining how to make interaction in Wikipedia more effective. Our research has shown that certain types of feedback encourage Wikipedians to edit more while others seem to discourage them. Experienced and less experienced Wikipedians seem to have different reactions to very similar feedback. I am interested in interviewing you about your reaction to the message I sent you. A discussion with you will help us better understand the types of feedback that can encourage newcomers's participation to Wikipedia without turning off old-timers.

I can talk with you via online chat, on Skype, over the phone, or just through Wikipedia messages if you are more comfortable with that. The interview should take take less than 60 minutes. You do need to be over 18 years old, and consent to be a part of the study in order to for me to interview you. This study has been approved by Carnegie Mellon's research ethics committee (the IRB), and the Wikipedia Research Committee.

Thank you for your time, and I look forward to hearing from you soon. We will be glad to send you a draft describing our research results right after the interview.

Amy Z (talk) 04:12, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your improvements to the OFB's article

Hi,
I saw your edits at OFB's page and much grateful to you! It'd be a great help if you can do the same to other sections as well and check the neutrality of the whole article as it was tagged previously for its tone and grammar. I know I should be doing it myself rather than asking someone else, but I'm unable to devote time as I'm out of the city for some work. I hope I haven't offended you in any manner and really appreciate the work you're doing in this information age for humanity.
Warm regards, --BharatRakshak (talk) 13:38, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amaresh Misra

The article Amaresh Misra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable person. Coverage needs to be in-depth and independent of the subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:41, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

I request you to go through Persecution of Muslims , Indian section, The sikh, Maratha empire subsection have false information. But Godhra riots, Babri Masjid demolition needs to be mentioned. False information in websites like wikipedia will poison minds of youth. Please look into this. 117.200.130.55 (talk) 10:59, 7 September 2012 (UTC)Hrushi[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ankola (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bunt
Chettinad Group (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Tamil
Sanghera (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Maharaja Ranjit Singh

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maya Kodnani

Hi WBRSin. Just a heads up that you shouldn't label good faith edits as vandalism (as here). Comment on the substance instead on the article talk page, especially when the material added is well-sourced. --regentspark (comment) 14:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ofcourse its vandalism, IP editor(117.216.153.214) removed the [better source needed] tag without giving reason and made this comment "better source my ass", you can check it at this link. I cant be expected to humour a uncouth fool who has no respect for others. I suggest you ask him to behave properly since he has complained on your talk page and made you an party to this incident. And the latest patronising comment made by him in the comment section calling me "son" is not helpful either. He should drop his hostile attitude and stick with adding facts not his personal vendetta. Thanks for reading WBRSin (talk) 16:26, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Just don't label the edits as vandalism because they clearly are not vandalism. If a source is dubious, then by all means add the tag but also explain why on the talk page, that way it will be harder for someone to revert it without explanation and you can take the question to WP:RSN for a second opinion. --regentspark (comment) 16:59, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
He removed the dubious tag, I just reverted that edit. According to wiki definition Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. That places his edits right in the category of vandalism. He is deliberately filling the person's biography with dubious sources and maligning her name. Note he inserted her wiki with an criminal infobox even though the conviction is not final and is yet to be heard in the higher courts. The conviction is said to be final only when the supreme court decides on the matter, until then every accused is deemed innocent. Well I will leave it to you to take a look at that page yourself and try making it NPOV, that will leave me free to edit other pages and needlessly not get involved in this matter. Are you willing to do so? WBRSin (talk) 17:25, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'll take a look but will probably just punt it to WT:IN so that there are more eyes on it. --regentspark (comment) 17:35, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
OK, Thanks for using your valuable time to help WBRSin (talk) 17:38, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion of author Babasaheb Purandare at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard

There is a discussion at the RS Noticeboard as to whether Purandare qualifies as a WP:RS for the article Shivaji. Discussion posted here: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Raja_Shivachhatrapati_by_Babasaheb_Purandare_in_the_article_Shivaji_.28Indian_history_bio.29. MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:56, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Misinformation

Hi, don't add obvious misinformation to the Bijbehara Massacre. They were unarmed protestors and were not rebels. You can see UN report for the incident. Night Fury (talk) 15:35, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You changed the version of events quoting a unnamed protestor, claimed armed militants who fired and injured a security official as unarmed protestors. Dont do it again, follow wikipedia policies on verifiablity and neutral point of view.WBRSin (talk) 15:41, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At the first place check your spelling. Now if army fired against unarmed protestors is against neutral point of view. Then calling 2 million people who were present there as rebels is also against neutral point of view. And calling Osama bin Laden as terrorist is also against neutral point of view. We should include true facts in wikipedia in an efficient manner. This means neutral point of view. About the edit, I will cite references in a short while. Penny on your thoughts Night Fury (talk) 15:48, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop shouting and assume good faith. The report you linked to mentions the fact that the protestors were armed and fired injuring a security official, then why do you claim the protestors were unarmed? This is shows your lack of neutral point of view and trying to paint a one-sided picture of the chain of events. So refrain from doing so in the future and stick to topic. WBRSin (talk) 15:59, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Where does it say like that, see below Night Fury (talk) 16:07, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the report you copy pasted the quote from has this nugget of information "the security forces were ambushed by militants, only one BSF sub inspector was injured." Now that pokes holes in your theory of unarmed protestors. WBRSin (talk) 16:12, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell are you saying, where does my references mentioned below say like that. Is it my 1,2 or 3. Night Fury (talk) 16:19, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Regarding the unreliable sources, the Greater Kashmir newspaper is the most reliable source. The wikipedia about Topics of Jammu and Kashmir wholly depends upon this source. Every administrator accepts it as reliable source. Night Fury (talk) 16:22, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The quote is from the pdf file from HRW website that you linked to previously. I hope you dont have trouble finding it. And stop the hyperbole about greater kashmir site. It's not a reliable site due to its partisan and conspiratorial view. WBRSin (talk) 16:32, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I never attached any pdf file. Can you please send me its link. Also in this article the Wikipedia contradicts with itself by saying that they were rebels and then saying army killed protestors. Read the full article. Also if Greater Kashmir newspaper is unreliable source then please remove content from Srinagar Jammu National Highway and Udhampur-Jammu highway. Night Fury (talk) 16:42, 23 October 2014 (UTC) I think a person who is insolent fool will say that Trubine from chandigarh is unreliable source. Check it out. http://www.tribuneindia.com/2013/20131024/kashmir.htm BSF killed 43 civilians. So sad on their part. Night Fury (talk) 17:19, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop lying about not attaching a pdf file from HRW website, your edit exposes you. Stop your uncouth attitude of peppering every post with petty insults. The tribune link you posted also quotes activists who are party to the conflict and not neutral sources. It would not even pass the smell test to be considered a reliable source.WBRSin (talk) 17:34, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I had not induced it. I just rollbacked to previous version. You can check hist. My point is that the people present there were not rebels. If they were militants then why were there families given compensation and 12 BSF men were accused of killing. Have you read the full article. Are you from Bihar. I think I know you. .. Night Fury (talk) 17:52, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Give me a reliable source which says people present there were militants. Night Fury (talk) 17:55, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

http://www.risingkashmir.com/1993-bijbehara-massacre-when-playground-turned-into-graveyard/ Night Fury (talk) 15:53, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Who was now doing Vandalism you or me. This is the tertiary reliable source. Night Fury (talk) 15:55, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The sites you are spamming my talkpage with are unreliable sources as per WP:RS. risingkashmir and greaterkashmir are self-published sites while the countercurrents site is a laughably conspiratorial site. At this rate you will claim alex jones and his infowars site as an reliable reference.

Advice

You can't really say that people who were unarmed as rebels. Rebel means a person who is rebelling with arms. Now can you remove that vandalism message from my talk because I never do vandalism, otherwise it will be a slander on me. Thanks Night Fury (talk) 16:05, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replied in the parent thread. Stop spamming my talk page with multiple comment threads. Reply to the parent thread if you need any clarification. WBRSin (talk) 16:15, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]