User talk:Vitsuha

July 9, 2020

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into List of oldest universities in continuous operation. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:48, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shandong Experimental High School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East China University. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shandong Experimental High School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public school.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Simla Convention did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Kautilya3 (talk) 20:21, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your notification, Yifan is a more generalized spelling of that person's name (like this:https://tibetpolicy.net/chinese-perspective-simla-convention-indian-lens/), but late I saw that Ivan appeared in sources in that article mutilple times, so it might be more appropriate. Vitsuha (talk) 20:42, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Pontiac Transportation Center, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:20, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wonder why do you think it's not constructive? I think the quality of the image I intent to use is much better than the replaced one. Thanks. Vitsuha (talk) 05:03, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree - File:Pontiac station, September 2016.jpg actually shows the station building and platform, while File:美鐵龐帝亞克站 (1).jpg shows mostly sky and a locomotive disconnected from its train. The Wolverine Train near the Pontiac Station is also a poor caption - that's a single locomotive rather than the Wolverine, and "train" and "station" should not be capitalized per MOS:CAPS. Furthermore, you inexplicably removed other improvements I made to the infobox. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I understand. Thanks Vitsuha (talk) 05:39, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But do you think the original one (Pontiac Transportation Center 04.jpg) is better? Since it has the name of the station on it? Vitsuha (talk) 05:52, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, Vitsuha, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. -Lemonaka‎ 05:45, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Xicheng, Beijing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jingshan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vienna

Hi, are you serious that this photo:

is representative for Vienna as first photo? There is in fact nothing to see on it. Tibesti1 (talk) 17:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The reason that I changed the original one is because:

1, the (first) picture was too gloomy,

2, the resolution was not high,

3, as the configuration of such {{multiple-images}} is 1/3/3, the first one should be longer enough to avoid making the infobox too redundant

Also, it did show the downtown Vienna, Belvedere, and St. Stephen's Cathedral on the left.

Moreover, when you put your mouse on the link of Vienna in another article, it is not the first picture to appear, due to its length.

Finally, if you think it's not well-rounded enough, we can try this one?

At least I think we should not keep the original one. Vitsuha (talk) 17:50, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No on that one, the typical Vienna is not visible either. I know that the first photo sometimes doesn't appear as preview, however, it remains the first photo of the photo collage, and i got the impression that you chose the new one just because you couldn't find a better one. The original first photo seems to be the only existing photo that shows at least to some point the old silhouette of Vienna, which should include the cathedral. And anyway i don't find it good of you to just alter my photo collage which was stable since December. Tibesti1 (talk) 18:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would say it depends on every person's opinion, I do think the photo collage you made previous contains too many photos. I think the one for Los_Angeles is just enough. But if you insist you can just revert my edit and I'm fine with it. Vitsuha (talk) 18:12, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so cause the collage doesn't really represent LA in its abundance, but i understand that some people think so. I think it depends on the beauty of the photos and in my collage practically every photo was beautiful. At Miami there are even 12 photos. I don't know if you are really interested in Vienna, but perhaps you find a long photo showing the old skyline of the city, i didn't like the first photo very much either, but couldn't find a better one. Greetings. Tibesti1 (talk) 18:22, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WCNA Program Committee

Hi! Thank you for your interest in joining the WCNA Program Committee! Could you please send me an email from your primary email so I can send you the link to our bi-weekly meetings, and invite you to the telegram group? My email is [e-mail] Thank you again for your interest, looking forward to hearing from you. JamieF (talk) 16:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]