User talk:Vincentvikram/Archives/2021/January
On proposalModifying an original users comment isn't the best decision. If you would like to create a new ANI, or raise the issue there. Changing a users post isn't the best. If you would like to create a new report at ANI by all means go ahead. However the proposal has nothing to do with this, in fact multiple users have told you to stop trying to state something on a user without solid diffs, and to stop stating things on users motives "votes" as you stated. Thanks. Des Vallee (talk) 06:57, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
ANI ArchivesHello, Vincentvikram, Please do not edit an archived talk page or noticeboard. If you feel that a case was archived prematurely, please unarchive the entire complaint and repost it on ANI. There is no reason to be adding new material to a closed case in the archives. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 05:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
P SainathPlease see the link here to the India Today article. Para 6. The reference was explained in another user's edit summary too. 115.96.29.204 (talk) 21:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
The only block currently affecting that individual IP is a partial-block on the /34 range, which is a really big range; a full block on the range would cause a lot of "collateral damage" (i.e., prevent good-faith edits from many other users). We can easily block that individual IP, or a smaller range (like a /64 range) without touching the partial-block on /34. At this time, I'm only seeing 3 bad edits coming from the individual (and the corresponding /64 range). OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC) Feedback requests from the Feedback Request ServiceYour feedback is requested at Talk:Al Capone on a "Social sciences and society" Good Article nomination, and at Talk:Aimery of Cyprus on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:12, 15 January 2021 (UTC) Substantiate your accusations or keep them to yourself pleaseVincent, starting on 21 December you have posted demeaning and inaccurate information about me on ANI forums. You didn't provide any evidence to back them up. Please stop. I have offered to discuss your grievances several times but you've refused just as often. I can't keep anyone from liking or disliking me, but such feelings should not be the motivation for influencing ANI discussions and shopping for blocks. Thank you.Saflieni (talk) 23:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Get off my talk page, Saflieni! Vikram Vincent 08:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC) MfD nomination of Draft:WP:Yes Marxism-LeninismDraft:WP:Yes Marxism-Leninism, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:WP:Yes Marxism-Leninism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:WP:Yes Marxism-Leninism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Crossroads -talk- 08:36, 27 January 2021 (UTC) January 2021A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Mccapra (talk) 18:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Vikram Vincent 18:51, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
|