en User talk:Van Aldenhaag

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/C.C. van Asch van Wijck.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Cheers! Stella ^BATPHONE _GROOVES 03:00, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Van Aldenhaag! Thank you for your contributions. I am Dcshank and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! :- ) Don 05:13, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Van Aldenhaag. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk.
Message added 05:13, 2 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

:- ) Don 05:13, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

C.C. van Asch van Wijck, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

heather walls (talk) 23:22, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome!

Nice article! :) Ryan Vesey was wondering on my page what the marks are in the corner of your images: .

Thank you very much Heather, Good pointRyan Vesey I'll make that clearer, they are the signing monograms of Cornélie as found on her Glass Mask and on the Flying Maiden. She was also a Graphic Artist but I don't have much info on that (yet) and I am not aware of any commercial work done by her as a Graphic Artist. Van Aldenhaag (talk) 01:25, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Van Aldenhaag, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! heather walls (talk) 07:54, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

File:C.C. van Asch van Wijck door Piet van der Hem.jpg

Oil of C.C. van Asch van Wijck (detail) by Piet van der Hem

Thanks Magog the Ogre for streamlining pictures sourcing. Van Aldenhaag (talk) 15:10, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Helping is not causing work for others.

To all the "helpful" people out there trying to get their Wiki Editor score cards up, using robots to destroy links under the guise of cleaning up is not appreciated. Do it again and I will tag you as a Vandal. Van Aldenhaag (talk) 22:59, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

C.C. van Asch van Wijck

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Van Aldenhaag. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 18:13, 31 August 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Hello, Van Aldenhaag. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Sionk (talk) 02:02, 1 October 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Clover Forest Plantation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:48, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Van Aldenhaag. You have new messages at MatthewVanitas's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

"talkbacks" are used so we can keep the conversation all on the page it started on. Just keep replying on the same page a conversation started on, and the party who's hosting the conversation should (ideally) ping the visitor to let them know they have a reply. Folks don't always use it if it's assumed they're in the middle of a back-and-forth and checking each other regularly, but if there's any chance someone might not swing back by in the next few days, Template:Talkback is useful. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:35, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Van Aldenhaag. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Van Aldenhaag. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm PigeonChickenFish. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Clover Forest have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 20:52, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Van Aldenhaag. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Clover Forest, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 20:54, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]