User talk:Vincentvikram/Archives/2021/February


Thanks and a query

Thank you for your contribution and invitation on my user page. Can I apply to you for comment and advice on a vital point of Wikipedia policy? ChalSeismo (talk) 15:17, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi ChalSeismo! I cannot claim to know policy very well but will try to help to the best of my ability. Vikram Vincent 03:30, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. It is WP:NOR/Noticeboard, item 9. It is pretty long? and I am not at all sure if you are interested in the topic. Still, the issue for policy (NOR or rather what is not NOR) must be interesting to anybody writing in the Wikipedia. The long text after I was told by Blueboar to show that my case is not one like the flat-earth hypothesis was just to show that it was not. It need no detain you. But read my first input, will you? ChalSeismo (talk) 13:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

ChalSeismo Let me have a look and see if I can contribute anything of value. Vikram Vincent 13:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
ChalSeismo Really sorry. I scanned through the discussion and it went above me :-) Hope you find what you need. Best! Vikram Vincent 18:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

It's all right. Thanks all the same ChalSeismo (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 06:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: History Good Article nomination

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Byzantine–Venetian treaty of 1277 on a "History" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Dhananjay Munde Wikipedia Page

Thank you for your reply to my request about the mentioned page. I haven't written anything on the said article as I haven't succeeded in finding sources and citations that are online. Although I have new information and I am not sure how to put them on the article as it keeps getting edited. I do know Vedika Thorat and the reason why you found the changes the same is that I haven't edited anything from any editor (You can check in the history). But I saw what is happening and thought it would be best to seek help from the administrator board. As the edit war continues I am spending more time on my talk page rather than research. I am getting new information but too worried to do anything because I keep getting backlash, spiteful language, and warnings. Please check my wikipedia. As I said I am new to Wikipedia. I would really appreciate your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahesh Karve (talk • contribs) 06:44, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Mahesh Karve there are several guidelines when editing Wikipedia which you will figure out in the course of your contributions. While it is commendable that you are attempting to improve that article, you do need to follow those guidelines which I linked in my welcome msg on your talk page. The warnings on your talk page were because your edits are perceived as disruptions as they dont observe those guidelines. Also once you post a complaint to an Admin notice board, even the behavior of the complainant is observed. Hope that clarifies. Vikram Vincent 07:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)


Sure thing! I do understand that why you would observe my behavior too. My question is I didn't write anything, all I did was reinstate one section of one article that was completely wiped out. How can that be disruptive? Also, I got a warning when I was discussing this with the fellow editor. It was a very quick thing, the one who gave me the warning didn't even discuss or talked to me he simply issued a warning (When I wasn't even editing, I was just talking because I realized there is some issue.). This way anyone can issue 3 warnings and get someone blocked from editing. I do not wish to be biased. I will get my content checked before editing anything but someone needs to do something because this page is becoming field ground for political ideologies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahesh Karve (talk • contribs) 07:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Mahesh Karve For starters, you need to sign your msgs on talk pages. Second, have a look at the article in its current cleaned up format. If you want to add/modify something let me guide you in small changes so that you can get it right. Would you prefer that? Vikram Vincent 07:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Yes. Thank you! Mahesh Karve (talk) 10:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Mahesh Karve

Angelica di Silvestri

Hello,

First of all I am here to inform you that "Angelica di Silvestri" is a paid contributor means she paid to "Wiki on sky"

Please make the template for paid contributor.

The claims on this page are not reliable and sources are totally wrong. I can send you some official statement against this written by the Italian police. I can send you an attachment but i didn't know how to send it to you Wiki on Sky (talk) 07:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Wiki on Sky! It might be better to add that tag to your account and on the page appropriately. I am waiting for more feedback from the AfD so as to improve/balance that article. Unfortunately, we cannot use documents like that unless it was published in a news report. See WP:RS. Vikram Vincent 07:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Can you please add the template of paid contributor on Angelica di Silvestri page. But it is the statement by Italian police. If it isn't valid to prove that the information is wrong, so please give me some time so I will be back with some news report regarding it. Thank you Wiki on Sky (talk) 07:31, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Aspersions

Read WP:ASPERSIONS and don't ever resort to cheap shots like this. You have no evidence of me getting canvassed and any more such misleading tagging will be reported accordingly. Shankargb (talk) 04:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

And now you have a DS alert Vikram Vincent 05:01, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

@Shankargb: Sure, feel free to report whatever you want. on your talk page I count at least five sections with warnings related to disruptive editing and two DS alerts in under one year. So go ahead and report me :-) I expressed my concern on the appropriate forum. Vikram Vincent 05:08, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Sure. Reported on WP:ANI now. You can find the thread at the bottom. Shankargb (talk) 05:57, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks! Responded at WP:ANI. Best! Vikram Vincent 06:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Just for the record, my doubts about canvassing are not unsubstantiated considering https://mobile.twitter.com/deepdhan555/status/1361760523465887744

A cup of tea for you!

Thank you for your invaluable contributions, they are very much appreciated. Beccaynr (talk) 01:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)